Restrictions on wind, solar unpopular among Texas Republicans: Poll
The polling by Conservative Texans for Energy Innovation comes out amid a multifront push by suburban Texas Republican legislators to hamstring the growth of wind and solar in the state.
Texans 'understand what is at stake,' CTEI state director Matt Welch said in a statement, supporting a wide range of common sense, market-driven solutions,' said Matt Welch, state director of CTEI. 'By getting this right, Texas will remain a national leader in energy production and job creation.'
The survey of 1,000 likely voters with about a 4 percent margin of error was completed March 22-30. It found that 91 percent of Texans 'strongly supported' landowners' ability to use wind and solar on their own land, or lease it to utilities.
And 51 percent of Texans 'strongly supported' that right, per the survey.
The findings come as the Texas renewable industry comes under legislative assault. The Texas Senate has passed two bills — S.B. 819 and S.B. 388 — that would restrict landowners' ability to put wind and solar energy on their land, and require every new watt of renewable power to be accompanied by a watt of power from coal or natural gas.
Backers of these bills argue that the state's renewables boom is ultimately bad for the state. Texas is 'number one in wind, number one in solar,' Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R), who represents the suburbs of Houston and sponsored both S.B. 819 and S.B. 388, told KXAN.
'I'm not sure that's something to brag about,' Kolkhorst added.
The CTEI survey suggests that opposition to renewables — and in particular restrictions on landowners' ability to install them — are not popular positions, even among Republicans.
The CTEI poll found that 80 percent of Texans supported more government action to increase development of renewable energy — with more than 40 percent strongly supporting such state intervention.
The poll found that 75 percent of Republicans — and 90 percent of independents — also favored 'government action to accelerate clean energy.'
Nearly identical numbers of Texans also supported the use of energy efficiency measures to cut total use of power — a proposal that the pollsters found was especially attractive to Republicans.
While self-described 'very conservative' Texans were the most opposed to renewables of any group, 56 percent of such respondents still supported it — a jump from the 49 percent who responded that way in 2023.
And a more than three-quarters of men without college degrees also support renewables — up from less than two-thirds in 2023.
These findings don't imply blanket support for green policies or renewable energy. A plurality of Texans — 45 percent — want to see the state develop more gas resources.
In statements to the press, Kolkhorst has insisted that her measures wouldn't meaningfully harm renewables, but would 'places guardrails to ensure every inch of Texas is not covered' by windmills and turbines.
'I have no doubt that with SB 819, Texas will be able to build the generation it needs to keep up with growth while also protecting Texas land,' she said.
The renewable energy industry disagrees. The bill 'will kill renewable energy in Texas,' Jeff Clark, CEO of Texas Power Alliance, said during public testimony on the bill earlier this month.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem Senator Elissa Slotkin complains party is too worried about ‘p—ing off' the Internet
Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., says that Democrats are too worried about making people angry and that they 'constrain' themselves too much. During an interview last week on PBS's 'Firing Line with Margaret Hoover,' Hoover asked Slotkin about President Barack Obama's recent criticism of Democrats, where he said that his party should 'toughen up.' 'President Obama chided Democrats, saying they need to 'toughen up' against Donald Trump. You have said we need more 'alpha energy' in the Democratic Party,' Hoover told Slotkin. Slotkin agreed, and Hoover asked if she and Obama are 'saying the same thing.' 'I don't know if we're saying the exact same thing, but it sort of smells the same, right,' Slotkin said. 'And I think this idea that Democrats are so careful, and they're so caveated, and they're so worried about offending each other, offending other people, they're so worried about pissing off people on the Internet. They live often in a world where they constrain themselves.' Hoover then asked if Democrats are 'too sensitive.' 'I think some of them, sure, are too sensitive,' Slotkin said. 'And this is, to me, the central point, especially with Donald Trump in the White House, this is just not a moment to be careful and polite. We need a plan. We need to be on the same page. We need to play as a team. We need to call out when someone isn't helping the team. And we need to hug someone when they do something great.' 3 'They're so worried about pissing off people on the Internet,' Senator Slotkin said about Democrats. 'They live often in a world where they constrain themselves.' PBS 3 Slotkin agreed with Barack Obama's statement that the party should 'toughen up.' 'It sort of smells the same, right,' Slotkin said. Getty Images The PBS host asked Slotkin if she was saying that Republicans are afraid of Trump, and if Democrats 'fear each other's factions.' Slotkin responded by saying that some 'fear' backlash on X, still often referred to as its former name Twitter. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! 'You know, I've been shocked — you know, I'm new to the Senate, six months in — how many of my peers said, 'Well, Elissa, I'd love to be with you on that issue, but, you know, Twitter will be mad. You know, the Internet people will be mad at me,'' Slotkin said. 'They literally say that,' Hoover asked. 3 'Especially with Donald Trump in the White House, this is just not a moment to be careful and polite,' the sentor said. 'We need a plan.' AP 'Yeah. There'll be a bad online response,' Slotkin admitted. Obama's 'toughen up' comments referenced by Hoover were made at a fundraiser in July where he said Democrats should complain less.
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Rand Paul stalls Mike Waltz nomination for UN ambassador
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is standing in the way of Mike Waltz's nomination as ambassador to the United Nations, dealing a serious setback to Trump's former national security adviser, sources familiar with the matter tell Axios. Why it matters: Paul's resistance to Waltz forced the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to delay an expected Wednesday vote on the nomination. The committee is now in recess. Some Republicans are still hopeful that Paul can be convinced to support Waltz or that one or more Democrats will decide to back him in committee, according to people familiar with the matter. A key Waltz adviser expressed strong confidence that Waltz would garner bipartisan support in committee. What he's saying: When asked if he plans to support Waltz, Paul told Axios: "They pulled it for now, we're going to see what happens over the next week." "If you want to report my opinion," he continued, "I had an exchange in the committee last week — that's probably the best thing to report." Zoom out: Paul grilled Waltz in his confirmation hearing last week, demanding to know why he tried, as a House member, to force Trump to keep 8,000 troops in Afghanistan. "The idea that Congress should be involved with declaring war is sort of passé. It's old-fashioned. But when it comes to ending a war, you voted with Liz Cheney and the others to say that the president couldn't end the war," Paul said in a heated exchange. The intrigue: Some Democrats are privately concerned about who Trump might nominate if Waltz goes down, citing their deep misgivings about other rumored candidates, like Richard Grenell, Trump's ambassador to Germany in his first term. The bottom line: Waltz still might be reported out of committee in the coming days.
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump team hurls accusations at Obama over 2016 election interference
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Wednesday continued to accuse former President Obama's administration of a "manipulation of intelligence" around Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The big picture: Nearly a decade after he won, President Trump remains fixated on disproving the thoroughly investigated and widely held conclusion that Russia interfered to aid his campaign. Back in 2020, the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee — including now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio — concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win but did not hack election infrastructure to manipulate cast ballots. State of play: Gabbard released a document Wednesday that she alleges undermines previous findings from the Obama-era intelligence community that Russia favored a Trump win in 2016. She wrote that the Obama administration was "promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election." Gabbard released another memo last week, with which she accused the Obama administration of a "treasonous conspiracy" to sabotage Trump's presidency in 2016. Driving the news: During a White House press briefing Wednesday, Gabbard again accused Obama and his national security team of directing "the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." She alleged, "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump when selling it to the American people as though it were true." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down on the claims, saying, "The truth is that Trump never had anything to do with Russia" and alleging that "the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth." Zoom out: Asked for comment Wednesday, Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush referred Axios to his Tuesday statement where he called the allegations "outrageous" and "bizarre." He said in that statement, "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." In response that statement, Gabbard said Wednesday that Obama's office is "trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal." Asked if the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity protects Obama from any possible prosecution, Leavitt said Trump "wants to see all those who perpetuated this fraud against our country, who betrayed our country and the Constitution to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable."
