logo
Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli: Tale of two farewells

Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli: Tale of two farewells

Time of India19-05-2025
Case 1– James Anderson, the legendary fast bowler from England and one of the finest bowlers in the history of red ball cricket, announced his retirement from international cricket at Lord's in July 2024, following the first Test of England's home summer series against the West Indies. In a subsequent interview, Anderson revealed that he was given the option to conclude his Test career prior to the summer or to have a farewell match against the West Indies at the Home of Cricket. English team management made it clear that he would not be able to participate in the upcoming winter Ashes series. Anderson recognized that the decision was challenging but accepted the natural evolution of the team. He made his announcement in May and retired in July.
Case 2– In November 2024, Tim Southee, who holds the record as New Zealand's leading wicket-taker in international cricket across all formats, declared his intention to retire from Test cricket at his home ground in Hamilton in December 2024. He achieved a total of 776 international wickets, the highest for any New Zealand bowler. At Hamilton he received a proper farewell.
Case 3- On Instagram, on the evening of May 7, Rohit Sharma shared: 'Hello everyone, I would like to share that I am retiring from Test cricket.'
Case 4- After five days on May 12, Virat Kohli bid farewell to the format, announcing his retirement on social media after a distinguished 14-year journey.
Both these legends of Indian cricket walked away from the longest version of the game, within a week from one another. They leave an enormous hole and raise some serious questions around the kind of Test team India can field over the five critical Test matches in England. Virat Kohli scored 30 Test hundreds and was right up there with the Joe Roots, Steve Smiths and Kane Williamsons – dubbed the 'Fab 4'.
File photo of Indian cricketer Virat Kohli (Pic credit: AP)
These retirements highlight one significant disparity. The BCCI does not adequately honour its players' contributions by failing to arrange comparable farewells. Whether by choice or circumstance, both Anderson and Southee concluded their careers with a memorable farewell match. Cricket Australia also organized a heartfelt send-off for David Warner, while Indian cricket legends did not receive similar recognition. Ravichandran Ashwin retired during the Australian series, and in the past several senior players, including VVS Laxman, Virendra Sehwag, and Harbhajan singh, have also stepped away without such tributes.
The BCCI's selection committee frequently emphasizes future strategies and team transitions over acknowledging past achievements. For instance, in the case of Rohit Sharma, selectors were reportedly reluctant to keep him as captain due to his subpar performance in red-ball cricket, opting instead to develop a younger leader for the upcoming Test cycle. This strategy may result in sudden retirements without the chance for a formal farewell. Critics contend that the BCCI often lacks effective communication with players regarding their futures, resulting in retirements that seem abrupt or ill-timed. However, this issue appears to be more systemic within the cricket board.
File photo of Indian cricketer Rohit Sharma (Pic credit: AP)
The questions on Rohit's Test future had started swirling after he was dropped from India's Playing XI in the fifth and final Test against Australia in Sydney. It signalled a shift in team dynamics and the beginning of Gautam Gambhir era where the coach will have full control over the dressing room. No doubt, both Kohli and Sharma experienced a dip in form during the 2024–25 seasons. Their performances led to increased scrutiny and discussions about their future in the Test format. Some reports also suggest that the BCCI had already decided to move on from Rohit as captain, leaving little room for a planned farewell. While, Virat Kohli's Test retirement has been described as a personal decision, but some reports also claim the BCCI pushed him toward it. It is also possible that both players may have preferred a quiet departure to avoid the fanfare and media attention. But in both the cases one thing is clear – communication gap.
In the past, numerous legendary players, including MS Dhoni, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Virender Sehwag, Harbhajan Singh, R Ashwin, among others, did not have the opportunity for appropriate farewell matches. Even Gautam Gambhir, the current coach of the Indian team, experienced a similar situation. The pressures of selection or indications from selectors regarding a player's future may have prompted these veterans to retire unexpectedly. Players also bear some responsibility for not coordinating their retirements to facilitate farewell opportunities.
The lack of communication between selectors, BCCI officials and senior players has been a recurring point of friction. VVS Laxman case is a typical example. VVS Laxman chose to retire immediately despite being selected for a Test series, turning down the opportunity to play a farewell match in front of his home crowd. Reports suggested that unclear or insensitive communication from selectors contributed to his abrupt decision to retire, possibly because he felt hurt by how the situation was handled.
File photo of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma (Pic credit: PTI)
Unlike Cricket Australia or England Cricket Board, the BCCI hardly organises farewell matches. The only exception was the retirement of Sachin Tendulkar in 2013 after his 200th test match and that was because of his big stature and public pressure. In the case of MS Dhoni it is said that the BCCI wanted to give a proper farewell but Dhoni wanted a low-key exit. Comparing Indian cricket's treatment of retirees to other nations' practices highlights a poor show from the BCCI. BCCI, the richest cricket board in the world, definitely lacks a formal, transparent policy for handling player farewells. This is one area where the BCCI could improve its performance. Farewell is an emotional and legacy driven gesture for the past contributions and everyone deserves a dignified send-off.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Rishabh Pant be the next Adam Gilchrist of Indian cricket?
Can Rishabh Pant be the next Adam Gilchrist of Indian cricket?

India Today

time34 minutes ago

  • India Today

Can Rishabh Pant be the next Adam Gilchrist of Indian cricket?

There is little doubt that Rishabh Pant has emerged as one of the most exciting young players in world cricket today. His performances across all three formats have earned him admiration, and comparisons with legends like Adam Gilchrist - one of the greatest wicketkeeper-batsmen of all time - are beginning to known for his aggressive batting and crucial contributions as a wicketkeeper, redefined the role during his era. Similarly, Pant has shown glimpses of greatness, especially in Test cricket, both with the bat and behind the stumps. Since returning from his near-fatal car accident, Pant has impressed with his resilience and skill, hinting at the potential to follow in Gilchrist's the Comparison Fair?Pant possesses the talent to chase the benchmarks set by Gilchrist. If he can maintain consistency across formats - especially in Tests - he could challenge some of the records held by the Australian legend. However, fitness, remains a key factor. For Pant to fulfill this potential, he must remain in peak physical condition. Some cricket experts believe it's still premature to draw such comparisons. Gilchrist's long career, from 1999 to 2008 (Tests), was pivotal to Australia's golden era. Pant, who debuted in 2018, is still relatively new to international cricket. With Gautam Gambhir now coaching India and the team captained by Shubman Gill in Tests, Pant will need consistent backing to flourish in the longest Between Pant and GilchristTechnically and temperamentally, both Pant and Gilchrist share several traits:Aggressive Batting: Both are known for counter-attacking innings in high-pressure Contributions: Each has delivered crucial moments with the Potential: Their presence can turn a game on its record-breaking 57-ball Test century against England and his explosive ton in the 2007 World Cup final are legendary. Pant, too, has played unforgettable innings—most notably his match-winning efforts in Australia (2021) and against England at home, especially in It Might Be Too EarlyWhile the comparisons are flattering, they come with a few caveats. Pant's career is still young. He has faced fitness concerns and at times, lacked consistency. More importantly, Pant must aim to build his own legacy rather than live in the shadow of a former also important not to overburden him with expectations. Every cricketer deserves the chance to shape their own identity, without constantly being measured against past Numbers GameLet's look at the stats (as of 17 September 2025):Rishabh Pant:Tests: 46 matches, 3,373 runs, average 44.38, 8 centuriesAdam Gilchrist:Tests: 96 matches, 5,570 runs, average 47.60, 17 centuriesAt the time that Gilchrist had completed 46 Tests, he had 3053 runs to his name, slightly less than Rishabh Pant. However, he was averaging a mighty played significantly more matches and had a larger impact in ODIs, particularly at World Cups. Pant has the potential, but getting close to Gilchrist's numbers will require sustained fitness, evolution, and consistency over many has scored 1,061 runs at an average of 55.84 with two centuries at home, while Gilchrist scored 2,936 runs in 55 home Tests. Away from home, Pant has 2,267 runs at an average of 41.21 with six centuries, while Gilchrist made 2,512 runs in cluding 10 also scored 14 Test centuries in winning causes, while Pant has two, a reflection of their match-winning intent and ability to perform for the for their keeping records, Pant has 171 dismissals in 46 Tests (156 catches and 15 stumpings), while Gilchrist recorded 416 dismissals (379 catches and 37 stumpings), an Australian record in Test RoadblocksPant's journey has been punctuated by setbacks. Injuries, especially on overseas tours, have been a recurring issue. So have questions about discipline and focus. If Pant wants to follow in Gilchrist's footsteps, he'll need to take care of both areas and establish himself as a consistent presence in the Indian is another question mark. Pant's recent stint as captain of the Lucknow Super Giants in IPL 2025 was underwhelming. The team struggled, and Pant's leadership lacked spark. If he hopes to lead India someday, he must grow into the role—showing composure, clarity, and leading with both bat and of ImprovementHandling Pressure: Pant needs to become more reliable in tense situations. A 10/4 scenario in a Test should bring calm, not chaos. A brief glimpse was seen in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in 2024-25, where Pant's dismissals were heavily Technique: While he has quick reflexes, technical flaws—like poor footwork and dropped chances—still pop Wicketkeeping is brutal on the body. Post-injury, staying fit—especially with the wear and tear on knees and fingers—is Balance: His attacking instinct is an asset, but he must read the conditions—pitch, bounce, swing—and know when to shift gears. In Tests, this balance is Curve: Studying Gilchrist—how he adapted his game, his reading of match situations, and his overall temperament—could help Pant evolve Pant undoubtedly has the talent and mindset to become one of India's greats. But perhaps the goal shouldn't be to become the next Adam Gilchrist. Maybe it's about becoming the best version of Rishabh Pant.R Ashwin spoke on the same and argued that Pant should be compared to the top batters in Test cricket as his is likely to reach their improvements in fitness, consistency, keeping, and leadership, Pant has everything it takes to become a generational cricketer.- EndsMust Watch

Jasprit Bumrah vs Ben Stokes: Ten Doeschate shuts down workload comparison talks
Jasprit Bumrah vs Ben Stokes: Ten Doeschate shuts down workload comparison talks

India Today

time34 minutes ago

  • India Today

Jasprit Bumrah vs Ben Stokes: Ten Doeschate shuts down workload comparison talks

Indian assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate downplayed comparisons between Jasprit Bumrah and Ben Stokes regarding their respective workloads. Stokes was lauded for his performance in the Lord's Test, bowling 14 consecutive overs across the fourth and fifth days and leading England to a 22-run victory, which earned him the Player of the Match Doeschate stated that Bumrah's strength lies in short, high-impact spells, and India is not interested in comparing their bowlers with those from other teams. He highlighted that each bowler has unique skills and should plan according to their individual was super impressive—bowling with that intensity on Day 5, along with his batting and fielding. But we're not comparing our bowlers to others. We have our own strengths. Jasprit, for instance, thrives in short, sharp spells, which works for us. 'Some bowlers—like (Mohammed) Siraj—build into their spells, peaking in their 7th, 8th, or 9th over. Not everyone is the same, and we plan accordingly,' Ten Doechaste told the reporters in Beckenham where the Indian team trained on Pathan critical of Jasprit BumrahEarlier, after India's loss in the Lord's Test that saw them fall 1-2 behind in the five-match series, former Indian all-rounder Irfan Pathan was critical of Bumrah. He pointed out that while Ben Stokes bowled a tireless spell in the opening session on Day 5, Bumrah only came on to bowl when Joe Root arrived at the also questioned the need for additional rest for Bumrah, noting that he had already missed the Birmingham Read: ENG vs IND: Why Ben Stokes and Jasprit Bumrah's workload management is incomparable"Ben Stokes bowled a marathon 9.2 over spell in the morning on day five. What a player he is. He bowls, bats and executes a crucial run out of Rishabh Pant but there is no talk of workload management. But with India it is not like that."Bumrah bowls five overs and waits for Joe Root to come out to bat when you need to control the game (in the second innings). It was disappointing," Pathan said on his YouTube channel."His workload was managed having not played at Edgbaston. When you play a match, there is no workload. You have to win at all costs. The Indian camp could have done that better," Pathan is currently the second-highest wicket-taker of the series, having claimed two five-wicket hauls. India began the series with a five-wicket loss at Headingley in Leeds but bounced back strongly with a commanding 336-run win at the defeat at Lord's has once again put them on the back foot, leaving them needing a win in Manchester to keep their hopes of a series victory alive.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store