STM won't be adding more elevators to Metro stations, for now, citing lack of funding
The Société de transport de Montréal (STM) pointed to Quebec's spring budget in a news release, saying that for the third year in a row, the government had not allocated any new funding for infrastructure maintenance or universal accessibility.
According to the STM, maintenance funding is actually set to decrease by $258 million over the next three years.
"This is a worrying situation that jeopardizes the reliability and safety of the network," said Éric Alan Caldwell, chairman of the STM board of directors, in the release.
"This is all the more worrying given that the Annual Infrastructure Management Plan (PAGI) confirms that the proportion of STM assets in poor condition has jumped from 23 per cent to 39 per cent, whether it be tunnels, stations or our MR-73 trains."
Caldwell said that without the necessary funding, the STM can't launch projects to both maintain its infrastructure and build elevators.
Elevator installation work that is already underway at the Berri-UQAM Metro station on the Yellow line and Édouard-Monpetit on the Blue line, will continue.
The $7-million elevator project at Atwater means it is now the 30th of 68 stations in the Metro network to become universally accessible.
WATCH | Transit funding not a top priority in provincial budget:
Public transit 'losing ground' in Quebec as provincial budget focuses on other priorities
23 days ago
Duration 2:08
Steven Laperrière, general manager of the disability advocacy group Regroupement des activistes pour l'inclusion au Québec (RAPLIQ), said he welcomed the addition in such a "pivotal" station but laments the pause on future projects.
He said the onus is often put on people with disabilities or people who use wheelchairs and other mobility devices, to justify the need for more accessibility, when in fact, it benefits everyone.
"Let's just say you have an accident and you have a broken leg, well you can at least have an elevator to take you [to the] subway station," he said. "It's important ... it helps everyone."
Laperrière acknowledges that STM's paratransit system, used as an alternative to riding the subway, is a good one, but he says it still has its limitations.
"You have to reserve at least 24 hours in advance so that if you have an emergency, there's nothing you can do about it," Laperrière said.
Then you need to know your departure time and your return time which requires a lot of planning, and the service isn't always on time, he added.
"What we're asking is for the complete accessibility of the subway system," he said.
While the transit agency was aiming to make 41 stations accessible by 2030, that target, it now says, is unlikely to be reached.
Despite the setback, Laperrière is still hopeful it can become a reality.
it initiated against the STM, the City of Montreal, the Autorité régionale de transport métropolitain and Réseau de transport métropolitain.
The organization argued that the lack of wheelchair accessibility on subways and trains is discriminatory.
With hearings on the matter over since December 2023, a decision should be forthcoming, says Laperrière.
"It's kind of long, but at the end of the day, I guess everybody understands because it's a huge decision," he said. "It's going to be historical, whatever the decision is."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
3 days ago
- Vancouver Sun
David Eby threatens to step in if Metro Vancouver ducks external probe of huge sewage plant cost overrun
VICTORIA — Metro Vancouver's decision to delay a review of the $3-billion-overbudget North Shore wastewater treatment plant does not let the regional district off the hook on accountability to taxpayers, Premier David Eby said Monday. 'We're reviewing the decision of Metro Vancouver to delay doing a full review … that Metro had committed and promised to us that they would deliver,' the premier told reporters. 'We'll have a look at the justification for the (delay) decision. But the bottom line is that Metro Vancouver needs to ensure accountability for taxpayers and we'll make sure that happens.' A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Metro board's rationale, announced Friday, was that it wanted first to resolve a lawsuit with the former contractor on the troubled project, which is now expected to cost nearly $4 billion. 'There are two obviously crucial values for taxpayers,' Eby conceded. 'One is to know that Metro Vancouver has the tools and the capacity to do and deal with big infrastructure projects and do it responsibly and in a way that minimizes costs for people at home. 'The other is that Metro Vancouver, if they were wronged by contracting companies, that they're able to recover in court and offset losses the taxpayers and all of us are facing as a result.' Metro chair Mike Hurley cited the latter consideration in explaining the board's decision, taken in private on Friday, to suspend the independent review. 'The board has decided the public interest is best served by resolving the legal dispute with the previous contractor before undertaking the review,' Hurley said by news release. Hurley had launched the independent review just five months ago, citing it as evidence of his commitment to transparency and accountability since he took over as Metro chair in July of last year. 'When I came in as the chair, I committed to bringing in an independent party to review the North Shore wastewater treatment plant,' said Hurley. 'We look forward to sharing the results of this work with the public once complete.' The lead reviewer was Peter Milburn, former deputy minister of finance in the B.C. government. Milburn reported on the overrun on the Site C project, which led to the budget being increased from $10.7 billion to $16 billion. Hurley announced the appointment of Milburn and his associates on Feb. 28. Then in April, Metro went to court to try to delay its two-way legal battle with Acciona, which the region's sewerage and drainage district terminated as contractor on the wastewater treatment plant three years ago. Acciona is claiming $250 million in damages over the termination. The regional district's counterclaim 'exceeds $1 billion,' court was told. The two sides were set to square off in B.C. Supreme Court starting on March 1, 2027. But Metro asked for the proceedings to be delayed to September 2028, a request that raised a judicial eyebrow with the presiding B.C. Supreme Court judge, Bruce Elwood. 'The district says in effect it cannot be ready for a trial in the one year and 10 months that remain before the trial date and that an adjournment of one and a half years is necessary to ensure that it receives a fair trial,' the judge observed. 'Three years have already passed since the termination of the project agreement, four to five and a half years since the events leading to the termination, six years since the project agreement was negotiated and 10 years since the procurement period commenced. 'If the trial is adjourned there will be a further 3½ delay before the witnesses can start to provide their testimony.' Though Metro asked for more time to process some four million documents produced by Acciona, the judge said the case is also dependent on the memories of dozens of witnesses whose testimony will be heard over an estimated 130 days of court time. Some key witnesses have moved away, others have retired and one has died. Instead of granting the lengthy delay, the judge urged Metro to put more staff to work on preparing for trial. The case is still set to go ahead March 1, 2027, well after next year's civic elections. But rumours persist that Metro is exploring an out-of-court settlement, probably including non-disclosure agreements for both sides. The Metro politicians have already gagged themselves by making decisions in private on this fiasco. Last year, they were sworn to secrecy on what their own internal reports said about the overrun. On Friday, they refused to disclose how individual board members voted on the decision to suspend the review. This week, a quartet of local political leaders — New Westminster Coun. Daniel Fontaine, Richmond's Kash Heed, Surrey's Linda Annis and Burnaby's Richard Lee — called on Eby to intervene with a review of his own. Eby hasn't ruled out the possibility. 'There's no question that work has to be done at Metro to get things under control and in hand,' he said last week. 'We're counting on the chair and the Metro Vancouver council to deliver that — and if they can't, the province is prepared to step in.' He should do just that, if Metro's pattern of delay and coverup persists. vpalmer@
CTV News
17-07-2025
- CTV News
Frustrated by stalled talks, STM maintenance workers consider strike action
Bruno Jeannotte, president of the Montreal Transit Union, addresses journalists to denounce the lack of progress in negotiations between the STM and its maintenance employees during a demonstration held on Thursday, Jul 17, 2025. (The Canadian Press/Pierre Saint-Arnaud) Hot dogs, hamburgers, signs, flags, horns and whistles were on the menu outside the Youville workshops where the Société de transport de Montréal (STM) services and repairs its buses, as about 100 maintenance workers staged a protest Thursday afternoon over stalled contract talks. According to Bruno Jeannotte, president of the Syndicat du transport de Montréal, which represents about 2,400 STM maintenance workers, the slow pace of negotiations could lead to stronger pressure tactics. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Jeannotte expressed frustration with the employer's failure to table its bargaining priorities, despite nine days of mediated talks since the end of the last strike in mid-June. 'Our perception is that the employer is stalling at the bargaining table,' he said. 'Instead of identifying its priorities — which should have happened on day one or two of mediation — they're asking us for clarifications on various articles, which in the end might not even make it into their priority list. So we're really at a standstill right now.' Waiting on Bill 89? Jeannotte suspects the STM may be dragging its feet in hopes the Quebec government will rush through Bill 89, legislation titled An Act to Better Consider the Needs of the Population in the Event of a Strike or Lockout. 'We know the labour minister, Jean Boulet, is hinting that bills like Bill 89 could be fast-tracked. Is the employer leaning on the minister, thinking it will get government backing, and so sees no benefit to negotiating right now? I can't explain why the STM still hasn't presented its priorities.' Bill 89 would limit strikes and expand the definition of essential services in Quebec. It also gives the labour minister new powers to intervene in labour disputes, including the ability to impose arbitration to end strikes or lockouts in certain cases. Pressure tactics or a breakthrough Maintenance workers already walked off the job from June 9 to 17. If bargaining remains stalled, Jeannotte warned the union may have to repeat that strategy. 'Will we be forced to strike again to really make an impact, to put pressure on the STM? We don't want it to come to that. But after nine full negotiating sessions without any priorities being tabled, we're concerned. If we can't reach an agreement in July or August, there will be pressure tactics come September.' Salaries and outsourcing are at the heart of the dispute. On wages, management is offering an 11 per cent raise over five years — less than half of the union's demand of 25 per cent. Outsourcing poses additional complications. The STM has said that due to chronic underfunding from Quebec, it is considering no longer doing certain maintenance work in-house, particularly in construction. But the union argues that outsourcing will cost more in the long run than using its own workers — assuming they stay. 'In the past, we were still ahead of the construction sector,' Jeannotte said. 'Now when we look at outside job postings, construction wages and conditions have improved. We need electricians, masons and bricklayers who work in the Metro at night. But the competition offers daytime work, weekends off, and overtime pay for weekend and night work. Meanwhile, the STM wants workers on regular pay for days, evenings, nights and weekends. That doesn't attract people.' Thirteen years of night shifts The Canadian Press spoke to one employee, who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of employer retaliation, who works as a track maintenance worker in the Metro . His reality echoed Jeannotte's comments when asked why he was protesting under the sweltering sun. 'It's mostly about work-life balance,' he said. 'I've been with the STM for 13 years, working nights as a track maintenance worker, and I still don't see the day when I'll have a daytime position.' The collective agreement expired Jan. 1, but negotiations began in March 2024. Mediation has been ongoing since the end of the strike on June 17. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on July 17, 2025.
Montreal Gazette
08-07-2025
- Montreal Gazette
Opinion: Valérie Plante needs to come out of hiding
Op Eds It's the summer of 1997. I'm sitting in the back seat of my parents' car as we head off on our next family vacation. To keep me occupied, my mother hands me one of my Where's Waldo? books. I could spend hours searching for Waldo — hidden behind a tree, a beach house or an ice cream parlour. Today, as a political observer and with summer vacations in full swing, I'm no longer looking for Waldo. I'm looking for Valérie Plante. Because like many Montrealers, I'm seriously wondering: Where is our mayor? A few weeks ago, La Presse revealed that the city's top elected official has missed half of the executive committee's meetings since announcing her decision to step down last fall. That's as if the province's premier would neglect to attend half of their cabinet's meetings — serious questions would soon be raised about their leadership and ability to govern. In recent months, Plante has also significantly reduced her media presence and public appearances, despite the city grappling with major events like the STM strike and dangerously poor air quality due to high smog levels. Understandably, many are now questioning her motivation and commitment to the job. Usually, as their time in office winds down, politicians step up their public presence — to defend their legacy, to leave a lasting impression, to be remembered positively in the history books. But after nearly eight years in power, what legacy does Plante really have to defend? Bike paths? Sure. If you're among the few who believe spending nearly $100 million to turn Camillien-Houde Way into a giant bike path on Mount Royal — despite clear public opposition — is a productive and visionary move, when city hall is facing other, much more pressing issues, then maybe Plante's tenure can appear to have been a tremendous success. Beyond that — and perhaps a few newly landscaped sidewalk corners — what else does she have to be proud of? Frankly, not much. The city's finances are in poor shape, with steep property tax hikes under Projet Montréal. Our crumbling infrastructure continues to decay. Construction zones and orange cones remain omnipresent. Crime and homelessness are on the rise, with a Léger poll last summer revealing that two-thirds of Montrealers felt their city was less safe than it had been five years before. Small businesses are struggling, with many commercial areas now considered unsafe or uninviting. Meanwhile, the housing crisis has worsened under the Plante administration's heavy-handed bureaucracy and restrictive bylaws, which have made Montreal's real estate market so unappealing that some developers now prefer to build in the suburbs — even though the city itself is where new housing is most urgently needed. In short, almost everything Plante promised to fix when first elected in 2017 has only grown worse. So, is there still a captain at the helm? While her predecessor Denis Coderre was dubbed 'the omni-mayor' for insisting on being everywhere all the time, Plante could be remembered — at least for the final year of her tenure — as the 'ghost mayor.' Maybe her party has asked her to stay out of the spotlight this summer so as not to overshadow her successor as Projet Montréal leader, Luc Rabouin, as he ramps up his campaign ahead of this fall's municipal elections. Or maybe she's just no longer interested in the job now that her departure is official. Either way, the mayor should remember that she still holds the office until someone else is sworn in this November — and that the important responsibilities with which she has been entrusted demand unwavering dedication at all times. Because if she continues to hide like Waldo, Montrealers might remember Valérie Plante as the captain who abandoned ship before it reached its final destination. It may be summertime, but it's not vacation time yet for the mayor. Raphaël Melançon is a public affairs consultant and political analyst. He previously worked as a journalist and political adviser at all three levels of government.
