logo
Britain's influence spreads through new Syria

Britain's influence spreads through new Syria

The National19-02-2025
The UK is wielding considerable influence in post-Assad Syria, through a combination of political connections, charity operations and a well-networked returning diaspora, The National can reveal. Britain's relations with the Syrian administration are understood to be good despite no ministerial visit. British-Syrians in Damascus hope it will lead to the lifting of sanctions to allow rebuilding and investment to begin after 14 years of war. Sources have disclosed to The National that the UK's National Security Adviser Jonathan Powell recently held a low-key meeting with the new administration, boosting suggestions that he will play a leading role in relations. Unlike ministers from Germany and France, the UK's Foreign Secretary David Lammy has yet to visit Damascus since the toppling of dictator Bashar Al Assad. France also hosted an international conference on Syria in December. There has been disappointment from the British-Syrian community about the UK's "low profile" on the issue. But the UK's long-standing support for the opposition in Syria, and envoy Ann Snow's recent engagement with the new administration, has placed UK relations on par with Germany and France, a former diplomat for the traditional Syrian opposition told The National. "The UK supported change since 2011 and they supported the opposition in many ways. The relationship and contact is there, and there is mutual understanding,' said Walid Saffour, who was exiled to the UK more than 40 years ago and represented the Syrian National Coalition in the UK in 2012, but is not involved in the new Syrian administration. Meanwhile, a new generation of British-Syrians are advising the new administration, although this is not connected to any UK government initiative. Syrians from civil society, political and legal support groups established by diaspora communities in the past 14 years are helping to shape the course of policy. Their expertise covers law, governance and preservation of civil freedom. The sharp increase in the number of well-attended conferences and workshops taking place in Syria since December indicates that those inside the country are hungry for political participation, paths to justice for victims of past crimes, and knowledge about how their country can be reshaped after more than five decades of one-family rule. Some Syrians who have returned are directly participating in the government. Among them is Razan Saffour, Mr Saffour's daughter, who became a prominent voice of the opposition during the civil war. She travelled with Syria's interim leader Ahmad Al Shara during his first official state visit to Saudi Arabia and sat in on the meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. She also accompanied Foreign Affairs Minister Asaad Al Shibani to the Munich Security Conference last week. Ms Saffour was born and raised in London, where she studied at the School of Oriental and African Studies. She travelled to Damascus for the first time in January with her father, and his partially destroyed childhood home in Homs was one of their first stops. Oxford-educated barrister Ibrahim Al Olabi was appointed as an adviser for human rights to the new administration. Mr Al Olabi practises at law firm Guernica 37 and is the founder of the UK-based NGO Syrian Legal Development Programme. He is widely regarded as being concerned with achieving justice for Syrians, having worked for years advising European governments and police forces on crimes related to Syria. He was part of the legal team advising The Netherlands on actions to bring the former Syrian regime to account for crimes involving torture. Mr Powell, who served as chief of staff during Tony Blair's premiership, was appointed to the role of National Security Adviser by the new Labour government in November, just weeks before the toppling of Mr Al Assad. His knowledge of Syria pre-dates the civil war. His brother, Lord Charles Powell, is a trustee of the Said Foundation, set up by British-Syrian businessman and philanthropist Wafic Said. Mr Said met Mr Al Shara in mid-January at the presidential palace in Damascus. This personal connection and the work done by the Said Foundation has given Mr Powell a long-standing and extensive knowledge of the country and the issues it faces, according to those who know him. Two sources confirmed a recent meeting between Mr Powell and Syria's new administration and it is thought he had established back-channel contact with Hayat Tahrir Al Sham before it took power via Inter Mediate, the negotiation and diplomacy charity he co-founded with Martin Griffiths, the founder and former director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue in Geneva. In 2021 it was claimed that Mr Powell had even met Mr Al Shara, although that was denied by the Syrian group. Mr Powell – who was the chief negotiator in Northern Ireland peace talks that led to the Good Friday agreement – is an advocate of engagement with terrorist groups and has said that the lessons from the Troubles can be applied to other conflicts. Britain's Foreign Office has for several years used paid contractors to help displaced Syrians return home, address community tension between Arabs and Kurds and report back to London on the situation in north-east Syria. Aims of UK-funded projects also included challenging Russian narratives and 'amplifying truth and the views of moderate Syrians', according to government documents. Taking the appropriate tone with the new regime will be key, according to former British Army officer Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, who has written extensively on Syria and has been in the country this month. He acknowledged the new government in Damascus 'does not need us to tell them what to do', but instead requires 'advice and resources' to ensure they can achieve their plans. Writing in The National, Mr de Bretton-Gordon said: 'It was ostensibly the British Syrian diaspora from the Syrian British Medical Society (SBMS) and Union of Syrian Medical Charities (UOSSM) who kept the medical facilities in Idlib running, giving the residents some hope and the will to carry on.' He visited the new Health Ministry and said it would like to replicate what SBMS did across the whole of Syria. 'Also, in the same vein they have asked the White Helmets, the civil emergency teams … to run the emergency services now country-wide,' he said. 'The revolution which toppled the old guard in Damascus grew out of north west Syria, and the interim President … appears to be a viable leader. The Syrians I know, some very close to the new team, tell me they are the real deal. 'Britain is uniquely placed through the British-Syrian diaspora to make a real difference, and opening the British Embassy in Damascus cannot happen soon enough.' British-Syrians hope developments will lead swiftly to a lifting of sanctions. Ghaith Armanazi, a British-Syrian diplomat and former ambassador to the Arab League in London, said members of the community had met with City firms keen on investing in Syria. 'An idea is being developed at the moment with members of the Syrian community promoting the idea of an international conference that would look into bringing investment into Syria,' Mr Armanazi told The National. "All areas of Syria need help: education, finance, energy and tourism. These areas are ripe for development and recovery from all these years of conflict." He also suggested that the UK could open offshoots of its schools and universities in Syria. 'One of the messages the new administration is projecting is how open they are and different from the socialist model of the [Assad regime],' Mr Armanazi said. The UK will debate easing restrictions applying to energy, transport and finance sectors, Foreign Office Minister Stephen Doughty said last week. But more radical measures were needed, said Mr Saffour. 'In the long term we have to lift sanctions altogether otherwise the situation in Syria will stay as it is. Refugees will not be able to go back. It is a country without services,' he said. The diaspora's input may also ensure that the desires and demands of a broad range of Syrian views are represented in building new institutions, policy planning, and the writing of a new constitution, potentially tempering the positions of more hardline, conservative officials who have joined Ahmad Al Shara's new administration in Damascus from HTS's former Syrian Salvation Government in Idlib. At the end of last month, 48 Syrian civil society organisations who had worked in opposition-held areas of the country and abroad held a meeting attended by Judge Khitam Haddad, caretaker deputy minister of Justice for Legal Affairs and Studies, at Damascus's Cham Palace hotel. The meeting proposed specific and urgent recommendations to the new authorities on initiating legal accountability and transitional justice processes, which, the groups said, were 'essential to prevent the country descending into civil conflict".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Syria clashes as Kurds accuse authorities of 'aggression' near Aleppo
New Syria clashes as Kurds accuse authorities of 'aggression' near Aleppo

The National

time36 minutes ago

  • The National

New Syria clashes as Kurds accuse authorities of 'aggression' near Aleppo

Kurdish-led fighters in Syria have said they clashed with authorities for a second day in a row on Monday in the latest setback to peace efforts. The mainly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces accused 'factions affiliated with the Syrian transitional government' of attacking four positions in the early hours of Monday morning. They said the clashes occurred in a village near Syria's industrial capital of Aleppo. 'Our forces responded to the attack with the necessary force to defend their positions and fighters, and clashes erupted that lasted for 20 continuous minutes,' the SDF said. It called the fighting a 'deliberate escalation' and said its forces were 'more prepared today than ever to exercise their legitimate right to respond with full force and determination'. The Syrian government said on Sunday that the SDF had fired rockets at army positions near the Euphrates river in an attempt to infiltrate the area. The SDF said it was responding to an unprovoked artillery assault against civilians. The authorities in Damascus did not comment on Monday's reported violence. The clashes are the first since US-sponsored talks between the two sides faltered last month. Syrian President Ahmad Al Shara signed a deal with SDF chief Mazloum Abdi in March to integrate his fighters into state forces, but the peace process has faced setbacks. It also comes shortly after a flurry of violence in Sweida in southern Syria, this time involving fighters from the Druze minority, Bedouin tribes and the Syrian government. Hundreds of people were reported to have been killed during days of unrest, with tensions continuing to simmer. Tom Barrack, a US special envoy for Syria, described the latest violence in Sweida and in Aleppo province as disturbing. The US is proud 'to be co-mediating with France the reintegration of the north-east into a unified Syria,' he said on Monday. 'The path ahead belongs to Syrians – urging all sides to uphold calm and resolve differences through dialogue, not bloodshed.' Extending Syrian government control to east of the Euphrates, which is mostly under the control of the SDF, has been a main goal for Mr Al Shara since the removal of former president Bashar Al Assad in December. The March deal paved the way for Kurdish-led forces that hold a quarter of Syria to merge with Damascus, along with regional Kurdish governing bodies. In Aleppo, government forces started joint patrols with SDF units soon afterwards in Sheikh Maqsoud, the main Kurdish neighbourhood of the city, official media. An SDF component called the People's Protection Units began a partial withdrawal from the neighbourhood. The deal faltered though after the SDF convened a conference of Kurdish political groups in April that demanded that Syria be governed under a federal system. Mr Al Shara called Syrian unity a 'red line' and said the authorities 'reject any attempt to impose a partition or create separatist cantons under the terms of federalism or self-autonomy'. Mr Al Shara and Mr Abdi failed to meet as expected on Wednesday during a visit to Damascus by Mr Barrack last month.

Syrian democracy campaigners wary of upcoming 'selected' elections
Syrian democracy campaigners wary of upcoming 'selected' elections

Middle East Eye

time6 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Syrian democracy campaigners wary of upcoming 'selected' elections

Syria is set to hold its first elections since the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad and concerns have been raised over plans for the president to select a third of parliamentarians and tightly control the remaining two-thirds. The elections, set to take place between 15 and 20 September, will be based on a principle of 'selection and election" according to the country's newly created electoral body. Nawar Najma, spokesperson for the Higher Committee for People's Assembly Election, told Rudaw last week that two-thirds of the parliament would be elected by "electoral bodies", themselves formed by subcommittees whose members would be selected by his department after "extensive consultations". Each electoral body would be composed of roughly 50 people who would elect a member of the parliament. He added that a "basic condition must be that they absolutely do not support, neither in word nor deed, the defunct [Assad] regime". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "They must also have no affiliation with any of the security forces or the army to ensure the neutrality of the military apparatus and the interior ministry as well," he said. The new assembly will have a renewable mandate of 36 months, according to the constitutional declaration adopted in March, and will exercise legislative powers until a permanent constitution is adopted and new elections held. The criteria for the new electoral system, which the government has said is "interim", has provoked criticism from rights groups and pro-democracy campaigners who see it as a potential power grab on behalf of President Ahmed al-Sharaa. Razan Rashidi, executive director of The Syria Campaign, said her organisation would be "keeping an eye" on the process. 'Since the start of the revolution in 2011, the people of Syria have been dreaming of having fair and democratic elections' - Razan Rashidi, The Syrian Campaign "It is worrying that [a] third of the seats will be assigned by the interim president himself, while an electoral college in each province in Syria will vote for the elected seats," she told Middle East Eye. Rashidi fled Syria after the beginning of the country's civil war in 2011 and, until Assad was toppled in December, worked under an alias due to safety concerns. While she was overjoyed at Assad's overthrow, the direction taken by Sharaa's government has worried her and she expressed concerns about the "transparency and legitimacy" of the upcoming elections as well as "how much it will be a real representation of Syria's diverse communities, including female representation, especially after the appointment of an almost all-male government to rule the country. "Since the start of the revolution in 2011, the people of Syria have been dreaming of having fair and democratic elections, something that many of us, even older generations, didn't get to practise at all under the rule of the authoritarian regime," she said. "Our struggle to make that dream come true continues.' 'Sham' elections Under Assad, the People's Assembly was effectively a rubber-stamping body for the government. Elections held under Assad were denounced as a "sham" by rights groups and opposition figures, with presidential elections regularly returning more than 95 percent of the vote for the former president. Since Assad's overthrow by an alliance led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a former affiliate of al-Qaeda, there has been much debate about the direction the new government will steer the country in. At the same time as attempting to rebuild relations with the international community and secure help in reconstructing the devastated country, the government has been asserting its control over not only state institutions and the security services, but a range of civil society organisations, including appointing trade union leaders and members of the chambers of commerce. Syria asks Turkey for defence support following Sweida violence Read More » But the government has struggled to maintain its authority over much of the deeply fractured country. Attacks by Assad loyalists in the coastal province of Latakia following his overthrow provoked a violent sectarian backlash against the minority Alawite population, which the former president and his family were members of. At least 1,500 Alawites were killed in the subsequent violence, with a Reuters investigation tracing much of it back to officials in Damascus. The government has also sought to to stymie violence in the southern province of Sweida, where violence between members of the Druze minority, Bedouin tribesman and state forces had also seen more than 1,000 people killed since the beginning of July. Violence continued in the province over the weekend with four killed on Sunday following an attack by armed groups on state forces. "Sharaa does not want to deal with political and social actors that are organised," said Joseph Daher, a Swiss Syrian professor at the University of Lausanne. He told MEE that he saw the new government pursuing the creation of a new "ruling regime" with centralised power, but that it still lacked the capacity to effectively assert its authority. "I think the lack and the failure to control Sweida, not only because of Israeli attacks, but also local resistance, is also an indication that this is one of the contradictions of this government," said Daher. "That it wants to seek monopolisation, centralisation of power, but at the same time is quite weak, whether militarily, human capacities, financially, politically." 'Decentralisation' Last week Syrian Foreign Minister Assad al-Shaibani was in Moscow to meet with Russian officials to discuss "post-conflict reconstruction" and, most likely, the issue of Russia's bases in the country. The Russian government was a staunch backer of Assad during the civil war, regularly launching air strikes on opposition-held areas, including those held by HTS, of which Shaibani was a founding member. The Syrian government's apparent attempts to repair relations with its erstwhile enemies has, to some, stood in contrast with much of its domestic policy, where the gaps between different ethnic, religious and political groups have remained vast. 'As Syrian authorities work to establish new political structures, they must guarantee the right to political participation for all Syrians' - Adam Coogle, Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch told MEE the recent turmoil in Syria made it vital that ordinary citizens could hold the state to account. 'As Syrian authorities work to establish new political structures, they must guarantee the right to political participation for all Syrians," said Adam Coogle, deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa division at Human Rights Watch. "Given the rampant unchecked authority of the previous government, it is paramount for Syria to establish independent systems for holding the government accountable for violations.' While the current interim constitution is set to expire after five years, the tightly controlled nature of September's elections has made some Syrian democracy activists wary of a return to the worst aspects of the Assad era, when both parliament and civil society were tightly controlled by Damascus. Daher said that there needed to be programme of decentralisation in Syria as well as genuine political inclusion on the part of the government, rather than symbolic representatives of religious and ethnic communities. "It could be one aspect of it, you know, the election, one man, one vote, but it cannot be limited to this. We need real political participation in an inclusively democratic way," said Daher. "This starts, for example, with allowing regions to elect their own representatives, whether in Sweida or the northeast, and throughout Syria."

Le Monde publishes new details of campaign against Karim Khan and ICC
Le Monde publishes new details of campaign against Karim Khan and ICC

Middle East Eye

time7 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Le Monde publishes new details of campaign against Karim Khan and ICC

French newspaper Le Monde has reported extensive details of an intensifying intimidation campaign targeting the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor Karim Khan. The campaign has taken place against the backdrop of Khan's efforts to build and pursue a case against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant and other Israeli officials over alleged war crimes. Khan went on leave in mid-May after an attempt to suspend him, prompted by a senior member of his own office, failed. This was amid an ongoing United Nations investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against the prosecutor. In a story published on Friday, the French newspaper quoted British barrister Andrew Cayley, who oversaw the ICC's Palestine investigation, saying Dutch intelligence informed him that he was at risk in The Hague. Cayley said that in December 2024 he was directly threatened: "I was told I was an enemy of Israel and that I should watch my back." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Cayley told the Observer in June that he left his role earlier this year fearing US sanctions, and that the pressure severely affected his health. Le Monde reported on the role allegedly played in the proceedings by Thomas Lynch, a senior legal adviser at the ICC and longstanding friend and colleague of Khan and his wife. Khan had tasked Lynch, who worked in his office as his special assistant, with liaising with Israel on the Palestine investigation. According to Le Monde, in May 2024 Lynch suggested that Khan organise a dinner in Jerusalem with prominent lawyer Alan Dershowitz. The plan was that Netanyahu himself would join them in the middle of the meal. The newspaper reported that Khan described this as "a remake of Oliver Twist... Netanyahu and I eating roast turkey in front of the hungry Gazans! It's a dangerous idea!" Le Monde reported that an anonymous source in the ICC said Lynch tried to sabotage Khan's pursuit of arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. The source told Le Monde that Lynch "openly said that for him Palestine is not a state, that Israel is not a party to the Court, and that the office should not investigate it". The source further alleged that Lynch referred sexual harassment allegations against Khan to investigators "to get rid of the prosecutor" and "hijack the process" of applying for arrest warrants. Le Monde reported that a note written by Lynch was the source of press reports about the misconduct allegations against Khan in October 2024. Lynch told Le Monde that the reports in its story were "false and misleading". Cameron's threatening phone call Le Monde also reported that on 23 April 2024, then-British Foreign Secretary David Cameron threatened Khan in a phone call that Britain would withdraw from the ICC if the court issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. In June, MEE first revealed details of the call based on information from a number of sources - including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be like dropping "a hydrogen bomb", Le Monde reported. He threatened that the UK would "withdraw from the ICC's founding treaty", the Rome Statute, "if Karim Khan followed through with his intentions". Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » In June, Cameron did not respond to MEE's requests for comment and the British foreign office declined to comment. Le Monde also reported on a meeting on 1 May this year between Khan and British-Israeli ICC lawyer Nicholas Kaufman, which was first revealed by MEE last month. Le Monde cited a "report of the meeting" which said Kaufman told Khan that if ICC arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant were not dropped, he and the ICC would be destroyed. Kaufman told Khan he had spoken to Netanyahu's legal adviser Roy Schondorf and offered Khan a way out, Le Monde reported. Khan, Kaufman suggested, should reclassify the arrest warrants as confidential. This would allow Israel to challenge them in private. In response to questions from MEE in July, Kaufman denied threatening Khan. He denied having been authorised to make any proposals on behalf of the Israeli government and said he had shared his personal views with Khan on the Palestine situation. Kaufman told Le Monde he "did not dispute the meeting", but said he was looking to help Khan "get out of his mistakes". Intensifying intimidation campaign The meeting came less than two weeks before allegations of sexual assault against Khan, which he has strenuously denied, were first published, and as he was reportedly preparing to seek arrest warrants for more members of the Israeli government. There is no suggestion of any connection between the Kaufman-Khan meeting and the publication of the allegations. Khan went on indefinite leave shortly afterwards. Exclusive: How Karim Khan's Israel war crimes probe was derailed by threats, leaks and sex claims Read More » Le Monde quoted Cuno Tarfusser, a former ICC judge, who said Khan going on leave was a "coup d'état". Tarfusser described the ongoing UN investigation into misconduct allegations against Khan as an "irregular procedure", "tailor-made" and conducted with a "disregard for confidentiality". On Friday MEE published extraordinary details of the intimidation campaign targeting Khan, which has involved threats and warnings directed at Khan by prominent figures, close colleagues and family friends briefing against him, fears for the prosecutor's safety prompted by a Mossad team in The Hague, and media leaks about sexual assault allegations. MEE reported details of Lynch's role in the process by which Khan was forced on leave. Lynch triggered the initial investigation by the ICC's Internal Oversight Mechanism (IOM) into harassment allegations against Khan in May 2024, after Khan told him to follow the established procedures. On 4 May, just after the investigation was launched, Khan's wife Shyamala Alagendra met up with Lynch. According to the material reviewed by MEE, Lynch privately expressed his own doubts about the allegations and said their timing was 'suspicious'. ICC lawyer linked to Netanyahu advisor warned Khan to drop war crimes probe or be 'destroyed' Read More » But following the publication in May this year of the sexual assault allegations against Khan, Lynch approached the ICC's presidency in a bid to have the prosecutor suspended. Lynch urged the presidency to start a process by which ICC member states could vote to formally suspend Khan. When this attempt failed, Lynch approached the two deputies and urged them to make the same case to the presidency. This followed leaked reports that Khan was preparing to request arrest warrants for more Israeli officials. It was amid this internal turmoil that the decision was made that Khan should step away on leave while the investigation continued. Lynch told MEE: "As you are aware, there is an ongoing confidential investigation into this matter that limits my right to reply." He said questions put to him by MEE were "false and misleading". Sanctions and pressure Since being subjected to sanctions by the US in February, Khan has had his American visa revoked, and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the country. His bank accounts have also been frozen and his credit cards cancelled in the UK. At present, the progress and future direction of the ICC's investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes rests with Khan's deputies, pending the outcome of the ongoing OIOS investigation. On 27 May, the Wall Street Journal reported that just before he took leave, the prosecutor had been preparing to seek new warrants for Smotrich and Ben Gvir, Netanyahu's key far-right allies in his coalition government, over their roles in expanding illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. Whether or not those applications have been filed is no longer public knowledge after the court recently ordered that any further warrants cannot be publicised. But the pressure on both the prosecutor's office and the court itself has continued to build, with US sanctions on four ICC judges on 8 June. In a further threat to the court last month, US State Department legal adviser Reed Rubinstein warned that "all options remain on the table" unless all arrest warrants and the investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes are dropped.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store