logo
Can a French citizen's petition reverse the reintroduction of a banned pesticide?

Can a French citizen's petition reverse the reintroduction of a banned pesticide?

France 2421-07-2025
The French National Assembly on July 8 adopted the divisive "Duplomb law", named after the conservative lawmaker Laurent Duplomb who proposed it. The draft law was presented in parliament as a bid to "reduce constraints" on French farmers, who have repeatedly expressed frustration over bureaucratic constraints on the agricultural sector, unfair foreign competition, and stringent regulations.
But some farmers, environmentalists and medical experts have criticised many of the law's proposals – particularly one provision that proposes to reintroduce the insecticide acetamiprid, a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees and to ecosystems – which was banned in France in 2018.
The contentious provisions spurred 23-year-old masters student Eleonore Pattery to launch a petition against the law on July 10, which brought the bill to the public's attention. The petition's author, who describes herself as "a future environmental health professional", called the new law a "scientific, ethical, environmental and public health aberration".
"It represents a frontal attack on public health, biodiversity, the coherence of climate policies, food security, and common sense," she said.
At the time of writing, the petition had collected more than 1.5 million signatures – higher than any other petition published on France's official National Assembly site so far.
The reintroduction of acetamiprid – an insecticide that belongs to a class of synthetic chemicals similar to nicotine called neonicotinoids, often shortened to "neonics" – is the most divisive provision of the law.
Neonics were developed in the 1980s to target the central nervous system of insects and disrupt nerve function. These insecticides are extremely effective against a wide range of pests like aphids and grubs, and have been used globally since the 1990s. In France, they are widely used by beetroot and hazelnut growers.
However, they come with a list of caveats that harm biodiversity and human health, according to experts.
Unlike contact pesticides that coat the surface of a plant, neonics are absorbed by the plant and distributed through its leaves, flowers, pollen, and nectar.
While this makes them very effective against pests, they also cause impaired navigation, reduced learning, weakened colony health and death among bees. Various beekeeping organisations have urged citizens to fight against the law for this very reason and have branded the chemical "a bee killer".
Scientists also say that neonicotinoids tend to remain inside the soil and hurt non-target species i.e., insects and animals that don't hurt crop yield but play an essential role in maintaining ecological balance.
However, the invertebrates aren't the only ones at risk. A growing body of research shows that neonicotinoids impact human nervous systems too. Hundreds of doctors and researchers have signed an open letter published by French healthcare organisation Médecins du Monde that says the law fails to address the collapse of biodiversity and the impact on farmers' health. The letter specifically mentions three chemicals: acetamiprid, flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor.
'The primary consequence of these dysfunctions is an increased risk for farmers of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), myeloma, prostate cancer, Parkinson's disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders, to take just a few examples, while the precautionary principle (and the European regulation) requires that no marketing authorisation be issued in the event of a risk to human health or biodiversity,' it says. The letter has been backed by The French League Against Cancer and the European Federation of Neurological Associations.
01:34
Environmentalists are also concerned by some of the other provisions of the law.
The law claims it will promote the expansion of industrial agriculture by easing permits for large livestock facilities and water reservoirs. Critics say this move will harm smaller family-run operations and is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation.
The Duplomb law will also implement several long-standing demands from France's largest farm union FNSEA, which has historically supported pesticide use.
"We need to maintain our means of production, and I believe there's a lot of exaggeration in the comments being made," the head of FNSEA, Arnaud Rousseau, told franceinfo radio.
Growers also argue that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, is vital to fight yellows disease, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output.
Can a citizen's petition change the law?
The number of signatures on Pattery's petition continue to climb, and increasing pressure on the government to revisit the law.
The French government has defended the bill, but has been obliged to acknowledge the outcry, amid the rapidly rising number of signatures.
In France, petitions with over half a million signatures can prompt a parliamentary debate, but do not require a new vote.
National Assembly chairwoman Yael Braun Privet said the government "had to listen to the people. We will hold a debate but this debate will not – it cannot – change the text that was just voted." Former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal has also said he would back a debate.
Benjamin Morel, a constitutional expert and lecturer at the University of Paris-Panthéon-Assas agrees, saying that while the petition might lead to a debate, it will not ultimately lead to any change in the text of the law itself: "For the Duplomb law not to be enforced, a new bill would have to be introduced, or the president of the Republic would have to get involved."
" Emmanuel Macron could request a new deliberation by Parliament, in accordance with Article 10 of the Constitution," Morel adds. But he believes that the result of the vote would be identical.
For now, France's left – the four parties formerly allied under the banner of the New Popular Front – have promised to continue to battle to repeal the Duplomb law. "The fight has only just begun," warned Green Party MP Sandrine Rousseau on franceinfo radio on Monday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy
France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy

France 24

time7 hours ago

  • France 24

France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy

The contraceptives -- intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa -- were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden. But France's health ministry told AFP Friday there was no legal way for it to intervene. The administration of Biden's successor Donald Trump, which has slashed USAID and pursued anti-abortion policies, confirmed last month it planned to destroy the contraceptives, which have been stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision "insane". The health ministry told AFP that the government had "examined the courses of action available to us, but unfortunately there is no legal basis for intervention by a European health authority, let alone the French national drug safety authority, to recover these medical products. "Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks," it added. The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. Leaving Belgian warehouse Sarah Durocher, head of the French women's rights group Family Planning, told AFP that some contraceptives had already left the Belgian warehouse. "We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun," Durocher said Thursday. "We do not know where these trucks are now -- or whether they have arrived in France," she added. "We call on all incineration companies not to destroy the contraceptives and to oppose this insane decision." French company Veolia confirmed to AFP that it had a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. But Veolia emphasised that the contract concerned "only the management of expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile" in Belgium. The products, mostly long-acting contraceptives such as IUDs and birth control implants, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. Outrage over decision The US decision has provoked an outcry in France, where rights groups and left-wing politicians have called on their government to stop the plan. "France cannot become the scene of such operations -- a moratorium is essential," an opinion piece in the French daily Le Monde said Friday. Signed by five NGOs, it condemned the "absurdity" of the US decision. Among them was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse". A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed". The spokesperson pointed to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule", was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It has been reinstated under every Republican president since.

France halts intake of Gazans over student's antisemitic posts
France halts intake of Gazans over student's antisemitic posts

France 24

time8 hours ago

  • France 24

France halts intake of Gazans over student's antisemitic posts

The move comes after officials said the female student from Gaza would have to leave France after the Sciences Po university in the northern city of Lille revoked her accreditation over the online posts. "No evacuation of any kind will take place until we have drawn conclusions from this investigation," Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told Franceinfo radio. All Gazans who have entered France will undergo a second screening, he added. The foreign ministry told AFP it could not disclose how many people would be affected by the policy change, citing confidentiality concerns. France has helped more than 500 people leave Gaza since the latest war between Palestinian militant group Hamas and Israel started, including wounded children, journalists, students and artists. The conflict, triggered by Hamas's murderous October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, has seen Israel retaliate with a deadly military campaign and an aid blockade in Gaza that some rights groups have qualified as "genocide". "France cannot suspend its policy of welcoming evacuated Gazans: our common humanity is at stake," said Arthur Delaporte, spokesman for the opposition Socialist Party, on X. Lille's general prosecutor said Thursday that a judicial probe has been opened against the student for allegedly trying to "justify terrorism" and "justify a crime against humanity". Barrot confirmed she must leave France, noting that talks were ongoing to determine her destination. 'Just two minutes' The 25-year-old woman was due to start studying at France's prestigious Sciences Po in the fall as part of a government scholarship programme for students from Gaza. A French diplomatic source said the student arrived in France on July 11 on a scholarship based on "academic excellence" and after "security checks". But now she will have to leave the country after pro-Israel accounts on X resurfaced posts she shared in September, including an image of Adolf Hitler and words appearing to call for the death of Jews. The account attributed to the student has been taken offline, after French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau demanded it be closed down. AFP has not been able to independently confirm the social media posts attributed to the young woman. Sciences Po however confirmed on Wednesday that the young woman had shared the content. It said they were in "direct contradiction" with the university's values, without elaborating. "The security checks carried out by the relevant state services, as well as by the Israeli authorities, did not detect these antisemitic and unacceptable comments," Barrot said. A spokesman for France's far-right National Rally criticised the government's vetting process, saying "it only took two minutes of browsing" to find the posts. "And yet, France welcomed this individual," said spokesman Julien Odoul on Europe 1 radio. AFP was not immediately able to reach the student for comment. The news agency is not identifying her at this stage of the investigation. In a July interview on broadcaster RMC, before her posts came to light, the 25-year-old had expressed her excitement about studying in France. "I am finally in a safe space," she said.

Budapest mayor questioned as a suspect over Pride march
Budapest mayor questioned as a suspect over Pride march

France 24

time9 hours ago

  • France 24

Budapest mayor questioned as a suspect over Pride march

If the environmentalist mayor Gergely Karacsony is charged and convicted, he could spend up to a year in prison for organising and encouraging participation in a banned rally. "They described the accusation. I said that I considered this to be unfounded and that I will lodge a complaint against it," Karacsony told journalists after having been questioned for more than an hour. He did not answer any questions posed by investigators, but contested the accusations levelled against him on legal grounds, he added. Karacsony said he thought the investigation would likely be put to rest ahead of next year's election. Police confirmed to AFP that "an interrogation of a suspect" as part of an ongoing probe took place on Friday, but declined to say who they had questioned. Karacsony wore a T-shirt featuring the capital's coat of arms overlaid with rainbow colours when he arrived at the headquarters of Hungary's top investigative authority. He addressed a few hundred supporters gathered outside, saying Budapest Pride showed that "neither freedom nor love can be banned in Budapest. "And if it cannot be banned, it cannot be punished," he added. Pride organisers said more than 200,000 people took part in the June 28 parade in what they said was a rebuke of Prime Minister Viktor Orban's years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights in the name of "child protection". After the nationalist leader declared his intention to ban this year's celebration, his ruling coalition in parliament passed new laws to prohibit the annual parade. Budapest city hall stepped in to co-organise the event, arguing the police cannot legally ban a municipal event. Before the march, Orban warned organisers and attendees of "legal consequences". The National Bureau of Investigation -- tasked with investigating serious and complex crimes -- later launched a probe against an "unknown perpetrator" for organising a banned rally. But police announced last month they would not take action against participants, who could have faced fines up to 500 euros ($570) for attending the Pride parade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store