Chris Minns to reveal NSW plans to bolster housing construction
Developers in New South Wales will be able to choose between paying a levy of $12,000 per lot, or building infrastructure such as roads and parks themselves as an 'in kind payment' payment in a further push to speed up the construction of new housing in the state.
The changes will be revealed today by the premier, Chris Minns, ahead of next week's state budget.
It will probably be welcomed by groups like the Property Council of NSW which has long complained that the $12,000 levy adds to developers' financing costs and puts them at the mercy of government agencies to provide infrastructure like roads, parks and schools.
However, past experiments with developer-constructed infrastructure has resulted in serious problems. A housing development at Wilton on Sydney's fringe was without sewer services when homeowners began moving in, leaving residents reliant on having sewerage trucked away.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'You can't build new homes without roads, parks, and schools to match, and the community shouldn't have to wait for them,' Minns said of the new arrangements.
'Whether it's new tax incentives, planning reforms or fast-tracking infrastructure, we're focused on making it faster and easier to build the homes and communities NSW needs.'
The treasurer, Daniel Mookhey, said the government's focus was improving efficiency of investment, and that meant making government investment more effective as well as making private sector investment easier.
'Household income is beginning to be rebuilt, but we do have a challenge of making sure that the economy is growing so living standards are growing … and that we are delivering for people the quality of life that they expect,' he said.
'And so that's what's been sitting behind, thinking around the strategy of this budget, that we have to fix the essentials that people rely upon and set the state up for growth.'
A focus of the budget is likely to be further streamlining investment in planning.
The budget will probably allocate funds to overhaul NSW's planning laws after a round table in February and an offer by the opposition to work on planning reform.
The government has already announced changes to zoning around transport nodes to encourage low and medium density development. The transport oriented development program is designed to build 112,000 new homes within 800 metres of transport within five years.
Mookhey will also announce changes to tax concessions for build-to-rent developments, which are designed to promote investment in developments that offer long-term, stable rental options and in some cases, housing for key workers.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
BTR projects have been slow to gain acceptance among developers in NSW despite a 50% land tax discount, introduced by the previous government. Labor will announce the discount will be extended indefinitely.
Victoria leads the way with 11,098 BTR units either completed or under construction, and another 14,440 in the pipeline – totalling 25,538.
NSW has 3,584 completed or under construction and 11,505 in the pipeline, with the total number of BTR units totalling 15,089.
Build-to-rent developments typically provide returns to investors through long-term and stable rental income.
This means that build-to-rent housing may offer longer-term lease options, better security for tenants, and more housing choice for people at different life stages.
The expiry of the tax concession in 2039 is a key factor affecting investment decisions today, Mookhey said.
The budget, which will be handed down on Tuesday 24 June, will reveal the pressures that natural disasters have put on the state's finances, as well as the increased claims for psychological injuries, particularly by the state's workers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Investors have ‘insatiable appetite' for Edinburgh hotels but other sectors mixed
'In a volatile world, commercial property remains an attractive option for investors' – Alasdair Steele, Knight Frank Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Hotels have emerged as Scotland's top performing area of property investment as the overall market 'pauses for thought' amid geopolitical tensions and a changing policy backdrop, according to new research. Knight Frank's latest study reveals that Scotland's commercial property market attracted some £750 million of investment in the first half of 2025. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The total is down by a fifth on the £925m average for the previous five years, but broadly in line with the trend seen across the UK. That figure includes a particularly strong year in 2022, which if discounted, produces an average of £769m, much closer to the 2025 first-half result. The recent sale of the W Hotel at Edinburgh's St James Quarter was hailed as a landmark transaction. Picture: Jane Barlow The commercial property consultancy's analysis is based on data from Real Capital Analytics (RCA). Hotels were found to be the top-performing asset class, with £213m of investment. That was the second highest figure for the sector during the first six months of the year since 2020, behind only 2024's £235m. Retail was second with £207m-worth of transactions, followed by offices at £152m. Private investors were the most active buyers during the first half of the year, accounting for 40 per cent of investment - the highest share for the six-month period in recent years. International investors were second with 32 per cent of the total. Institutions accounted for 19 per cent, while real estate investment trusts (REITs), listed property companies and occupiers made up the remaining 9 per cent. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Alasdair Steele, head of Scotland commercial at Knight Frank, said 'a lot had happened' in the first six months of 2025, both internationally and closer to home. The St Enoch Shopping Centre in Glasgow also changed hands in a property investment deal. 'The changing geopolitical backdrop has given overseas investors pause for thought,' he noted, 'while the Housing (Scotland) Bill's journey through the Scottish Parliament will be a big influence on appetite for deals in areas like build-to-rent and student accommodation.' 'Nonetheless, Scotland has shown an encouraging level of resilience, with investment holding up well despite the level of uncertainty. That is partly a reflection of the deeper buyer pool, with private investors active while other groups have been quieter than usual. 'At the same time, hotels are emerging as the standout property type, supported by a seemingly insatiable appetite for Edinburgh, in particular,' Steele added. 'With more hotel stock coming online in the city over the next year or so, we could see the strong levels of investment in the sector continue. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'All things being equal, we expect to see a pick up in deal activity during the second half of the year. In a volatile world, commercial property remains an attractive option for investors - and Scotland remains good value within the UK, which itself is widely seen as a safe haven from an international perspective.' The Knight Frank report coincides with new research from Lismore Real Estate Advisors and its latest review of the Scottish investment market, covering the second quarter of 2025. The firm said transaction volumes between April and June appeared 'relatively healthy' at £296m, representing an increase of 9 per cent, compared to the same period last year. However, it noted that two transactions accounted for 48 per cent of total market activity in the latest quarter, with volumes 21 per cent below the five-year average - broadly in line with Knight Frank's findings for the first half. Stripping out landmark transactions, such as Nuveen's £100m sale of the W Hotel at Edinburgh's St James Quarter to Schroders, and Sovereign Centros' £54.4m disposal of St Enoch Shopping Centre in Glasgow to Praxis, total investment volumes were actually down on the same period last year, underlining what has been another 'muted' quarter for the market, Lismore added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chrissie Clancy, an investment surveyor at the property advisor, said Edinburgh's hotel market was continuing to 'outperform', buoyed by strong tourism and business travel. The city's high occupancy and double-digit growth in revenues per available room, or RevPAR, a key industry measure, are said to be driving investor appetite for 'increasingly scarce redevelopment opportunities'. Clancy added: 'The high street retail sector is also regaining momentum. Elsewhere, the market is showing early signs of renewed activity, with Glasgow offices seeing increased interest and several deals under offer.' Lismore said that in a landscape defined by 'economic uncertainty and shifting investor sentiment', consistency had become a 'prized commodity' with Scotland's logistics sector highlighted as a standout example. It noted that logistics has emerged as a 'rare constant', driven by strong occupational demand, critically low supply and renewed investor appetite. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Logistics The firm's quarterly investor research indicates that sentiment towards Scotland's logistics sector remains broadly optimistic. More than half of respondents (56 per cent) expect to be net buyers in the second half of 2025, with just 10 per cent anticipating they will be net sellers. Valentine Beresford, investment director at LondonMetric, said: 'Logistics continues to be our preferred sector, driven by strong demand and chronic supply constraints. While rising debt costs and limited stock present challenges, they're market-wide, not sector-specific. The biggest issue now is the lack of investable opportunities, with strong competition when assets do come to market.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims
Anthony Albanese 's plan to impose a new tax on super balances above $3million is likely to hit more than five million young Australians by retirement and not just 80,000 people as Labor claims, new analysis shows. The re-elected Labor government has the numbers with the Greens to get its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill through the Senate when Parliament resumes next month. For the past two years, Labor has been arguing its plan to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million, before assets are sold, would affect the top 0.5 per cent of super savers or just 80,000 people. This would take the headline tax rate to 30 per cent, as the new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains was added on to the existing 15 per cent tax on earnings during the accumulation phase for all super accounts. Controversially, Labor isn't indexing it for inflation, arguing a future government could do so, like they periodically do for income tax rates. Wilson Asset Management has done new modelling showing this failure to index the new tax would affect 5.4million Australians, aged 18 to 34, by the time they turned 67 and were able to qualify for the age pension. 'All age cohorts under the age of 35 would be captured by the taxation on unrealised gains by retirement,' it said. The modelling showed Labor's new tax on super balances above $3million, known as tax Division 296, would even affect young Aussies with a zero super balance now. 'Our modelling indicates those aged 27 and under with a zero starting superannuation balance would exceed the unindexed cap before retirement,' it said. 'This has led to some characterising it as a "stealth tax", one that fundamentally alters the long-term investment incentives within superannuation.' A 19-year-old worker on a $54,088 salary, with zero super, would have $3.491million in retirement savings by 2071. Someone who is 20 now on a $66,768 salary and just $75,000 in super now would $5.197million in superannuation by 2072. Australians who studied longer before starting work would also be affected, with a 27-year-old worker with zero super, on a $90,315 salary now, like to have $3.098million in super by 2065. A typical income earner, now 34, with $180,000 in super would $3.5million in super by 2058. These Australians would face an annual tax bill in the hundreds of thousands depending how much their fund had growth during the previous financial year. Wilson Asset Management Management founder Geoff Wilson said young Australians would suffer in decades to come. 'The proposed tax on unrealised gains will not merely be a burden on individual superannuation accounts exceeding $3million, the failure to index means a 25- year-old who today starts with a zero-superannuation balance will be captured by the time they reach retirement,' he said. Wilson Asset Management warned that forcing those with a self-managed super fund to sell assets, to avoid going above the $3million threshold, would discourage investors from backing technology start-ups. 'The policy will constrict the flow of essential risk capital to the engine room of the Australian economy – our small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and innovative start-ups,' it said. 'It is a policy that threatens to undermine the foundations of Australia's economic dynamism by inhibiting the very companies that drive innovation, competition, and future growth.' Wilson Asset Management has released a new discussion paper called, 'Critiquing the Proposed Taxation on Unrealised Gains in Superannuation.' AMP last month warned Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains above the $3million threshold would affect the average 22-year-old worker in four decades' time but Wilson Asset Management's modelling shows the effects would capture workers aged 19 to 34 now. Compulsory employer super contributions are rising to 12 per cent on July 1.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Paul Keating says young Australians are guaranteed to have $3m in super by retirement – but not everyone agrees
Paul Keating says the 12% rate of compulsory super contributions from 1 July will 'guarantee' a young Australian joining the workforce today will have more than $3m in savings by the time they retire. A statement from the former prime minister celebrating the day 'the system finally matures' came with an implicit criticism of Labor's proposal to put an extra 15% tax on earnings from super balances over $3m. The Australian Financial Review has reported that the former prime minister has privately blasted as 'unconscionable' the Albanese government's decision to not adjust the threshold each year in line with inflation or wages growth. Keating on Monday wrote that the 12% rate would 'guarantee personal super accumulations in excess of $3m at retirement, reducing the call by the age pension on the Australian budget to 2% of GDP in the 2050s'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The former PM's claim goes further than other critics of the policy, which Treasury estimates will affect 80,000 individuals when it comes into effect. AMP's deputy chief economist, Diana Mousina, said an 'average' 22-year-old earning $98,000 today would breach the $3m limit by the time they retire at age 67. The Financial Services Council has estimated that 204,000 workers under the age of 30 will have super balances of more than $3m by the time they retire – still less than 5% of that group. None have said workers were 'guaranteed' to crack $3m in super savings. And while other tax policy experts have said while indexation is common, they believe it is virtually impossible that the threshold will not be adjusted over the coming years and decades. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Guardian Australia sought clarification on the $3m claim, but Keating was unavailable before deadline for publication. Despite Keating's concerns, the policy is expected to pass parliament with the support of the Greens in the senate. The final scheduled 0.5 percentage-point lift in SG comes 25 years later than Keating hoped when he laid out his vision in a 1991 speech. 'Tomorrow, 34 years after I nominated a 12% wage equivalent as the appropriate level of compulsory contribution into superannuation, the system finally matures,' Monday's statement said. Keating said the advent of compulsory super had slashed the country's reliance on taxpayer-funded pensions, pointing out that France spends 14% of its GDP on public pensions, Germany 10%, and the United States 7%. 'Australia's pension call on the budget is currently just 2.3% of GDP – a sunken level thanks entirely to universal superannuation. 'Superannuation, like Medicare, is now an Australian community standard, binding the whole population as a national economic family, with each person having a place.' He told the AFR that savers would have been between $250,000 and $300,000 better off were it not for John Howard's decision in 1996 to freeze the rate at 9% until 2013.
