Which countries are quitting a key landmine treaty and why?
NATO members Finland, Poland and the three ex-Soviet Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - have either withdrawn from the convention or indicated that they would do so, citing the increased military danger from their neighbour.
The moves threaten to reverse decades of campaigning by activists who say there should be a global ban on a weapon that blights huge swathes of territory and maims and kills civilians long after conflicts have abated.
Countries that quit the 1997 treaty, one of a series of international agreements concluded after the end of the Cold War to encourage global disarmament, will be able to start producing, using, stockpiling and transferring landmines once again.
COUNTRIES EXITING
All European countries bordering Russia have announced plans to quit the global treaty, apart from Norway, which has only a 200km border with Russia in its remote Arctic far north, and said it was important to maintain stigma around landmines.
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Sunday (Jun 29) that he had signed a decree to pull Ukraine out of the Convention because Russia has used anti-personnel mines extensively in parts of Ukraine during the 40-month-old war.
Anti-personnel mines, Zelenskyy said, are "often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes".
Some European countries have said they fear that Russia could use any pause in fighting to re-arm and target them.
Officials have suggested a withdrawal could put them on more of an equal footing with Russia, which has not signed or ratified the treaty. Other major powers that have not signed include the United States and China.
In mid-June, United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres raised grave concerns about recent withdrawal announcements and urged all states to adhere to existing treaties and immediately halt any steps towards their withdrawal.
FUNDING CUTS
As countries quit the convention, global demining efforts are also backsliding amid "crippling" US funding cuts under President Donald Trump, according to the International Campaign to Ban Landmines. Washington had provided more than US$300 million a year, or 40 per cent of total international support for removing mines, according to the Landmine Monitor report in 2024.
A State Department official said in March it had restarted some global humanitarian demining programmes and activities, without giving details. It has previously run major programmes in Iraq, Afghanistan and Laos.
Anti-personnel landmines are generally hidden in the ground and designed to detonate automatically when someone steps on them or passes nearby. More than 80 per cent of mine victims are civilians, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross.
The convention includes provisions to assist victims, many of whom have lost limbs and suffer from other permanent disabilities.
In June 2025, the UN reported that Ukraine had become the most mined country in the world. It said there had been around 800 civilian casualties due to unexploded ordnance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
EU unveils long-delayed 2040 climate target, with wiggle room
BRUSSELS: The EU on Wednesday (July 2) unveiled its long-delayed target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, but with contested new flexibilities built in to win over the most sceptical member states. After months of tough negotiations, Brussels said it would stick to the headline objective announced last year of cutting emissions by 90 per cent by 2040, compared to 1990 levels. The proposal comes as much of Europe roasts in an early summer heatwave, which scientists say is becoming more intense, frequent and widespread due to human-induced climate change. The 2040 target, which needs sign off from the European Union's member states and parliament, is a key milestone towards the bloc's goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050. Brussels says the EU has already cut climate-warming emissions by 37 per cent relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate scepticism in many European countries. EU climate chief Wopke Hoekstra acknowledged the "sensitive" debate, saying Brussels was keeping an "ambitious" goal while being "pragmatic and flexible on how to achieve it". To sway resistant capitals, the European Commission proposes that from 2036, the bloc's 27 countries can count carbon credits purchased to finance projects outside Europe, for up to three per cent of their emission cuts. Climate campaigners are broadly opposed to the measure. Backed by scientific studies and the commission's science advisers, they say factoring in international credits -- for things like tree-planting or renewable-energy projects -- risks undermining the EU's efforts to shift away from fossil fuels. "While this is a step in the right direction, by sneaking in international offsets and leaning heavily on supposed future carbon removals, the European Commission has built loopholes into the heart of the proposal," WWF EU said. "Three per cent is not insignificant," echoed Neil Makaroff, an expert at the climate-focused Strategic Perspectives think tank. "These are potentially considerable sums that will be spent abroad instead of financing the transition" in Europe."But there's a political compromise to be found," said Makaroff -- stressing the importance of "delivering" on the headline target. MAJOR TRANSFORMATIONS NEEDED To reach the 2040 and 2050 objectives, Europe's industry and citizens will have to undertake major transformations, including increased uptake of electric cars, the gradual phasing out of fossil fuels and making buildings more energy-efficient. "Today we show that we stand firmly by our commitment to decarbonise Europe's economy by 2050," EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said. EU environment ministers will discuss the objective at a meeting in mid-July, ahead of a vote expected on September 18. EU lawmakers also need to greenlight the target, which requires the support from the biggest group in parliament, the centre-right EPP. To win others over, Brussels also proposes to make it more financially attractive for companies that capture and store CO2. The commission's hope is that the 2040 objective will be approved before the UN climate conference (COP30) in November in the northern Brazilian city of Belem. But that gives little time for negotiations with sceptical nations, with whom Hoekstra has already spent months trying to build a compromise. For some states, including the Czech Republic, the 90-per cent target is unrealistic. Meanwhile, others, including Italy and Hungary, worry about the burden of decarbonising heavy industry at a time when Europe is working to strengthen its industry in the face of fierce competition from the United States and China. French President Emmanuel Macron wants guarantees for the decarbonisation of industry and support for nuclear energy, the largest source of power in France. But the commission can count on the support of other countries, including Spain and Denmark, which took over the rotating EU presidency this week. And the three-per-cent "flexibility" -- which mirrors demands made in the new German government's coalition agreement -- should help keep the economic powerhouse on board. When it comes to Europe's international commitments, Macron has also stressed the bloc is only bound to present a midway target for 2035 at COP30 in Belem, and not the 2040 objective.
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Military aid increasingly focuses on boosting Ukraine's defence industry
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: The sign in front of the main entrance of the United States Army's European headquarters, Lucius D. Clay barracks, is pictured in Wiesbaden's Erbenheim district July 18, 2013. REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach(/File Photo WIESBADEN, Germany - Fenced off behind barbed wire, about 350 soldiers from 31 countries including Ukrainians work in a hangar and air-conditioned green tents at a U.S. military base in Germany. Their job at the Clay Barracks in Wiesbaden is to match Kyiv's needs in terms of weapons, equipment and training with offers received from donor countries in NATO and outside the Western alliance as Russia's war in Ukraine drags on. Six months after NATO set up a command centre at the base to coordinate military aid for Ukraine, military assistance for Kyiv is evolving, especially when it comes to drone production. After Russia's invasion in 2022, NATO states provided support for Kyiv's military effort largely by depleting their own inventories and Ukraine was heavily dependent on Western defence firms. Military aid today is increasingly shifting towards bolstering Kyiv's defence industry, Major General Maik Keller, deputy commander of NATO's Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine (NSATU), told Reuters at the mission's headquarters in Wiesbaden. "Now, we need to change our focus," Keller said in an interview at Clay Barracks. He said Ukraine had shown creativity, and praised the speed of its innovation, production and certification processes. The manufacture of drones was an area where NATO states could learn and even eventually buy weapons from Kyiv, he said. "Defence procurement is not a one-way street. Looking at drones, there is certainly a lot that we might want to buy from Ukraine, though, for now, I believe they need their entire output themselves," Keller said. NATO's Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, Admiral Keith Blount, also says Western allies may learn a lot from Ukraine, in particular on autonomous weapons such as drones. "We're learning about power of autonomy in a way that we always imagined was the future, but we are seeing it accelerated perhaps even faster than any of us could have imagined", Blount told Reuters while visiting NSATU's headquarters. He was referring to the use of drones on the sea, beneath the sea and on the ground as well as in the air. "That has been logarithmic, really, in the pace of adoption and actually the ability for Ukraine not just to learn how to use them, but learn how to make them, which has been fascinating," he said. PRESSING NEEDS Military assistance to Ukraine is evolving as European allies and Canada prepare to increase defence spending amid concerns over Russia's military ambitions and following demands by U.S. President Donald Trump. The companies that are producing arms for use by Ukraine will also be needed by NATO members to increase their own weapons stocks, Keller said. Keller said Ukraine's most pressing needs were air defence systems, ammunition and anti-tank mines to hold territory without tying down too many troops in the war with Russia. NSATU was established partly to make Western military aid less dependent on the United States, whose commitment to Ukraine under Trump has been called into question. A decision by Washington to halt some weapons shipments to Kyiv has underlined those concerns, prompting new concerns in Ukraine on Wednesday about its ability to defend itself. The United States, however, provides NSATU's commander and about 9% of its personnel in Wiesbaden. Most supplies are shipped to Ukraine through a NSATU hub in Poland, which NATO says sends in 18,000 tons each month, and a second hub is being established in Romania. Keller said he expected military aid channelled by NSATU to remain at least steady for now but that this depended on what political decisions were taken. Asked whether NSATU would be capable of sustaining Ukraine's resistance should the U.S. drop out, he said: "Yes." He also cautioned, however, that "Europe and Canada would be hard pressed" to replace some critical capabilities such as satellite surveillance although he made clear NSATU itself was not making use of satellite imagery. REUTERS
CNA
11 hours ago
- CNA
China not EU's adversary but security ties under strain, says Kaja Kallas ahead of Wang Yi meeting
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi will meet his EU counterpart Kaja Kallas for a high-level strategic dialogue later today. He is in Brussels for his first stop in a European tour that includes Germany and France. Ahead of the meeting, Ms Kallas acknowledged that China is not Europe's adversary, but said security ties are strained. She said Chinese firms are aiding Russia's war efforts in Ukraine, and accused Beijing of being behind cyberattacks in Europe. Ross Cullen reports from Paris.
