logo
Hot chips, cool solutions: powering the AI revolution

Hot chips, cool solutions: powering the AI revolution

Techday NZ20-05-2025
Strap yourselves in, fellow travellers, for today we are talking data centre infrastructure. Over at Computex in Taipei, Schneider Electric which makes the physical stuff where AI lives (power, cabinets, UPS, cooling systems) delivered the lowdown on the role and challenges facing what is probably the most fundamental component of the revolution sweeping through, well, everything today. Those challenges largely revolve around increasing compute density and the necessity for appropriate cooling and housing. And in turn, that means out with the bulky finned heatsinks consuming excessive rackspace, and in with liquid cooling.
Now, it is hard to get very excited about data centre infrastructure in much the same way as being enthralled with the foundations of Taipei 101 is an unlikely prospect. But that doesn't make those foundations any less crucial, for without them the tower wouldn't stand.
At a swanky press conference, Schnieder Electric secure power VP Pankaj Sharma contextualised the challenge by noting the astonishingly rapid adoption of AI: 100 million lemmings consigned free thought to be past in just two months, according to his figures. In what may be a case of a false analogy, Sharma noted this sort of adoption took seven years for that other transformative technology we like to call 'the internet' (those of a certain age will remember being puzzled about the utility of email and downloading fuzzy images over the course of half-hours, right up until we tried it).
Since forever, compute has generated heat, and generating heat eats electricity. Sharma noted that demand for AI (and the other now-boring stuff data centres do, like storage or application hosting) has spiked electricity demand, straining power grids and challenging net zero goals.
It is, of course, only going to get worse as that demand keeps ramping up. In much the same way that one's spouse insists that more shopping for stuff on sale delivers greater savings, Sharma said AI itself will cleverly help ameliorate demand. NVIDIA, with which Schneider Electric has forged a partnership, fielded head of data centre product marketing at NVIDIA conceded that this is some potentially Inception-level circular logic, so it really sort of boils down to 'trust me bro'.
Pankaj's colleague and Schneider Electric international secure power VP Nirupa Chander emphasised the unique needs of AI data centres, noting ultra-high power densities and the necessity of future-proof designs. She explained Schneider Electric's collaboration with NVIDIA aims to streamline power integration from grids to data centres, addressing challenges like unstable power supply and high energy costs. There was some insider banter too: from chip to chiller, and if you haven't already, then you heard it here first.
Harris riffed on NVIDIA supremo Jenson Huang's celebrated keynote and noted AI's growth driven by diverse models and use cases, transforming data centres into AI factories capable, one imagines, of Incepting us all. And then, in a highlight of the afternoon, Trent McCarley from Schieder Electric's recently acquired cooling pioneer Motivair went into some detail on the emergence of liquid as a crucial component in creating the infrastructure capable of handling AI-driven heat loads.
For those who are into motorcycles, an easy analogy emerged. Back in the day, most engines were air cooled, with effective 'heat sinks' on the engine evidenced by fins. As compression ratios increased in the search for more power, the heat dissipation of those fins proved inadequate, and so radiators, water pumps, ethylene gycol, and a bit of plumbing became part and parcel of the package. Not that dissimilar from the trajectory on which AI data centres find themselves, but of course, at considerably expanded scale.
Donovan Jackson is attending Computex as the guest of Schneider Electric. AI must live somewhere, and among other things, Schneider Electric makes data centre infrastructure.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sensitive data exposure rises with employee use of GenAI tools
Sensitive data exposure rises with employee use of GenAI tools

Techday NZ

time3 days ago

  • Techday NZ

Sensitive data exposure rises with employee use of GenAI tools

Harmonic Security has released its quarterly analysis finding that a significant proportion of data shared with Generative AI (GenAI) tools and AI-enabled SaaS applications by employees contains sensitive information. The analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising 1 million prompts and 20,000 files submitted to 300 GenAI tools and AI-enabled SaaS applications between April and June. According to the findings, 22% of files (total 4,400) and 4.37% of prompts (total 43,700) included sensitive data. The categories of sensitive data encompassed source code, access credentials, proprietary algorithms, merger and acquisition (M&A) documents, customer or employee records, and internal financial information. Use of new GenAI tools The data highlights that in the second quarter alone, organisations on average saw employees begin using 23 previously unreported GenAI tools. This expanding variety of tools increases the administrative load on security teams, who are required to vet each tool to ensure it meets security standards. A notable proportion of AI tool use occurs through personal accounts, which may be unsanctioned or lack sufficient safeguards. Almost half (47.42%) of sensitive uploads to Perplexity were made via standard, non-enterprise accounts. The numbers were lower for other platforms, with 26.3% of sensitive data entering ChatGPT through personal accounts, and just 15% for Google Gemini. Data exposure by platform Analysis of sensitive prompts identified ChatGPT as the most common origin point in Q2, accounting for 72.6%, followed by Microsoft Copilot with 13.7%, Google Gemini at 5.0%, Claude at 2.5%, Poe at 2.1%, and Perplexity at 1.8%. Code leakage represented the most prevalent form of sensitive data exposure, particularly within ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, and Baidu Chat. File uploads and risks The report found that, on average, organisations uploaded 1.32GB of files in the second quarter, with PDFs making up approximately half of all uploads. Of these files, 21.86% contained sensitive data. The concentration of sensitive information was higher in files compared to prompts. For example, files accounted for 79.7% of all stored credit card exposure incidents, 75.3% of customer profile leaks, and 68.8% of employee personally identifiable information (PII) incidents. Files accounted for 52.6% of exposure volume related to financial projections. Less visible sources of risk GenAI risk does not only arise from well-known chatbots. Increasingly, regular SaaS tools that integrate large language models (LLMs) - often without clear labelling as GenAI - are becoming sources of risk as they access and process sensitive information. Canva was reportedly used for documents containing legal strategy, M&A planning, and client data. Replit and were involved with proprietary code and access keys, while Grammarly and Quillbot edited contracts, client emails, and internal legal content. International exposure Use of Chinese GenAI applications was cited as a concern. The study found that 7.95% of employees in the average enterprise engaged with a Chinese GenAI tool, leading to 535 distinct sensitive exposure incidents. Within these, 32.8% were related to source code, access credentials, or proprietary algorithms, 18.2% involved M&A documents and investment models, 17.8% exposed customer or employee PII, and 14.4% contained internal financial data. Preventative measures "The good news for Harmonic Security customers is that this sensitive customer data, personally identifiable information (PII), and proprietary file contents never actually left any customer tenant, it was prevented from doing so. But had organizations not had browser based protection in place, sensitive information could have ended up training a model, or worse, in the hands of a foreign state. AI is now embedded in the very tools employees rely on every day and in many cases, employees have little knowledge they are exposing business data." Harmonic Security Chief Executive Officer and Co-founder Alastair Paterson made this statement, referencing the protections offered to their customers and the wider risks posed by the pervasive nature of embedded AI within workplace tools. Harmonic Security advises enterprises to seek visibility into all tool usage – including tools available on free tiers and those with embedded AI – to monitor the types of data being entered into GenAI systems and to enforce context-aware controls at the data level. The recent analysis utilised the Harmonic Security Browser Extension, which records usage across SaaS and GenAI platforms and sanitises the information for aggregate study. Only anonymised and aggregated data from customer environments was used in the analysis.

Statement On AI In Universities From Aotearoa Communication & Media Scholars Network
Statement On AI In Universities From Aotearoa Communication & Media Scholars Network

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Statement On AI In Universities From Aotearoa Communication & Media Scholars Network

We speak as a network of Aotearoa academics working in the inter-disciplines of Communication and Media Studies across our universities. Among us we have shared expertise in the political, social and economic impacts of commercially distributed and circulated generative artificial intelligence ('AI') in our university workplaces. While there is a tendency in our universities to be resigned to AI as an unstoppable and unquestionable technological force, our aim is to level the playing field to promote open critical and democratic debate. With this in mind, we make the following points: For universities… · AI is not an inevitable technological development which must be incorporated into higher education; rather it is the result of particular techno-capitalist ventures, a context which needs to be recognised and considered; · AI, as a corporate product of private companies such as OpenAI, Google, etc., encroaches on the public role of the university and its role as critic and conscience, and marginalises voices which might critique business interests; For researchers… · AI impedes rather than supports productive intellectual work because it erodes important critical thinking skills; instead, it devolves human scholarly work and critical engagement with ideas–elements vital to our cultural and social life–to software that produces 'ready-made', formulaic and backward looking 'results' that do not advance knowledge; · AI promotes an unethical, reckless approach to research which can promote 'hallucinations' and over valorise disruption for its own sake rather than support quality research; · AI normalises industrial scale theft of intellectual property as our written work is fed into AI datasets largely without citation or compensation; · AI limits the productivity of academic staff by requiring them to invent new forms of assessment which subvert AI, police students and their use of AI, or assess lengthy 'chat logs', rather than engage with students in activities and assessments that require deep, critical thinking and sharing, questioning and articulating ideas with peers; For students… · AI tools create anxiety for students; some are falsely-accused of using generative-AI when they haven't, or are very stressed that it could happen to them; · AI tools such as ChatGPT are contributing to mental-health crises and delusions in various ways; promoting the use of generative-AI in academic contexts is thus unethical, particularly when considering students and the role of universities in pastoral care; · AI thus undermines the fundamental relationships between teacher and student, academics and administration, and the university and the community by fostering an environment of distrust; For Aotearoa New Zealand… · AI clashes with Te Tiriti obligations around data sovereignty and threatens the possibility of data colonialism regarding te reo itself; · AI is devastating for the environment in terms of energy and water use and the extraction of natural resources needed for the processors that AI requires. Signed by: Rosemary Overell, Senior Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Olivier Jutel, Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Emma Tennent, Senior Lecturer, Media & Communication, Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington Rachel Billington, Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Brett Nicholls, Senior Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Yuki Watanabe, Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Sy Taffel, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Leon Salter, Senior Lecturer, Communications Programme, University of Auckland Angela Feekery, Senior Lecturer, Communications Programme, Massey University Ian Huffer, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Pansy Duncan, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Kevin Veale, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Peter A. Thompson, Associate Professor, Media & Communication Programme, Te Herenga Waka/Victoria University of Wellington Nicholas Holm, Associate Professor, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Sean Phelan, Associate Professor, Massey University Yuan Gong, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Chris McMillan, Teaching Fellow, Sociology Programme, University of Auckland Cherie Lacey, Researcher, Centre for Addiction Research, University of Auckland Thierry Jutel, Associate Professor, Film, Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington Max Soar, Teaching Fellow, Political Communication, Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington Lewis Rarm, Lecturer, Media and Communication, Te Herenga Waka | Victoria University of Wellington Tim Groves, Senior Lecturer, Film. Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington Valerie Cooper, Lecturer, Media and Communication, Te Herenga Waka | Victoria University of Wellington Wayne Hope, Professor, Faculty of Design & Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology Greg Treadwell, senior lecturer in journalism, School of Communication Studies, Auckland University of Technology Christina Vogels, Senior Lecturer, Critical Media Studies, School of Communication Studies, Auckland University of Technology

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store