Lung Power Peaks in Our 20s—and It's a Steady Decline From There, Study Finds
Scientists at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) led the study, published Thursday in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. After analyzing data from earlier population studies, the researchers found that peak lung function is usually reached by our early 20s and—contrary to current wisdom—continues to steadily decline as we age.
According to lead author Judith Garcia-Aymerich, co-director of the Environment and Health over the Life Course program at ISGlobal, it's been assumed that our lungs follow a specific trajectory: they gradually get stronger until our mid-20s, reach a steady plateau over the next few decades, then decline as we reach middle age. But this assumption was based on studies that only examined lung function at certain time periods, rather than over the course of an entire life.
To bridge this knowledge gap, Garcia-Aymerich's team combined and analyzed data from eight different population studies in Europe and Australia. These studies collectively involved around 30,000 people from the ages of four to 82, and lung function was measured through forced spirometry, a test where people blow out as much air as possible after taking a deep breath.
The researchers first identified two broad stages of lung development: a phase of rapid growth in early childhood, followed by slower, steady growth through the early 20s. On average, this peak was reached around age 20 for women and age 23 for men. Unlike other research, they failed to find any evidence of a steady period of lung function following this peak.
'Previous models suggested a plateau phase until the age of 40, but our data show that lung function starts to decline much earlier than previously thought, immediately after the peak,' said Garcia-Aymerich in a statement released by ISGlobal.
The findings, somber as they are, might help improve how respiratory health is tracked and maintained, the researchers say.
They found that certain risk factors for poor lung health, such as asthma and smoking, might affect lung function a bit differently than suspected, for instance. Chronic asthma appears to weaken lung health at an early age, a weakness that then persists throughout a person's life. Smoking, on the other hand, seems to rapidly worsen a person's lungs starting in the mid-30s. Equipped with this knowledge, it might be possible to intervene early on, the researchers say.
'Early detection of low lung function may allow interventions to prevent chronic respiratory diseases in adulthood,' said Garcia-Aymerich.
While our lungs might not stay in tip-top shape as long as hoped, there are things most anyone can do to keep them as healthy as possible, such as regular physical exercise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
17 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Landfills are Overheating and Neighbors Have Been Getting Sick
Beneath layers of waste, landfills around the US have been reaching scorching temperatures, and neighbors have been getting sick. Bloomberg's Laura Bliss explains. (Source: Bloomberg)
Health Line
34 minutes ago
- Health Line
Can Pressure Points Help Relieve Nausea?
Acupressure involves applying pressure to certain points of your body. Pressing on some of these points may help manage nausea by relaxing muscles and improving blood circulation. Acupressure is different from acupuncture. Rather than using needles, it involves using fingers to apply pressure to certain points of your body. Pressing on these points may help relax muscles and improve blood circulation. There are several pressure points, also called acupoints, that may help with nausea. You can reach some of these yourself. Other pressure points are harder to locate. For those, you'll want to see a trained massage therapist with acupressure experience. It is important to note that acupressure should not be a substitute for medical care. Persistent or severe nausea may require medical treatment. Read on to learn more about the acupressure points that may help relieve nausea. Tips for acupressure When trying acupressure at home, there are a few things to keep in mind: Use your thumb or index finger to massage the pressure points. You can also use more than one finger or the heel of your hand to press on these points. Use firm but gentle pressure. Use a circular motion when applying pressure to these points. Continue treatments for several days or until you begin to feel relief. Do not apply acupressure to open wounds or swollen or painful areas without discussing it with a medical professional. PC6 or P6 (Nei Guan) Pericardium 6 (PC6 or P6) is a pressure point located on the inner side of your wrist. It may help manage nausea and prevent vomiting. To focus on P6: Hold your hand up so that your palm is facing you. To find the right spot, place the first three fingers of your other hand across your wrist at the base of your palm. Place your thumb just below your three fingers. Gently press your thumb so you feel two large tendons. The P6 pressure point is located there, at the center of your lower wrist. Apply gentle pressure to this spot. Repeat on your other wrist. LI4 (He Gu) The large intestine 4 (LI4) point on your hand helps with nausea caused by headaches, pain, and digestive issues. To try it: Find the highest spot on the muscle between your thumb and index finger. This is the area where your thumb connects to the fingers. This area will bulge out slightly when you bring your thumb and finger together. The LI4 point is located about half an inch inward on the back of your hand. Apply pressure to this area. Repeat on your other hand. Avoid if pregnant Although more research is necessary to verify this, most practitioners agree that you shouldn't apply pressure to your LI4 point while you're pregnant. LIV3 or LV3 (Tai Chong) The LIV3 or LV3 (Tai Chong) pressure point on your foot is linked to your liver. A 2012 article suggests that acupuncture focusing on LV3 may reduce headaches, which can be a cause of nausea. While acupuncture is not the same as acupressure, it may be a pressure point you wish to try. To try this point: With your foot flat on the floor, place your finger in the gap between your big toe and the toe next to it. Slide your finger down about two finger widths onto your foot. The pressure point is on your foot in this spot. Apply pressure to this area. Repeat on your other foot. SP4 (Gongsun) This pressure point on the inside of your foot is connected to the spleen. It may help with nausea. To try the spleen 4 (SP4) point: Sit down, and pull one foot onto your knee so that the inside of the foot is facing you. Slide your hand from your big toe to the side of your foot. This point is where your foot begins to arch, just past the padded ball of your feet. You should feel a slight downward curve of the foot in the SP4 point. Apply pressure to this area. Repeat on your other foot. ST36 (Zu San Li) The stomach 36 (ST36) point is located on your lower leg, just below the kneecap. Massaging this point may relieve nausea and pain, as well as help with other health issues. To try it: Sit down, and place your hand on your kneecap. Press on the spot where your pinky finger is resting. The pressure point for nausea is located on the outside of your shin bone, just below the knee. Apply pressure in a downward motion. Repeat on your other knee. BL20 (Pi Shu) This pressure point on your back is linked to the digestive system. It may be best to see an acupressure practitioner to reach this point. To try the BL20 point, also known as UB20: Lie down on your stomach. The practitioner will locate your 11th thoracic spine (T11) on the middle of your back. This spine bone is at the bottom of your rib cage and is connected to the last ribs. The pressure points are on both sides of the spine, about two inches from the edges of the bone. KID21 (Youmen) The kidney 21 (KID21 or KD21) point is used to relieve nausea and vomiting. A 2020 study found that it could help alleviate nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. You'll need an acupressure practitioner to reach this point. To try it: Lie down on your back. The acupressure practitioner will find this point on your upper stomach area. KID21 points are located just below the breastbone on either side of the middle of your stomach. They're located about midway between your collarbone and belly button. The bottom line Acupressure may help manage nausea for some people. To relieve nausea at home, you can try applying pressure to these points. You can also visit a trained acupressure professional. You may need more than one visit to see results. Contact a doctor for advice if you frequently experience nausea. The doctor can help determine the underlying cause and advise on any treatments they recommend.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inquiry hears of older people ‘cull' as Matt Hancock defends care home policies
Care home deaths felt like a 'cull of older people who could no longer contribute to the society', the UK Covid-19 inquiry has heard as Matt Hancock defended his handling of an 'impossible' situation. There were tense exchanges as the former health secretary returned to give evidence to the wide-ranging probe, this time focused on the adult social care sector. Mr Hancock, who resigned from government in 2021 after admitting to breaking social distancing guidance by having an affair with a colleague, responded to an accusation he had 'blatantly lied about the situation with care homes'. At a Downing Street press conference on May 15 2020, Mr Hancock said: 'Right from the start, we've tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes.' Bereaved families have previously called the phrase a 'sickening lie' and a 'joke'. The inquiry has heard there were more than 43,000 deaths involving the virus in care homes across the UK between March 2020 and July 2022, and a civil servant was quoted earlier this week describing the toll as a 'generational slaughter within care homes'. On Wednesday, remarks were read to the inquiry from an anonymous witness, who accused Mr Hancock of not being heartfelt or having a proper understanding of the situation care homes were in during the pandemic. Counsel to the inquiry Jacqueline Carey KC, who gave no further information on the person's identity or their role, said: 'One person in particular said 'He (Mr Hancock) blatantly lied about the situation with care homes, there was no blanket of protection. We were left to sail our own ships. He wasn't heartfelt. He had no understanding or appreciation of the challenges care homes face, pandemic or not, it felt like we were the sacrifice, a cull of older people who could no longer contribute to the society'.' Mr Hancock said he felt it was 'not helpful' for the inquiry to 'exchange brickbats' – a term used to describe a verbal attack. He added: 'I've been through everything that we did as a department, a big team effort, and we were all pulling as hard as we possibly could to save lives – that's what I meant by saying that we tried to throw a protective ring around. 'Of course, it wasn't perfect. It was impossible – it was an unprecedented pandemic, and the context was exceptionally difficult. 'What I care about is the substance of what we did, the protections that we put in place, and most importantly, what we can do in the future to ensure that the options available are better than they were last time.' He said the emphasis was on ''tried' – it was not possible to protect as much as I would have wanted'. He added that he and others were 'trying to do everything that we possibly could' in 'bleak circumstances' at a time when 'I also had (former government adviser) Dominic Cummings and a load of people causing all sorts of problems for me, and I had Covid'. Elsewhere in his evidence, Mr Hancock – who said one of his own relatives died in a care home but did not give further details – acknowledged the policy around discharging patients from hospital into care homes early in the pandemic was an 'incredibly contentious issue'. When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested before admission, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid-19 symptoms being able to spread the virus. The High Court ruled in 2022 that government policies on discharging hospital patients into care homes at the start of the pandemic were 'unlawful'. While the judges said it was necessary to discharge patients 'to preserve the capacity of the NHS', they found it was 'irrational' for the Government not to have advised that asymptomatic patients should isolate from existing residents for 14 days after admission. Asked about the policy, Mr Hancock said there were no good options, adding: 'It's the least-worst decision that could have been taken at the time.' Pressed further, he said he had both agreed with and defended the decision at the time. He added that 'nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives.' He said while the policy had been a government decision, it had been 'driven' by then-NHS chief executive Sir Simon Stevens, now Lord Stevens. The inquiry heard Mr Hancock said in his witness statement that NHS England had 'insisted' on the policy, and while he did not take the decision himself, he took responsibility for it as then-health secretary. Asked about March 17 2020 when NHS bosses were instructed to begin the discharge process, Mr Hancock said officials were 'pushing very hard' to get more PPE (personal protective equipment) into care homes. He said not advising care homes to isolate returning residents without symptoms was a 'mistake', but it was in line with clinical guidance at the time. In 2023, appearing for a separate module of the inquiry, Mr Hancock admitted the so-called protective ring he said had been put around care homes early in the pandemic was not an unbroken one, and said he understood the strength of feeling people have on the issue. Mr Hancock's statement, referred to during Wednesday's hearing, said while there had been 'widespread concern' that patients being discharged from hospital were the main source of infection in care homes, 'we learned in the summer of 2020 that staff movement between care homes was the main source of transmission'. He told the inquiry he had wanted to bring in a ban on staff movement between care homes but that being unable to secure funding from the Treasury to compensate affected workers was a 'killer blocker' so it did not happen. Nicola Brook, a solicitor representing more than 7,000 families from Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK (CBFFJ), said Mr Hancock's claim that the discharge policy had been the least-worst decision available was 'an insult to the memory of each and every person who died'. The CBFFJ group has written to inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett, to express their concern at some 'key decision-makers' not expected to be called in this module, including former prime minister Boris Johnson and Lord Stevens. Outlining the state of the adult social care sector at the outbreak of the pandemic, Mr Hancock said it 'was badly in need of, and remains badly in need of, reform', but rejected the suggestion of it being a 'Cinderella service to the NHS'. He said pandemic contingency plans, prepared by local authorities for adult social care, had been 'as good as useless' at the time, and described a 'hodge podge of accountability' between local councils and government departments. He claimed the situation has 'got worse not better' for care homes in the event of another pandemic hitting, and suggested a series of recommendations, including having isolation facilities in care homes and ensuring a stockpile of personal protective equipment (PPE). Hearings for module six of the inquiry, focused on the effect the pandemic had on both the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector across the UK, are expected to run until the end of July.
