Superdry relaunches with new logo, store design and business model
Superdry, the British clothing brand known for blending American vintage-preppy style with British flair, is undergoing a full-scale reboot. Celebrating its 22nd anniversary, the brand returned to Pitti Uomo in Florence for the first time in over six years—marking a key moment in its transformation. 'I came back because I love this show—it's the best in Europe, maybe the world,' said Julian Dunkerton, co-founder and CEO of Superdry, speaking to FashionNetwork.com. 'But more importantly, I needed to feel proud of our product again. And I do—because we've rediscovered who we are. This is the right time to talk positively about Superdry again. Fashion's on my side too—preppy style is back. Once loved by 50-year-olds, now embraced by 18-year-olds too.'
A year ago, Superdry exited the London Stock Exchange. 'Thank God,' Dunkerton said bluntly. 'It was like being in prison. Now I finally have the freedom to lead again. This is our opportunity to rebuild.'
The new roadmap? A blended model focused on franchising, wholesale and concessions. 'We've already launched franchises in Spain and are very likely to do so in Italy as well,' he revealed.
The company closed its previous fiscal year on April 27 2024, with annual revenue down 22% to £488.6 million (€586.4 million), compared to £622.5 million in FY23. The drop was mainly due to continued weakness in the wholesale channel. Superdry is due to release its audited FY25 accounts in August this year.
Retail also declined, though less sharply, falling 16% to £371.6 million (€446 million), impacted by reduced physical store presence and a significant 18% decline in e-commerce revenue to £146 million (€175.2 million). The brand attributes this performance to 'well-known external and macroeconomic challenges,' along with a strategic reduction in digital marketing spend to focus on profitability. That move paid off: Superdry's EBITDA margin increased by 2.2 percentage points.
Superdry currently operates 89 standalone stores in the UK and plans to expand with new locations in Amsterdam, Saint-Tropez and more cities in the UK, with the next opening scheduled in six weeks. 'Britain remains our most important market, but France is absolutely crucial,' Dunkerton noted. 'Our European focus is growing. In India and Australia, we have key partners—like Brand Collective, with whom we just extended our licensing deal by 12 more years.'
He emphasized Superdry's strong value proposition: 'We offer what I think is one of the best price-to-quality ratios in the world. A Superdry shirt retails at around €60, for example.'
'I'm happy to refocus on our core business—apparel—and our womenswear line is doing especially well,' Dunkerton said. He ruled out further brand extensions for now, though Superdry recently launched a fragrance. 'All of our polos have been redesigned with a vintage effect. We've adopted a more refined brand aesthetic with a new logo. Each product category has its own distinct identity.'
Superdry employs around 3,000 people and has subsidiaries across Europe—though not in Italy, where it works with distributor Interjeans.
'We're undergoing a rebirth,' Dunkerton concluded. 'We'll transform our stores with updated interiors and a more modern in-store experience. Our wholesale partners love the new concept. Just last week in the UK, physical store sales rose 24% year-over-year. The new Superdry journey has begun.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sustainability Times
2 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'$14 Billion Wiped Out': Massive Wave of Hydrogen, Battery, and Solar Projects Cancelled or Delayed Across the U.S. in Energy Collapse
IN A NUTSHELL 💡 Over $14 billion in green energy projects have been canceled or postponed in the U.S. due to political uncertainties. in green energy projects have been canceled or postponed in the U.S. due to political uncertainties. 🔧 The cancellations have resulted in the loss of 10,000 potential jobs in the renewable energy sector. in the renewable energy sector. 🏛️ Proposed tax reforms by Republicans threaten the tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act . . 🌍 Republican-led states, despite benefiting from clean energy, are the most affected, jeopardizing both economic growth and environmental goals. The green energy sector in the United States is facing unexpected challenges, with over $14 billion in projects either canceled or postponed this year alone. Political uncertainty, largely influenced by proposed tax reforms, is the primary culprit. Ironically, many of the states most affected are Republican-led, which have historically benefited from advancements in renewable energy. This situation highlights the complex interplay between politics and the burgeoning clean energy industry, creating a ripple effect that impacts employment and economic growth across the nation. Visible Impact on Employment According to recent analyses, the cancellation of green energy projects has resulted in the loss of 10,000 potential jobs in the renewable sector. These jobs were tied to crucial technologies such as solar, wind, battery storage, and hydrogen energy. For instance, the Kore Power battery plant in Arizona and two electric vehicle production sites by BorgWarner in Michigan have been halted. Additionally, Bosch has put a significant investment of $200 million on hold for a hydrogen fuel cell plant in South Carolina. These projects were not just about job creation; they were integral to advancing sustainable technologies. The pause on these initiatives underscores the importance of tax credits provided by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This legislation, passed under the Biden Administration, was designed to support emerging green technologies. However, proposed changes in tax policy threaten to dismantle these incentives, making the future uncertain for many planned and ongoing projects. 'Crazy French Invention Turns Waves Into Power': Breakwaters Now Generate Clean Energy Nonstop With This Shocking Coastal Technology Republican States Face Greater Impact Ironically, Republican-led states and districts are bearing the brunt of these cancellations. More than $12 billion in projects have been affected in these areas, which have seen substantial growth in renewable energy. Over the years, states like Georgia and Tennessee have invested heavily in the battery and electric vehicle supply chains. These investments have not only boosted employment but have also positioned these states as leaders in the clean energy transition. Yet, the proposed fiscal reforms threaten to halt progress, potentially reversing years of growth and investment. The consequences extend beyond economic setbacks; they could undermine efforts to combat climate change, as these states are pivotal in the national strategy to reduce carbon emissions. The risk of job losses and stalled technological advancements looms large, with potential ripple effects across the broader economy. 'From Black Dust to Bright Power': These Abandoned Coal Mines Are Now Massive 300 GW Solar Energy Giants Changing the Game Forever The Role of Political Uncertainty The central issue behind these project cancellations is the proposed tax reform by Republicans in the House of Representatives. This reform aims to dismantle significant portions of the tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act. These credits are vital for sustaining investment in clean technologies. Without them, many companies are reconsidering their commitment to the U.S. market, leading to a re-evaluation of planned projects. Political uncertainty not only deters investment but also creates a volatile environment for innovation. Companies are less likely to invest in long-term projects if there is a risk that supportive policies could be revoked. This unpredictability may discourage future investments and collaborations, crucial for advancing the country's renewable energy goals. 'America's First Nuclear Reactor in 50 Years': This Ultra-Compact Power Source Will Deliver Electricity Where No Grid Can Reach The Future of Clean Energy Initiatives The current situation raises critical questions about the future of clean energy in the United States. While the potential of renewable energy remains vast, the political climate poses significant challenges. The need for bipartisan support in fostering a stable and conducive environment for green investments is more urgent than ever. As we move forward, it is crucial to consider how policy decisions impact not only the economy but also the environment and society at large. The stakes are high, and the decisions made today will shape the country's energy landscape for years to come. Will the U.S. manage to overcome these political hurdles and continue its path toward a sustainable future? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (26)
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump forces the rest of the world to exempt US companies from global tax on multinationals
Once again, the threat worked. By brandishing in recent weeks the prospect of a new tax on foreign companies – dubbed the "revenge tax" – the United States secured a major concession from other G7 countries on a tax issue that has irked Donald Trump since his return to the White House: the taxation of multinationals, and more specifically, the 15% global minimum corporate tax adopted in 2021 by 140 countries under the aegis of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Already implemented in 2024 across the European Union as well as in the United Kingdom, Canada and Japan, this tax was seen as a first step in combating unfair tax competition among states. Eager to share this American victory, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced it on Thursday, June 26, on the social network X. "After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests," he wrote. "(…) OECD Pillar 2 taxes [that is, the 15% global minimum tax] will not apply to US companies." Le Monde was able to confirm this information on Friday, 27 June, via both France's Ministry of Finance and the OECD, as the G7 finalized a communiqué seen by the newspaper.
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Europeans are buying frozen food to reduce waste, survey shows
Sustainability is playing a bigger role in how people shop, but does that influence what they buy in the frozen food aisle? A new survey from Europe's largest frozen food company suggests yes. Nearly half of European consumers (47 per cent) are opting for frozen food products to reduce food wastage, according to Nomad Foods, owner of Birds Eye, Findus and other household brands. Almost 59 million tonnes of food waste are generated annually in the EU, according to the European Consumer Organisation. So, in the words of one UK supermarket giant, every little helps. But what difference does buying frozen make exactly, and which countries are embracing it? How does frozen food help reduce waste? It's obvious, really - that freezing food preserves it for longer, meaning less needs to be thrown away and bought. When food goes to waste, it is not only the food itself that is lost, but also the resources used in production and transportation, including fuel, water, land, labour, fertilisers, and packaging. And as food breaks down in landfills, it produces methane - a potent greenhouse gas. 'In 2021 and 2022 combined, food waste accounted for around 18m tonnes of GHG emissions in the UK,' says Ben Ashmore, head of external affairs at FareShare, a charity which works across the food industry to help identify and redistribute surplus food. 'By redistributing surplus food to people, and making it longer-lasting through freezing, we can help reduce food waste and the associated emissions, while helping people in need." There are many reasons why people are leaning more heavily on the freezers, but Nomad Foods' inaugural 'Frozen in Focus' report indicates that sustainability is a prominent factor. 'The freezer is no longer just a place to store food; it's becoming the cornerstone of a more efficient, sustainable, and nutritious lifestyle,' claims Stéfan Descheemaeker, CEO at the UK-headquartered company. The UK leads the way on the food waste front, according to the new multi-market study of 7,500 adults. Nearly 60 per cent of Brits prefer to buy frozen food as it reduces food waste. That figure is followed by 50 per cent in Italy, 49 per cent in France, 43 per cent in Sweden, and 44 per cent in Germany. A smaller, but still significant portion of consumers recognise the potential of frozen food to contribute to more sustainable food chains. 15 per cent in Sweden, 7 per cent in Italy, 9 per cent in the UK, 8 per cent in Germany, and 7 per cent in France agreed with this statement. 'European consumers are increasingly aware of the link between food waste and sustainability,' says David Pettet, head of sustainability at Nomad Foods. 'Freezing food isn't just about convenience; it's a powerful tool for preserving freshness, maximizing resources, and building a more sustainable food system.' Reducing the energy consumption of freezers Research is also going into making the freezer itself a more eco-friendly space, given the significant energy usage and associated emissions of the always-on appliances. Launched in 2023 at COP28, the Move to -15°C Coalition aims to make a difference in food supply chains by "resetting frozen food temperature standards". Featuring big names, like shipping giant Maersk and supermarkets Iceland and Morrisons, the coalition challenges the received wisdom that -18°C is the correct freezer temperature. Studies have shown that -15°C works too, and can deliver significant energy savings. One recent study from Campden BRI, a food and drink research centre, and Nomad Foods found that a 3°C increase in frozen food storage temperatures could reduce freezer energy consumption by 10 per cent, with no significant change in most products.
