King praises Islamic studies centre's commitment to ‘international co-operation'
'The centre's ongoing commitment to objective scholarship and international co-operation, underpinned by principles of dialogue, deep understanding and mutual respect, is more imperative than ever in today's world,' said the King in a brief speech.
'I need hardly say I am extremely heartened that the centre continues to play such a significant role in that globally critical endeavour.'
His comments came as the Middle East remains mired in conflict, with Israel fighting on multiple fronts from its continued bombardment of the Gaza Strip, recent strikes on Syria and the attack on Iran.
Speaking to invited guests and supporters, who included former home secretary Jack Straw and former attorney general Dominic Grieve, Charles, who is the centre's patron, praised its 'unfailing work to broaden our understanding of the Islamic world in the United Kingdom'.
Farhan Nizami, the centre's director, has been instrumental in its development over the decades, and said about its work today: 'The ability to bring scholars from around the world in a safe space where they can exchange ideas – we can agree to disagree when need be – but also to encourage the students to come into Oxford to read for Oxford degrees.
'I think the very presence of the centre is a statement of inter-faith.'
He also praised the King's support for the centre since becoming its patron in 1993, hosting celebratory events at various anniversary milestones and delivering the centre's inaugural lecture, Islam And The West, that year.
The director said Charles' 1993 speech 'still has a tremendous resonance and is still quoted – the call for better understanding of peoples and cultures.
'But as he put it then, that Islam was part of us in Britain and Britain is part of the Muslim world, and we should get rid of any prejudice and ignorance that might exist, to do that through good scholarship which is the basis for building bridges'.
During the visit the King cut a ribbon to officially open a wing renamed the King Charles III Wing.
It will host a programme named in his honour which consolidates activities inspired by him, from the Young Muslim Leadership Programme to conferences focused on global issues like the environment and sustainability.
Mr Straw, who sat on an advisory committee for the centre for a period, said: 'The fact it has developed in this way over 40 years is absolutely extraordinary.
'The patronage of now the King, then the Prince of Wales, has also been profoundly important because he was very much ahead of his time and it wasn't necessarily a popular cause.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Prince Harry & Meghan Markle's ‘peace talks' won't work – their TRUE motive was so confused, slams pro
A ROYAL expert has claimed that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's 'peace talks' had a strategic motive - alongside trying to repair their family relationship. King Charles ' and Prince Harry's senior aides reportedly held a secret summit in July aiming to resolve the bitter royal feud. 9 9 The private meeting - held at a London private members' club - was hailed as the first step towards a "rapprochement process" between Harry, 40, and the rest of the Royal Family, sources claim. However, Newsweek's Chief Royal Correspondent, Jack Royston, said the Duke and Duchess of Sussex want more than just reconciliation. Speaking on The Sun's Royal Exclusive show this week, he claimed: 'I think the reason behind it is fundamentally because Harry had a clear-out, and Meghan had a clear-out of their PR team on both sides of the Atlantic. 'They brought new people in who have come with new energy and a real determination to move the dial in terms of public opinion, move the dial in terms of media coverage of the Sussexes, and, that comes with it, move the dial in terms of the relationship with the palace.' The British monarchy has spent years dealing with the fallout of Prince Harry 's decision to marry former actress Meghan after the two hit out at the family and stepped down as senior royals. News commentator Samara Gill claims Prince Harry is keen to repair his fractious relationship with King Charles, 76, given his cancer struggle - and alluded to this in May. She added: 'I think he's trying to get reconciliation before the king goes. 'I mean, he did obviously say in that BBC interview, 'I don't know how much longer my father has left', and obviously dropped a bunch more bombshells in that interview. 'Though it wasn't that long ago, so it's kind of crazy now that they're trying to share diary slots and trying to figure out how he can kind of get back in with the royal fold, because Queen Elizabeth II did say, 'you can't have it both ways, you can't be one foot in, one foot out royals. I don't want that.' 'And I think that this is really betraying what she wanted for them.' Harry & Meghan peace talks motive EXPOSED - they'll beg for handouts now Netflix deal's scrapped 9 9 The royal expert said that the Sussexes need to decide if they want to be in the royal fold, or out. She continued: 'They need to choose. I just don't agree with this hybrid situation. 'They're like typical millennial royals who want to do, like, gig economy jobs in the royal family or something. They brought new people in who have come with new energy and a real determination to move the dial in terms of public opinion, move the dial in terms of media coverage of the Sussexes Jack RoystonNewsweek's Chief Royal Correspondent 'I don't exactly know what their whole plan is. 'It's a very confused strategy. And I do agree that they've got a better team who's clearly trying to fashion something out of this, but I just think it's a very confused, dilapidated thing and I don't see it going anywhere.' BBC BOMBSHELL Prince Harry recently gave an extraordinary BBC interview after losing his appeal against the decision to remove his taxpayer-funded security. In a fresh scathing attack, the Duke of Sussex unleashed a host of new claims including how dad Charles is no longer speaking to him and how he's "uncovered his worst fears". Speaking of the revelations, Jack said: 'That BBC interview was a huge moment and Harry clearly experienced restraint, basically. 'He'd clearly gone in. I'm sure that they had that interview booked in the diary before they knew the outcome of the case and Harry probably imagined that he was going to go in there and give this plea for reconciliation with his family. 'Then he saw we'd lost the case and just was furious about it and so he started giving these swipes at Charles in the middle of this interview that was supposed to be calling for reconciliation. 'And so I thought that that had a huge potential to blow any chance that he had, but it is promising to see this new... kind of these new meetings taking place.' 9 ROYAL RECONCILIATION Speaking on whether or not we are likely to see Prince Harry repairing his relationship with King Charles, Jack stated: 'I think there's a chance we will, but I do think Charles is going to need to be slightly dragged into it. 'I think Charles got to a point after his diagnosis where I think he took a decision that he needed to protect his peace and that his younger son was causing him a significant amount of stress and anxiety in his life, and so he took a decision that he needed to focus on his health and getting back to the place that he needed to be, and that meant not exhaustingly spending all of his time running around after Harry. 'And so Harry is going to have to show Charles that having a relationship is not going to be exhausting and draining for him if Harry's serious about wanting to repair that relationship. 'And so it's going to have to be softly, softly, and Harry's probably going to have to soak some stuff up along the way. 'Charles has soaked up a huge amount of pain and turned the other cheek, not fought back, except in small ways like taking Frogmore Cottage away. 'And it's Harry's turn. Harry's going to have to soak up a lot as well.' 9 BROKEN BOND In his bombshell BBC interview Harry claimed a reconciliation with his family lies in Charles' hands. He said: "I would like to get my father and brother back." Insiders say the recent talks are the strongest sign in years that both sides are determined to resolve the bitter Windsor feud. A source said: "There's a long road ahead, but a channel of communication is now open for the first time in years. "There was no formal agenda, just casual drinks. There were things both sides wanted to talk about." I think Charles got to a point after his diagnosis where I think he took a decision that he needed to protect his peace and that his younger son was causing him a significant amount of stress and anxiety in his life Jack RoystonNewsweek's Chief Royal Correspondent Harry was represented by his chief communications officer and head of his household in Montecito, California, Meredith Maines. She is said to have flown in from Los Angeles specially for the talks. Liam Maguire, head of the Sussexes' PR team in the UK, was also present. The King was represented by his communications secretary Tobyn Andreae. 9 The details of the conversation have remained private with Ms Maines jetting back to the US as soon as the meeting ended. Harry opened up a number of wounds when he spoke to US talk show host Oprah Winfrey alongside his new wife about how Meghan was allegedly treated during her time as part of the family. Meghan claimed she was left suicidal due to how she was treated as Harry said that questions were raised about the colour of their child's skin colour by other royals. 9 The Prince would also publish his bombshell book Spare in 2023 after moving to California which stirred up further controversies. Ever since, Harry has been left out in the cold by his fellow hardworking royals. He reportedly hasn't seen Charles in years with his last direct communication with brother William coming in 2022. The feuding brothers reportedly didn't even speak to each other despite standing 'virtually back to back' among mourners at their uncle's memorial service last year. Inside Prince William and Prince Harry's 'feud' TENSIONS have been running high in the royal family since Prince Harry stepped down from royal duties in 2020 and relocated to California with Meghan Markle. Their last reported interaction was during the funeral of their grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, in September 2022, but conversations were said to be brief. The feuding brothers reportedly did not speak to each other despite standing 'virtually back to back' among mourners at their uncle's memorial service last year. Growing up, Wills and Harry shared many of the same friends who were part of their close, tight-knit circle. But their relationship took a sour turn after Harry lobbed vile allegations against the Prince of Wales in his memoir Spare - and they are said to have not been in direct contact since the 2023 release. In the book, he claimed William had physically attacked him and knocked him to the floor in 2019 and made insulting comments about Meghan. The Sussexes had also targeted Princess Kate, when Meghan claimed the royal made her cry. The bitter feud was ignited when the Sussexes told Oprah, in their 2021 sit down interview, that certain members of the Royal Family had speculated about Prince Archie's skin colour. It was later claimed the royals were Princess Kate and King Charles, after Harry and Meghan's former pal Omid Scobie published his hatchet-job book Endgame. During the infamous Oprah interview, the duchess also made stinging comments about the Firm and how they handled her mental health struggles. Prince William and Harry's bond then worsened after the Sussexes made a number of accusations against the Royal Family in their 2022 Netflix docuseries. The duke has given subsequent interviews, such as his most BBC chat in May 2025, that have only propelled bad blood.
New Statesman
2 days ago
- New Statesman
Support for Palestine in Britain is not limited to Muslim voters
Photo by Adrian Dennis/AFP 'By September, there will be nothing left to recognise.' These are the words of a right-wing Israeli journalist, posted in response to the British government's announcement that it would recognise Palestine as an independent state in September if Israel did not meet certain conditions, including agreeing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was no less coy, accusing Keir Starmer of 'rewarding monstrous terrorism'. Dramatic language, but an alien sentiment to the median British voter, and indeed westerners, who, it seems, have an increasingly lost love for the Israeli state. Across Europe the voters' view of Israel has fallen to a new low. While a majority in every major European state agree that Israel was right to respond to the Hamas attacks of October 2023, the scale of its assault on Gaza has been disproportionate, and unforgiveable. At the start of this conflict I noted how, for the most part, Britons wanted no part in picking sides. That still holds. British enthusiasm for Israel is a minority view, and is falling with every passing month. British enthusiasm for Palestine is also minority view, but has strengthened, relatively, in recent months. But when it comes to the prospect of recognition, a plurality of voters now back recognising a Palestinian state. YouGov's latest poll on the issue finds almost half of Brits (45 per cent) back the stance set out by the UK government. Just 14 per cent are against it. The rest – a hefty 41 per cent – aren't quite so sure. Sympathy for Palestine is by no means limited to Britain's Muslim population. While it doesn't sit high as a voter motivating issue for many, the plurality view in a majority of constituencies now is that Palestinian statehood is a necessity. But where? I've taken the YouGov headline figures and applied them to a demographic and election forecast model I've built of Britain. It factors for religion, age, and voting intention. And it shows us that much of the enthusiasm for Palestinian statehood does come from the more built-up, urban areas of Britain. But it's also a little more widespread than that. Chester North backs a Palestinian state in plurality terms, while Liverpool Riverside backs it in absolute terms – almost six in ten. Neither hold significant Muslim populations. Meanwhile, 71 per cent of voters in Blackburn, a seat which saw a hefty Labour majority felled in favour of a so-called Gaza Independent in last summer's general election, backs recognising a Palestinian state outright. Clacton, Nigel Farage's own seat, isn't quite so sure. Because within the YouGov cross-breaks you find only 15 per cent of current Reform voters backing the idea of Palestinian statehood. Also worth noting is that 68 per cent of Green voters back recognising Palestine. These two findings from the more shoe-end parts of the horse-shoe parties in Britain today expose a persistent truth about UK public opinion. Reform, polling 30 per cent right now, does speak for a body of Britain that would rather stay out of anything and everything overseas. Less the successor party to Winston Churchill, Reform has become the poor-man's reboot of Neville Chamberlain-type indulgent isolationism. 'Not in my back yard? Not interested.' Whereas when it comes to Green voters, unsurprisingly a majority would back Palestinian statehood, but it is not absolute. The notion that Green supporters are all a bunch of activists is very much an online view. The Greens are not sloppy seconds for disgruntled Labour members. Their appeal speaks to a voter base in rural England, one that is not especially enthusiastic for Zack Polanski's eco-populism. The findings from this model projection tell us the following. Enthusiasm for a Palestinian state will, naturally, be concentrated in Muslim-majority areas – areas that gave Starmer's Labour outsized defeats in council and parliamentary elections. But there is a growing number of voters who believe that Palestinian statehood must be recognised in Merseyside, in County Cheshire, in Wrexham, in the Central Belt of Scotland and indeed, even in Home Counties England. [See also: How do we keep the lid on race-related violence?] Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Terrorist 7/7 London bombings and 9/11 plotter 'could walk UK streets in days'
Haroon Aswat, 50, originally from West Yorkshire, could soon be freed despite admitting his role in the attack on the World Trade Center and the 7/7 London bombings A terrorist who helped mastermind 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings could soon be freed in the UK despite being a 'risk to national security'. Haroon Aswat, 50, was jailed for 20 years in 2015 in New York over terror offences and deported back to the UK in 2022. He has since been detained in a secure hospital, with his release expected soon to his family in West Yorkshire. He had been involved in setting up a 'terrorist training camp' in the US with radical cleric Abu Hamza in the 1990s and has admitted his role in 9/11 as well as the London bombings in 2005. It comes as Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. He admitted to a psychiatrist 'I am a terrorist' before he was deported back to the UK and US court documents reveal that he also confessed to being a 'mastermind behind the (9/11) attacks and a 2005 attack in the UK', reports The Sun. Aswat has also threatened to kill Jews, Christians and other Muslim groups, and it is feared that he could be released onto streets in the UK without a full risk assessment within days due to a legal loophole blocking him from stringent checks. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick reportedly said: 'This despicable man was behind one of the most deadly attacks in modern history. He should never experience freedom again." At a hearing in April, the Metropolitan Police applied for a 'notification order', meaning Aswat would be subject to certain requirements about informing police of his whereabouts and personal life upon his release. In a ruling, Mr Justice Jay approved the order for 30 years, which Aswat did not oppose. But he said that despite a psychiatrist's finding in 2022 that there 'remains the risk of Islamic violent extremism' by Aswat, no risk assessment had been carried out. In his judgment, Mr Justice Jay added: 'Although (the psychiatrist) did not conduct a full risk assessment for terrorist risk, he identified 15 of the 22 relevant factors … as being likely to be present.' He added: 'No formal terrorist risk assessment has been carried out in the United Kingdom since the defendant's return here. The circumstances of his detention have precluded that. However, on the basis of the material which is available, the defendant has been assessed by various police officers … that he remains a risk to national security.' He said that the psychiatrist had concluded 'there remains the risk of Islamic violent extremism-motivated targeted terrorist offending behaviour given his threats to kill Jews, Christians and certain groups of Muslims … (t)here is also a risk of him influencing other vulnerable individuals, as when he is in an abnormal mental state his religious extremist rhetoric is amplified by mental illness'. And a US District Court document shows how he admitted his role in terrorist activities. It stated: 'In March 2017 the defendant stated, 'if you think I am a terrorist, I don't shy away from my responsibility' and also stated he was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and a 2005 terrorist attack in the UK.' The papers also reveal that Aswat was in contact with Osama bin Laden and trained in al-Queda camps in Afghanistan before the attack on the World Trade Center in 2001. Police also traced 20 calls made by 7/7 bombers to a phone connected to Aswat. In his witness statement Det Chief Supt Gareth Rees, head of operations for the Met's SO15 Counter Terrorism Command, said of Aswat: 'He has spoken positively of his time with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and expressed aspirations to reconnect with them. 'Based on my experience, this is conduct which gives me grave concerns about the risk which the defendant poses to the UK's national security and to the public. The assessment of medical practitioners is that he currently has capacity to make complex decisions and understand complex restrictions when mentally he may temporarily lose capacity if he were to relapse into a psychotic state.' Aswat, who is now 50, helped to set up a terrorist training camp in Oregon and Seattle in the US from 1999, which the American government described as a camp 'to train young impressionable men in America to fight and kill so that they could travel to Afghanistan to join forces with al Qaida'. He then travelled to Afghanistan to receive training from al Qaida in 2001, and in 2005 was arrested in Zambia and extradited to the UK. In August that year, he was then arrested in the UK because of an arrest warrant being issued for him in the US, and was eventually extradited. In March 2015, he pleaded guilty in the US to one count of conspiracy to provide support to a foreign terrorist organisation before January 1 2000, and to another charge related to providing material to a terrorist organisation. He was jailed for 20 years, but did not serve the full sentence due to 'periods of detention in this country awaiting extradition' being taken into account, Mr Justice Jay said. A Government spokesman reportedly said: "Protecting our national security is the very first priority of this government and if any individual poses a threat to that security, the police and intelligence services have a range of powers they can apply to deal with that threat. "We will always do whatever is necessary inside the law to protect the public from any risk posed by former terrorist offenders or people of terrorist concern." The Mirror has contacted the Ministry of Justice for comment.
