&w=3840&q=100)
In a quiet diplomatic move, India appoints ambassador to North Korea after 4 years
Aliawati Longkumer, who is currently the Charge d'affaires of the Embassy of India in Paraguay, attends the event presenting the progress of the project 'Expansion of access and coverage in maternal and child health in dispersed rural areas, indigenous communities, and border zones of the Paraguayan Chaco', in Villa Hayes, on June 13, 2024. (Photo: Embassy of India, Paraguay)
Aliawati Longkumer has been appointed as India's next ambassador to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (also known as North Korea).
Longkumer is currently the Charge d'affaires of the Embassy of India in Asuncion, Paraguay. He is expected to take up the assignment as the next Ambassador of India to North Korea shortly.
'Aliawati Longkumer (YOA : 2008), presently Charge d'affaires a.i. Embassy of India, Asuncion, Paraguay, has been appointed as the next Ambassador of India to Democratic People's Republic of Korea. He is expected to take up the assignment shortly,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement on Monday.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As per the MEA, relations between India and North Korea have been generally characterised by friendship, cooperation and understanding. The consular relations with North Korea were set up in March 1962.
According to the MEA, the Consulate General of India in North Korea was established in 1968, with the diplomatic relations between the two countries at Embassy level established on 10 December 1973.
As per the MEA, after the 1950-1953 Korean War, the United Nations had formed a nine-member Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission under the Chairmanship of India. The Commission's role in the exchange of POWs under the Chairmanship of Major General K S Thimayya was highly appreciated. Regular and meaningful exchange of views on bilateral issues of mutual interest and concern are conducted through the mechanism of Foreign Office Consultations (FOC).
MEA in a previous statement had noted that India urged North Korea to restrain from nuclear and ballistic missile tests so as to ease tensions on the Korean peninsula. India supports all efforts to bring about peace and stability in the Korean Peninsula through dialogue and diplomacy.
Previously, India welcomed the inter-Korean Summit meeting held at Panmunjom on April 27 2018 and in Pyongyang in September 2018.India also welcomed the historic summit held on 12 June 2018 in Singapore and on 27-28 February in Hanoi between US President Donald Trump and North Korea's leader Kim Jong-un, and hoped that such engagement would help in reducing tensions and pave the way for lasting peace and reconciliation in the Korean Peninsula.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
(This is an agency copy. Except for the headline, the copy has not been edited by Firstpost staff.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
How to deal with him
Indian public opinion is incensed by Trump's Truth Social post about having reached a deal with Pakistan, to prospect for and develop oil and natural gas in that country. He goes on to say that the search for the right company to undertake this work is ongoing. To add salt to the wound, he writes that perhaps in the future India could purchase oil from Pakistan. This has created a furore in our media, in Parliament and in our public at large. As expected, opposition has labelled this development as the failure of govt's foreign policy. And our people are wondering what Trump is up to, especially how he has got so close to Rawalpindi during this second term. Not only has he feted Field Marshal Asim Munir over lunch at the White House, but now US govt appears to be cozying up again with Islamabad. Read more at TOI+ Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's 25 per cent tariff on India: An opportunity, and a step too far
US President Donald Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, along with a penalty for procuring energy and military equipment from Russia, is a shocker at first sight. But, it also presents a moment for India to seize the initiative and do what is right without losing any more time. A free trade agreement that allows greater access for Indian products to the world's largest market and, at the same time, opens up its economy to American goods and services, is a win-win for both sides. India's exports to the US, at $86.5 billion in 2024-25 (April-March), were higher than those to any other country. Imports from the US, at $45.7 billion, were below only those from China ($113.5 billion), Russia ($63.8 billion) and the UAE ($63.4 billion). A no-deal, simply put, is not in India's interest. The effort should be to not just preserve, but enhance the gains from trade. Trump, no doubt, has overturned the predictable rules and principles governing the global trading order that delivered high growth and lifted the fortunes of millions across countries. His latest unilateral measure, subjecting India to a higher tariff than the UK (10 per cent), the European Union, Japan and Korea (15 per cent), Indonesia (19 per cent) or Vietnam (20 per cent), runs counter to the larger story of growing cooperation between the two countries. The last couple of years alone have seen significant movement towards the signing of a new 10-year defence partnership framework, an MoU to expand and diversify critical mineral supply chains and proposed amendments to India's nuclear liability law. For all the jarring notes in Trump's imperious actions and pronouncements, India must not lose sight of the big picture. If anything, it must hasten the process of clinching a long-delayed agreement that will also give a push to much-needed domestic economic reforms. And the approach should be based on export proactiveness rather than import defensiveness — as was evident in the recent India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. While Trump's 25 per cent import levy may be a pressure tactic for forcing India to lower both duties and non-tariff barriers on American products, his threatening to impose an additional 'penalty' for the country buying Russian oil and defence hardware is unacceptable. Just as signing a trade deal with the US is in India's interest, securing the energy needs of its population — including by sourcing oil from any country offering crude at discounted prices — is non-negotiable. It is possible this may entail a cost in the form of secondary sanctions linked to Russian supplies, which India will have to factor in going ahead. Recognising this cost is as important as converting the Trump threat into an opportunity to be seized.
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
To justify dismissal of constable who married Pakistan national, CRPF cites national security: ‘Our security will get compromised…'
The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has justified the dismissal from service of constable Munir Ahmed, saying that he married a Pakistani woman despite apprehensions from seniors that it may raise a national security issue and before any decision was made on his applications seeking permission for the marriage. The CRPF opposed Munir's writ petition in the High Court of J&K and Ladakh, challenging his dismissal from service. While the DIG (Adm) had clarified that under the CCS (Conduct) Rules 1964, there is no requirement for an NOC and that a government servant marrying a person who is not of Indian nationality has to just inform the government, the CRPF said that in this case, since the woman is a Pakistani national, it opposed the marriage. In a letter dated July 23, 2024, the Jammu Sector CRPF had resubmitted Munir's file to the J&K Zone CRPF, asking the latter not to grant an NOC to him for the marriage. In the letter, the Jammu Sector CRPF said, 'CCS Conduct Rule 1964 was framed 60 years ago, and at that time, Pakistan was not a hostile country'. 'However, after the eruption of militancy in J&K, the neighbouring country has become a hostile nation and is abetting terrorism in J&K, which has claimed thousands of innocent lives, as well as of police personnel, political activists and paramilitary forces,' it said. 'Besides terrorism, Pakistan has also indulged in various means and efforts to gather intelligence of our strategic locations, campuses, deployment, and our weaponry, and keeps our forces (engaged) in proxy war,' it wrote, adding that the petitioner was employed in the executive staff in the CRPF and had access to confidential information. 'Therefore, there is apprehension that once he gets married to a Pakistani girl, our security will get compromised and… (this) could endanger our national security,' it said. It also claimed that there had been 'some instances of women working as spies to lure such boys into marriage, even though in this case, he states she is a relative'. In a subsequent response to further questions from the J&K Zone CRPF, it was told that Ahmed solemnised nikah with Pakistani national Menal Khan on May 24, 2024, through video conferencing and that he had requested an NOC for the same. It said that it came to know through a newspaper on February 28, 2025, that Menal Khan had entered India through the Wagha Border on a 15-day tourist visa and was residing with the petitioner at his residence. The CRPF on May 3 this year dismissed Ahmed, a resident of Jammu district's Bhalwal tehsil, from service without a formal inquiry, saying that his actions were found to be detrimental to 'national security'. The dismissal came in the aftermath of the attack in Pahalgam, where 26 people were shot dead by terrorists from Pakistan. Ahmed had denied the allegations, claiming he had informed the CRPF Directorate last year of his marriage with Menal Khan and that the latter had acknowledged it in a communication. He also claimed that he had first told the DG of the wedding on December 31, 2022 and had sought an NOC from the organisation. But he had also admitted that his wife's short-term visa had ended earlier this year and the couple was trying to get a long-term one. Meanwhile, with her short-term visa now ended, Minal had been issued a 'Leave India' notice in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack and was taken to Attari, but the deportation was stalled after Ahmed moved the High Court.
