Class Action Alert: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE) Investors of August 1, 2025 Deadline
https://zlk.com/pslra-1/fortrea-holdings-inc-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=157693&wire=5&utm_campaign=17
or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at jlevi@levikorsinsky.com or call (212) 363-7500 to speak to our team of experienced shareholder advocates.
Cannot view this video? Visit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIQSg7_r0dk
THE LAWSUIT: A class action securities lawsuit was filed against Fortrea Holdings Inc. that seeks to recover losses of shareholders who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between July 3, 2023 and February 28, 2025.
CASE DETAILS: The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that: (i) Fortrea overestimated the amount of revenue the long-term projects in its portfolio, the Pre-Spin Projects, were likely to contribute to the Company's 2025 earnings; (ii) Fortrea overstated the cost savings it would likely achieve by exiting the transition services agreements; (iii) as a result, the Company's previously announced EBITDA targets for 2025 were inflated; (iv) accordingly, the viability of the Company's post-spin-off business model, as well as its business and/or financial prospects, were overstated; and (v) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Fortrea Holdings Inc. stock during the relevant time frame - even if you still hold your shares - go to https://zlk.com/pslra-1/fortrea-holdings-inc-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=157693&wire=5&utm_campaign=17 to learn about your rights to seek a recovery. There is no cost or obligation to participate.
WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky LLP has established itself as a nationally-recognized securities litigation firm that has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. The firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Can Buying $10,000 of Nvidia Stock Still Make You a Millionaire?
Key Points Nvidia would have to grow to nearly 4x last year's global GDP to turn $10,000 into $1 million. Achieving this goal is theoretically possible, but highly improbable. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › If you had invested $10,000 in Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) on the day of its initial public offering in 1999 and never sold, you'd have a whopping $42.4 million today. Even if you had waited until 2015 to buy $10,000 of the stock and held on for the wild ride, your investment would be worth roughly $3.58 million now. But, as the old saying goes, hindsight is 20/20. Can buying $10,000 of Nvidia stock still make you a millionaire? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » What it would take Let's first address what it would take for a $10,000 investment in Nvidia to make you a millionaire. The math is simple: Since $1 million divided by $10,000 is 100, Nvidia would need to deliver a 100x gain. Most stocks aren't able to produce that kind of return, even over a lifetime. However, Nvidia has done it in less than nine years. Admittedly, it's hard to envision Nvidia doing it again. After all, the GPU maker now sports a market cap of over $4.2 trillion -- the highest valuation for any company ever. To turn $10,000 into $1 million, Nvidia's market cap would have to grow to a mind-blowing $420 trillion. To put that figure into perspective, the U.S. GDP last year was roughly $29.2 trillion. The GDP for the entire world was around $110.5 trillion. All Nvidia would have to do to make you a millionaire with a $10,000 investment is to grow to 3.8 times the economic output of every country on the planet. Easy, peasy, right? Potential scenarios It's hard to envision how Nvidia could grow 100x. However, I can come up with two potential scenarios where it could at least theoretically happen. The first scenario involves Nvidia achieving a revolutionary breakthrough that gives it a monopoly on technology that everyone wants. Maybe the company builds a teleportation device that allows people and products to be instantly transported anywhere. Perhaps a more likely goal would be to create AI superintelligence, an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system that's smarter than any human who has ever lived. Nvidia has teamed up with partners, including Turing, who are trying to develop AGI systems. The company's GEAR group (GEAR stands for "generalist embodied agent research") is trying to build foundation models, agents, and robots that might eventually achieve AGI. The second scenario requires time and consistently strong earnings growth. Nvidia's earnings jumped 31% year over year in the first quarter of 2025. Stock prices tend to track earnings growth over the long term. If we assume that Nvidia continues to grow by 31% for the next 17 or so years, its share price would increase by 100x. However, to deliver such stellar growth over such a long period, Nvidia might need a game-changing breakthrough mentioned in the first scenario. Facing long odds Is it possible that buying $10,000 of Nvidia stock right now could make you a millionaire? Sure. Is it probable? No way. The odds against Nvidia delivering a 100x gain are enormous. Of course, that's true for pretty much any other stock. However, I suspect that Nvidia could still make investors millionaires. It'll just take more money and potentially a long time. If you want $10,000 to turn into $1 million, though, you might have to find a smaller stock with tremendous growth prospects -- in other words, another Nvidia of 10 to 20 years ago. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
The Stock Warren Buffett Spent $78 Billion Buying Over the Last 7 Years Is Slumping, and It Begs the Question: Has the Oracle of Omaha Lost His Touch?
Key Points Warren Buffett has purchased close to $78 billion worth of his favorite stock since the midpoint of 2018 -- and you won't find it listed in Berkshire Hathaway's quarterly 13F filings. However, Berkshire's billionaire chief hasn't spent a dime buying shares of this stock for at least three quarters -- and there's a good reason why. Buffett sticking to his roots and purposefully sitting on his hands until valuations make sense shouldn't be misconstrued as weakness. 10 stocks we like better than Berkshire Hathaway › Berkshire Hathaway 's (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) billionaire CEO Warren Buffett is widely viewed as Wall Street's greatest money manager. Without relying on fancy charting software or algorithms, the aptly named Oracle of Omaha became one of the richest people in the world and watched Berkshire grow into one of only 11 public companies worldwide to ever hit a $1 trillion valuation. Buffett's track record -- he's overseen a 5,868,186% cumulative return in Berkshire Hathaway's Class A shares (BRK.A) in six decades -- has earned him a huge following, which includes investors who aim to mirror his trading activity. But with Warren Buffett's most-purchased stock over the last seven years recently falling more than 10% as the broad-based S&P 500 and growth-fueled Nasdaq Composite power to fresh all-time highs, the question has to be asked: Has Berkshire's billionaire CEO lost his touch? Warren Buffett's favorite stock is a company near and dear to his heart Most investors track the Oracle of Omaha's buying and selling activity by following Berkshire Hathaway's quarterly Form 13F filings. This required filing for institutional investors with at least $100 million in assets under management concisely lists all buying and selling activity from the previous quarter. However, there's a catch: Buffett's favorite stock to buy isn't listed in his company's quarterly filed 13Fs. To get the skinny on this top stock, you'll need to dig into Berkshire Hathaway's quarterly operating results. On the final page of each quarterly report, just prior to the executive certifications, you'll find a detailed breakdown of exactly how much Wall Street's most-revered billionaire money manager spent on his favorite stock (cue the dramatic music)... which happens to be shares of his own company. Prior to July 2018, Warren Buffett and now-late right-hand man Charlie Munger were only allowed to repurchase shares of Berkshire Hathaway stock if it fell to or below 120% of book value (i.e., no more than 20% above listed book value). Unfortunately, Berkshire's stock never fell to or below this line-in-the-sand threshold, which resulted in no buyback activity. On July 17, 2018, Berkshire's board amended and simplified the rules governing buybacks to two criteria. It allowed the Oracle of Omaha to repurchase shares with no ceiling or end date as long as: Berkshire has at least $30 billion in combined cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. Treasuries on its balance sheet; and Buffett views shares of his company as intrinsically cheap. This latter point is purposefully vague so as to give Buffett the discretion to put his company's capital to work via buybacks whenever he feels it's appropriate. Between July 1, 2018, and March 31, 2025, Berkshire's billionaire chief bought back almost $78 billion worth of his company's shares. This is more than Buffett has spent buying Berkshire's existing stakes in Apple, Bank of America, American Express, Coca-Cola, and Chevron, combined. But the Oracle of Omaha's favorite stock is slumping. As of this writing on July 23, it's down more than 10% from its all-time closing high in early May. Perhaps more importantly, it's underperforming the benchmark S&P 500 on a year-to-date basis. Berkshire Hathaway's slump is a sign of Buffett's resolve and shouldn't be confused with weakness With Berkshire's billionaire chief set to turn 95 in less than five weeks, as well as retiring from the CEO role at the end of this year, few investors would fault him for losing his touch. But what we're witnessing with Berkshire's stock at the moment isn't a sign of Buffett failing. Rather, it's validation of his resolve and investment philosophies. During his six decades as CEO, Buffett has bent a few of his own unwritten investment rules. For instance, while he's often viewed as a long-term investor, he and his top advisors purchased shares of gaming giant Activision Blizzard in 2022 as a short-term arbitrage opportunity given Microsoft 's $95-per-share all-cash offer to acquire the company. But the one investment philosophy Warren Buffett hasn't wavered on in six decades is his desire to get a good deal. Value is of the utmost importance to Berkshire Hathaway's billionaire chief. No matter how much he appreciates a company's competitive edge, brand, and/or management team, he's not going to buy shares if the valuation doesn't make sense. When Buffett green-lit the cumulative purchase of nearly $78 billion worth of his favorite stock over 24 quarters (six years), Berkshire Hathaway stock consistently traded at a 30% to 50% premium to its book value. But between July 1, 2024, and March 31, 2025, Buffett hasn't spent a dime to repurchase his company's stock. The reason? Berkshire's premium to book climbed to between 60% and 80%. Even shares of the Oracle of Omaha's own company are off-limits when the valuation no longer makes sense. BRK.A Price to Book Value data by YCharts. However, Buffett's cold-turkey approach with his own company's stock isn't unique. He's been a net-seller of equities for 10 consecutive quarters, with $174.4 billion more in stocks sold than purchased. Back in 2001, in an interview with Fortune magazine, Buffett referred to the market-cap-to-GDP ratio as, "probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment." This valuation tool, which divides the cumulative value of all public companies by U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), has averaged a multiple of 85% when back-tested to 1970. This is to say that the aggregate value of all publicly traded stocks has equaled about 85% of U.S. GDP over 55 years. As of the closing bell on July 22, the " Buffett Indicator," as this valuation measure is now more-commonly known, hit a record high of 212.23%! Value isn't just hard to come by in this market -- it's practically nonexistent. What we're witnessing from Buffett isn't weakness. Rather, we're seeing a time-tested investor sticking to his roots and purposefully sitting on his hands until valuations make sense. Though there's no timeline as to when valuations will fall back into Warren Buffett's (or successor Greg Abel's) wheelhouse, patience has proved to be a virtue and substantial moneymaker in the past for Berkshire's CEO and the company's shareholders. Should you invest $1,000 in Berkshire Hathaway right now? Before you buy stock in Berkshire Hathaway, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Berkshire Hathaway wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
The U.S. economy is thriving in spite of tariffs. Will it last?
By just about every indicator, the U.S. economy is holding up remarkably well. When Donald Trump launched his global trade war, economists and markets said his tariff policy would slow the economy, drive up prices and dramatically reduce global trade. And yet, stocks are at all-time highs, the country's employment is strong, its economy is expanding and the expected surge in inflation hasn't materialized. Canada's economy has shown surprising resilience, as well, with consumer spending starting to pick up last month and unemployment declining. Economists told CBC News it's unclear whether the tariffs' impact was overestimated, or if further pain lies ahead. But they say resilience in both countries is fragile, and could be quickly upended if the trade war worsens or expands. A lack of retaliation BMO's chief economist Douglas Porter says two key factors are driving the recent U.S. resilience. "Other nations have not really been retaliating against the U.S., so their own exports are not facing that much pressure. And on the flip side, the U.S. consumer has been pretty heavily sheltered so far from this," said Porter. In the meantime, American businesses have not passed on the costs of tariffs. General Motors, for example, released earnings last week that said Trump's tariff policies drove down profits by 35 per cent in the second quarter. The automaker said tariffs on cars and parts led to a $1.1-billion US loss in its quarterly earnings. But still, it has not increased prices. Royce Mendes, managing director at Desjardins Capital Markets, says that's becoming a trend among affected American companies. "Some companies may choose to just eat the tariff increase in costs rather than draw the ire of President Trump," said Mendes. GM stock fell on the news, but has since rebounded, paring losses and climbing almost all the way back to where it was before it published its earnings. Financial markets have had some pretty volatile sessions, including steep sell-offs when tariffs are announced, and big rallies when exemptions are made. But stock markets in both Canada and the U.S. are at or near record highs — which investors believe is a sign that the resilience we're seeing will last. A stockpile of products The question, though, is whether the impact of the tariffs has simply been delayed. When the levies were first announced last spring, businesses around the world scrambled to get product out the door and into the United States. That has led to a huge stockpile of products — and it means American importers have not yet had to bear the worst of the tariffs. WATCH | The future of Canada-U.S. free trade: Is Canada-US free trade dead? | About That 4 days ago North American free trade is teetering on the edge of uncertainty as U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs continue to complicate how goods come and go. Andrew Chang explores signs that free trade — as we've come to know it — is on its way out, and challenges that may lie ahead in renegotiating the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters. "There was a lot of front-running and that may be one of the big reasons why we haven't seen much impact yet," said BMO's Porter. "There's probably some pain to come, but I don't think it's going to be as bad as many economists were fretting about earlier this year, at least for the U.S." Canada's economy has shown resilience, too But both economists point to the fact that Canada's economy has also fared better than almost anyone had expected. Economic growth shrank in April, but only by 0.1 per cent. Statistics Canada says another 0.1 per cent decline is likely for May. (Those numbers will be confirmed on Thursday.) The unemployment rate has actually begun to decline since peaking in May at seven per cent. And last week's retail sales figures showed consumer spending had started to pick up again in June. "We've been pointing to this broader resilience in consumer spending," said Claire Fan, a senior economist with RBC. She says consumer sentiment plunged in the spring, at the height of the uncertainty. But since then, RBC crunched U.S. customs data and found exemptions for CUSMA-compliant products have dragged the average effective tariff rate all the way down to as low as 2.3 per cent. "It's a reflection of President Trump's overall strategy of coming out very aggressive early on, but then walking things back. I mean, the tariffs have not been as punitive for Canada as initially believed — nowhere close to it," said Mendes of Desjardins. Sector-specific pain However, real damage has been done in sectors like auto, steel, aluminum and lumber. The concern now is that the carve-outs Canada has secured for CUSMA-compliant products won't last. "Unless a trade deal is reached to significantly reduce U.S.-Canada tariffs by Aug. 1, when new U.S. tariffs are set to come into effect, we expect job losses and higher prices from tariffs to squeeze disposable income and cause households to tighten their purse strings," wrote Michael Davenport, senior economist at Oxford Economics in a note to clients. WATCH | Negotiations continue between Canada and the U.S.: Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C., said Canada will only accept a deal when there is one in the best interest of workers and the Canadian economy on the table. On the one hand, some in the Trump administration will look at the U.S. economy's relative resilience as a reason to double down and push harder for more and more punitive tariffs. But escalation wouldn't just be bad for the Canadian economy. Right now, most businesses and consumers on both sides of the border have been sheltered from the worst impacts of the tariffs. That shelter depends on a fine and tricky balance of importers eating some costs, exporters dropping some prices and countries limiting retaliatory measures. Upending that balance further comes with risks on both sides of the dispute.
