Fossil-fuel pledge in EU-Trump deal sparks climate fears
Many experts believe the eye-watering figure to be unrealistic -- and point out that market dynamics rather than EU policymakers dictate companies' energy choices.
Even on the supply side, Simone Tagliapietra of the Bruegel think-tank noted that the United States might not be able to build the additional export capacity within such a short time frame.
Brussels insists the number was not plucked out of thin air to keep Trump happy, but was based on an analysis of energy needs as it phases out Russian imports because of the Ukraine war between now and 2027.
The proposed increase would mean more than tripling annual energy imports from the United States -- about $70 billion last year -- and equate to well over half the 378 billion euros' worth of overall EU energy imports last year.
'Submission'
A large part of the EU's additional billions would go to imports of LNG, which is transported in liquid state to European ports before being converted back to gaseous form and injected into the bloc's power network.
The United States currently account for about half of the EU's LNG imports, ahead of Russia on 20 percent -- a figure Brussels wants to cut to zero to choke off income that helps fund the war in Ukraine.
But environmental groups warn against a massive switch to American LNG extracted in part though hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which uses explosives to create cracks in rock formations to release oil and gas deposits.
The highly polluting process comes with steep costs to both the climate and local environment, and is banned in a number of European countries.
"The Commission risks replacing one disastrous dependency with another -- unplugging Putin's gas and plugging in Trump's," Greenpeace warned when the EU's phase-out plans were presented.
Francois Gemenne, a policy expert who co-authored the UN's most recent IPCC report on climate change, in 2023, accused the EU of "submission" to Trump's pro-fossil fuel agenda.
Elected on a promise to "drill, baby drill," the US leader is openly hostile to renewable energy efforts and lashed out again at windmills "ruining" the landscape before meeting with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland last weekend.
For Aymeric Kouam of the Strategic Perspectives think-tank, the energy deal with Trump is both "dangerous and counterproductive" and imperils its goal to become carbon neutral by 2050.
"Tying Europe's energy future to the US as a main supplier undermines the bloc's energy security strategy, anchored in supply diversification, renewable energy development, and energy efficiency increase," he said.
The EU pushed back at the charge on Tuesday.
"This agreement does not contradict our medium- to long-term decarbonisation objectives or targets at all," a commission spokesperson told reporters of the three-year energy pledge.
The Trump trade deal comes as the EU debates its 2040 emissions-reduction target, a key step towards its net zero goal.
The commission has proposed a target of cutting emissions by 90 percent compared to 1990 levels, but with new flexibilities to win over reluctant member states.
The EU says it has already cut climate-warming emissions by 37 percent relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate scepticism in many European countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
7 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Will tariffs eventually impact markets?
Markets, which had so far remained unmoved, experienced turbulent sessions in recent days. This volatility was triggered by disappointing US job creation figures – 73,000 jobs created compared to the 104,000 expected – and, more significantly, by downward revisions for May and June, with 258,000 jobs erased from the record for those two months. Profit-taking abruptly halted the spectacular recovery seen across major markets since the trauma of Trump's so-called "Liberation Day." The S&P 500, which had surged 30%, was setting new records, and the Euro Stoxx 50 was up by 16%. On Wall Street, the reversal was particularly notable, with a 1.60% drop on Friday, August 1, following four consecutive sessions of decline, bringing the week's slide to 2.79%. The Euro Stoxx 50, meanwhile, had gained 16% before falling by 2.90% on August 1. Concerns over the impact of tariffs on inflation and US growth have intensified, especially given the tariffs already applied to Canada, Mexico, India and Switzerland. In addition, the unresolved situation with China could have knock-on effects for Europe. Toward a cut in US interest rates? "Markets can see the glass as half-empty or half-full," commented Alexandre Baradez, head of market analysis at the brokerage IG. "On the downside, it demonstrates that US trade policy is truly impacting its economy. On the upside, it increases the chances of a cut in the Federal Reserve's key interest rates, as Donald Trump has demanded." Such a rate cut would reignite growth, boost the real estate market and ease the debt burden, part of which is tied to short-term rates. Expectations for such a move in September abruptly jumped from 50% to 80%, supporting the recovery at the opening of Asian, European and North American markets on August 4, except in Japan, Taiwan, Israel, Switzerland and Poland. In Europe, certain sectors – such as automotive and spirits – are set to suffer from the 15% ceiling applied to most European exports. "Germany, the leading European exporter to the US, will take the full brunt of the 15% tariffs on its cars and machine tools," wrote John Plassard, partner and head of investment strategy at Cité Gestion Private Bank.
France 24
8 minutes ago
- France 24
Trump targets tariff evasion, with eye on China
Goods deemed to be "transshipped," or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-percent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of "reciprocal" tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But "it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy," said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. "The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again," he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a "perpetual stick in the negotiations" with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone. Alternative supplies Experts have noted that Vietnam was the biggest winner from supply chain diversions from China since the first Trump tariffs around 2018, when Washington and Beijing engaged in a trade war. And Brookings Institution senior fellow Robin Brooks pointed to signs this year of significant transshipments of Chinese goods. He noted in a June report that Chinese exports to certain Southeast Asian countries started surging "anomalously" in early 2025 as Trump threatened widespread levies. While it is unclear if all these products end up in the United States, Brooks cast doubt on the likelihood that domestic demand in countries like Thailand and Vietnam rocketed right when Trump imposed duties. "One purpose of the transshipment provisions is to force the development of supply chains that exclude Chinese inputs," said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "The other purpose is to push back on Chinese overcapacity and force them to eat their own surpluses," he added. But Washington's success in the latter goal depends on its ability to get other countries on board. "The transshipment penalties are designed to encourage that," Reinsch said. Lipsky added: "The strategy that worked in the first Trump term, to try to offshore some Chinese manufacturing to other countries like Vietnam and Mexico, is going to be a much more difficult strategy to execute now." China response? Lipsky noted that Beijing could see the transshipment clause as one targeting China on trade, "because it is." "The question is, how China takes that in the broader context of what had been a thawing relationship between the US and China over the past two months," he added. While both countries temporarily lowered triple-digit tariffs on each other's exports, that truce expires August 12. The countries are in talks to potentially extend the de-escalation, although the final decision lies with Trump. It will be tough to draw a line defining product origins, analysts say. Customs fraud has been illegal for some time, but it remains unclear how Washington will view materials from China or elsewhere that have been significantly transformed. The burden lies with customs authorities to identify transshipment and assess the increased duties.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Trump seeks sway over Los Angeles Olympics with new task force
The group will engage the federal government to "ensure the Games are safe, seamless and historically successful," potentially offering Trump and his allies greater influence over the sporting event. Trump will serve as chairman and Vice President JD Vance will be vice-chair of the task force, which will encompass several other leaders in his administration. Signing an order to establish the group Tuesday, Trump said "we'll do anything necessary to keep the Olympics safe" -- including potentially deploying "our National Guard or military." He enraged Los Angeles and state officials in June with his highly unusual decision to deploy California's National Guard against the wishes of Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump claimed the deployment was necessary to quell protests that had flared up against federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, which has a huge migrant population. On Tuesday he doubled down on his feud with Karen Bass, the city's Democratic mayor, by labeling her "not very competent." Trump has previously criticized her response to wildfires that impacted Los Angeles in January. However, Casey Wasserman, the chairman of the 2028 LA Olympics organizing committee, gave no hints of animosity as he joined Trump for the task force announcement at the White House. "You've been supportive and helpful every step of the way. And we wouldn't be here without you," Wasserman said. Los Angeles was awarded the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games in September 2017, during Trump's first term. Wasserman also flattered the president with examples of gold, silver and bronze medals that were given to athletes the last time Los Angeles hosted the Games in 1984. And he offered Trump a chance to carry the Olympic flame -- something he has already done in New York ahead of the Athens Games in 2004. "For the first time in history, we are going to take the Olympic torch relay to all 50 states," Wasserman said. "And sir, if you'd like to run on Park Avenue again to revisit history, you're more than welcome," he told Trump. Trump's second term will coincide with the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Olympics -- two major global sporting events taking place in the United States. He has previously targeted transgender individuals, particularly athletes, and further stated on Tuesday that the "United States will not let men steal trophies from women at the 2028 Olympics."
