Shubman Gill Hit On The Head While Trying To Take A Catch. Rishabh Pant's Gesture Is Viral
Siraj struck twice in as many balls but Jamie Smith swung the momentum back in England's favour with a counter-attacking hundred as the hosts raced to 249 for five at lunch.
Brothers #SonySportsNetwork #GroundTumharaJeetHamari #ENGvIND #NayaIndia #DhaakadIndia #TeamIndia #ExtraaaInnings pic.twitter.com/OdClX7Cn49
— Sony Sports Network (@SonySportsNetwk) July 4, 2025
Despite the swashbuckling effort from Smith (102 batting off 82 balls), England remain far away from India's 587 all out.
Smith smashed a memorable hundred in less than a session and Harry Brook (91 batting off 127) was on course to reach three figures at the break.
Strikingly, England hammered 172 runs in 27 overs in the first two hours of play.
Resuming the day at 77 for three, England lost half their side in the second over of the morning session when Siraj had Joe Root (22) and Ben Stokes (0) caught behind. Root's was a soft dismissal as he got faint tickle down the leg side while Stokes was surprised to get a sharply rising ball first up.
England were reduced to 84 for five but Smith and Brook continued to attack and put pressure back on the opposition.
Prasidh Krishna was brought in to implement the short ball plan with six fielders on the leg side but that failed as Smith got the better of him in the 12th over of the morning that yielded 23 runs. Four boundaries and a six over deep square leg came in that eventful over.
India persisted it with Krishna, whose following over went for 11. His figures after the session read 8-0-61-0. It is not often that Brook is outscored but it happened on Friday as Smith relentlessly attacked the Indian bowlers.
Smith also did not allow spinners Ravindra Jadeja and Washginton Sundar get into any sort of rhythm. Sundar was driven for back-to-back fours by Smith in his first two balls before the wicket-keeper batter collected a six and a four from Jadeja in the following over.
Smith got to his second Test hundred off 80, the third fastest by Englishman, with consecutive fours off Jadeja in the last over before lunch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh skating association felicitates 24 Asian c'ship medallists
The Chandigarh Roller Skating Association (CRSA) felicitated city skaters who made the country proud at the recently concluded 20th Asian Roller Skating Championship held in South Korea. A total of 26 skaters from Chandigarh, participating in the roller hockey and in-line hockey disciplines, were part of the Indian contingent. (HT Photo) A total of 26 skaters from Chandigarh, participating in the roller hockey and in-line hockey disciplines, were part of the Indian contingent. Chandigarh skaters contributed significantly to India's medal tally with two gold, two silver, and one bronze medal in roller hockey and inline hockey events. Sanjay Tandon, chairman of the Standing Committee of the administrator's Advisory Council on Sports, was the chief guest. CRSA president Arun Walia and general secretary Harpreet Singh were also present. 'Roller skating is among the popular sports in Chandigarh, and city skaters have always made the country proud at the international level. The inclusion of cash awards in the sports policy has further boosted the sport in the city, and the performance in South Korea is a testimony to that,' said Arun Walia, President, CRSA. Apart from the skaters, CRSA also honoured its joint secretary, Sanan Mahajan, who served as the manager of the Indian contingent, and Harpreet Singh, who was the coach during the Asian championship. In roller hockey, senior girls who won the gold medal are Manika Mahajan, Yashika Sharma, Vinnati, Himanshi Kaushal and Anshika Sharma. While senior mens' team, which managed to win the silver medal, comprises of Gurshaan Singh Aujla, Angadbir Singh, Jujhar Singh and Naman Gussain. Meanwhile, the under-19 team, comprising of Adhiraj Shaunak, Damanpreet Singh, Daksh, Mayank, Dhruv Rathee, Ritesh Kamboj, Saarthak and Ansh Sharma, won the gold medal at the championship. In the In-line hockey event, junior girls' team, consisting of Angel Kaushik, Sonam Singh and Jasmine Saini clinched the silver medal. Skater Nanki participated in the senior women category. The junior boys team, consisting of Jobanjeet Singh, Abhyuday Thakur, Paraspreet Singh and Sanidhya Tiwari, won the bronze medal. Meanwhile, Karanveer Singh Kang participated in the senior men category.
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ravindra Jadeja's 3D supremacy hits new peak: rock-solid batter now leads India's fightbacks, not just finishes them
It's not often that two Indian batters have made upwards of 500 runs in a Test series. Before this ongoing skirmish against England, only once previously – in 1971, during their historic tour of the Caribbean – had that feat been achieved, through debutant Sunil Gavaskar (774 runs) and the seasoned Dilip Sardesai (642). London: India's batter Ravindra Jadeja celebrates his half century during the third day of the fifth Test match between India and England(PTI) At Old Trafford last week, KL Rahul (532) helped India replicate that achievement by joining sensational first-time skipper Shubman Gill (754) in the 500-club. On Saturday at The Oval, Ravindra Jadeja became India's third 500-plus batter of the series with a fifth half-century to go with a match-saving unbeaten 107 in Manchester. Jadeja's continued blossoming as a Test batter has been one of the many illuminating storylines of a series most compelling. It took the left-hander a half-dozen years to crack the Test batting code, but once he turned the corner on the tour of England, coincidentally, in 2018, there has been no stopping him. Over the last five Tests, Jadeja has shown stupendous consistency. Saturday was the first time he was dismissed in the second innings; his earlier second-innings scores weren't trifling – 25, 69, 61 and 107. Throw in first-innings half-centuries in Birmingham and at Lord's, and the picture of a hungry, hardly satisfied batter determined to discharge his responsibilities and shepherd a still-inexperienced batting line-up is complete. Until he started to believe in his batting abilities in the five-day game, Jadeja was pretty much a defensive left-arm spinner overseas and a deadly one in helpful home conditions, and an electric all-round fielder who moved like a gazelle, swooped on the ball like an eagle attacking its prey, and threw the orb as if swapping his shoulder for a cannon. Now, he has metamorphosed into the ultimate 3D cricketer – to borrow a term from former chief selector MSK Prasad – whose pre-eminence is evident from his status as the No. 1 all-rounder in Test cricket. Innately intelligent though he hasn't got as much credit for that facet as he should have, Jadeja's watertight defence is his go-to option these days at the start of an innings, when he absorbs pressure like a sponge. His defensive technique has gradually, with plenty of work behind the scenes, gone from passable to excellent. His once-hard hands have developed a lot of 'give' and their softness has allowed him to keep down nasty lifters. In the dressing-room, there is a sense of calm no matter when Jadeja walks out. They know that for the most part, he won't throw his hand away – saying that, he could so easily have been out first ball in Manchester had Joe Root not shelled a simple catch in the second innings – and that there are few better than him in their midst at reading a situation and reacting accordingly. The art of batting alongside tailenders One of Jadeja's great traits is that he doesn't allow himself to get bogged down. In this series, 48.1% of his runs have come in boundaries (53 fours, six sixes), yet his strike-rate is a more-than-acceptable 55.06, which speaks to his ease at rotating strike and ensuring that bowlers aren't able to line up a specific batter. He is adept at batting with the specialists and the all-rounders, but at Lord's, he revealed a new facet – the art of getting the tail to play above itself, something VVS Laxman was outstanding at. Jadeja did farm the strike when he batted alongside Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj after India slumped to 112 for eight while chasing 193 for victory. But he also allowed the two pacers to develop confidence in themselves by not attempting the outrageous in trying to keep the lion's share of the bowling. Bumrah negotiated 54 of the 132 deliveries faced by the ninth-wicket pair, while Siraj's share in the 80-ball last-wicket stand was 30. Batting with bowlers isn't easy, but it is an integral part of the arsenal when one is occupying slots at No. 6 or 7, where Jadeja has spent most of the second part of his Test career. He is now a more complete batter than he ever was, and now that he has been joined in the genuine spin-bowling all-rounders' band by the exceptional Washington Sundar, India can so easily field Kuldeep Yadav's left-arm wrist-spin on home patch without compromising on the batting depth they so desperately crave. It's sometimes easy to forget, given how lithely athletic he is and how lightly the years sit on him, that Jadeja will turn 37 in four months' time. He has been an under-sung, if not unsung, Indian hero for long, but especially with his recent batting exploits, he is getting his place in the sun. Finally. And deservedly.
Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Indian football's forever mess: ISL crisis risks shattering sport's big dreams
Agencies Indian football's forever mess: ISL crisis risks shattering sport's big dreams Statutory warning: If you love football, don't read this. It will hurt. The story so far: The All India Football Federation (AIFF) and the Football Sports Development Ltd (FSDL), a Reliance-owned company that runs the Indian Super League (ISL), are not seeing eye to eye. They remain poles apart in their renegotiation of the master rights agreement (MRA), which grants the marketing rights of India's toptier league to FSDL. FSDL favours a fundamental rewiring of the agreement, which involves the setting up of a new company—with itself, the clubs and AIFF as shareholders—to run the league. AIFF wants to continue with the current setup where it receives an annual fee of Rs 50 crore from FSDL, with a 5% hike baked in. Negotiations, which began in February, have stalled. What complicates matters is a separate case being heard by the Supreme Court on a new constitution to govern AIFF. For now, the court has directed AIFF not to sign any deal, including a renegotiated MRA. A verdict was expected on July 18, but it has been delayed with the court waiting to see if the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, would be adopted in this session of Parliament. If it does, then the law, which will form the basis of regulating India's wild west of sports bodies, will be the foundation of a newly constituted AIFF as well. The problem? ISL usually runs from September to April, and with time ticking, Indian football is now a game of inglorious uncertainties. Questions abound. When will the bill pass? When will the SC deliver its verdict? Will a newly constituted AIFF have enough time to negotiate with FSDL on a new MRA? Will they be able to reach an agreement? With most clubs going slow on preparations, citing uncertainty, will players be fit? Will the league start on time? Will all the delays end up with the league being nixed for this season? If the league gets cancelled this year, expect sanctions from the governing body of world football, Fifa, apart from a damaged brand, disappointed fans and an admission that perhaps the strongest attempt yet to breathe life into Indian football has failed. Back in 2014, during the first ISL, there was a glimmer of hope that this was going to be the big break that India, then the world's second most populous nation, would need to spark interest in the world's most popular sport. For one, it was backed by Reliance, one of India's biggest names in business. With the organisational heft of IMG, the global sports marketing agency that had played a key role in setting up the Indian Premier League (IPL) cricket tournament, it was taken for granted that things would be was also a sprinkling of global stars in the first edition—Alessandro Del Piero, Freddie Ljungberg, Robert Pires, David Trezeguet, Joan Capdevila, Luis Garcia and Nicolas Anelka—to attract was interest from corporates as well as movie and sports stars to own the franchises, as they saw it as an opportunity to get early on what could be the next a while, it worked. It was reported that 429 million viewers watched the inaugural edition live on TV, making it the second most watched sport in India after ISL couldn't sustain the momentum. Last year's viewership numbers reportedly dwindled to 130 million which, while outnumbering all other sports save cricket, is not quite the sparkle that was expected from ISL after a decade.A key reason, say club owners, is the quality of football itself. As top global names nearing retirement were phased out, their replacements, as well as Indian players, didn't quite step up as expected. There could be another reason, too. ISL started as a twomonth tournament and then changed to a longer league format. Joy Bhattacharjya, CEO of Prime Volleyball League, believes that Indian audiences prefer a short, twomonth, IPL-esque format to a sevenor eightmonth-long league format followed by ISL. While the current format is in sync with the global norms in football, it may have diluted a sustained audience engagement in India where folks aren't used to longer leagues. Net-net, after 10 years, no one is really making money from their investments.A club CEO told ET on condition of anonymity that each ISL club is losing Rs 30-35 crore annually for the last 11 years: 'Your average ISL club has easily lost about Rs 330-350 crore. I'm not even counting interest costs.'The league's cumulative losses have been variously pegged between Rs 3,000 crore and Rs 5,000 numbers weren't sustainable, and one club, FC Pune City, had to shut shop, while Delhi Dynamos moved to Bhubaneswar, lured by a free stadium and increased are worries for other clubs. As a club executive laments, 'We are in a situation where commercially, the sport is not viable. As the broadcasters cannot see value right now, the return on investment is weak.'What will it take to fix that? A key worry —and a quick fix that clubs suggest—pertain to player salaries. A wage-to-turnover ratio under 60% is considered the best practice globally for football clubs. For ISL, claims a club executive, this figure sometimes crosses 70%. The ISL has a mandatory wage cap of Rs 18 crore, but this is frequently flouted, a club owner says on condition of to the salary conundrum is the lack of quality players coming in. To get even marginally decent players, clubs end up paying a lot, claims a club executive. Player salaries have gone from ' ?20 lakh back in 2010 in the I-League (the former top tier) to Rs 3 crore now. The quality of players and the quality of football have not improved in proportion,' says another club Prabhakaran, executive committee member of the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) and former secretary general of AIFF, counters it is market forces at play: 'The pool of talented players is small. At the same time clubs want to win the league by giving the best salaries to the best available players. The clubs are hiking the salaries, nobody has asked them to pay more.'Some clubs want the league to renew its commitment to a wage cap, with far stricter enforcement and oversight on payments made to footballers on the sly as to really fix Indian football, short-term remedies are not enough. To make ISL a more attractive experience for the fan and a more attractive proposition for the advertiser, the quality of football should go up.'You need a steady flow of young talented footballers to make a league sustainable, and that hasn't happened because not enough money is being invested in football structure and youth football,' complains a club executive Bhattacharjya, who was project director of the Fifa Under-17 World Cup in India in 2017, reckons that the administrative set-up for football in India is broken beyond club owners and chief executives ET spoke to squarely blame AIFF which, they allege, is not investing enough in grassroots football, resulting in a pyramid, where money concentrates on the top, with little trickling down. Their question: what has the AIFF been doing with the Rs 50 crore going into its coffers as fees for organising the league?In FY2023, AIFF's income touched Rs 137 crore, which came down to Rs 110 crore in FY2024. Even so, AIFF remains the second richest sports body in Chaubey, president, AIFF, responds: 'Marketing partner FSDL provides fees to AIFF. These funds are utilised by AIFF across various areas, including grassroots and youth development, coach and referee education, development of national teams, and the organisation of national championships across all age groups both for men and women.' He says that last year, 'AIFF successfully conducted 21 championships, featuring a total of 1,697 matches'.Prabhakaran says, 'The budget is 10% of what a country the size of India requires. With the current numbers, you cannot invest in high-quality manpower. You cannot invest in grassroots football, in youth, in infrastructure.'It is a classic chicken-or-egg situation— to improve the financial situation you need to improve viewership, for which you need better football, for which you need better players, for which you need to invest in youth, for which you need said, ISL has been the most successful attempt to put together a national-level football competition—at least from a viewership attempts like the National Football League (NFL) and the I-League had failed to improve Indian football. A league should power the performance of the national team. But strangely enough, India's best-ever Fifa ranking of 94 was in 1996, before NFL. The best since—No. 96— was in 2017. Currently the team is at a dismal 133. This is not how things were supposed to now, everyone is waiting, hoping against hope that things will work out with the passing of the sports law—the prospect of a reconstituted AIFF and a new MRA. If it doesn't, then what will be under threat immediately include the livelihood of hundreds of players, support staff and their families, and indeed the likelihood of a revival of Indian football anytime thing this correspondent, as a football fan, can guarantee is that supporters of Indian football—ignored by all—are angry.
