'Right down the line': Medicaid reform in 'big, beautiful bill' divides lawmakers by party
Medicaid reform in President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" has drawn a partisan line through Congress.
Democrats have railed against potential Medicaid cuts since Trump was elected, while Republicans have celebrated Medicaid reform through the reconciliation process as an efficient way to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in the welfare program.
Fox News Digital asked lawmakers from both ends of the political spectrum to react to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's Medicaid reform. The results were as expectedly divided.
"This is all B.S., what the Democrats are doing," Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., told Fox News Digital. "They're pushing the agenda that we're cutting 10 million people off Medicaid. It's people that actually shouldn't be on it, illegals that shouldn't be on it. We're reforming it."
Gop Rails Against 'Blatantly False' Dem Claims About Medicaid Reform In Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan federal agency that has been ridiculed by Republicans, estimated this week that Trump's "big, beautiful bill" would leave 10.9 million people without health insurance, including 1.4 million who are in the country without legal status in state-funded programs.
Read On The Fox News App
But Republicans are holding firm in their defense of Medicaid reform, which Republicans say only cuts benefits to illegal immigrants, those ineligible to receive benefits who are currently receiving benefits, duplicate enrollees in one or more states and those who are able but choosing not to work.
"The people who would not continue to get Medicaid benefits under this bill were not qualified to get them in the first place," Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told Fox News Digital.
Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Resistance From Republican Senators Over Debt Fears
Democrats continue to sound off on the healthcare threat of eliminating 10 million people from Medicaid. Not a single House Democrat voted to pass Trump's championed legislation, which includes fulfilling key campaign promises like cutting taxes, immigration reform and American energy production.
"These burdensome regulatory requirements for proving that somebody has obtained or sought work are going to mean millions of people will go without healthcare, and the restrictions on food assistance are equally an obstacle to people meeting their everyday needs," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said.
Blumenthal added he is "very, very concerned about these seemingly cruel and unproductive ways of raising money simply to finance tax cuts" for "wealthy billionaires."
New Jersey Democratic Sen. Andy Kim said he is happy to have an "honest conversation" about government efficiency and saving taxpayer dollars, but that's not the reality of this bill.
"People are struggling, and I feel like, in the richest, most powerful country in the world, we should be able to make sure that people can have the basic needs they need to be able to survive," Kim said of Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., told Fox News Digital there is "nothing beautiful" about Trump's "big, beautiful bill."
"This is horrific, and it adds massive amounts to our debt, compromising our ability to [fund] the fundamentals in the future, foundations for families to thrive — health care, housing, education, good-paying jobs. That's what we should be doing here, not doing massive tax cuts for billionaires and paying for them by tearing down programs for ordinary families," Merkley said.
The national debt stands at more than $36.2 trillion as of June 5, according to the Fox Business, based on data from the Treasury Department.
The CBO's report this week also estimated Trump's bill will cut taxes by $3.7 trillion while raising deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade.
Fox News' Anders Hagstrom and Eric Revell contributed to this report. Original article source: 'Right down the line': Medicaid reform in 'big, beautiful bill' divides lawmakers by party
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Big beautiful' AI rule means feds must act NOW to stop Big Tech's abuses
Deep within President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — the major spending legislation he wants to see by July 4 — is a rule that holds enormous implications for the rapidly developing artificial intelligence sector. The Senate is debating a provision that would prevent state governments from regulating the AI industry for years. Supporters claim this moratorium would stop a patchwork of conflicting state laws from slowing AI's rocketing development. But without subsequent federal action, a moratorium on state regulation risks making the AI industry a law-free zone, where Big Tech companies can essentially do whatever they want with an untested, sometimes exploitative new technology. We've needed federal regulation on AI companies for some time, but if this new moratorium passes, it will become even more urgent for Congress to act. If the AI industry is going to grow sustainably and responsibly, we need legislation to provide guardrails and clear rules about how to protect the creators of content that AI tools use — publishers, authors, journalists, artists, musicians and creatives of all types. Right now, those content creators are AI's victims. Big Tech and AI companies scrape vast amounts of content to build and operate their generative AI products, which turn content into GenAI outputs for users. Sometimes they just reproduce content creators' passages word for word — without credit or compensation. AI companies admit these unfair and un-American tactics are fundamental to their businesses, but they refuse to pay because it's cheaper to steal. Even worse, this predatory behavior lets AI models act as information gatekeepers. If Big Tech is left to its own devices, Americans will have less access to accurate information, and certainly no one to hold accountable for errors and mistakes. Reporting on stories that Americans need to know will dwindle as the AI companies undermine the business models of publishers, opening the door to viewpoint suppression and creating opportunities for foreign propagandists. How dire these problems will become is a matter of guesswork — because AI development is currently a black box. Developers do not share information on whether or how they are obtaining consent for using publisher content. (News reports suggest that when they do share information about these methods, it is sometimes misleading.) Publishers must hire experts to reverse-engineer how their content has been taken, a costly process that overburdens small publishers and can't always identify all works that were used in training the models. This lack of transparency hinders the enforcement of intellectual property rights and distorts regulatory decisions, business development and more. Federal legislation could address these issues by requiring recordkeeping and full disclosure. AI companies must let publishers know whether a generative AI model was trained on their work — and must also explain whether certain publications have been specifically excluded from AI models, so that the public can judge any bias. Further, AI companies must disclose the sources they use to keep their models' responses current. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Simple rules such as these will prompt commercial GenAI developers to enter agreements with publishers to use their content — agreements that will likely block AI companies and foreign actors from distorting the news that the public receives. The benefits will be widespread. These rules would strengthen America's position in the AI race by making its products more trustworthy and preserving the journalism that lies at its foundation. Protecting intellectual property and homegrown content is what gives American AI companies an international competitive edge. Strong federal rules will also keep many small media businesses viable, and protecting thousands of workers and their communities. The White House blueprint for AI wisely recognizes that AI development must be responsible and aligned with American values, including respect for intellectual property and the rule of law. If Congress is going to act, as it appears it might, to limit the ability of states to enact these important regulations, then it's up to the House and Senate to fill that gap — and set this growing but potentially dangerous industry on a solid foundation. Danielle Coffey is president and CEO of the News/Media Alliance, which represents more than 2,200 publishers nationwide.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michael Saylor and Senator Lummis send a hard-nosed response on 'double taxation'
Michael Saylor and Senator Lummis send a hard-nosed response on 'double taxation' originally appeared on TheStreet. Strategy's Michael Saylor and U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) are actively seeking reform to what Saylor calls the "unfair" double taxation of Bitcoin miners and stakers. Lummis explained how the current tax regime creates a situation where miners suffer taxation twice for the same reward — once when they receive block rewards and again when they sell the rewards. Bitcoin mining is the process of using computing power to solve cryptographic puzzles in order to verify transactions and secure the Bitcoin network. Miners are taxed twice, once when they get new coins as a reward and again when they sell X, Lummis wrote, "For years, miners and stakers have been taxed TWICE. Once when they receive block rewards, and again when they sell it. It's time to stop this unfair tax treatment and ensure America is the world's Bitcoin and Crypto Superpower." Soon after, Saylor jumped into the conversation, saying, "We must end unfair taxes on BTC miners if America is going to be the world's Bitcoin Superpower." According to Cryptoquant, Bitcoin miners are earning the least they have in a year, but the majority still refuse to sell their coins. Miner income fell to $34 million on June 22, the lowest since April 20, as lower transaction fees and a lower Bitcoin price reduced revenues. The slump is attributed to declining Ordinal inscription activity, which had previously raised fees throughout the quarter. The firm's Miner Profit/Loss Sustainability score now classifies miners as "extremely underpaid." Michael Saylor and Senator Lummis send a hard-nosed response on 'double taxation' first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 30, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 30, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street could see big moves with Trump's new bill
Wall Street could see big moves with Trump's new bill originally appeared on TheStreet. Senate Republicans are advancing a broad-based tax package to extend the 2017 Trump-era tax cuts by deploying a controversial 'current policy' accounting gimmick that waives the $3.8 trillion price tag from the official estimate. Republicans are employing a controversial accounting method to erase the $3.8 trillion cost of extending Trump-era tax cuts, trying to sell the bill to fiscal conservatives despite warnings that it will exacerbate the national debt. Democrats are referring to it as "magic math," while others believe it sets a precedent for hiding future costs and dragging the United States into record deficits, as per a June 30 Bloomberg report. Republicans, however, have another plan! GOPs say that embracing this accounting system would let them add further tax cuts to Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill." Especially, John Thune has been leading the efforts to pass the bill. The move allows the GOP to get around budget rules and make an appeal to deficit hawks. The bill includes a section (Section 899) that would give the Treasury the ability to retaliate against unfair foreign tax measures affecting U.S. individuals or firms, in line with President Trump's trade deals. This could be reflected as a measure to push forward President Trump's crypto-forward movement. A new amendment from Senator Cynthia Lummis aims to address this gap with significant upgrades to the taxation of digital assets. The bill will also protect foreign investors who utilize U.S. staking services and clarify that crypto loans are not subject to taxation. The bill could be more precise definitions, especially those related to staking, stablecoins, NFTs, and borrowing fees, to work well in practice, as per experts. Many analysts believe that the One Big, Beautiful Bill (OBBB) could have significant positive consequences for financial markets and push Bitcoin to the forefront. Bitcoin has surged by nearly 75% in the past year, which some view as a response to accelerating deficits and the adoption of aggressive fiscal policies. Gold, an equally conventional hedge, is up 41% over the same time frame — and, even with the higher yields on bonds, that suggests nervousness about monetary stability is getting more, not less acute. Join the discussion with CryptoWendyO on. For its part, the dollar is down to three-year lows with the DXY Index gapping down at the open on Monday, a sign that confidence in the greenback's long-term prospects is slowly eroding. Yields on long-term government debt are also up, steepening the yield curve and sending a signal that bond markets continue to be skeptical that the Federal Reserve will join Trump in pushing for rate cuts. The rise in borrowing costs reflects investor unease about both persistent inflation and the sustainability of U.S. fiscal policy. Wall Street could see big moves with Trump's new bill first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 30, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
