Waitrose updates popular hot drink loyalty perk — but shoppers face £3 fines
The middle-class supermarket offers its My Waitrose shoppers a free hot drink, without buying anything in store, as long they bring a reusable cup.
Now, in a bid to ensure everyone gets their caffeine fix, customers can borrow a cup if they've forgotten their own.
Sounds like a pretty great deal, but it comes with a catch. If shoppers don't bring the cup back to a designated collection point within seven days, they'll face a £3 penalty.
The 'Borrow a Free Cup' system aims to reduce plastic waste and is currently being tested at nine branches. It was first spotted in Waitrose's Newark store, according to The Grocer.
A Waitrose spokesperson said: 'We're currently conducting a reusable cup trial in nine of our branches – it kicked off this week and is available for MyWaitrose members to use when redeeming their free coffee, or for our cafe customers to use if purchasing one.'
Shoppers will need to tap their MyWaitrose card to redeem their free brew. Those who bring in a reusable cup will be able to enjoy the perk as normal.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Waitrose first introduced its free hot drink offer in 2013. But in 2017, uproar ensued when the supermarket changed its terms to require members to make a purchase to get their free brew.
Then came heartbreak once more when the pandemic hit – the scheme was paused for two whole years. In 2022, it was reintroduced, but with the same terms that a purchase was necessary.
Since January this year though, Waitrose customers have been able to pour themselves a cup of Joe (or tea) without paying a penny for anything inside the store, as long as they bring their own cup.
Customers can enjoy an americano, cappuccino, latte or tea inside Waitrose and Little Waitrose stores. The drinks are made with Caffe Nero beans, and obviously, oat milk is included.
The only requirement to redeem the free perk is that the reusable cup fits under the nozzle of the self-service coffee machine. More Trending
When the return of free coffee was announced back in January, fans flocked to X to share their delight.
'Going to Waitrose and getting a free coffee is a form of therapy,' @harry_jrh wrote.
'Can there be anything more full of middle-class tension than a queue at the free coffee machine, with a frisson of fear it might be broken?' @PhilipGlanville said.
View More »
While @ruth_walshe joked that 'moving north to south is discovering the joy of buying a 30p banana from Waitrose and getting a free coffee.'
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: Price of Freddo increases yet again as popular chocolate suffers shrinkflation
MORE: This 28p supermarket Diet Coke is 'so good' a superfan couldn't tell the difference
MORE: Sainsbury's aisle change could signal end of an era for classic shopping feature
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
12 hours ago
- Metro
State pensioners being short-changed £210,000 depending on where they live
Where someone lives could mean a difference of hundreds of thousands of pounds in state pension payouts, a new analysis has revealed. Pensioners in well-off areas receive around £210,000 more in state pension payments in comparison to those in the most deprived areas. The divide is driven by differences in life expectancy between the poorest and richest parts of the country, the analysis by The Telegraph found. Rich people live longer and therefore receive more pension payments over their lifetime. Hart in Hampshire has the highest life expectancy at 85, with the average retiree drawing a state pension at the age of 66 and receiving total payments of £375,610. Other areas with high life expectancy include Kensington and Chelsea, Horsham, South Cambridgeshire, Uttlesford and South Oxfordshire. These residents live long enough to accumulate £347,978 in state pension payments over their lifetimes. Those in well-off areas benefit from the triple lock system, which means annual payment increases by the highest of inflation, wage growth or 2.5%. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video On the other end of the spectrum, Blackpool has the lowest life expectancy at 76. Pensioners here are short-changed with a state pension at the age of 66 for 10 years, totalling £165,720 over their lifetime. Other areas with low life expectancy at the age of 77 include Middlesbrough, Hull, Manchester, Liverpool and Blaenau Gwent in South Wales, resulting in life payments of £185,151. This means between Hart and Blackpool, there is a £209,890 gap between the two areas. Steve Webb, former pensions minister and now partner at consultancy LCP, suggested the problem is not to do with the pension system. He told Metro: 'The pension system is a mirror to the inequality we face in the country. 'This inequality has got worse because of long-term issues that can't be fixed by one specific policy. 'On one level, this is what you would expect: the longer you live, the greater the pension is. 'The problem we face is why those who are less well-off have shorter lives. 'The way to try and prevent this is better public health campaigns around leading a healthier lifestyle.' Director of Age UK Caroline Abrahams warned: 'It's clear from these statistics that raising the state pension age will particularly penalise those on lower incomes, who are more likely to live in deprived areas.' Pensioners can withdraw their state pension at the age of 66, but this will rise to 67 by 2028 and 68 between 2044 and 2046. There is debate about whether people who are likely to die earlier should retire earlier. For example, in France, someone who started work rather than going into higher education can access the state pension sooner, as can those including miners, soldiers and police officers. More Trending Steve added that this would be 'fraught with challenges' if done in this country. He said: 'For example, there would be 'boundary issues' where people living on two sides of the same street could have different state pension ages. 'There would also be issues about people whose life was spent in a prosperous area, but claiming state pension from an address in a deprived area in order to access an earlier pension. View More » 'Similarly, any attempt to have lower state pension ages for those who had more physically demanding jobs are undermined by the lack of data on the jobs people have done over their lifetime.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Exact amount you'll need in savings at age 30 to be able to retire revealed MORE: Millions could be paying off debt well into retirement amid 'pension postcode lottery' Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Metro
19 hours ago
- Metro
What Rachel Reeves' tears at PMQs say about the government and Labour
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video At Prime Minister's Questions yesterday afternoon, Keir Starmer may have been the main event – but many people couldn't take their eyes off Rachel Reeves. The Chancellor was visibly distressed, wiping tears from her cheeks as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch tore into the government's climbdown over welfare the previous evening. According to Reeves' spokesperson, the reason she was upset was a 'personal matter, which – as you would expect – we are not going to get into'. That gap has left room for speculation, one of the favourite pastimes of politicians and journalists in Westminster. While some have linked her emotional state to her role or relationship with colleagues, the PM has dismissed those suggestions. But it's not possible to deny that those images had an impact. Messages of concern were posted by figures across the political spectrum, and the markets reacted badly to questions of whether Reeves was on the way out. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Bond yields – a key measure of economic trust in the UK government – jumped up considerably during PMQs, when Starmer ignored Badenoch's questions about whether the Chancellor was going to be sacked. They have since fallen back to where they were on Wednesday morning, after the Prime Minister told the BBC she would remain in her role 'for a very long time to come'. This morning, Reeves joined Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting at the launch of the NHS 10-Year Plan. In a sense, it doesn't matter why Reeves was crying at PMQs – showing a bit of emotion doesn't affect people's ability to do their job. It's not hard to understand that politicians, particularly those at the top of government, are often under an immense amount of pressure. That can be exacerbated if – as seems to be the case here – something has happened in their personal life that they would rather keep private. The Chancellor appears to have had a bit of a disagreement with Speaker Lindsay Hoyle yesterday over her response to being told to keep her answers short in an earlier Parliamentary session. Other reports of rows with Deputy PM Angela Rayner or Starmer himself have, however, been denied. And in his interview with the BBC, the Prime Minister said: 'It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week. 'It was a personal matter for her. I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that, it's a personal matter.' Perhaps Reeves will feel comfortable telling the full story about why she felt the way she did at PMQs one day – perhaps she won't. Either way is fine. The country doesn't necessarily need to know every detail. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video What's true, though, is that those pictures seemed to reflect a broader sense of how the government might be feeling after almost exactly a year in power. More Trending Even if it's not the reason she was in tears yesterday, the Chancellor is likely to be deeply frustrated by the tight fiscal spot she finds herself in – a situation that wasn't helped by the chaotic welfare bill vote the day before. Speculation is rife that she may need to resort to raising taxes in her budget later this year after the last-minute scrapping of reforms to the Pip disability benefit left her without billions in expected savings. But if there's one reason for Reeves to be cheerful, it's those bond yields mentioned earlier. The fact they spiked amid concerns she was leaving and fell back when it was confirmed she was staying suggests the markets – an important source of support for any Chancellor – would rather she stays in No 11. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Almost 20,000 asylum seekers in 6 months proves a crucial point MORE: Full list of 38 New Look stores closing down in 2025 MORE: The stress caused by welfare reform flip-flopping left me feeling sick
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
Rachel Reeves wipes tears from her cheeks at PMQs after Welfare bill U-turn
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Kemi Badenoch described Rachel Reeves as looking 'absolutely miserable' at Prime Minister's Questions after a tough day for the Chancellor. Reeves appeared to cry on the front bench as Keir Starmer responded to the Conservative leader's questions – and notably failed to confirm she would stay in her role until the next election. Her sister, Labour Party chair Ellie Reeves, was seen holding her hand as they left the chamber together at the end of the session. A Treasury spokesperson described the situation as 'a personal matter', adding it was something 'we are not going to get into'. They added: 'The Chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.' At a briefing after PMQs, a Downing Street spokesperson said the Chancellor was 'going nowhere', arguing the PM had backed her several times before and did not need to explicitly repeat his support. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Reeves is facing a serious economic dilemma after a bill aiming to bring down the UK's welfare bill was gutted before being voted through yesterday evening. As a result, billions of pounds in savings that might have eased the Chancellor's job balancing the books will no longer happen. More Trending Changes to Universal Credit were included in the final bill that passed its second reading, but changes to the Personal Independence Payment – where most of the savings were set to come from – were scrapped. Instead, alterations to the disability benefit will come from a review by Work and Pensions minister Stephen Timms which is set to be published next autumn. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: 'UK taxpayers will pay price': How people are reacting to the Welfare Bill vote MORE: Full list of 38 New Look stores closing down in 2025 MORE: The stress caused by welfare reform flip-flopping left me feeling sick
