
Trump's tax and spending bill passes Congress in major win for president
The 218-214 vote came after weeks of wrangling over the measure that Trump demanded be ready for his signature by Friday, the Independence Day holiday. Written by his Republican allies in Congress and unanimously rejected by Democrats, the bill traveled an uncertain road to passage that saw multiple all-night votes in the House and Senate and negotiations that lasted until the final hours before passage. Ultimately, Republicans who had objected to its cost and contents folded, and the bill passed with just two GOP defections: Thomas Massie, a rightwing Kentucky lawmaker, and Brian Fitzpatrick, who represents a Pennsylvania district that voted for Kamala Harris in last year's election.
'We've waited long enough, some of us have literally been up for days now, but this day – this day – is a hugely important one in the history of our nation,' the Republican House speaker, Mike Johnson, said, just before voting began.
'With one big, beautiful bill, we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before, and every American is going to benefit from that.'
The legislation is expected to speed up and expand Immigration and Customs Enforcement deportations, and will likely make Trump's longstanding desire for a wall along the border with Mexico a reality.
It also strikes a blow against the US government's efforts to fight the climate crisis by phasing out tax incentives created under Joe Biden that were intended to spur investments in electric cars, wind and solar power and other green energy technologies.
The bill's centerpiece is a permanent extension of tax cuts made in 2017, during Trump's first term, as well as the creation of new, temporary exemptions for tips, overtime pay and car loan interest that the president promised voters during last year's campaign.
The government will lose trillions of dollars in revenue from those provisions, and to offset their costs, Republicans approved an array of cuts to Medicaid, the federal program providing health insurance coverage to poor and disabled Americans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap).
Those changes are expected to cost millions of people their benefits, but the bill remains expensive, with the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) saying it will add $3.3tn to the country's debt through 2034.
Democrats blasted the proposal as 'one big, ugly bill' that dismantles anti-poverty programs to fund tax breaks for the wealthy. Analyses have shown that high earners benefited most from Trump's tax policies.
The Democratic House minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries, made a last-ditch effort to halt the bill's passage by delivering a floor speech that lasted eight hours and 44 minutes, the longest ever.
'This is extraordinary. This assault on everyday Americans, assault on children, veterans, seniors, people with disabilities. It's incredible to me, all of this in this one, big, ugly bill,' Jeffries said.
'Ripping food out of the mouths of vulnerable Americans – that's extraordinary that that's what we're doing, extraordinary. And all of this is being done, this unprecedented assault on everyday Americans, is being unleashed on the American people, Mr Speaker, on the most vulnerable among us, all of this is being done to provide massive tax breaks to billionaire donors. Shame on this institution. If this bill passes, that's not America. We're better than this.'
Trump has described the bill as crucial to the success of his second term, and congressional Republicans made its passage their top priority. It was a tall task – the GOP won small majorities in both the House and Senate in last November's election, and could afford no more than three defections in either chamber.
The party's lawmakers broadly support Trump but were divided on a host of other issues. There were lawmakers who wanted big spending cuts, rapid phase-outs of green energy incentives and an expanded deduction that would mostly benefit taxpayers in Democratic-led states. Their demands butted against others who sought to moderate the bill, but over the course of weeks, Republicans leaders managed to forge a compromise.
The bill is only able to affect revenue, spending and the debt limit, under the rules of budget reconciliation that allowed the GOP to avoid a filibuster by Democrats in the Senate. Under Biden, Congress's then Democratic majority had used the same procedure to pass legislation to spur the economy's recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic and curb US carbon emissions.
Trump's bill allocates $45bn for Ice detention facilities, $14bn for deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire 10,000 new agents by 2029. An additional $50bn will go towards the border wall and other fortifications.
Enrollees of Medicaid and Snap will face new work requirements, and states will be forced to share part of the cost of the latter program for the first time ever. The CBO estimates the bill's Medicaid changes could cost as many as 11.8 million people their healthcare, and the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities forecasts about 8 million people, or one in five recipients, may lose their Snap benefits.
The legislation also forces changes to provider taxes, which states use to finance their share of Medicaid spending. That is expected to further increase the financial stress of hospitals in rural areas, and when the bill was in the Senate, a $50bn fund was added to support those facilities.
Some in the GOP were openly nervous about the cuts to safety net programs that their constituents rely on. Thom Tillis, a senator who represents swing state North Carolina, refused to support the bill for those reasons, leading Trump to announce he would support a primary challenger when he stands for re-election next year. Tillis then made public his plans to retire, a potential boost for Democrats' hopes of claiming his seat.
'It is inescapable this bill will betray the promise Donald Trump made,' Tillis said on the Senate floor.
'What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there any more, guys?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court clears way for deportation to South Sudan of several immigrants with no ties there
The Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for the deportation of several immigrants who were put on a flight in May bound for South Sudan, a war-ravaged country where they have no ties. The decision comes after the court's conservative majority found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries. The majority halted an order that had allowed immigrants to challenge any removals to countries outside their homeland where they could be in danger. The court's latest decision makes clear that the South Sudan flight can complete the trip, weeks after it was detoured to a naval base in Djibouti. There, the migrants who had previously been convicted of serious crimes were held in a converted shipping container. It reverses findings from federal Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts, who said his order on those migrants still stands even after the high court lifted his broader decision. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said federal authorities would complete the trip to South Sudan by the next day. The Supreme Court majority wrote that their decision on June 23 completely halted Murphy's ruling and also rendered his decision on the South Sudan flight 'unenforceable.' The court did not fully detail its legal reasoning on the underlying case, as is common on its emergency docket. Two liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, saying the ruling gives the government special treatment. 'Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial,' Sotomayor wrote. Justice Elena Kagan wrote that while she disagreed with the original order, it does countermand Murphy's findings on the South Sudan flight. The eight migrants could face 'imprisonment, torture and even death' in South Sudan, where escalating political tensions have threatened to devolve into another civil war. 'We know they'll face perilous conditions, and potentially immediate detention, upon arrival,' Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said Thursday. The push comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Trump's Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The Trump administration has called Murphy's finding 'a lawless act of defiance.' McLaughlin said the Supreme Court's intervention is 'a win for the rule of law, safety and security of the American people.' Attorney General Pam Bondi called Murphy a 'rogue district court judge' and said the justices had rebuked him. Authorities have reached agreements with other countries to house immigrants if authorities can't quickly send them back to their homelands. The eight men sent to South Sudan in May had been convicted of crimes in the U.S. and had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said. Murphy, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, didn't prohibit deportations to third countries. But he found migrants must have a real chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent to another country, even if they've already exhausted their legal appeals. The men and their guards have faced rough conditions on the naval base in Djibouti, where authorities detoured the flight after Murphy found the administration had violated his order by failing to allow them a chance to challenge the removal. They have since said they're afraid of being sent to South Sudan, Realmuto said.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office 'does not know' how many foreign workers stay in Britain to work illegally after visas expire, MPs warn
The Home Office fails to collect 'basic information' on foreign workers including whether they carry on working illegally in the UK at the end of their visas, MPs have warned. The Commons' Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found the department 'does not know' how many foreign visa holders leave the country when they are supposed to. A damning new report, published today, raised serious concerns about the operation of the skilled worker visa system which was brought in at the end of 2020. It comes after a Daily Mail investigation into a 'cash for care jobs scandal' last year found some agents charging overseas applicants fees of up to £20,000 to help them get a visa allowing them to come – and stay – here. The PAC's report said: 'We asked the Home Office whether it knows if people leave the country when their visa expires. 'The Home Office told us the only way that it can tell if people are still in the country is to match the data it holds on individuals with the passenger data it receives on people using airlines. 'The Home Office has not analysed exit checks since the route was introduced and does not know what proportion of people return to their home country after their visa has expired, and how many may be working illegally in the United Kingdom.' It added that officials had told the committee the problem 'was not solved' but there was 'scope to strengthen exit checks' under a new digital visa system currently being rolled out. The cross-party committee of MPs urged the Home Office to do far more to tackle visa overstayers. It recommended the department should 'undertake a full assessment … to identify gaps in its response', including studies of specific work sectors which should be updated every six months. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper should also make sure the Home Office can 'identify what data is needed to strengthen its response, including how to better understand what happens to people at the end of their visa', it added. PAC chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said: 'From when the government opened the skilled worker visa route in December 2020 up to the end of 2024, 1.18million people applied to enter the UK. 'Our report finds that this speed came at a painfully high cost – to the safety of workers from the depredations of labour market abuses, and the integrity of the system from people not following the rules. 'There has long been mounting evidence of serious issues with the system, laid bare once again in our inquiry. 'And yet basic information, such as how many people on skilled worker visas have been modern slavery victims, and whether people leave the UK after their visas expire, seems to still not have been gathered by government.' In the wake of the visa changes in 2020, net migration – the difference between those coming to live long-term in Britain and those emigrating – hit a record 906,000 in the 12 months to June 2023. It then fell to 413,000 last calendar year after the Tory government tightened the rules. A visa allowing overseas recruitment of care workers was particularly vulnerable to abuse, and saw 648,100 applications, including dependants, between 2022 and last year. Earlier this week the Home Office set out measures to phase out foreign care worker recruitment, plus a range of other new restrictions on other types of visa. Sir Geoffrey added: 'Further changes are now underway in this system, with an end to the overseas recruitment of care workers. 'Without effective cross-government working, there is a risk that these changes will exacerbate challenges for the care sector. 'Government now needs to develop a deeper understanding of the role that immigration plays in sector workforce strategies, as well as how domestic workforce plans will help address skills shortages. 'Government no longer has the excuse of the global crisis caused by the pandemic if it operates this system on the fly, and without due care.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump's White House visit with struggling Boston Red Sox baffles baseball fans
The last time the Boston Red Sox visited Donald Trump 's White House was when the club was the reigning World Series champion back in May of 2019. On Thursday, with a record of just 43-45 entering a weekend series with the Washington Nationals, an entirely different group of Red Sox players were greeted by President Trump in the Oval Office. 'Why is a team that is 43-45 at the White House?' a fan asked in response to a White House video showing players shaking hands with Trump at the Resolute desk. The confusion was understandable. Typically, such White House visits are reserved for champions, and unless the sub-.500 Red Sox are supremely confident in their playoff chances, their presence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. was a bit presumptuous. But as it turns out, the Red Sox were not prematurely celebrating a tenth World Series title. Instead, 'the team participated in a tour of the White House as part of their family trip to DC this weekend,' a club spokeswoman told Daily Mail. It's unclear if players' parents were also on the tour, or who arranged the meet-and-greet opportunity on Thursday as the Red Sox spokeswoman did not respond to those specific questions. Regardless, Trump did get a laugh out of some members of the Red Sox roster. When Boston reliever Justin Wilson introduced himself, Trump joked: 'I know every one of you.' The President would get another chuckle from the crowd after receiving praise from another reliever. 'Great job,' Brennan Bernardino told Trump, who acted as if he expected the compliment. 'I know that,' the 79-year-old executive said, generating a few more giggles from players. Beyond the confusion over the players' presence in the Oval Office was the outrage among some Boston fans. 'We found a way to lose on an off day,' one remarked. 'Don't see why [manager Alex] Cora would let them go and see this guy,' one fan wondered. Cora and then-Red Sox star Mookie Betts both skipped Boston's White House trip in May of 2019 as the team was celebrating its 2018 title. However, Betts was on hand this April when he and the reigning-champion Los Angeles Dodgers visited Trump in Washington. 'Mookie Betts, aww is he good,' Trump said Monday before finding the 5-foot-9 former MVP on stage among his teammates. Trump went over and shook Betts hand before exchanging a few words and returning to the podium.