
Six months later, no answers on death of State Police recruit
Besides undercutting public confidence in the process, the time that has elapsed since Delgado-Garcia's death also raises another concern: How many more recruits will cycle through the academy before this investigation reaches a conclusion and any needed reforms can be put in place?
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The dearth of information led three state senators who represent Delgado-Garcia's hometown of Worcester — Republican Peter Durant and Democrats Michael Moore and Robyn Kennedy — to write a letter to Campbell in February, seeking an update.
As they
In separate interviews, Moore and Kennedy said that the letter led to a conversation with a representative from Campbell's office — but no new information. (Durant's office did not respond to an emailed inquiry.)
Moore said the lawmakers sought to know if the investigation is focused strictly on the death of Delgado-Garcia or if it will also address 'the culture of the academy and possible discriminatory practices.' Regarding those questions, 'They told us they would get back to us,' he said.
Advertisement
Added Kennedy, 'We want to give some peace to the family, that there's some end to this investigation. We did not get that answer.' Lawmakers, she said, will continue to press for answers and 'make sure every lever is pulled.'
Asked for comment about the letter from lawmakers, and for any updates about the investigation, a spokesperson for Campbell said via email, 'The status of the investigation is ongoing and because the matter is open we cannot comment.'
Sure, investigations take time. To maintain their integrity, the amount of information that can be shared with the public is also limited. That's understood. But there is also a need to reassure Delgado-Garcia's family and the public. To that end, why not issue a basic statement that goes a little beyond saying the investigation is ongoing — one that acknowledges that numerous investigative steps are underway, including relevant interviews; review of medical, forensic and physical evidence; and review of training procedures and protocols.
Separate from the Meier investigation,
But the independent review is not yet underway.
In response to Healey's directive, Noble led a series of conversations to develop a request for proposals to conduct an independent review, the spokesperson said. A team is now reviewing proposals that were submitted by the deadline of Feb. 25. A proposal will be chosen 'very soon,' and after that happens, the hope is that the review will be completed within six months.
Advertisement
State Police did provide some information about the scope of the independent review. It will focus on training programs and methods; attrition and injury rates; injury prevention and fitness standards; organizational culture and leadership; and alignment with national standards.
In the meantime, the department is implementing a pilot program that will divide the recruit class into two smaller groups, one beginning in May and the other in October. The goal is to give instructors an opportunity to better address the individual needs of each recruit, strengthen mentorship, and foster overall readiness. An hour-by-hour stress assessment of a recruit's day at the academy was also recently completed.
'We remain committed to ensuring that all training curriculum, staff instruction, and physical space fosters professionalism, integrity, and excellence, while prioritizing the health and well-being of our recruits,' Noble said in a statement emailed to the editorial board.
Without concrete action, commitment is merely a promise.
Before he died, Delgado-Garcia was sworn in as a trooper. To honor his dream and his memory, Massachusetts owes him more than words.
Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats should make 2026 a referendum on Trump and Epstein
Memo to Democrats: If you want to trigger a wave of wins in next year's midterms, demand hearings on the Epstein files. Also, at every press conference about inflation, Ukraine or cuts to Medicaid, display a big photo of President Trump posing with Jeffrey Epstein and women. Every camera should have a clear view of a poster with this Trump quote: 'I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do — and many of them are on the younger side.' Credit New York Magazine's 2002 interview with Trump. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) is a role model here. At his reelection campaign kickoff last week, he said plainly, 'Did anyone really think the sexual predator president who used to party with Jeffrey Epstein was going to release the Epstein files?' Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Cali.) is another model. He is demanding the release of all files related to the Epstein case. Khanna even tried to attach a resolution on releasing the files as an amendment to a cryptocurrency measure, only to have it blocked by House Republicans. A cynic might ask: Why are House Republicans sitting on the files? Who are they protecting? Many of Trump's loyalists in the House GOP conference used congressional oversight powers to push conspiracy theories about Benghazi and Hillary Clinton's email server. Democrats have far more evidence of wrongdoing and cover-up in going after the Epstein files. Trump won in 2016 on the strength of a conspiracy theory, the false claim that President Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. Remember Trump saying his private investigators 'couldn't believe what they were finding'? There is no need for false claims tying Epstein to Trump. You can watch the video of Trump partying with Epstein in Florida in 1992. You can also watch the video where Trump says of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime companion, 'I wish her well.' Maxwell is in jail on charges of helping Epstein by 'facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of children,' in the words of Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney who oversaw her 2021 trial and conviction. Open the facts of this case for all to see. Note that Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi served as Florida's attorney general from 2011 to 2019. Remind Americans that Trump was questioned by lawyers for Epstein's victims, according to Florida investigative reporter Julie K. Brown, who helped break the Epstein story open in 2018. Trump's first Secretary of Labor, Alex Acosta, was the U.S. Attorney in South Florida who cut Epstein a sweetheart deal. When asked why by the Trump vetting team, Acosta reportedly claimed he had been told to 'back off' because Epstein was connected to 'intelligence.' That's not speculation. Neither Acosta nor the Trump administration officials who vetted him have denied it, according to the reporter who broke the story. A special prosecutor should subpoena Acosta, place him under oath and ask, 'Mr. Acosta, is it true that someone told you to go easy on Epstein because he was connected to intelligence? If so, who told you that?' The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Trump sent a birthday greeting to Epstein in 2003 with a hand-drawn outline of a naked female. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief White House strategist, is calling for a special prosecutor. And let's not forget that Elon Musk, Trump's top campaign donor, said flatly that Trump was in the Epstein files in an X post last month. Why isn't Trump suing Musk for defamation? Calling out Trump on his use of conspiracy theories is long overdue. Even in the White House, he has falsely claimed he was targeted by a liberal ' Deep State. ' Despite Russia being found to have supported his 2016 candidacy, he rightly said there was no proof of 'collusion,' but then he claimed Democrats had created a Russia 'hoax.' When he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden, Trump spun yet another conspiracy theory about the election being rigged by Democrats in big cities. That led to a riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6. One of Trump's first acts upon returning to office was to pardon the people who attempted a violent overthrow of the election in service of that conspiracy theory. For years, Trump and his supporters in the conservative media have pushed conspiracies featuring him as a truth-telling, right-wing avenger. But none of those charges against Democrats, including former President Bill Clinton and President Obama, have been more enduring than suspicions of a conspiracy involving Trump and a man convicted on prostitution charges, Epstein. The shadowy former financier apparently committed suicide during Trump's first term before he could face added charges for sex crimes. His associate Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence in a federal prison in Florida for her role in Epstein's activities. Now, as the Trump administration refuses to make good on its promise to release all files on Epstein's crimes, Democrats have an opportunity to heal the damage done by the president's use of social media to create a political base of people who follow his false claims. Trump's critics have long asked: How does this end? What will it take for Trump's base to finally see through him? Ironically, the conservative media's echo chamber may now lead to his undoing. Democrats have to make 2026 a referendum on Trump's handling of Epstein.

Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NH rejects Trump request for list of registered voters
Citing a black-and-white voting records privacy law, Secretary of State David Scanlan flatly rejected the Trump administration's demand for New Hampshire's list of all registered voters, part of an organized White House campaign to seek millions of names from targeted states in advance of the 2026 midterm elections. A little over a week ago, President Donald Trump signaled his focus remains on the falsehoods that he has spread about his 2020 presidential election defeat. Trump posted on social media that Attorney General Pam Bondi will be looking into 'The Rigged and Stolen Election of 2020.' The push for the voting data has election observers wondering if the aim is to build a file of voter intelligence that could help Trump become more immune to partisan losses in the midterm elections. More than 350 election officials from at least 33 states joined a recent conference call to hear from Democratic and Republican lawyers who offered their insights about the implications of the administration's demands. On June 25, Acting Chief of the Civil Rights Division Maureen Riordan and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Gates wrote Scanlan, presenting him with a 15-point punch list of voter information. N.H. rejects Trump administration request for registered voters list The Trump administration's Justice Department sent demand letters to election officials in New Hampshire and eight other targeted states requesting a complete list of registered voters along with 14 other items. Secretary of State David Scanlan said the state can't meet that demand, citing a 2003 law that defines these records as confidential. This image is from a town meeting last March which was the first election when a new law kicked in that new voters would have to prove identity, citizenship and domicile to register to vote. The letter cited the federal Help America Vote Act as the authority for Justice to request information on voter registration, including how the state identifies illegal immigrants who may seek to vote or culls from the voting rolls dead voters or those convicted of a felony. 'Please include both active and inactive voters,' the letter states in asking for lists of registered voters. The Washington Post first reported this story, noting that the inquiries for the voter list were a mix of blue and red states including New Hampshire, Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. On that list, Wisconsin and Nevada were the only two that were battleground states that decided the 2024 election, an electoral vote romp for Trump over Democrat Kamala Harris because Trump swept all seven battleground states. Trump was competitive in the Granite State, but he has lost all three presidential races in New Hampshire. Curiously, the Union Leader has confirmed there were other states such as Pennsylvania that received the same letter demand, which was identical except it did not have the critical 15th action item — a copy of the voter registration list. Pennsylvania has long been a battleground state. Its majority for Joe Biden ensured Trump's defeat in 2020, but Trump recovered to take it last November. Law created in 2003 The New Hampshire Legislature in 2003 created a law spelling out how the voter database is to be compiled, monitored and protected. It contains a strikingly stark privacy provision that makes the documents not only secret but undiscoverable in a court case. 'The voter database shall be private and confidential and shall not be subject to RSA 91-A (Right-to-Know Law) and RSA 654:31 (Voter Checklist Law) nor shall it or any of the information contained therein be disclosed pursuant to a subpoena or civil litigation discovery request,' the law reads. Anna Sventek, Scanlan's communications director, confirmed Scanlan's office spoke with a Justice Department official about the request. 'We had a conversation with them about New Hampshire statutes relative to the availability of voter checklist information and made them aware of RSA 654:45,' Sventek said, alluding to the law and its privacy provision.' N.H. rejects Trump Justice Dept. demand for registered voter list David Scanlan 'No further action has been taken or requested.' The law permits designated local and state ballot officials to have access to the database for the purpose of verifying registration information for elections. Also, the law permits the data to be shared with state and federal court officials strictly for the preparation of jury lists. Judge granted exception in ALCU suit vs. N.H. A federal judge recently granted an exception to the New Hampshire privacy law, agreeing to allow the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire access to it. The ACLU-NH sued the state over a new Republican-led law that compels first-time voters to show proof of citizenship when they register. State prosecutors argued giving the ACLU the database was too much of a risk. A New Hampshire federal judge disagreed, pointing to a previous lawsuit in which the same information was shared with opposing lawyers without adverse consequence. The Post reported that Colorado and Florida provided information to the Justice Department from their lists while officials in other states said they were reviewing requests. David Becker, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation & Research, who was on that conference call, said election officials worry about 'federal imposition' that could override their authority. Some inquiries 'The DOJ seems dead set on acquiring personal information on voters, including driver's license numbers, Social Security numbers and dates of birth — records that are highly protected under federal law and under state law and which state election officials are sworn to protect,' Becker said. Some of the inquiries to states went beyond the fact finding sought from New Hampshire and others. Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold told ABC News her office got a letter in May after Justice officials said they 'recently received a complaint alleging noncompliance' with the Voting Rights Act. The letter was signed by Harmeet Dhillon — an assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division — who was formerly a Trump campaign legal adviser. klandrigan@

28 minutes ago
Republicans can't stop talking about Joe Biden. That may be a problem.
ATLANTA -- It's been six months since Joe Biden left the Oval Office. Republicans, including President Donald Trump, can't stop talking about him. The House has launched investigations asserting that Biden's closest advisers covered up a physical and mental decline during the 82-year-old Democrat's presidency. The Senate has started a series of hearings focused on his mental fitness. And Trump's White House has opened its own investigation into the Biden administration's use of the presidential autopen, which Trump has called 'one of the biggest scandals in the history of our country.' It all fits with Trump's practice of blaming his predecessors for the nation's ills. Just last week, he tried to deflect criticism of his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case by casting blame on others, including Biden. Turning the spotlight back on the former president carries risks for both parties heading into the 2026 midterms. The more Republicans or Democrats talk about Biden, the less they can make arguments about the impact of Trump's presidency — positive or negative — especially his sweeping new tax cut and spending law that is reshaping the federal government. 'Most Americans consider Joe Biden to be yesterday's news,' Republican pollster Whit Ayres said. Seeking to avenge his 2020 loss to Biden, Trump mocked his rival's age and fitness incessantly in 2024, even after Biden dropped his reelection bid and yielded to then-Vice President Kamala Harris. He and other Republicans seemed poised to spend the summer touting their new tax, spending and policy package. But Trump, now 79 and facing his own health challenges, has refused to let up on Biden, and his allies in the party have followed suit. Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden of Wisconsin called the Biden White House's use of the autopen 'a massive scandal,' while Republican Rep. Nick Lalota insists his New York constituents 'are curious as to what was happening during President Biden's days.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt recently confirmed the administration would pursue an investigation of the Biden administration's use of the presidential autopen. Trump and other Republicans have questioned whether Biden was actually running the country and suggested aides abused a tool that has long been a routine part of signing presidentially approved actions. 'We deserve to get to the bottom of it,' Leavitt said. Biden has responded to the criticism by issuing a statement saying he was, in fact, making the decisions during his presidency and that any suggestion otherwise "is ridiculous and false." On Capitol Hill, the House Oversight Committee has convened hearings on use of the autopen and Biden's fitness for office. Van Orden cited the Constitution's Article II vesting authority solely with the president. 'It doesn't say chief of staff. It doesn't say an auto pen,' he said. The House panel subpoenaed Biden's physician and a top aide to former first lady Jill Biden. Both invoked Fifth Amendment protections that prevent people from being forced to testify against themselves in government proceedings. 'There was no there there,' said Democratic Rep. Wesley Bell of Missouri, a member of the committee who called the effort 'an extraordinary waste of time.' The committee's chairman, Rep. James Comer, wants to hear from former White House chiefs of staff Ron Klain and Jeff Zients; former senior advisers Mike Donilon and Anita Dunn; and other former top aides Bruce Reed, Steve Ricchetti and Annie Tomasini, among others. Republicans confirmed multiple dates for the sessions through late September, ensuring it will remain in the headlines. That GOP schedule comes as both parties work feverishly to define Trump's start to his second term. His so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is a mix of tax cuts, border security measures and cuts to safety net programs such as Medicaid, a joint state-federal insurance program for lower-income Americans. Polls suggest some individual measures are popular while others are not and that the GOP faces headwinds on tilting the public in favor of the overall effort. A recent poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about two-thirds of U.S. adults view the bill as a win for the wealthy and another found that only about one-quarter of U.S. adults felt Trump's policies have helped them. In the policy survey, he failed to earn majority support on any of the major issues, including the economy, immigration, government spending and health care. Immigration, especially, had been considered a major strength for Trump politically. It is 'rather tone deaf,' said Rep. Wesley Bell, a Missouri Democrat, for Republicans to go after Biden given those circumstances. 'Americans want us to deal with the issues that are plaguing our country now … the high cost of living, cost of food, the cost of housing, health care,' Bell said, as he blasted the GOP for a deliberate 'distraction" from what challenges most U.S. households. The effort also comes with Trump battling his own supporters over the Justice Department's decision not to publicly release additional records related to the Epstein case. 'The Epstein saga is more important to his base than whatever happened to Joe Biden,' said Ayres, the GOP pollster. Even Lalota, the New York congressman, acknowledged a balancing act with the Biden inquiries. 'My constituents care most about affordability and public safety,' Lalota said. 'But this is an important issue nonetheless.' With Republicans protecting a narrow House majority, every hotly contested issue could be seen as determinative in the 2026 midterm elections. That puts added pressure on Republicans to retain Trump's expanded 2024 coalition, when he increased support among Black and Hispanic voters, especially men, over the usual Republican levels. But that's considerably harder without Trump himself on the ballot. That could explain Republican efforts to keep going after Biden given how unpopular he is with Trump's core supporters. Democrats, meanwhile, point to their success in the 2018 midterms during Trump's first presidency, when they reclaimed the House majority on the strength of moderate voters, including disaffected Republicans. They seem confident that Republicans' aggressiveness about Biden does not appeal to that swath of the electorate. But even as they praise Biden's accomplishments as president, Democrats quietly admit they don't want to spend time talking about a figure who left office with lagging approval ratings and forced his party into a late, difficult change at the top of the ticket. Democratic Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia said Biden was productive while acknowledging he "was not at the top of his game because of his age.' He said Democrats want to look forward, most immediately on trying to win control of the House and make gains in the Senate. 'And then who's our standard bearer in 2028?' Beyer said. "And how do we minimize the Trump damage with what we have right now?'