
The staggering number of Romanians on student loans, a deserted Oxford business college with 10k students - and why it could cost taxpayers BILLIONS
Judging by videos on its website, this noble seat of learning is only one step removed from Brideshead Revisited.
Here you'll see young students cycling along cobbled streets, walking down the steps of historic limestone buildings or rowing through the dawn mist on a tranquil River Cherwell.
The reality of life at Oxford Business College is, however, somewhat different. This becomes immediately apparent when I pay a visit to the 'main campus'.
According to the advertising bumf, this venue is 'situated in one of the city's many historic buildings' and will be 'buzzing with energy and activity'.
Instead, I find a black entrance door, bolted shut on a tatty row of shops opposite the bus station.
The venue is sandwiched between a 'pan-Asian' cafe and a derelict Chinese restaurant that was previously called Opium Den and is now covered in graffiti.
Stairs lead to the first floor where, through a cracked window pane, I can see a sign bearing Oxford Business College's logo.
A piece of A4 paper next to the security camera informs visitors that the 'due to ongoing refurbishments, this campus and its offices are temporarily closed'.
It says that the college has instead relocated to King's Mead House, a modern commercial building near the railway station roughly half a mile away.
Here, too, I look in vain for much 'energy and activity' or any sign of the 'melting pot of modern influences and cultures' advertised on the website.
Actually, Oxford Business College's 'main campus' appears to be above a Royal Mail sorting office. But it, too, seems eerily quiet.
Not a single person crosses the threshold until half an hour after I arrive, when the front door finally opens, and a man and woman who appear to be in their thirties step outside and each light a cigarette. When I approach, a brief conversation ensues.
The man, who is wearing a tracksuit and speaks with a thick eastern European accent, confirms they are both students and that, despite the absence of people, we are in the middle of term-time.
I identify myself as a reporter and his attitude hardens. He says he won't answer further questions. Instead, 'you need to speak to the Boss man'.
It's all very strange. Surreal even. But as I am fast discovering, Oxford Business College – or OBC – is a very unusual place indeed. In fact, it lies at the centre of a mounting political scandal.
On Tuesday, this privately owned provider of higher education courses was the subject of a damning written statement to Parliament by the Education Secretary, Bridget Phillipson.
She stated the college's 10,000-odd students are to be banned from receiving student loans.
Phillipson claimed to have 'credible concerns' about 'recruitment and attendance' at OBC, saying that an investigation by the Government's Internal Audit Agency had raised fears that it was recruiting students whose 'competence in the English language' was inadequate and wasn't monitoring whether they attended class.
Four universities, which have in recent years paid Oxford Business College to educate thousands of undergraduates on degree courses under lucrative franchising arrangements, have 'terminated their agreements' with the organisation, the Education Secretary continued.
Behind this announcement lies a hair-raising scandal involving student loan fraud. It appears to have left the British taxpayer on the hook for millions – perhaps billions – of pounds. The whole thing revolves around students who dishonestly enrol on 'franchised' degree courses at private, for-profit institutions such as Oxford Business College, despite having little to no intention of ever doing any actual studying.
Instead, the fraudsters want to use their phoney status as students to access tens of thousands of pounds in government loans… which they will never, ever pay back.
The true scale of this scam is unclear. But the Sunday Times reported last month that a Government probe had uncovered 1,785 fraudulent funding applications, totalling £22million, linked to just six universities, since 2022.
No fewer than 270 individuals at Oxford Business College are believed to have dishonestly claimed £4million in the last two years, it said, though the exact figures may end up being far higher. Ms Phillipson has called such fraud 'one of the biggest financial scandals in the history of our universities sector'.
The government-owned Student Loans Company (SLC), gives financial support to both British citizens and foreigners with settled status in the UK who wish to go into higher education. People who enrol at university are entitled to access up to roughly £45,000 a year in support.
The first £9,535 covering their annual tuition fees is paid directly to the establishment they attend. Up to £13,348 a year more is then handed out as a 'maintenance loan' which goes directly into the student's personal bank account. Further support, including childcare grants and other hardship loans, can be accessed depending on an individual's circumstances.
On paper, that loan will later start being repaid, plus interest, when the student starts earning more than £25,000 a year.
But if someone's declared earnings never hit that threshold, it gets written off after 40 years.
And if a former student disappears overseas, the debt becomes tricky – and in some cases impossible – to collect.
The system has always been open to abuse. But for someone to fraudulently enrol on a course to access loans, with no intention of actually studying, has been reasonably difficult in the past. Firstly, universities generally demand that applicants have at least some academic qualifications. Secondly, the Office for Students requires them to monitor attendance and ensure a student passes some tests and exams.
But in 2011, the Government decided that so-called 'franchised' providers – many of them 'for-profit' colleges such as OBC – could begin delivering degree courses on behalf of universities, in return for payment.
The big idea was to widen access to higher education to people from 'non-traditional' backgrounds, thereby aiding the Department for Education's quest for diversity.
However, 'franchised' providers are not regulated by the Office for Students. As a result, many began allowing almost anyone to enrol (even if they could barely speak English) and remain on courses, even if they barely attended class.
While little in the way of education was going on, cash from the SLC would roll in. Universities would get fees (currently £9,535 a year), from which the franchised provider would receive a cut, while the 'student' would receive a £13,348 'maintenance grant' in three separate tranches each year. Scandalously, many colleges seem to have been using agents to aggressively recruit 'students' who have no real desire to study by telling them they can access large amounts of free cash.
'Apply now as spaces will go quick,' reads a social media advert for one course, quoted by the Sunday Times. 'Full student finance available. Claim a free laptop when you start. Our service is 100 per cent free.'
Under a post from another agent, a comment in Romanian reads: 'Yes, that's how it goes in the UK without English at university. I barely know 2 words and I'm passing because they take money and we take it and university is fine without English.'
As that remark suggests, most of the fraud appears to be carried out by EU nationals, particularly Eastern Europeans, who automatically gained 'settled status' if they were resident in the UK when Brexit was completed in 2020.
All of a sudden, a foreign person living in Britain earning minimum wage in – say – a local takeaway could automatically get hold of an additional £13,750 a year by enrolling in a part-time 'franchised' degree course. They might never have to actually attend. And the chances of the loan ever being paid back were adjacent to zero.
Official figures suggest that the number of Romanians accessing UK student finance increased from 5,000 a decade ago to 84,000 in the last academic year. This means that a staggering 15 per cent of Romanians in the UK are currently receiving student loans.
All of which brings us back to Oxford Business College, which was founded in the 1980s as a 'business school' offering tuition to young people who wished to improve their A-level grades.
It began offering franchised degrees in 2019, striking a deal with Buckinghamshire New University to teach an undergraduate business degree and has since expanded with astonishing speed, growing from 28 to 265 employees in five years, and opening a total five campuses in four cities and towns, including Slough and Nottingham, which can cater to as many as 10,000 students.
Disclosures to Companies House show that the franchise deals have been hugely profitable. At the end of 2020, its turnover was £5million a year. This rose to £18million the following year and £40million the one after.
Last year, it turned over £49.7million with profits up from £7.073million to £9.512million.
The firm is co-owned by its director, Padmesh Gupta, and (somewhat oddly) a dress designer named Titiksha Shah. They shared an annual dividend of £200,000 and, when the last accounts were filed were sitting on funds of almost £20million.
For several years, Oxford Business College's remarkable growth stayed under the radar. But signs of trouble under the bonnet emerged in late 2023, when the New York Times published an investigation into its recruitment practices.
It told how agents – 'essentially salesmen who advertise the courses online and are paid commission for every student they find' – were operating on social media sites such as TikTok, Facebook and Instagram, where they posted adverts claiming it was possible to 'join a university without any qualification and get up to 18,500 pounds'.
At OBC, claimed the paper, agents were even taking to the streets: 'Recruiters walked immigrant neighbourhoods, knocking on doors or stopping people in shopping malls, selling the merits of a business-school education and adding a surprising offer: Get paid to enrol.'
The NYT quoted former Oxford Business College recruiter Stefan Lsepizanu saying, 'Money, money, money… everybody was saying, "Hey, push the money".'
At this stage, it should be stressed that OBC denies all allegations of fraud and misconduct and insists that many of the practices described in the article are both legal and commonplace in the industry. Whether they pass the smell test is, as the Education Secretary has found, another matter.
So desperate was OBC to recruit new students (each of whose £9,250 tuition fee would be split with the franchise-issuing university) that it was routinely admitting people who struggled to speak English, the NYT alleged, citing evidence from 'a dozen students and former staff members'.
A former member of staff named Jake Smith, who was employed to interview applicants to courses, told the NYT that his supervisor had told him to pass an applicant whose admission essay read: 'Whomen mi wife en wi thinking to ghet him whit as hire to uk when i si his education i oz very hapy because mi mom ground hi very well.'
(Fortunately, Mr Smith had already decided to fail the individual before the instruction was handed down.)
What's more, the college was offering students a 'golden ticket' of £250 for every person they referred who decided to enrol. One student revealed that she'd signed up 'dozens' of people including her own husband, who didn't bother to attend class.
OBC was even attempting to recruit new punters via testimonial videos on its own social media feeds, which carried grammatically incorrect headlines such as 'Why Alex feel fortunate?' and 'Elizabeth have a dream'.
Responding to the New York Times, the college's director and co-owner, Padmesh Gupta, insisted it had 'robust admissions standards' and rejects 60 per cent of applicants.
That was 18 months ago. Fast forward to March this year, and the Sunday Times began sniffing around the affair. It reported that the college was now accepting applications from people with English as a second language, provided they passed a proficiency test on the popular mobile app Duolingo.
Again, OBC has either disputed the paper's claims about its practices or believes they are both legal and commonplace in the industry. It continues to deny fraud or misconduct.
The Department for Education was nonetheless sufficiently concerned to carry out an investigation. And according to the Sunday Times, it has uncovered concerning evidence about the manner in which the college's students were applying for loans.
An 'intelligence report' cited by the paper stated that a single computer IP address was used for 164 separate loan applications. It was 'traced to an OBC building'.
Two more IP addresses linked to 63 student loan applications were 'based in Romania'.
'While some students were genuinely there to learn, they were aware of entire families enrolling on the same course and that students admitted they were paid to recruit their relatives,' a senior academic linked to the college said.
The college responded to that report via a statement insisting: 'We take any concerns about alleged fraudulent student finance behaviour with utmost seriousness. OBC upholds the highest standards of integrity, compliance, and academic excellence.'
After this week's announcement that its students will be barred from accessing student loans, it went further on the offensive, saying that it intended to take the Government to court.
'The Department for Education's lengthy investigation into Oxford Business College concluded with no findings of fraud, illegality or malfeasance,' reads a statement.
'Despite this clear outcome, the DfE has indicated that courses will be de-designated as of September 2025 a decision OBC firmly believes is unlawful and will challenge through judicial review.'
A spokesman was unable to elaborate on what grounds they intend to challenge the Secretary of State's decision.
Whatever the outcome, the wider crisis around student loans seems unlikely to go away. Britain's taxpayers are currently on the hook for £236billion in student debt with the balance expected to reach £500billion in the next 15 years.
And while Oxford Business College's courses no longer provide access to SLC loans, those at an astonishing 340 other 'franchised' providers very much do.
No fewer than 138,000 students are currently enrolled on their courses, more than 60 per cent of whom are studying business.
In the coming months, tens of thousands of new ones will sign up.
Quite how many of them are actually doing any work is, for now, unclear. As is the question of what proportion will ever pay back their generous taxpayer-funded loans.
For the really scary thing about Oxford Business College is that it could represent the tip of a very expensive iceberg.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Arsenal's stance on Eberechi Eze transfer revealed as date release clause expires is confirmed
Arsenal have been heavily linked with a move for Crystal Palace star Eberechi Eze this summer, but it remains to be seen if the Gunners can strike a deal for the 27-year-old Arsenal are interested in Crystal Palace star Eberechi Eze, but want to offload a forward before making a formal approach. The Gunners have made six new signings so far this summer, with Viktor Gyokeres, Martin Zubimendi, Noni Madueke, Cristhian Mosquera, Christian Norgaard and Kepa Arrizabalaga all joining the club. Eze is another player that has been heavily linked with a move to the Emirates and he does have a £68million release clause in his contract. However, multiple reports have stated that the clause expires on Friday. And BBC Sport are reporting that Arsenal have 'shown no inclination of triggering the forward's release fee', with the Gunners looking to sell before they make any more new signings. The report adds that Arsenal value Eze at less than £68m and 'want to negotiate a deal beneath the agreement'. Palace have so far been unwilling to negotiate a lower fee, but it is claimed that may change later in the window. When asked about Eze's future back in May, Palace boss Oliver Glasner said: "I don't want to comment on individual players. "We could talk about Marc Guehi, we could talk about Dean Henderson, we could talk about Adam Wharton, we could talk about Jean-Philippe Mateta, Daniel Munoz, Ismaila Sarr who played an incredible, outstanding season for us. We won't sell all of them." And Glasner has been left frustrated with Palace's lack of business so far this summer, having only spent £3m on a backup goalkeeper and a left-back. "Even though all the players are still here, we haven't made the most of the transfer window so far," Glasner admitted. "I was promised that we would be more active and bring in the new players earlier this year. As of now, I have 17 outfield players. "I hope we don't lose any more. If that happens and we get four new ones on deadline day like last year, another false start is possible." Palace's business has been complicated by the fact that they are still waiting to find out which European competition they will be playing in next season. Palace qualified for the Europa League after winning the FA Cup last season, but have been demoted to the Conference League by UEFA. UEFA ruled that they had breached their multi-club ownership rules, but Palace have lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport and a decision is expected before August 11.


Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
EU banks can weather recession driven by global trade war, stress test shows
MILAN, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Banks across the European Union are strong enough to weather an economic shock driven by geopolitical and trade tensions, the European Banking Authority said on Friday as it presented the outcome of its latest health check of the sector. The EBA tested how 64 European banks, including 51 euro zone lenders, would react to a prolonged recession across the EU and other advanced economies, finding none would breach their core capital requirement, and only one would breach its leverage requirement. "The results indicate that the EU banking system could withstand a severe but plausible macroeconomic scenario, reflecting the resilience built up by banks in recent years," the EBA said, urging lenders to maintain adequate capital. European and U.S. banking authorities introduced formal, comprehensive stress tests after the global financial crisis of 2008 led to costly state bailouts of banks. Some elements of this year's adverse scenario had begun to materialise, the EBA said, pointing to U.S. trade tariffs and escalating tension in the Middle East. Lenders accounting for three quarters of EU banks' total assets took part in the exercise, which simulates the losses banks would incur by analysing their performance over a three-year period under a baseline and an adverse scenario. Under the adverse scenario, worsening geopolitical tensions and protectionist trade policies lift energy and commodity prices, disrupt supply chains and hurt consumption and investment, driving a cumulative 6.3% contraction in EU economic output over 2025-2027. That would translate into combined losses of 547 billion euros for the sampled banks, the EBA said, higher than the 496 billion euros envisaged in its 2023 stress test. While the hit to capital reserves is particularly severe for some European subsidiaries of major U.S. banks, all the lenders remained able to meet core capital requirements, the EBA said, although one would breach the requirement on the leverage ratio. For 17 lenders, the adverse scenario would entail limits or adjustments to bonus and dividend payments for at least one of the three years. In terms of capital reserves - calculated using the current 'transitional' regime that tightens progressively through 2033 - the adverse scenario would knock 3.7 percentage points off the sample's aggregate core capital ratio, pushing it to 12.1% in 2027 from 15.8%. When looking at individual countries, Irish, Danish, French, German and Belgian banks experienced the biggest capital impact, EBA data showed. For individual banks, Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg and two other German regional banks, as well France's Credit Agricole and La Banque Postale, saw the largest capital depletion effect. While there is no pass/fail threshold in the EU-wide stress test, its outcome feeds into the risk assessment of lenders carried out by supervisors every year, setting bank-specific capital requirements and guidance known as 'Pillar 2'.


Scottish Sun
13 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Legendary car brand pulls out of country forever as it shuts massive engine factory in move to rival Tesla
The carmaker is shifting its focus to electric vehicles KICKED TO KERB Legendary car brand pulls out of country forever as it shuts massive engine factory in move to rival Tesla A LEGENDARY car brand has called it quits in one of the world's biggest automotive markets, shutting down a major factory and ending local production for good. The firm has officially pulled out of China after decades of operations, closing its joint engine venture and handing over its factory to a domestic rival as it pivots towards electric vehicles. 2 Mitsubishi's relationship with China stretches back to 1973, when it began shipping mid-sized vehicles to the market Credit: YouTube / Mitsubishi Motors Europe SAME, which began producing engines in 1998, supplied not only Mitsubishi vehicles but also powertrains for a host of Chinese automakers. It will now operate under a new name: Shenyang Guoqing Power Technology Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi said it has: "terminated its engine business operation at Shenyang Aerospace Mitsubishi Motors Engine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, SAME) in China and has terminated the joint venture partnership. "Established in August 1997, SAME began engine production in 1998 and has played a key role in China's expanding automotive market by supplying engines not only to Mitsubishi-branded vehicle manufacturers, but also to numerous Chinese automakers. " However, in response to the rapid transformation of China's automotive industry, Mitsubishi Motors has reassessed its strategy in the region and has decided to terminate its participation in the joint venture." Mitsubishi's relationship with China stretches back to 1973, when it began shipping mid-sized vehicles to the market. At one point in the early 2000s, its engines powered nearly 30 per cent of cars built in the country. But as China's car industry turned sharply toward new energy vehicles (NEVs), demand for traditional engines plummeted. In 2012, Mitsubishi joined forces with Guangzhou Automobile Group (GAC) and Mitsubishi Corporation to launch GAC Mitsubishi. The joint venture saw strong early success, especially with the Outlander SUV, which pushed sales to 144,000 units in 2018. But it didn't last - sales crashed to just 33,600 vehicles by 2022. Nissan 'on brink of collapse' after Renault deal falls through By the following year, Mitsubishi shut down local production and, in 2024, exited the market entirely. GAC has since taken over the plant and turned it into a production base for its EV brand, Aion. Industry analysts say Mitsubishi's retreat is just the latest in a broader trend. Foreign carmakers are losing ground in China as homegrown brands surge ahead in the electric vehicle market. GAC-FCA, a joint venture with Fiat Chrysler, also folded under similar pressures. Mitsubishi says the decision is part of a strategic shift as it focuses on electrification and more competitive global markets. But in China, the brand that once powered nearly a third of the country's cars is now just a memory. The collapse of its Chinese business is a blow for the brand, which had hoped to hold on in the world's biggest car market. But with EV start-ups popping up at lightning speed and government backing for green tech, Mitsubishi simply couldn't keep up. The factory closure also means job losses for hundreds of local workers, with some fearing they'll struggle to find work in an industry moving away from fossil fuels. One former worker said: 'We saw the writing on the wall last year. EVs are the future, and we weren't part of that plan anymore.' It's a bitter end for a brand once considered a key player in Chinese motoring. Now, it's packing up — leaving behind empty factories, lost jobs and a name that once meant something on Chinese roads. The Sun has approached Mitsubishi for comment. Iconic car brand 'on brink of collapse' as 'bosses warn company has just 12 months to survive' ONE of the world's largest car manufacturers reportedly could go under within 12 months if it doesn't receive support. The firm is looking to sure up its future by growing a partnership with its former rival after the reported collapse of a three-way alliance. Nissan was one-third of a strategic deal with Mitsubishi and Renault to share financial backing and expand all their markets in Europe, Japan and the US. The agreement dates back to 1999 but now could be on the brink of collapse. A report from the Financial Times cites two anonymous "senior officials" at the firm suggesting that Renault is looking to reduce its financial stake in the Japanese carmaker. The withdrawal of funding means, according to the same sources, that Nissan could require support from the Japanese or US governments within the next year just in order to stay afloat. One of the officials said: "We have 12 or 14 months to survive. "This is going to be tough. "And in the end, we need Japan and the US to be generating cash." Nissan has already cut 9,000 jobs across its global operation, while its CEO Makoto Uchida took a 50% pay cut in an economy drive. The business is working through an emergency recovery plan, which will see it cut output by 20% and slash around £2bn in costs. Its struggles have partly been blamed on the lack of a strong hybrid lineup, which has helped rivals like Toyota and Honda through the global collapse in EV sales. In a press conference earlier this month, Mr Uchida said: "This has been a lesson learned and we have not been able to keep up with the times. "We weren't able to foresee that hybrid electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids would be so popular."