Israel's aggression against Iran and the end of its impunity
While the Islamic Republic of Iran had chosen the path of indirect negotiations with the US, on the eve of the sixth round, on June 13, 2025, it faced an illegal armed attack by the Israeli regime.
Iran had been prepared to reach an agreement within the framework of its commitment to nuclear non-proliferation and the legitimate right to a peaceful nuclear program.
In response to Israel's unlawful act of aggression, Iran exercised its inherent and lawful right to self-defense as stipulated in Article 51 of the UN Charter.
Let us not forget that even amidst the 'imposed war' by the Israeli regime, Iran remained steadfastly committed to the path of diplomacy.
Also, at the very moment when Iran's foreign minister was engaged in negotiations in Geneva with the European Troika and the EU high representative for foreign affairs, and consulting with regional states in Istanbul, the nation fell victim to military strike by the US.
This was a blatant betrayal of diplomacy and a grave threat to regional and global security.
'The Israeli regime's attack was not just against Iran, it was a calculated and deliberate strike against regional stability, integrity, progress and development.'
The targeting of Iran's fully transparent and safeguarded nuclear facilities, subject to the UN's monitoring and verification — by a rogue regime that flouts international law, evades Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations, and hides its nuclear arsenal — reveals the hypocrisy of the so-called rules-based order.
The Israeli regime, as an illegal occupying entity, has consistently violated international law through prolonged occupation, genocide, and illegitimate aggression against Iran.
These acts aim to destabilize the region, halt its progress and prosperity, and impose its bullying agenda. But the era of impunity has come to an end.
Iran has always made its position clear that it has never ignited war in the region, nor will it ever do so. We have long warned that Israel threatens regional security, with dire implications for the entire region.
The Israeli regime's aggression was not just against Iran, it was a calculated and deliberate strike against regional stability, integrity, progress, and development. It is aimed at forcibly reshaping the region according to its destructive agenda.
In the face of the Israeli attack, Iran deeply appreciates the principled positions and valuable solidarity of neighboring countries, especially the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
They have, in these critical times, stood in unity and solidarity alongside Iran, firmly condemning the hostile act against Iran.
The great nation of Iran will never forget the full support of the Kingdom, under the special directive of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, to provide Iranian pilgrims with comprehensive services, and to help facilitate their safe return home.
The wise positions of regional countries during Israel's aggression against Iran demonstrate their collective wisdom. They have shown their responsibility to safeguard the region against the Israeli threat, which is the primary disruptor of its peace, stability, and security.
At this critical juncture, the region is in greater need than ever to foster cooperation and ensure shared stability. Iran continues to extend its hand of friendship to neighboring states.
A fundamental pillar of Iran's foreign policy is the principle of good neighborly relations and regional cooperation.
• Ali Reza Enayati is the ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Eel-eating Japan Opposes EU Call for More Protection
Japan's agriculture minister said Friday the country would oppose any call by the European Union to add eels to an endangered species list that would limit trade in them. Eel is eaten worldwide but is particularly popular in Japan, where it is called "unagi" and traditionally served grilled after being covered in a sticky-sweet sauce. Minister Shinjiro Koizumi told reporters that the country carefully manages stock levels of the Japanese eel in cooperation with neighboring China, Taiwan and South Korea. "There is a sufficient population, and it faces no extinction risk due to international trade," AFP quoted him as saying. Japanese media have reported that the EU could soon propose that all eel species be added to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) which limits trade of protected animals. There are 19 species and subspecies of eel, many of them now threatened due to a range of factors including pollution and overfishing. In 2014, the Japanese eel was listed as endangered, but not critically endangered, by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, which cited factors including habitat loss, overfishing, pollution and migration barriers. Protecting the animal is complicated by their complex life cycle, which unfolds over a vast area, and the many unknowns about how they reproduce.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump dismisses reports US is weighing up to $30 billion civilian nuclear deal for Iran
US President Donald Trump on Friday dismissed media reports that said his administration had discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program. CNN reported on Thursday and NBC News reported on Friday that the Trump administration in recent days had explored possible economic incentives for Iran in return for its government halting uranium enrichment. The reports cited sources. CNN cited officials as saying that several proposals were floated and were preliminary. 'Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a 'HOAX.' Since April, Iran and the US have held indirect talks aimed at finding a new diplomatic solution regarding Iran's nuclear program. Tehran says its program is peaceful and Washington says it wants to ensure Iran cannot build a nuclear weapon. Trump, earlier this week, announced a ceasefire between US ally Israel and its regional rival Iran to halt a war that began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran. The Israel-Iran conflict had raised alarms in a region already on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. The US struck Iran's nuclear sites over the last weekend and Iran targeted a US base in Qatar on Monday in retaliation, before Trump announced the ceasefire. Israel is the only Middle Eastern country widely believed to have nuclear weapons and said its war against Iran aimed to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. The UN nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said it has 'no credible indication' of an active, coordinated weapons program in Iran.
Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Lebanon to US: Hezbollah Arms Move to North Litani Region if Israel Pulls Back from South
Lebanon has formally proposed a trade-off to the United States: Israel withdraws from Lebanese territory, and in return, Hezbollah will pull its heavy weapons to north of the Litani River, a senior Lebanese official told Asharq Al-Awsat. US officials have been informed that Lebanon cannot meet demands to disarm Hezbollah in the south without reciprocal steps from Israel, including troop withdrawals, a halt to hostilities, and the return of Lebanese prisoners. The official said the country has effectively entered what he called a 'dead-end equation' with Israel over the disarmament of Hezbollah, adding that Lebanon will not be able to act unilaterally without reciprocal steps from Tel Aviv. They likened the situation to the classic 'chicken or egg' dilemma: should Hezbollah pull its weapons first, or should Israel first withdraw from occupied Lebanese territory? Under UN Security Council Resolution 1701, Israel is required to withdraw from all areas south of the Litani River. However, Israel continues to demand that Hezbollah disarm - at least of its heavy weapons - across all of Lebanon. The official told Asharq Al-Awsat that Beirut has formally informed the US administration that reciprocal Israeli concessions, including troop withdrawals, an end to hostilities, and the return of prisoners, could offer a path to resolving the crisis. The official said Lebanon is seeking strong American backing to pressure Israel into action. In return, he added, Lebanon is prepared to take meaningful steps in line with President Joseph Aoun's inaugural address, which emphasized that the state must hold the exclusive right to possess arms. The official revealed that Aoun asked US envoy Tom Barrack to help advance the disarmament process, stressing that any move to withdraw weapons must be preceded by Israeli steps in that direction. According to the source, the Lebanese army has drawn up a detailed action plan and budget, which it presented to US officials. The plan outlines Lebanon's commitments in response to each Israeli measure, whether related to troop withdrawals or other issues. Lebanon believes that Israel's continued military presence and cross-border attacks are preventing the full deployment of Lebanese troops south of the Litani River and hampering efforts to secure the border. The official said Lebanon directly requested US guarantees for these steps in exchange for a commitment to begin withdrawing Hezbollah's weapons north of the river. The source also said that talks between Aoun and Hezbollah, suspended due to the recent Iran-Israel war, are expected to resume. He stressed that Lebanon 'has both the vision and the will' to address Hezbollah's arms nationwide. Aoun has reportedly spoken directly with Hezbollah lawmaker Mohammad Raad, urging the group to hand over its heavy weaponry to the Lebanese army, which would either store or destroy the arms based on national security needs. 'This weaponry has lost its strategic role and usefulness after the recent war in Lebanon,' the source said. 'It is no longer viable for use.' Lebanese leaders are working to finalize a unified position in response to a US proposal delivered by Barrack, ahead of a key meeting on Saturday. According to Asharq Al-Awsat, Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam have agreed on a draft response, which Salam will present to Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. If consensus is reached, the proposal will be submitted to the Cabinet for approval and then delivered to Barrack upon his return to Beirut in less than two weeks. Berri is expected to lead negotiations with Hezbollah on behalf of the Lebanese government. The proposal, dubbed the 'ideas paper,' outlines four key components: A plan for Hezbollah's gradual disarmament. A step-for-step mechanism with Israel, where Israel demands Lebanon take the first move, while Beirut insists that the initial step must come from Israel as the occupying power. A section on economic reforms and Lebanon's cooperation with the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. A framework for managing unresolved issues with Syria, including border demarcation and the return of refugees. The US proposal, known as the 'ideas paper,' includes several key elements, foremost among them a plan for the withdrawal of Hezbollah's weapons and Lebanon's strategy to begin the disarmament process. The second point outlines a 'step-for-step' mechanism with Israel. While Israel insists that Lebanon take the first move, Beirut maintains that the initial step must come from Israel, which it regards as the occupying power. The third component addresses Lebanon's economic reform agenda and its cooperation plan with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. The fourth and final element focuses on Lebanon's relations with Syria and ways to resolve outstanding bilateral issues between the two countries. Information Minister Paul Morcos said Friday that the government is ready to act immediately if political contacts progress. 'Israel must first withdraw from occupied areas and halt its aggression so that we can fulfill our commitments,' he said.
