logo
Vietnam's trade surplus with US surges, complicating tariff talks

Vietnam's trade surplus with US surges, complicating tariff talks

The Star07-06-2025
Sales staff work at an Apple shop in Hanoi, Vietnam Thursday, April 10, 2025. Vietnam is home to large manufacturing operations of US multinationals such as Apple, Intel and Nike. - AP
HANOI: Vietnam's trade surplus with the US expanded sharply in May as exports swelled and its imports from China also jumped, exacerbating sore points with Washington that could hurt Hanoi's efforts to avoid crippling tariffs.
Separate trade data from the US also showed Vietnam's surplus overtook Mexico's in April, lagging only China and the European Union.
US President Donald Trump has vowed to bring down the US trade deficit and the South-East Asian country faces one of his highest "reciprocal" tariffs at 46 per cent if a deal cannot be negotiated before a pause on the levies ends in early July.
Despite Hanoi's efforts and pledges to meet Washington's demands, the surplus keeps growing, particularly as exporters rush to get their goods to the US before the tariffs go into effect.
The new figures "may put some clouds in the sky of these negotiations and put pressure on Vietnam to make additional concessions to reach an agreement," said Leif Schneider, vice chairman of the European Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam's legal sector committee.
The surplus with the United States surged to US$12.2 billion in May, up nearly 42 per cent from a year earlier and 17 per cent higher than April, Vietnamese government data showed on Friday. Exports to the US also climbed roughly 42 per cent from a year earlier to a post-pandemic high of US$13.8 billion.
That stands in contrast to signs that other countries are reining in their exports to the United States with the US trade deficit narrowing sharply in April.
Schneider noted that while Vietnam's spike in exports was largely due to front-loading ahead of possible tariffs, and represents a short-term inflation of the surplus, Vietnam is in a particularly hard spot because of its limited imports from the United States.
In the first five months of the year, the surplus hit nearly US$50 billion, up 28.5 per cent and putting Vietnam on track to exceed last year's record surplus.
The country's imports from China also posted a post-pandemic record of US$16.2 billion in May, up 21 per cent from a year earlier.
Vietnam is home to large manufacturing operations of US multinationals such as Apple, Intel and Nike, and it also hosts numerous Chinese companies, often suppliers to US firms.
US officials have repeatedly accused Vietnam of being used as a waypoint for Chinese goods destined for the United States. They allege that some goods have "Made in Vietnam" labels despite having received no or insufficient added value in the country - allowing Chinese exporters to avoid high US duties on their goods.
The US has sent a "long" list of "tough" requests to Vietnam in its tariff negotiations, including demands that could force the country to cut its reliance on Chinese industrial goods imports, two people briefed about the matter have said.
Under US pressure, Hanoi has launched a crackdown on illegal transshipments of goods, mostly from China. It has also repeatedly shown its willingness to reduce non-tariff barriers and to import more US goods, including US planes, farm products and energy, although no purchase contracts have been announced yet.
Vietnam's overall trade figures with the world showed exports in May rose 17 per cent from a year earlier to US$39.6 billion, while imports were up 14 per cent at US$39 billion.
Separate government data also out on Friday showed industrial production in May shot up 9.4 per cent from a year earlier, while consumer prices rose 3.24 per cent and retail sales were up 10.2 per cent.
Foreign investment inflows for January-May climbed 7.9 per cent to US$8.9 billion. Foreign investment pledges over the period soared 51.2 per cent to US$18.4 billion. - Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bid to relocate US Space Shuttle Discovery faces museum pushback
Bid to relocate US Space Shuttle Discovery faces museum pushback

Malay Mail

time13 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Bid to relocate US Space Shuttle Discovery faces museum pushback

WASHINGTON, Aug 2 — Tucked inside President Donald Trump's flagship tax and spending bill last month was a little-noticed provision to relocate the iconic Space Shuttle Discovery from a museum outside Washington to Houston. The plan now faces legal uncertainty, with the Smithsonian Institution arguing Congress had no authority to give away what it considers private property—even before accounting for the steep logistical and financial challenges. 'The Smithsonian Institution owns the Discovery and holds it in trust for the American public,' the museum network, which receives substantial federal funding yet remains an independent entity, said in a statement to AFP yesterday. 'In 2012, Nasatransferred 'all rights, title, interest and ownership' of the shuttle to the Smithsonian,' the statement continued, calling Discovery one of the museum's 'centerpieces' that welcomes millions of visitors a year. The push to move Discovery from the Air and Space Museum's site in northern Virginia began in April, when Texas Senator John Cornyn, a Republican who faces a tough primary challenge next year by state attorney general Ken Paxton, introduced the 'Bring the Space Shuttle Home Act,' naming Discovery. The legislation stalled until it was folded into the mammoth 'Big Beautiful Bill,' signed into law on July 4. Its passage allocated US$85 million (RM363.6 million) for the move, though the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has projected a far higher cost of US$325 million, adding that the Nasa administrator's power over non-Nasa entities is 'unclear.' To comply with Senate rules, the bill's language was modified such that Discovery is no longer named directly. Instead, the bill refers to a 'space vehicle,' though there is little doubt as to the target. Nasa's administrator—currently Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, serving in an acting capacity—was given 30 days to identify which spacecraft is to be relocated, a deadline coming up on Sunday. End of an era Nasa's Space Shuttle program ended in 2011, after a 30-year run that carried America's post-Apollo space ambitions. The four surviving orbiters—Atlantis, Endeavour, prototype Enterprise, and Discovery—were awarded to Florida, California, New York, and Virginia through a ranked selection process. Discovery, the most flown, was chosen as a vehicle-of-record in a near-complete state, intended for study by future generations. 'There was not a lot of support within Houston to want a shuttle,' space historian Robert Pearlman told AFP, adding that a proposal to house it at Space Center Houston was relatively weak. But after the announcement, Texas—home to the Johnson Space Centre, which oversees NASA's human spaceflight—felt snubbed, and allegations of political interference by then-president Barack Obama swirled. A Nasa inspector general probe found no evidence of foul play. Enormous challenges Relocating Discovery now would pose major technical hurdles. NASA had modified two Boeing 747s to ferry retired shuttles—one is now a museum piece, and the other is out of service. That leaves land and water transport. 'The nearest water entrance to the Potomac River is about 30 miles (48.3 kilometres) away,' Pearlman said—but it may be too shallow for the orbiter and required barge, requiring a 100-mile journey instead. A water transport would require a massive enclosed barge, he added. The US government owns only one such vessel, controlled by the military. Loaning it to a civilian agency would require another act of Congress, and the alternative would involve building one from scratch. Dennis Jenkins, a former shuttle engineer who oversaw the delivery of retired orbiters to their new homes, told the Collect Space outlet he could see costs reach a billion dollars. Nicholas O'Donnell, an attorney at Sullivan & Worcester with expertise in art and museum law, told AFP that assuming Smithsonian has valid paperwork, 'I don't think Secretary Duffy or anyone in the federal government has any more authority to order the move of Discovery than you or I do.' The government could invoke eminent domain—seizing private property for public use—but it would have to pay fair market value or try to sue. The Smithsonian is unlikely to want a court battle, and while it's legally independent, its financial reliance on federal funds leaves it politically vulnerable, said O'Donnell. — AFP

India aghast at Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs
India aghast at Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

India aghast at Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs

NEW DELHI: Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25% tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the "most strenuous and obnoxious,' in a Truth Social post July 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them "dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25% tariffs kicked in as of Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath - and not the subject to the very highest rates - but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. "Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai based financial services firm. The levies "feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message.' Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal - or the lack of it - was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. As the US released rates across the world on Aug. 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. "The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V. Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the south Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. "We were expecting something in the 15 to 20% range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbours on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being "very disturbed.' A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40% of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. "The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for "months and months,' he said he'll have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated US$129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25%, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20% tariff, Vietnam got a 20% levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19% duties. "We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewelry Export Promotion Council. "We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi "my friend' in a Feb 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries "special.' India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported citing people familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. "It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Jewelry businesses "are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favourable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. "The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing "seems like a knee-jerk reaction,' according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. "This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said. - Bloomberg

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store