logo
Labour scraps £950m EV rapid charging fund first announced by Conservatives

Labour scraps £950m EV rapid charging fund first announced by Conservatives

The Guardian22-06-2025

Labour ministers have scrapped a promise by the previous government for a £950m fund for installing electric car chargers near motorways, instead setting aside a smaller sum mainly for on-street charging points.
The rapid charging fund (RCF) was first announced in 2020 by Rishi Sunak, then Conservative chancellor, with the aim of supporting upgrades to the grid so that more electric vehicles could be rapidly charged at the same time.
However, it was mired in delays amid concerns it could unfairly benefit some motorway service companies.
The Department for Transport said the RCF had never formally been included in budget plans, so the promise was unfunded.
The Guardian revealed in March that ministers were considering directing proposed funding away from motorway services, amid criticisms of the fund's design from industry.
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has committed £400m over the next five years 'to support the rollout of charging infrastructure' in this month's spending review, after announcing £200m for charging at the autumn budget. It is understood much of the spending will support on-street charge points in poorer areas, where private-sector investment has lagged behind.
However, some people in the charging industry said the government should have honoured the £950m pledge in full, even if the money was redirected towards other incentives for people to switch to EVs.
John Lewis, the chief executive at char.gy, which operates on-street chargers, welcomed the £400m pledge. However, he said: 'The key question now is: couldn't the full amount have been directed towards the EV effort – whether through the continued rollout of on-street charging or other consumer incentives – to give people greater confidence to make the switch to electric?'
The number of electric car chargers in the UK is rising rapidly, passing 80,000 in May, according to data company Zap Map. That represented a 29% increase compared with a year earlier, while the number of rapid chargers with power above 50kW rose by a third.
Not all chargers are created equal
More and more people are buying electric cars, and are having to grapple with charging for the first time. However, not all chargers are created equal, and the profusion of units can cause confusion.
Charging speeds are measured by power output in kilowatts (kW), while battery capacity is measured in kilowatt hours (kWh). For example, a Nissan Leaf has 39kWh of battery capacity, while a Tesla Model Y has 60kWh.
Recharge times vary depending on battery size: divide the battery size by the power to get a very rough idea of how many hours it will take to charge. (E.g., a 60kWh battery at a 22kW charger would take about three hours.) The quicker the charge, the more it tends to cost.
Slow: up to 8kW
Common at homes, on-street chargers and places cars hang around like car parks or hotels. Suitable for charging overnight. Plugging in with a UK three-pin plug to the mains at home will deliver about 2.3kW – although it is not recommended.
Fast: 8kW to 49kW
Found at urban sites like supermarkets, shopping centres or car parks. Capable of charging a smaller battery in a few hours.
Rapid: 50kW to 150kW
Typically found close to big roads for journey charging, but also increasingly found in locations such as supermarkets or gyms with short dwell times. 50kW could give 80% charge in less than an hour.
Ultra-rapid: 150kW and above
Most chargers being installed at motorway services or dedicated charging hubs are now at least 150kW. Many newer cars can now handle 150kW, and several can charge at speeds of over 300kW, adding hundreds of miles of range in around 10 minutes.
Increasing the number of public chargers is seen as crucial to persuading people to switch to electric cars. However, the focus has shifted from rapid chargers, which can allay 'range anxiety' on longer journeys, to the slower on-street chargers needed for car owners who do not have private parking spaces.
Ian Johnston, the chief executive of Osprey Charging, said: 'New funding should be more effectively deployed on projects in prime locations where the grid connection costs render the site unviable – whether A roads, underserved regions or the small number of motorway locations with unviable grid – rather than gifted to all motorway sites regardless of the costs, as was envisaged under the RCF.'
Johnston also called for changes to road signage permissions to allow charge points to be easily advertised to drivers.
Quentin Willson, the founder of FairCharge, a group campaigning for cheaper charging, said the full £950m should have been spent on accelerating the switch to electric cars.
'Withholding unused RCF funds and not diverting them towards other EV charging initiatives isn't a great look for government,' he said. 'It opens them to the obvious questions about their commitment to the EV transition.'
Willson, a former presenter of the Top Gear TV programme, said the government should also cut VAT on public charging to match the lower rates available on home electricity.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: 'The rapid charging fund was designed to support the rollout of charging infrastructure on motorways and major A roads – but the previous government did not set out detailed plans to deliver this.
'Since the fund was announced in 2020, the market has changed significantly, with the number of open-access rapid and ultra-rapid charge points within one mile of the strategic road network almost quadrupling in the last three years alone.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests
Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Savers won't benefit from Reeves's pension reforms, Labour's own research suggests

Rachel Reeves's radical pensions overhaul will only 'slightly' benefit savers, Labour's own research suggests. Unearthed government documents show that changes brought in by Pension Schemes Bill will provide just 'slightly greater expected returns', despite the Chancellor's promises to deliver 'bigger pots for savers.' The Bill, which is set to become law next year, proposes giving regulators the ability to force defined contribution schemes to invest in private markets. But in a best case scenario, this will only add £5,000 to an average pension pot after 30 years, Government forecasts show. Experts have repeatedly warned that the Chancellor risks 'sacrificing' people's long-term retirement goals in pursuit of economic growth. Meanwhile, Ms Reeves has claimed that the Bill is a 'game changer' that would deliver bigger returns. Currently, the majority of defined contribution schemes are invested in public markets, such as government and corporate bonds or stocks and shares. The private market, such as start-ups and infrastructure projects, only makes up a small portion of pension fund portfolios. But under Ms Reeves's changes, regulators could be given a reserve power to force schemes to invest in UK private markets. Mike Ambery, of Standard Life, said he did not expect the reserve power to be used, but he questioned why it was added to the Bill in the first place when already positively being actioned. Under the voluntary Mansion House Accord, 17 of the UK's largest defined contribution scheme providers pledged to invest at least 5pc of their assets in UK private markets by 2030. Defined contribution pensions are schemes that savers pay in to to build up a pot of money over time. Tom Selby, of AJ Bell, said: 'Pension schemes should fundamentally be investing to deliver the best possible returns for savers, regardless of where those assets are held.' 'There is a real danger in conflating the Government's increasingly desperate efforts to deliver economic growth with people's long-term retirement goals that the latter will be sacrificed in pursuit of the former. 'Ministers need to be straight with people about the risks inherent in this approach, rather than denying the uncertainty that exists and claiming this is somehow a guaranteed win-win for savers and the UK economy.' The Chancellor has already faced criticism over other parts of the Bill, namely allowing defined benefit pension schemes to transfer surplus funds back into businesses. Firms will be allowed to raid £160bn in defined benefit pension surpluses, loosening existing safeguards that protect pensions from riskier investments. Around 8.8 million savers are members of a defined benefit pension scheme. They provide a guaranteed income for life, typically based on someone's final salary. The majority of defined benefit schemes are now running at a surplus thanks to increased investment returns and higher interest rates. Steve Webb, partner at pension consultants LCP, said: 'The Government's primary objective in changing the way pension funds are invested is to boost the UK economy rather than to boost individual pensions. 'The Government's own projections suggest that even after several decades of the new approach, the impact on individual pension pots is likely to be slight. 'Given that we clearly have an under-saving crisis in the UK, with millions set for a disappointing retirement, there needs to be much greater urgency around measures to get more money flowing into pension savings'. The Department for Work and Pensions was contacted for comment.

How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills
How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

How plug-in solar panels could help Britons save 30% on energy bills

Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Britons could soon buy cheap solar panels which can be put on balconies, sheds and terraces to cut their energy bills. The plan, using so-called plug-in solar modules which typically cut bills by 30 per cent in countries where they are already used, has been announced by the government as part of a broader plan to step up solar power access. Using balconies for solar panels is already common in Germany, where 1.5 million homes use the technology. Locals have named it Balkonkraftwerk, or balcony power plant. Using solar panels this way is a lot cheaper than installing them on a roof, where scaffolding and hiring specialist workers means that even a modest eight-panel array will cost about £5,000. It will also unlock solar power for many of Britian's 5.4m households which rent. Presently, only homeowners can opt to fit solar panels unless they agree a deal with their landlord. Even then, if they moved, they would lose their panels. The proposed system is portable. This so-called plug-in power plant also means no expensive fitting is required. Instead, the panels are attached to an inverter, which steps up the voltage to the 240v used by your home's mains supply. It is then attached by a regular plug. To avoid electric shock, the inverters detect when they are unplugged and isolate the plug and its exposed electrical pins. open image in gallery Rooftop panels still produce the most ebergy but they are expensive to fit ( Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ) The government is investigating whether a similar safe system can be deployed in the UK. Unlike a full rooftop solar system, no power can be sold back to the grid with plug-in panels. Instead, the aim is to cut electricity bills during the day from appliances like fridges, freezers and computers used by home workers. The panels also probably won't face upwards for the best power generation, since roofs are still the best for that. But plummeting solar panel prices and climbing prices for having them fitted to a roof mean that balcony panels are now a more attractive option than in previous years. Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero Ed Miliband said solar 'is one of the cheapest and quickest to build power sources we have.' He added: 'We will push ahead on a solar rooftop revolution, while tackling the barriers of planning, grid, supply chains and skills.' In Germany, a pair of 400-watt panels could save €120 to €240 a year in electricity costs, according to consumer website Finanztip, which could be 30 per cent off a smaller flat's usage, according to manufacturer estimates. Panels can last 30 years if looked after well, and the €540 they can cost can be recouped in a few years, depending on usage.

'Very frustrating for Newcastle and Howe so far'
'Very frustrating for Newcastle and Howe so far'

BBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Very frustrating for Newcastle and Howe so far'

Our chief football writer Phil McNulty has been taking your asked: Why do we (Newcastle United) seem to be struggling to get deals done? Eddie Howe said he wanted business done early but we haven't been able to attract our top targets. It's a little bit of a replied: It has been frustrating as I was at Newcastle on the last day of the season when Eddie Howe said it was imperative business was done quickly. But this has not is not as if they have not been trying, but they have been unable to agree deals and now it looks like Joao Pedro, a prime target, is off to Chelsea.I think this was always a fear behind the scenes at Newcastle, with the attraction of London and extending the ex-Brighton clan of Marc Cucurella, Moises Caicedo and Robert plenty of time to bring in new faces – but there is no escaping the fact it has all been very frustrating for Newcastle and Howe so far.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store