What to know about California's fight over harsher penalties for soliciting sex from older teens
Republicans and some moderate Democrats were pushing for a new tool to help law enforcement go after those who solicit older minors for sex. But some said they worried the measure could be misused and weaponized by parents upset about interracial or LGBTQ+ relationships to target older teens involved in relationships.
The issue came to a head Thursday after Republicans in the Assembly argued for the policy on the floor. Democrats overwhelmingly rejected the effort but vowed to bring a new proposal to address the issue.
Here's what to know:
How does current law protect 16- and 17-year-olds?
Under current law, contacting a person under 18 to engage in sexual activity in California is a felony. So are crimes like soliciting a child who is a victim of human trafficking, sexting a minor and engaging in sex with a minor if the age gap between the parties is more than three years.
It's also a 'serious' crime in California to traffic minors. Anyone convicted of at least three "serious" felonies in California faces a sentence of between 25 years and life in prison under the 'three strikes law.'
'California leads the nation with some of the toughest laws against trafficking,' said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, a Democrat.
What changes are proposed?
Those who are 16 or 17 years old were not included in bipartisan legislation on sex trafficking signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last year. The law, which took effect this year, allows prosecutors to charge those who solicit and buy sex from minors 15 or younger with a felony. It left in place an existing law that limits the penalty for soliciting older teens to a misdemeanor.
Assemblymember Maggy Krell, a Democrat with a background as a prosecutor, wanted to expand the law Newsom signed to include older teens. Children under 18 who are bought for sex are considered victims of human trafficking under federal law and should receive the same protection under California law, she said.
'If you're 17 years old on the street corner and an old man comes up and purchases you for sex, that's rape,' Krell said. 'That should be treated as a felony.'
Why do some Democrats oppose the change?
Democrats on the Assembly Public Safety Committee amended Krell's bill to drop the provision that would make it a felony to solicit and buy sex from older teens. They agreed with Krell's goal but worried the approach could have unintended consequences.
Leigh LaChapelle of the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking told lawmakers at a hearing that the policy could be used to target 16- and 17-year-olds who are in relationships with other minors.
'They are worried about the way that the criminal legal system can be utilized by parents who are upset about interracial and LGBTQ relationships," LaChapelle said.
During Thursday's legislative debate, Democrats said it's important to give prosecutors the discretion to decide on penalties in these cases.
Newsom, first partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom and Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis criticized the committee's actions.
'The law should treat all sex predators who solicit minors the same — as a felony, regardless of the intended victim's age. Full stop,' Newsom's office said in a statement. He rarely comments on pending legislation.
What happens next?
Several moderate Democrats, including Krell, broke with their party Thursday to vote with Republicans. Democrats instead backed an amendment saying they plan to 'adopt the strongest laws to protect 16- and 17-year-old victims.'
'We will have a solution,' Schultz said. 'That's my commitment.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lions hooker Dan Sheehan suspended for four matches after reckless ruck clearout
SYDNEY (AP) — British and Irish Lions hooker Dan Sheehan was suspended for four matches on Monday for his illegal ruck clearout of Australia's Tom Lynagh at the weekend. Sheehan was cited for charging into a ruck and hitting Lynagh's head on Saturday in the third test won by the Wallabies 22-12 in Sydney. At his disciplinary hearing, Sheehan disagreed that foul play occurred. But the panel found it was reckless with a high degree of danger. The panel suspended him from four Leinster club matches in September and October, but allowed him to be available for the fourth match if he completed World Rugby's tackle school. ___
Black America Web
15 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Shocker: Poll Finds Fewer Americans Believe Black People Face Discrimination
Source: Dani DG / Getty In news shocking absolutely no one, a poll recently conducted by the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that fewer Americans believe Black people face significant discrimination as compared to 2021. According to AP, the poll found only 45% of Americans believe Black people faced 'quite a bit' of discrimination. This is down 15% from 2021, where 60% of people believed Black people faced significant discrimination in the wake of George Floyd's murder and the racial uprising that followed. This can be filed under 'disappointing, but not surprising.' It's only been five years since George Floyd's death, yet we've already gone from calls for racial equality to white folks publicly declaring they're fascists and turning 'Black fatigue' into a racist trend. The 2024 election only drove home that for white folks, the 'racial reckoning' was simply a fad they never put much weight behind. The poll also revealed growing skepticism across all demographics and political backgrounds over whether diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are actually helping the people they're designed for, with 4 in 10 Black people believing that DEI initiatives actually increase discrimination against Black people. If I can put on my speculation hat, I think this has less to do with DEI initiatives and more to do with how quickly the conversation around them turned toxic. Almost as soon as the concept of DEI became widespread, there was outrage and backlash from the usual suspects. 'DEI hire' quickly became the mediocre white person's slur of choice whenever they saw an employed Black person. 'Anytime they're in a space that they're not expected to be, like seeing a Black girl in an engineering course … they are seen as only getting there because of those factors,' Claudine Brider, a 48-year-old Black Democrat in Compton, California, told AP. 'It's all negated by someone saying, 'You're only here to meet a quota.'' I can personally attest to that reality. I hosted and produced a gaming show in 2022, which inevitably attracted some of the lamest lames the internet can produce. I cannot tell you how many times I'd see 'DEI hire' in the comments on the videos I hosted, and it'd only been less than two years since DEI entered the public lexicon. In the years since, we've seen DEI falsely blamed for causing plane crashes, wildfires, and bridge collapses. So sadly, it comes as no surprise that we've reached a point where 3 in 10 Americans now believe DEI programs are actually discriminatory against white people, with white people making up 39% of the folks who agree with that assessment. I'm going to assume a disproportionate number of those people currently work for the White House, given that the Trump administration has continually labeled DEI initiatives as discriminatory. The president himself promised 'restitution' for 'victims of DEI discrimination,' shortly after being elected for the second time. Despite the apparent skepticism over the helpfulness of DEI initiatives, another poll earlier this year found that companies that keep their DEI programs have better reputations. Polling also revealed that corporate lawyers and high-level executives believe DEI initiatives are necessary to avoid legal risk. It's long felt like America has gradually been going backward when it came to race relations, and now we have objective data proving it. While it's an objectively crappy reality, at least we can be clear-eyed on where people truly stand. SEE ALSO: SCOTUS Refuses To Review Discrimination Case By Black Dancer Allegedly Told By Club Owners There Were 'Too Many Black Girls' Hair Discrimination, The CROWN Act And Why DEI Matters SEE ALSO Shocker: Poll Finds Fewer Americans Believe Black People Face Discrimination was originally published on
Black America Web
15 minutes ago
- Black America Web
New Study Finds That When Black Women Run For Office They Crush It
Source: Mario Tama / Getty A new report titled 'Black Women in American Politics 2025,' found that not only has there been a steady increase in holding public office, but in 2025, Black women hit record highs in holding state legislative offices. According to the study, released by Higher Heights Leadership Fund and the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, Black women have steadily increased their role in the political universe; serving in statewide offices, state legislatures and Congress over the last decade. Where Black women have really shined is in down ballot races, which have shown to be the stepping stones to higher offices. 'The report found that at one point in 2025, 402 Black women were serving in state legislatures, up from 240 nearly a decade ago,' USA Today reports. 'It's steady progress,' Chelsea Hill, an author of the report, told the newspaper. From USA Today: Since 2014, there's been a 67% increase in the number of Black women in state legislatures, according to the report by Higher Heights, which works to expand Black women's political power, and the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University in New Jersey. State legislatures have long served as a path to Congress. In the more than 10 years since the first report, there's been an acceleration of Black women 'moving along the pipeline,'' said Glynda Carr, president of Higher Heights. Kamala Harris, the first woman of African American descent to hold the vice presidency, also made some historic firsts, last year, with her run to White House. She recently announced that she wouldn't be running for governor of California, but she didn't rule out another run for the White House in 2028. USA Today also noted that Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland, both Democrats, 'made history as the first two Black women to serve in the U.S. Senate at the same time.' The study also found that in the 2024 general election, 63% of Black women congressional nominees won their contests, crushing the win rates of all female candidates at 49% and male candidates at 53% across all races and ethnicities. 'When Black women run, they do win,' Hill told USA Today. 'They have high win rates. At the congressional level, Black women have higher win rates than their counterparts.'' SEE ALSO New Study Finds That When Black Women Run For Office They Crush It was originally published on
