
Inside Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham's decades-long feud - as former lovers spark reunion rumours following cryptic Instagram posts
Fleetwood Mac 's Stevie, 77, and Lindsey, 75, both based in the US, shared related Instagram posts of the lyrics from their song Frozen Love, which they released under their pop-duo group Buckingham Nicks in 1973.
The move came as a massive surprise to fans, with most under the impression that the pair's tumultuous romance and eventual breakup left their relationship beyond repair.
'And if you go forward…' Stevie's graphic read. Then, only half an hour later, Buckingham shared his own picture, with the line, 'I'll meet you there.'
Fans quickly took to social media to question what the posts mean. Some claimed that it meant the musicians have finally found resolution after their messy 1976 breakup, while others thought it means new music is on the way.
'Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham following each other in the year of 2025, after their fallout is proof that it's never over and you can have a 60-year-old situationship with your ex,' one user joked on X.
Speculation heightened because Stevie and Lindsey followed each other on Instagram, despite their thorny relationship between 1972 and 1976, and emotionally charged performance of Silver Springs in Burbank, California, one year later.
Here, Femail explores the highs and lows of Stevie and Lindsey's romance, from the formation of Buckingham Nicks to the Fleetwood Mac glory days and the bombshell post-break up claims.
The pair met at Menlo-Atherton High School in California, when Nicks was a senior and Buckingham a junior.
It was during a Christian youth music group when Buckingham strummed California Dreamin' and Nicks harmonized that they realised their potential together.
The duo first joined a band called Fritz before settling on forming their own rock duo in 1971, called Buckingham Nicks.
Nicks waited tables and cleaned houses to support them while Buckingham lounged all day with his friends, including Warren Zevon, she has said. 'I was making $50 a week cleaning,' Nicks once recalled to Rolling Stone.
'I'd come in every day and have to step over these bodies. Me, I've just been cleaning. I'm tired. I'm pickin' up their legs and cleaning under them and emptying out the ashtrays,' she recalled.
The rock and roll couple were posing for the cover art on their self-titled first album in 1975 when a photographer told her to take off her blouse, according to Stephen Davis' biography of Nicks, Gold Dust Woman.
She didn't want to do it, and Buckingham lost it, shouting: 'Don't be a f**king child, this is art!'
Despite initial differences, the pair got an opportunity in 1975 when drummer Mick Fleetwood recruited the pair to join Fleetwood Mac.
The duo were both admitted and completed the band's enduring line-up alongside Mick Fleetwood, Christine McVie and John McVie.
'When they first joined the band, Lindsey had control [over Nicks],' Mick Fleetwood told Davis in the biography. 'And, very slowly, he began to lose control. And he really didn't like it.'
With Nicks fronting the act, the band shot to stardom. But Buckingham was madly jealous that Nicks' songs 'Rhiannon' and 'Landslide,' about their fading romance, were more popular than his own, the biography claimed.
Ahead of the band's landmark album Rumours, which was released in 1977 and would later earn them a Grammy, the couple ended their love affair.
'I don't even remember what the issues were; I just know that it got to the point where I wanted to be by myself,' Nicks told Rolling Stone of the split.
'It just wasn't good anymore, wasn't fun anymore, wasn't good for either of us anymore. I'm just the one who stopped it.'
The ill-feeling between the on-off couple acted as a catalyst for songs such as Second Hand News and Never Going Back, which saw Buckingham write some very spiky lyrics, seemingly directed at his former love.
The most controversial was seemingly his Go Your Own Way, which states: 'Tell me why everything turned around, packing up, shacking up is all you want to do.'
And Nicks felt aggrieved at the sentiment. She told the publication: 'I very, very much resented him telling the world that 'packing up, shacking up' with different men was all I wanted to do.
'He knew it wasn't true. It was just an angry thing that he said. Every time those words would come out onstage, I wanted to go over and kill him.
When recording the band's 1977 album, 'Rumours,' he demeaned Nicks' songwriting and told her she needed him to make her songs sound halfway decent.
She said he was 'hijacking' her music and told her mother that Buckingham had 'thrown her down to the floor' when the two were arguing.
'He knew it, so he really pushed my buttons through that. It was like, ''I'll make you suffer for leaving me.' And did. For years.'
The singer said that she 'never brought men around' in case it added fuel to the fire, but that Buckingham 'immediately got girlfriends.'
But towards the end of the band's Rumours tour, Nicks seemingly looked closer to home for her next tryst after having an affair with married bandmate Mick Fleetwood.
The singer said that the pair would never had hooked up, had they not been intoxicated on a cocktail of drugs and alcohol.
Nicks said that the band were spending 'gazillions' on drugs during the '70s and admitted that used to carry a gram of cocaine in her boot at all times.
She revealed: 'It was the first thing I thought of when I woke up in the morning and the last thing I thought of before I went to bed.'
'Mick and I would never have had an affair had we not had a party and all been completely drunk and messed up and coked out, and, you know, ended up being the last two people at the party,' she told Oprah's Master Class.
'So guess what? It's not hard to figure out what happened – and what happened wasn't a good thing. It was doomed. It was a doomed thing, caused a lot of pain for everybody, led to nothing.'
But Buckingham did not appear to hold the affair against either of his bandmates. He later told The Independent: 'I didn't feel betrayed by Mick when he later had an affair with Stevie.
'Quite honestly I'd have been surprised if it hadn't happened. I remember he came over, sat me down and told me, and I went, ''Oh, okay.'' Stevie and I had long since parted company and she'd had several boyfriends in between.'
Stevie made further accusations in Stephen Davis' biography of her, which was published in 2017.
In one incident in 1987, the couple were arguing in front of the rest of the band when Buckingham 'manhandled Stevie, slapped her face and bent her backward over the hood of his car,' the book said.
'He put his fingers around her neck and started to choke her,' it read. The other bandmates intervened and told him not to lay a hand on her again. 'I thought he was going to kill me,' Nicks said.
Speaking to the book's author, bandmate Mick Fleetwood seemed to corroborate the manipulative behavior.
After the confrontation in front of their bandmates in 1987, Buckingham reformed his ways and never laid hand on her again, according to the book.
Nicks and Buckingham often 'shot eye daggers at each other in front of packed stadiums,' according to the LA Times, but the band largely soldiered on.
And fans have found it hard to let go of the chemistry between Nicks and Buckingham.
Nicks hinted at it during an interview with MTV in 2009, in which she said: 'That electric crazy attraction between Lindsey Buckingham and Stevie Nicks never dies, never will die, never will go away... Who Lindsey and I are to each other will never change.'
She continued: 'It's over. It doesn't mean the great feeling isn't there, it must mean that we're beauty and the beast.
'It means that the love is always there but we'll never be together, so that's even more romantic.'
In an interview with The Guardian in 2011, Nicks reflected on the end of her relationship with Buckingham.
She told the publication that had Fleetwood Mac, fame and drugs not become part of their lives, she believes the couple would have stayed together.
'We would have married and had children because we were headed that way. We didn't really mess up till we moved to Los Angeles. And that was when the whole world just ripped us apart.'
But far from time being the best healer, the former couple continued to clash in their seventies.
As recently as 2022, Buckingham hit out at Nicks once again as he blamed her, as well as band manager Irving Azoff, for his abrupt removal from Fleetwood Mac in January 2018.
Following his departure, Buckingham filed a $12million to $14million lawsuit against former bandmates: Nicks, Mick Fleetwood, Christie McVie and John McVie for lost wages that he would have earned from the 2018 tour. It was eventually settled in December of 2018.
However, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times in 2021, Buckingham maintained that his firing was a result of Nicks giving the rest of Fleetwood Mac an ultimatum - either he goes or she goes - following his request that the band delay a tour by three months so he could promote his new solo album.
'It would be like a scenario where Mick Jagger says, 'Either Keith [Richards] goes or I go,'' Buckingham recalled before adding, 'No, neither one of you can go. But I guess the singer has to stay. The figurehead has to stay.'
He continued: 'I think she saw the possibility of remaking the band more in the Stevie Nicks vein. More mellow and kind of down, giving her more chances to do the kind of talking she does onstage.'
Through her publicist at the time, Nicks told a far different ending to Buckingham's time in the band, calling his version 'revisionist history.'
'His version of events is factually inaccurate and while I've never spoken publicly on the matter, certainly it feels the time has come to shine a light on the truth,' Nicks said.
'To be exceedingly clear, I did not have him fired, I did not ask for him to be fired, I did not demand he be fired. Frankly, I fired myself.
'I proactively removed myself from the band and a situation I considered to be toxic to my wellbeing. I was done. If the band went on without me, so be it.
'And after many lengthy group discussions, Fleetwood Mac, a band whose legacy is rooted in evolution and change, found a new path forward with two hugely talented new members.'
That move forward was made by firing Buckingham and adding new members - Mike Campbell from Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers and Neil Finn of Crowded House.
Buckingham went on to question Nicks' creativity and energy level, in the time leading up to his firing.
'I think that was hard for her, seeing me jump around in an age-inappropriate way,' he said, before directing his comments on her personal life and the choices she made to remain in the band.
'Also, she's lonely. She's alone. She has the people who work for her, and I'm sure she has friends, but you know.'
Nicks simply retorted: 'Those are my decisions that I get to make for myself. I'm proud of the life choices I've made and it seems a shame for him to pass judgment on anyone who makes a choice to live their life on their own terms.'
However, bridges might have been built between Stevie and Lindsey following their recent moves on social media.
Earlier this month, the pair shocked and delighted followers when they took to Instagram to share lyrics from their song Frozen Love, which they released under their pop-duo group Buckingham Nicks in 1973.
The move did not go unnoticed by frenzied fans, who rushed to social media to speculate over what it could mean. One fan said, 'My divorced parents are back together.'
Another wrote: 'I cannot handle the prospect of my queen, Stevie Nicks, reuniting with Lindsey Buckingham.'
Some fans speculated the pair might be working on a creative project or album together.
'Fleetwood Mac reunion in 2025? A girl can dream,' another wistfully wrote. 'Our minds are exploding! Are you remastering BN or is this our dreams coming true,' gushed another.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stevie Nicks pulls out of two months of shows due to injury
Stevie Nicks has rescheduled her August and September US tour dates due to a fractured shoulder. Her tour will now begin on 1 October in Portland, Oregon, with all previously announced October dates remaining unaffected. The rescheduled August and September concerts will begin on 28 October in Detroit and conclude on 10 December in Hollywood, Florida. All tickets purchased for the original dates will be honored for the new schedule. Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham recently announced the re-release of their 1973 album, Buckingham Nicks, set for 19 September.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guide #202: Awol headliners to rampaging deer: how festivals survive the worst-case scenarios
We're in the thick of festival season in the UK, where every weekend seems to host a dizzying array of musical mega-events. The likes of Glastonbury, Download, TRNSMT, Wireless and others may already be in the rear-view, but there are still plenty more to come across all manner of genres: Camp Bestival (happening this very weekend), Creamfields, Green Man, All Points East, Reading and Leeds, End of the Road and so many others, across farms, city parks, country estates and the odd mid-Wales mountain range. For the people who run these festivals, months or even a full years-worth of work will have gone into readying for a single, crucial long weekend. The stakes are high: whether things go off without a hitch or not will, in some cases, determine that festival's future. And boy, are there a lot of potential hitches: electricity, sanitation, ticketing, food and drink, security, and the fragile egos of famous musicians, to name but a few. 'The scary thing about festivals is, if you take away one small element, the whole thing collapses,' says promoter James Scarlett. James should know. He books and organises not one but two annual festivals: 2000Trees, a 15,000-capacity alternative, punk and indie festival in Cheltenham, which last month completed its 17th edition with headline appearances from emo veterans Alexisonfire and Taking Back Sunday, along with Keir Starmer faves Kneecap; and ArcTangent, which specialises in metal, math rock, prog, post-rock and general experimental music, and later this month (13-16 Aug) will lure 5,000 punters to a farm near Bristol to hear bands as varied as post-rock titans Godspeed You! Black Emperor, prog-metallers Tesseract, lugubrious indie dance veterans Arab Strap and a duo called Clown Core who play avant garde jazz fusion from a portable loo. In addition, James is also the co-host – along with Gavin McInally, who runs Manchester extreme metal festival Damnation – of 2 Promoters 1 Pod, a weekly, unvarnished, slightly sweary look at how a festival comes together from the booking of bands to the construction of the site. If you have even the most cursory interest in how festivals work, it's a fascinating listen. All of which makes James the person you'd call for in case of something going badly awry on site. So in this week's Guide we've decided to test his firefighting skills, by asking him to solve a series of festival disasters, including some ripped from recent headlines. Read on for his thoughts on awol headliners, heatwaves and herds of marauding deer. Festival disaster #1 | Your headlining band are playing a mind-blowing set but are overrunning. You've already reached the curfew time your festival has agreed with the local council and the band still haven't played their biggest song yet. What do you do? 'I have, occasionally in the past, let bands breach curfew. We got caught once doing it at ArcTangent. A council member was driving home from another event and just thought they'd stop outside the farm. He heard the music stop at 11pm … and then start again at three minutes past! We received a slap on the wrist that time, and have a good relationship with the council as our crowds are never any hassle – but you can lose your licence over breaking curfew, and then the whole festival is gone. So I think normally the answer is the curfew is the curfew. Still, If you've got a headliner who, say, have 45 minutes of technical difficulties, I think there might be an argument to let them break the licence just in order to keep the crowd happy, you don't want an angry 15,000 people who didn't get the headliner that they wanted. There's a health and safety argument for breaking your curfew if that happens.' Festival disaster #2 | A heatwave has descended on the festival site. You've not been told to shut it down, but temperatures are reaching the mid-to-high 30s. What do you do? 'This year we had 53 cases of heatstroke at 2000Trees on the Wednesday of the festival, when people had only just arrived. It's pretty impressive that people have come straight in and gone: bang, heatstroke! You have to have a really good first aid tent. We cleaned the local depot out of saline drips for ours, because so many people were coming in extremely dehydrated. In fact one drummer from a band, Future of the Left, had to go to the tent for severe dehydration and heatstroke. He's a very energetic drummer and in those tents the heat rises, you're higher than the crowd, and you're properly going for it – not really a working environment you want to be in! Still, we've clocked up mid-30s temperatures at 2000Trees at least twice and once at ArcTangent, and you can still run an event in that. It's about communication with your audience: drink water, wear a hat, wear sunscreen, try to find some shade.' Festival disaster #3 | An Icelandic volcanic ash cloud leaves the headliner you've booked stranded in mainland Europe with no way of making it to the festival in time. What do you do? 'If a headliner drops out, you're in trouble. You've just got to be honest with your audience that the band aren't gonna be there. And all you can really do is bump whoever was second from top up a slot, and everyone moves up. We go into each festival with a long backup list of bands that are either local or already on site as punters. So if we get a dropout, we can usually fill the gap at short notice. You can always guarantee that someone will miss a train, miss a flight, get stuck in traffic or just get confused about what day they're playing … which is quite frustrating if you spend all year booking a lineup!' Sign up to The Guide Get our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Friday after newsletter promotion Festival disaster #4 | The prime minister has said it is not appropriate for a controversial act to headline your festival. What do you do? 'What the UK prime minister says about Kneecap is of little interest to me to be honest. I'm not being bullied. We were having ex-MPs and current MPs writing to 2000Trees, like they have a say in what we do. We're a business, it's not up to them. I think it was a help that a few other festivals have stuck to their guns on keeping Kneecap on the bill: Glastonbury and Green Man for example. It does give you a little bit of solidarity. If everyone had folded on it and we were the last ones, I guess I would have felt more pressure. I don't think we would have caved until such time as it was a risk to the business over it. And in the end there was no risk. Kneecap were good as gold at 2000Trees – they did a brilliant, amazing headline set, one of the best we've ever had at the festival.' Festival disaster #5 | A fire breaks out on site just days before the festival begins, destroying your main stage, Tomorrowland-style. What do you do? 'If you don't have the main stage for your festival you're probably going to have to cancel because there's not enough space for everyone across the other stages. So you'd be on the phone to every stage and marquee company across the country trying to find a replacement. The problem is, with the massive explosion in the festival industry in recent times, stages and marquees are very hard to come by. It's likely to be squeaky bum time. In the case of Tomorrowland, amazingly, they borrowed Metallica's stage. Bands like ACDC and Metallica tend to tour with two rigs, so they'll be playing one night on a stage with a lighting and sound rig. And ahead of them, in the next city, there'll be another team building their stage for the next show. When that show's finished, they tear that rig down and move on to the next place. Which is crackers really – it's hard to imagine the scale of that.' Festival disaster #6 | A herd of deer has descended on the festival, trampling over tents and chomping on the merch stall. What do you do? 'Well, we had pigs and swans invading our VIP campsite at 2000Trees this year! The pigs had broken out of a nearby farm. There's no gentle way of getting a pig out of a campsite, really, you have to manhandle them. Our production team were chasing them around – it was quite a comic scene. For the swans we rang up the RSPB – 999 for birds – and they advised us to not do anything, and eventually they'd take off, which they did. Deer would be more difficult. You can't go manhandling deer, particularly stags with their antlers. We have 140 pages of risk assessments, covering every risk you could ever imagine … but pigs in the camp was not on that list!' If you want to read the complete version of this newsletter please subscribe to receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Gov Gavin Newsom launches mean attack on Karoline Leavitt as he blasts White House's $200million ballroom plan
Governor Gavin Newsom took a break from managing the Golden State to launch a biting and bizarre attack on White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt as she announced President Trump's plans to construct a new $200million ballroom at The White House. The digital stunt, posted from Newsom's official X account, featured a photoshopped image of Effie Trinket, the flamboyant elite character from The Hunger Games known for her garish clothes and callous privilege. In the image Trinket could be seen holding up ballroom renderings inside the White House press room just as Leavitt had done earlier in the day. The California governor likened Leavitt to the dystopian aristocrat while casting Trump's ballroom as the architectural equivalent of 'let them eat cake'. 'While all the Districts pay extra for groceries and everyday goods, the White House is excited to announce that the Capitol is creating a grand ballroom for opulent parties! May the odds be ever in your favor!!!' Newsom wrote, echoing snobby language from the popular franchise. But the post quickly backfired on Newsom with Trump supporters rushing to defend Leavitt. 'It's not being paid for by taxpayers - but you knew that,' chimed in one X user. 'Trump and donors are footing the bill, not taxpayers. You seem to have *purposely* left that out,' explained another. 'Opulent parties? Like you and your cronies at the French Laundry during COVID?' jabbed another, referencing one of Newsom's biggest missteps during Covid when he was pictured dining with a large group of friends despite pandemic restrictions. But the California Democrat wasn't done. He followed up with a tweet mocking the Trump administration's priorities. 'They're more interested in defending their ballroom than the 17 million they kicked off health care.' Then in a third tweet dripping with sarcasm from his personal account, Newsom responded directly to the White House announcement: 'Oh thank god - this is what the American people were desperately pleasing with you to do!' Leavitt, for her part, remained focused on the policy as she unveiled renderings for the planned 90,000-square-foot State Ballroom, detailing the privately funded construction project she said would allow the White House to host major diplomatic events without resorting to makeshift tents on the South Lawn. 'The White House is one of the most beautiful and historic buildings in the world,' Leavitt said. 'But it does not have a space that can accommodate major functions without installing large and unsightly tents 100 yards from the main building entrance. 'This ballroom will change that,' she added, noting the facility would hold up to 650 guests, a massive upgrade from the East Room's 200-person capacity. She said construction would begin in September, with completion expected 'well before the end of President Trump's term.' The California governor mocked the White House defending the planned ballroom despite none of the money coming from public funds In another sarcastic tweet Newsom continued to mock the announcement of the new ballroom For his part, President Trump embraced the ballroom plan with his usual bravado. 'We're good at building,' he said on Thursday. 'I'm good at building things, and we'll get it built quickly and on time. It'll be beautiful - top of the line.' The ballroom, he said, would reflect the design elegance of Mar-a-Lago and Turnberry, two of his signature properties, and would replace the East Wing - home to the First Lady's office - which will be temporarily relocated and modernized. Despite Newsom's implication, taxpayer dollars will not fund the project. Leavitt confirmed that Trump and private donors will cover the entire $200 million cost, although donor names were not disclosed. The ballroom will be built just south of the main mansion, and renderings show a white-columned neoclassical structure that mimics the White House's famous façade. It will be the first major structural addition to the Executive Mansion in nearly a century. The East Wing will not be demolished, but repurposed during the construction period. Leavitt reiterated the ballroom's diplomatic utility. 'This new facility will give the United States a world-class venue to host global leaders with the dignity and grandeur that such occasions deserve.' White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles emphasized the administration's commitment to architectural integrity.