NY State Education Department won't sign Trump administration's anti-DEI certification — risking federal funds
A letter sent the day before by the U.S. Department of Education gave state commissioners 10 days to sign and return the formal affirmation. Insisting New York has attested to following federal law, a spokesman for state Education Commissioner Betty Rosa said, 'No further certification will be forthcoming.'
'The New York State Education Department has consistently certified, on multiple occasions, that it does and will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,' spokesman J.P. O'Hare said in a statement.
'Given the fact that USDOE is already in possession of the guarantees by NYSED, no further certification will be forthcoming. The Board of Regents and State Education Department continue to work with New York's schools to increase equity, access and opportunities in education for all New York State students.'
The federal government's directive on Thursday was the latest escalation against DEI programming in schools. Over the last couple of months, the U.S. Education Department has set deadlines, launched investigations and threatened to cancel funds. During President Trump's first month in office, the U.S. Education Department opened a probe into the Ithaca City School District over an annual student conference from which white children were reportedly excluded.
'Federal financial assistance is a privilege, not a right,' Craig Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights at the U.S. Education Department, said in the announcement. He accused schools of 'using DEI programs to discriminate against one group of Americans to favor another.'
Previous federal action to ban DEI is currently being challenged in court. State Attorney General Letitia James has also advised New York school districts and higher education institutions not to back away from their commitments to diversity.
New York City public schools receive about $2 billion in federal funding that could be on the line if they are found to be out of compliance.
'Diversity is a superpower here in New York City,' New York City Schools Chancellor Melissa Aviles-Ramos said after an unrelated press conference Thursday in East Harlem. 'We are always going to honor that. We are always going to make sure that we are serving every single child and family in New York City.'
_____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
'They're trying to rig the system': Sen. Padilla says Dems should fight fire with fire
California's Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla said his party should be willing to fight fire with fire, in light of Texas' potential, controversial gerrymandering plans. "If Republicans were confident on their policy agenda, they'd be eager to defend it with the people and to defend it at the ballot box next November," Padilla said in an Aug. 3 interview on NBC's "Meet the Press." "But they know they're in trouble," he continued. "And so they're trying to rig the system to hold on to power." The California senator was referencing Texas Republicans' proposed new map of their state's congressional districts, following President Donald Trump's urging that the GOP find a way to flip as many as five seats in next year's midterm elections. "Just a very simple redrawing, we pick up five seats," Trump told reporters on July 15. Padilla likened Trump's ask of Texas Republicans to his request during his first term in office that a top Georgia official "find 11,780 votes" to put him over the top in the Electoral College for the 2020 election. Redistricting in the middle of the decade, rather than every ten years after new census data is collected, is rare. And the pushback from Democrats across the country has been widespread. Blue state leaders have threatened tit-for-tat responses, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has suggested redrawing his state's map to counteract Texas' efforts. (Newsom faces the challenge of a bipartisan redistricting commission, which oversees California's maps, unlike Texas, where lawmakers dictate the boundaries.) Some California Democrats are wary, warning that a redistricting arms race could spiral and erode trust with voters. In response to those concerns, Padilla told NBC he believes it's appropriate for the Democrat-controlled state to evaluate its options. "The ideal scenario," he said, "is for Texas to stand down. They don't have to do this; they shouldn't do this. But if they were to go forward and deliver Trump his five additional Republicans ... the stakes are simply too high" for Democrats not to respond. Padilla also addressed recent comments from his fellow Democrats about the state of politics and American democracy, including Sen. Cory Booker's call for his party to "have a backbone." "It's time for us to fight. It's time for us to draw lines," Booker said from the Senate floor on July 29. Asked whether Booker's defiant approach was the appropriate stance for Democrats under the Trump administration, Padilla said, "Look, I think the extreme way in which this administration is conducting itself calls for higher and higher profile ways of pushing back." After announcing that she would not be running for California governor in 2026, former Vice President Kamala Harris appeared on CBS's "The Late Show" with Stephen Colbert. In her interview on July 31, Harris told Colbert, "Recently, I made the decision that, for now, I don't want to go back into the system. I think it's broken." Padilla agreed, in part, with Harris' take, saying, "I think the system is under duress." "Democrats are doing our part to try to stand up and push back," he added.
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
After blacks in Cincinnati beat white adults, why was there no nationwide, racial outrage?
Recently, a large group of black youths began pummeling white adults in downtown Cincinnati. The original altercation apparently broke out between a black and white male in he-said/he-said fashion. But that dispute soon turned into a virtual free-for-all. Numerous male and female black youths sucker-punched a middle-aged woman. Others continued to kick or body slam the victims. There were many disturbing aspects to the beat-downs. One, the violence broke out along racial and age fault lines. After the initial dispute, groups of black youths swarmed solitary older white bystanders to pound them. Two, the surrounding assembled group of black youths not only failed to intervene to restrain the bullies. They also recorded the beatings for social media and were heard cheering on the one-sided violence. Three, there was neither a police presence nor any timely Good Samaritan interventions. Four, oddly few of the usual black spokespeople who habitually comment on interracial violence were to be seen. During the fake Jussie Smollett attack, self-appointed leaders from Al Sharpton to Kamala Harris immediately issued warnings about so-called systemic white racism that had reared its ugly head to victimize Smollett. Yet when it was revealed Smollett had concocted the entire charade — and even hired his own assaulters — there were few if any retractions from those once so eager to shout 'racist!' Such demagoguery is a well-known pattern dating back to the days of the Tawana Brawley rape hoax, the Duke Lacrosse charade, the Covington kids ruse, the Michael Ford 'Hands-up-Don't Shoot' fabrication or the NASCAR noose fable. Racialists too often concoct white racist attackers and go silent when the evidence proves fabricated — only to be primed to manipulate the next hoax. Five, the media and authorities did their best to either hide or play down the violence. City leaders, the chief of police and the media variously blamed the mass black-on-white violence on 1) social media, 2) the original dispute, 3) alcohol, 4) the lack of civilian intervention to stop the violence and 5) a festival atmosphere — anything except endemic racial hatred shown toward whites from the crowd of black youths. Six, had a gang of white toughs beat middle-aged African-Americans senseless, recorded it and cheered on the violence, there would have been immediate national outrage. Nor did anyone wish to raise the taboo topic of inordinate black crime rates, disproportionate to respective demographic realities. In rare interracial violent crimes, the asymmetrical ratio of black-on-white versus white-on-black assaults ranges from three to five times greater. Seven, the quiet of the left-wing media to the reprehensible violence stands in marked contrast with their usual rush-to-judgment racialism in two near-simultaneous incidents. When a shooter entered a New York City corporate headquarters last week and executed four innocents, CNN falsely raised the speculation that a 'white male' was perhaps responsible — despite the photograph of the suspect, who was as clearly male as he was not white. Media and municipal officials jumped to explain the violence as due to the killer's alleged past traumatic brain injury or because of his access to a semi-automatic weapon — or anything other than his hate-filled plan to murder an NFL executive. Actress and model Sydney Sweeney just cut a jeans commercial in front of a poster that said, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes' — with 'genes' crossed out and replaced with 'jeans.' Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The left then exploded, alleging the ad was a supposed Hitlerian reference to white eugenics. Yet the eugenics movement in America was mostly a product of left-wing progressives, from Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger to Democratic President Woodrow Wilson. And the ad's sponsor, American Eagle, had previously used all sorts of models from all racial backgrounds. All might agree that the ad simply shows both tight, sexy jeans and a naturally attractive wearer — period. The country is descending into a tribal morass of double standards and racial fixations. The diversity/equity/inclusion industry, the defund-the-police madness and the perpetual left-wing hunt for 'white racism/white privilege/white rage' — from the prior Pentagon hierarchy to the lunatic fringe of Jasmine Crockett, Joy Reid and Zohran Mamdani — have all legitimized double standards while lowering the bar of the once unacceptable. When our careerist left-wing elites seek to divide us by race and make it essential, not incidental, to our identities, that tribalist message filters throughout communities. The ensuing signal is that 'payback' violence is OK — on the expectation that there are no consequences for interracial violence — as long as the victim is white and the assaulter is not. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump trade adviser pledges tariffs ‘pretty much set' as several countries scramble for deals
President Trump's newly unveiled tariff rates are unlikely to change much, his trade adviser and National Economic Council declared, while downplaying the risk of market turmoil. 'I know a lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday. 'Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country.' 'These tariff rates are pretty much set. I expect I do have my phone blowing up,' he added. 'I think that we have, we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Advertisement Trump initially unveiled a 10% baseline tariff rate against virtually every country on the planet and then a slate of customized rates on top of that during his April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement. The stock market promptly took a nosedive and Trump later announced a pause on the implementation of those tariffs to allow time for negotiations to play out. 3 Kevin Hasset ruled out the possibility of President Trump backtracking on tariffs due to market reactions. AP Advertisement 3 Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said most of the tariff deals are set. AFP via Getty Images Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, downplayed the risks of a similar crash this time around because 'the markets have seen what we're doing.' 'I would rule it out because these are the final deals,' Hassett told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday when asked about Trump changing the tariff rates due to market reactions. During the negotiating sprint that followed 'Liberation Day,' Trump's team helped cut deals with the European Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Cambodia, Thailand and more. Advertisement 'We have eight deals that cover about 55% of world GDP with our biggest trading partners, the EU and Japan and Korea and so on, and I expect that those [rates] are more or less locked in,' Hassett said. 'For the deals that aren't ready yet, they're going to get the reciprocal rates soon, and then we would expect that there might continue to be negotiations with those countries.' 3 President Trump has made overhauling US trade policy a centerpiece of his second term agenda. AP Last week, Trump's team unveiled a revised slate of customized tariff rates to be imposed against various countries, after previously delaying implementation of the 'Liberation Day' tariffs twice. Advertisement Most of those tariffs ranged from 40% to his baseline 10% rate. They will be effective on Aug. 7, per Trump's executive order. Meanwhile, Trump also has a tariff truce with China that is set to end on Aug. 12 and has given Russia until Aug. 8 to cut a peace deal with Ukraine before he implements secondary tariffs or sanctions on countries that purchase oil from Moscow. 'There are trade ministers who want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States, but I think that we have, we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates,' Greer assessed. Trump is also facing litigation in the courts over the legality of his tariffs, with the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit hearing arguments for the administration's defense of the moves last Thursday. The president had tapped into his emergency powers to impose the sweeping tariffs, but there are legal questions about whether he has the authority to do that.
