Praggnanandhaa On Carlsen's Viral 'Big Bang' Reaction: 'I've Done It Sometimes'
Last Updated:
R. Praggnanandhaa said Magnus Carlsen's viral reaction after losing to Gukesh Dommaraju was instinctive but not ideal.
Teenage Grandmaster R. Praggnanandhaa opened up on the recent controversy surrounding Magnus Carlsen's reaction after losing to Gukesh Dommaraju.
Nothing could be more dramatic in modern chess than Carlsen pounding his fist on the table after losing to Gukesh at the elite Norway Chess tournament recently. The incident quickly went viral on social media across various time zones.
When asked if the reaction was beneficial for popularising the game or if FIDE should set boundaries, Praggnanandhaa remarked that he might have reacted similarly, but it became such a sensation because Carlsen is a notable figure.
'Yes, it was an instinctive reaction. I think it does happen to players. I've done it sometimes, but rarely.
'I mean, it's (me hitting the table) not as powerful as Magnus because he's a strong guy, but Gukesh has done it and many others. It's just an instinctive reaction because you're so focused that it just comes out.
'But, I mean, is it a good thing? Maybe not. I don't think so because I guess it's not good. (Having said that), I think so many people got to know that something like this happened and it became such a big thing on the internet.
'And, I think it's good for the game in a way because a lot of people got to know that there was such a tournament going on and that such a dramatic game happened.
'So, I think there are some good things and bad things, but I think overall, chess is growing. That's what matters."
With a nine-year-old coming close to beating him in an online game, it seems that competition is intensifying.
'I think Magnus is still the best player in the world. And I don't think there is any question about it. Whenever he plays a tournament, he is the favourite. He has been proving that he is still the best by winning every tournament.
'For me, personally, I take a lot of inspiration from him, the way he plays.
'For example, he won 9 out of 9 (games) in Grand Slam Freestyle Tournament, which I don't think anyone can do except Magnus. So, yeah, it's just brilliant."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
11 hours ago
- News18
Praggnanandhaa On Carlsen's Viral 'Big Bang' Reaction: 'I've Done It Sometimes'
Last Updated: R. Praggnanandhaa said Magnus Carlsen's viral reaction after losing to Gukesh Dommaraju was instinctive but not ideal. Teenage Grandmaster R. Praggnanandhaa opened up on the recent controversy surrounding Magnus Carlsen's reaction after losing to Gukesh Dommaraju. Nothing could be more dramatic in modern chess than Carlsen pounding his fist on the table after losing to Gukesh at the elite Norway Chess tournament recently. The incident quickly went viral on social media across various time zones. When asked if the reaction was beneficial for popularising the game or if FIDE should set boundaries, Praggnanandhaa remarked that he might have reacted similarly, but it became such a sensation because Carlsen is a notable figure. 'Yes, it was an instinctive reaction. I think it does happen to players. I've done it sometimes, but rarely. 'I mean, it's (me hitting the table) not as powerful as Magnus because he's a strong guy, but Gukesh has done it and many others. It's just an instinctive reaction because you're so focused that it just comes out. 'But, I mean, is it a good thing? Maybe not. I don't think so because I guess it's not good. (Having said that), I think so many people got to know that something like this happened and it became such a big thing on the internet. 'And, I think it's good for the game in a way because a lot of people got to know that there was such a tournament going on and that such a dramatic game happened. 'So, I think there are some good things and bad things, but I think overall, chess is growing. That's what matters." With a nine-year-old coming close to beating him in an online game, it seems that competition is intensifying. 'I think Magnus is still the best player in the world. And I don't think there is any question about it. Whenever he plays a tournament, he is the favourite. He has been proving that he is still the best by winning every tournament. 'For me, personally, I take a lot of inspiration from him, the way he plays. 'For example, he won 9 out of 9 (games) in Grand Slam Freestyle Tournament, which I don't think anyone can do except Magnus. So, yeah, it's just brilliant."
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Drama! FIDE slams Vladimir Kramnik's defamation lawsuit against David Navara: 'Brings a lot of harm to chess community'
Chess Grandmasters Vladimir Kramnik (Photo byfor World Chess) In a strongly worded statement, the International Chess Federation (FIDE) has weighed in on the escalating controversy involving former World Champion GM Vladimir Kramnik and Czech GM David Navara, expressing deep concern over the fallout and urging a return to mutual respect within the chess community. FIDE reiterated its commitment to fair play in both over-the-board and online formats, acknowledging the growing influence of online platforms in shaping modern chess. The governing body confirmed the formation of a dedicated task force to review the statistical methods proposed by Kramnik for detecting possible cheating. FIDE has invited Kramnik to present his data for official evaluation but warned that his public commentary has been damaging. 'We are gravely concerned that the way Mr. Kramnik presents his points brings a lot of harm to the chess community,' the statement read. 'Coming from the former World Champion, it could be ruinous for the careers and well-being of certain players.' FIDE stood firmly behind GM David Navara, describing him as a 'paragon of fair play' and a player with 'great sensitivity and integrity.' The organization emphasized that Navara is especially vulnerable to reputational harm and psychological stress caused by public accusations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Forget Furosemide, Use This Household Item To Help Drain Edema Fluid WellnessGuide Learn more Undo The controversy reached new heights when Kramnik filed a civil defamation lawsuit in Geneva, not only against Navara but also against and news outlet Chessdom, following public clashes over online cheating allegations. In response, respected Armenian GM Levon Aronian published an emotional open letter to Kramnik, pleading for reconciliation and reflection. 'Dear Vladimir Kramnik, forgive me for addressing you publicly,' Aronian wrote. Describing Kramnik as one of his 'chess parents,' Aronian recalled his admiration for Kramnik's resilience and brilliance — but urged him to reconsider the legal path. 'You are fighting your own demons,' he said. Echoing that sentiment, FIDE concluded its statement by urging Kramnik to withdraw the lawsuit: 'We sincerely hope that GM Kramnik will take this morally justified step, which we believe will be welcomed by the broader chess world.' Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Indian Express
15 hours ago
- Indian Express
FIDE says way Vladimir Kramnik presents his points (on cheating in chess) brings a lot of harm to the community
The international governing body of chess, FIDE, has said that it is 'gravely concerned' about the way former world champion Vladimir Kramnik was choosing to presents his points about cheating in chess even as it announced that it will establish a dedicated task force to evaluate the Russian's allegations. Kramnik recently filed a defamation lawsuit against the online chess platform chess news organisation chessdom and Grandmaster David Navara. Navara had written an open letter on May 23 after cheating insinuations from the Russian. In that letter, Navara wrote how he lost sleep after reading the comments from the former world champion and went into depression and had to take professional help from a psychiatrist and a psychotherapist. Now, FIDE too has told Kramnik that 'he must recognise that it is not just his opinion or questions – it is a very clear narrative, and coming from the former World Champion it could be ruinous for the careers and a very well-being of certain players.' As the world governing body of chess, FIDE takes the issue of fair play – both OTB and online – very seriously, especially considering the current widespread popularity of online platforms and their impact on the growth and development of the game worldwide. In this regard, the methods publicly proposed by GM Vladimir Kramnik deserve careful review and assessment for practical applicability. FIDE will establish a dedicated task force to evaluate these methods and invites GM Kramnik to present the details of his approach and statistical data for an official FIDE evaluation. At the same time, we are gravely concerned that the way Mr. Kramnik presents his points brings a lot of harm to the chess community. Mr. Kramnik must recognize, that it is not just his opinion or questions – it is a very clear narrative, and coming from the former World Champion it could be ruinous for the careers and a very well-being of certain players. The current discourse has significantly affected such a respected member of the chess community as GM David Navara and has now led to a defamation lawsuit being filed by GM Kramnik against GM Navara. We wish to emphasize once again that throughout his chess career, GM Navara has earned an unquestionable reputation as a paragon of a fair play. The chess community is well aware that David is a person of a great sensitivity and integrity, particularly vulnerable to any implication of unfair play. Without entering into legal or stylistic analyses of the statements made, we believe that – above all – mutual respect and empathy among colleagues must take precedence. We are firmly convinced that the lawsuit against GM Navara should be withdrawn as soon as possible in the interest of the entire chess community. We sincerely hope that GM Kramnik will take this morally justified step, which we believe will be welcomed by the broader chess world.
