
Why is the Rs. 86,300 Cr Shaktipeeth Expressway facing massive farmer protests across 12 Maharashtra districts?
However, the expressway has triggered widespread farmer protests across 12 districts, making it one of the most controversial projects in the state's recent history.
Why Are Farmers Protesting the Shaktipeeth Expressway?
The expressway, stretching over 802 kilometers, will pass through Wardha, Yavatmal, Hingoli, Nanded, Parbhani, Beed, Latur, Dharashiv, Solapur, Sangli, Kolhapur, and Sindhudurg.
Over 55,000 agrarian families are reportedly affected by the land acquisition drive. Farmers allege that the government is planning to acquire around 27,000 acres of fertile agricultural land, much of which is irrigated and has supported generations of rural livelihoods.
The resistance is particularly fierce in districts like Sangli, Beed, and Hingoli, where protests have included road blockades on national highways such as the Sangli-Kolhapur route and Pune-Bengaluru National Highway.
Many fear that even with compensation, the loss of land will permanently affect their way of life. Concerns have also been raised about the parallel alignment of this expressway with the existing Ratnagiri-Nagpur Expressway, questioning the need for another similar route.
Shaktipeeth Expressway: Political and Social Backlash
The Shaktipeeth Expressway has sparked political controversy, with opposition leaders and farmer groups like the Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana leading protests. On Krushi Din (July 1), thousands of farmers across 12 districts staged 'chakka jam' blockades, disrupting highway traffic to oppose the land surveys.
Shaktipeeth Expressway Land Acquisition: Overview
Shaktipeeth Expressway: Regions Affected by the Expressway
The expressway will pass through key regions in eastern, central, and western Maharashtra, impacting both agricultural and tribal areas. The alignment overlaps with productive farmlands, increasing rural resistance.
Shaktipeeth Expressway: Farmers main concerns
Below are the required Farmers Main Concerns listed:
Land Acquisition and Compensation: Farmers argue that the acquisition process is proceeding without adequate dialogue, with fears of poor or delayed compensation and permanent loss of fertile land managed by families across generations.
Redundancy and Economic Viability: Farmers' leaders, including Raju Shetti of Swabhimani Shetkari Sangathana, have questioned the project's necessity, highlighting that the expressway runs parallel (2 to 30 km apart) to the existing Ratnagiri-Nagpur National Highway (NH166), which itself is running at a loss.
Impact on Livelihood: Especially in Marathwada, many farmers claim the project will hurt economic stability by displacing horticulture and agricultural communities.
Consultation Deficit: Representatives like MP Vishal Patil have demanded village-level consultations rather than unilateral imposition of the project by the government.
Shaktipeeth Expressway: Maharashtra Government's Response
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has defended the expressway as a transformative infrastructure venture that will stimulate economic growth in Marathwada and western Maharashtra, comparing its impact to the Mumbai-Nagpur Samruddhi Expressway.
The government believes the expressway will foster regional development and improve connectivity to important religious sites, or Shaktipeeths.
However, the government also faces pressure to address farmers' grievances and evaluate project viability seriously, with ongoing studies by IIT-Roorkee and IIT-Hyderabad regarding traffic, toll collection, and financial feasibility.
FAQs
1. What is the Shaktipeeth Expressway and where will it run?
Answer: The Shaktipeeth Expressway is a proposed 802-km long, ₹86,300 crore greenfield highway connecting Nagpur to Patradevi (Goa border), passing through 12 Maharashtra districts.
2. Why are farmers protesting the Shaktipeeth Expressway?
Answer: Farmers are protesting because the project may acquire 27,000 acres of fertile agricultural land, affecting over 55,000 families, threatening their livelihoods and traditional farming.
3. Which districts in Maharashtra are affected by the Shaktipeeth Expressway?
Answer: The expressway will pass through 12 districts, including Nagpur, Kolhapur, Sindhudurg, and others. These areas are rich in cultivable and irrigated lands, raising concerns among locals.
4. Is the Shaktipeeth Expressway different from the Ratnagiri-Nagpur Expressway?
Answer: Critics claim it runs parallel to the Ratnagiri-Nagpur Expressway, questioning its necessity. The distance between the two expressways is as little as 2 to 30 kilometers in some regions.
5. What is the Maharashtra government's stance on the protests?
Answer: The government has approved funding and maintains the project will enhance infrastructure. However, it faces intense backlash for inadequate dialogue with farmers and compensation concerns.
For the latest and more interesting financial news, keep reading Indiatimes Worth. Click here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Kolhapur residents hold 45-km silent march for elephant's return
MUMBAI: After the transfer of Mahadevi, an elephant belonging to a Jain shrine in Kolhapur, to Vantara, an animal rescue and rehabilitation initiative by the Reliance Foundation in Jamnagar, those who were unwilling to let go staged a march on Sunday. Thousands of locals and leaders from the ruling Mahayuti alliance in Kolhapur marched for 45 km from the shrine to the collector's office, demanding that Mahadevi be brought back, following which CM Devendra Fadnavis said he would hold a meeting on this on Tuesday. Starting from the Jain Shrine where the elephant, Mahadevi, was kept for the last 30 years, thousands walked together to the collector's office. Mahadevi, 36, was transferred from the Swastishri Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswamy Sanstha to Vantara, following a Bombay high court order on July 16. The court's decision came after hearing a petition by the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which had earlier raised concerns about the elephant's health and psychological condition with the Maharashtra forest department and the High-Powered Committee (HPC) appointed by the Supreme Court to look after the transfer and welfare of captive elephants. PETA had pointed out that the elephant had painful arthritis and foot rot and was kept in solitary confinement. The Supreme Court upheld the HC order on July 22. After initial resistance, Mahadevi was given a tearful farewell at the temple and shifted to Vantara on July 28, but plans by politicians and the people were afoot. Kolhapur residents reportedly began to boycott the Reliance Group's JIO mobile service and launched a signature campaign signed by 200,400 people to be sent to the President of India. After the outcry, Vantara's CEO Vivaan Karani met guardian minister Prakash Abitkar on Friday, following which the latter announced that the state government would move the Supreme Court to hand Mahadevi back to the Jain shrine. The march on Sunday began under the leadership of former MP Raju Shetti, which people joined en route. Other politicians who participated were BJP MLA Rahul Aawade, his father, former minister Prakash Awade, Shirol MLA Rajendra Patil-Yadravkar, Congress leader Satej Patil, Sangli MP Vishal Patil, MLA Vishwajit Kadam and local leaders. A memorandum was submitted to the authorities, urging them to bring the elephant back to the Jain math, where she was kept for over three decades. Addressing the crowd, Raju Shetti called the 'chronology of events leading to the transfer' of Mahadevi to Jamnagar a 'conspiracy'. He also alleged that fake health reports were submitted to the court by PETA and other concerned authorities to obtain an order for Mahadevi's transfer, and called for action against those responsible for submitting the reports. He also demanded that the President cancel the Supreme Court ruling and ensure the elephant's return to Kolhapur. Meanwhile, Vantara also issued an official statement on Sunday and said that it had played no role in seeking Mahadev's transfer. Rueing the 'considerable misinformation' that was being spread about this, the trust pointed out that it was named as a recipient by the HPC, based on its track record in elephant welfare. 'If the math feels it is entitled to the custody of the elephant despite enough proof and the final decision of the court, it should ask the Supreme Court to give it the elephant,' said the statement. 'What is the point of blaming Vantara? The promoter family, which supports Vantara philanthropically… were not party to the proceedings at any stage. Vantara reiterates its commitment to lawful, ethical animal care and has only acted in accordance with judicial and regulatory directives.' The Vantara statement also pointed out that the elephant had been transported 13 times from Maharashtra to Telangana between 2012 and 2023, often without proper forest department permissions. Reports and photographs documented that the elephant was being used commercially. 'She was sent for public processions, including Muharram, used for begging, and publicly paraded,' added the official statement. Using elephants for begging is unlawful and there are many conditions that have to be met before they can be paraded. Congress politician Satej Patil said that although Vantara had agreed to cooperate in transferring the elephant back to the Jain shrine, the state government should also intervene in the matter. Fadnavis, on his part, pointed out that the elephant was transferred to Vantara on a Supreme Court order and announced that he would hold a meeting on the issue on Tuesday. 'I will look into the legal aspects related to bringing Mahadevi back,' he said.


United News of India
2 days ago
- United News of India
Farmers' leader takes out silent march demanding Mahadevi elephant be brought back
Kolhapur, Aug 3 (UNI) Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana (SSS) national president and former MP Raju Shetty today took out a 45 KM long 'Atmaclesh' (masochist) Yatra silent March from Nandani to Kolhapur district collector office, demanding Madhuri alias the Mahadevi elephant be brought back. The pachyderm has shifted to Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust Jamnagar (Vantara sanctuary). Thousands of peoples along with women from all parts of the district, gathered at Sri Chakreshwar temple in Nadani village of this district in the early morning at 0500 hours and began their Silent March (Muk Morcha) towards Kolhapur city, which will reached around at 1600 hours this evening with taking boards in hands with slogans as 'Aamchi Madhuri Parat Dhya"(Return our Madhuri). Shetty, while talking with reporters in March, said that Vantara sanctuary misguided supreme court with submitting false report on the health of Mahadevi elephant. Even supreme court directed to shift the elephant to Jamnagar, it was not final and president of India has a right to change this judgement. A delegation comprising women, will meet district collector Amol Yedge to hand over a memorandum demanding to bring back Mahadevi elephant and also a letter addressed to president Droupadi Murmu to interfere and changed supreme court's direction. UNI SSS SSP


Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
28 Maharashtra sugar mills face action for non-payment of dues to farmers
The sugar commissionerate recently issued Revenue Recovery Code (RRC) against 28 sugar mills in Maharashtra for failing to clear their dues to cane farmers for the 2024-25 season. These mills now face the possibility of their sugar stocks being seized and auctioned to pay farmers their dues. A report from the sugar commissionerate shows that mills in the state had crushed 854.50 lakh tonnes of cane and were expected to pay Rs 31,587 crore as the Fair Remunerative Price (FRP) to farmers for cane purchased from them. Till July 15, Maharashtra reported 98.70 per cent of clearance of cane dues. A total of 135 mills have cleared 100 per cent of their FRP till date. Meanwhile, the Bombay High Court struck down the 2022 government resolution that allowed FRP to be paid in parts. FRP is linked with sugar recovery – which is the ratio between sugar produced and cane crushed – and the 2022 resolution had mandated that payment be done as per the recovery of the current season. This meant the first payment would be as per the base recovery, and once the season is over, the rest would be paid as per the final recovery percentage of the mill. This was a break from the past, where the mills paid the FRP as per the recovery of the last season, and most mills paid FRP in one instalment. Farmer leader Raju Shetti had moved the Bombay High Court against this move, and the high court had struck down the 2022 government resolution. The state government has moved the Supreme Court against this decision. Yogesh Pande, Spokesperson, Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana, said, 'We have already filed a caveat in the Supreme Court in this regard. We will pursue the matter to its logical end.' Partha Sarathi Biwas is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express with 10+ years of experience in reporting on Agriculture, Commodities and Developmental issues. He has been with The Indian Express since 2011 and earlier worked with DNA. Partha's report about Farmers Producer Companies (FPC) as well long pieces on various agricultural issues have been cited by various academic publications including those published by the Government of India. He is often invited as a visiting faculty to various schools of journalism to talk about development journalism and rural reporting. In his spare time Partha trains for marathons and has participated in multiple marathons and half marathons. ... Read More