logo
Now streaming, Irish Rep's ‘Beckett Briefs,' headlined by F. Murray Abraham, asks the essential questions

Now streaming, Irish Rep's ‘Beckett Briefs,' headlined by F. Murray Abraham, asks the essential questions

In the program for 'Beckett Briefs,' a bill of three short plays by Samuel Beckett at the Irish Repertory Theatre in New York City, three questions are posed: 'Why these plays?' 'Why now?' And 'Why Beckett?'
The concise answers put forth by the production's director, Ciarán O'Reilly, and Irish Rep Artistic Director Charlotte Moore are not my own, but I agree with them when they write that 'there has never been a more consequential time to delve deeper and ask the fundamental questions: The Whys.'
On a recent short trip, while deciding what to see, I felt compelled to make room for Beckett in what was an impossible schedule. Yes, I was curious to see Oscar winner F. Murray Abraham in the play I consider Beckett's masterpiece, 'Krapp's Last Tape.' And yes, I find I'm unable to pass up an opportunity of seeing 'Play,' in which three characters — a man, his wife and his mistress — are potted in funeral urns in the hereafter, each retelling their side of a romantic triangle that hardly seems worth the everlasting discord.
As for 'Not I,' the briefest of the three pieces, I have been waiting for another chance to experience the spotlighted mouth of a woman talking a mile a minute in fragments that I have yet to be able to piece together. Sarah Street, who heroically performed the work at a hurtling pace, confirmed for me that coherent narrative sense wasn't what Beckett was aiming for.
After I arranged tickets, it was announced that the League of Live Stream Theater will be streaming 'Beckett Briefs' from March 16 through March 30. I had thought this bill would be an ideal streaming offering and wished I had known in advance, but I'm glad I got to experience the production in person for reasons that have to do with the 'Why Beckett?' question.
Beckett is perennially timely because his works concern themselves with those eternal questions that the political emergencies of the day cannot override. Even as we confront impossible times, we remain planted in that greater impossibility — human existence.
But I was craving 'Beckett Briefs' for other reasons. I want to be more mindful of where I place my attention. Our minds are being hijacked by Big Tech, and one of the ironies of our age is that, even as our access to information, entertainment and consumer goods has grown exponentially, our capacity to focus and extend ourselves cognitively has become severely impaired.
As an act of personal resistance, I'm tackling James Joyce's 'Ulysses' again. I'll admit it's a struggle. I read a chapter, browse through supporting materials online, and then listen to the chapter in an audio recording on YouTube. Tech isn't all bad. The resources on the internet were not available to me when I read 'Ulysses' for the first time as a student. But back then, I didn't feel the need to read Joyce as a sociological corrective. And I was somewhat more comfortable with the idea of difficulty in art. I wasn't conditioned to expect everything worthwhile to be predigested and readily exploitable.
Joyce was, of course, Beckett's mentor, and though he went in the opposite direction of Joyce's maximalism, he shares the same determination to start from scratch with artistic form. In whatever discipline Beckett happened to be working in, he reinvestigated not just the vocabulary but the grammar of that medium.
His plays demonstrate a fierce effort to get down to brass tacks. What is the least that is required to reveal the most? Audiences have no choice but to exist in the theatrical moment, without recourse to linear logic, sententious language or psychological epiphanies.
'Krapp's Last Tape' creates a dialogue between an old man and his younger self, through audio diary tapes that reveal what the character was like 30 years earlier — to his everlasting disgust. Krapp eavesdrops, in effect, on his younger literary aspirations and his decision to end the relationship that turned out to be his last chance of love.
The play may be Beckett's most personal, the one that brings you closest to the man. In less than an hour, it achieves what took Marcel Proust, another key literary influence, thousands of pages in 'In Search of Lost Time' to convey — that we die not once but myriad times, being a succession of selves, recognizable yet discrete.
Abraham, adopting a dignified clown demeanor, has an embodied theatricality that is well suited to Beckett's style. His exuberant acting benefits from the severity of Beckett's concision. I recently showed my students the film of John Hurt's performance in 'Krapp's Last Tape,' which I was lucky enough to see in person at the Kirk Douglas Theatre. It remains for me the high-water mark of Beckett acting. But I was grateful to experience the text through a different voice and countenance.
It tells you something about Beckett that an actor of Abraham's stature wants to do this play off-Broadway at this time of his career. The cast of 'Play' — Kate Forbes, Street (doing double duty after 'Not I') and Roger Dominic Casey — lends the astringent playfulness a fresh tone in a lucid, deliberate, perhaps a tad overcareful production. The audience at Irish Rep on the Sunday matinee I attended may have been Beckett veterans, but it's vital that a new generation of artists stays in contact with the vision of this pathbreaking playwright.
Which brings me to the other reason I had for seeing 'Beckett Briefs' — my complete fatigue with realism. Or should I say my exhaustion with a kind of TV realism that seems to believe the purpose of art is to offer a slice not so much of life but of idiosyncratic behavior. It's not simply that the canvas has shrunk. Beckett worked on a rigorously compact scale. It's that realism has been confused with reality, and I worry that actors and writers are losing sight of the experience of living by zooming in on psychological minutiae.
Beckett reminds us of the metaphysical vastness that the stage can contain. Luckily, his style, always so ahead of us, is amenable to the close scrutiny of streaming. Were he alive he would have designed a digital performance that would have made us rethink the possibilities of the form. But it's heartening that more people will be able to experience through 'Beckett Briefs' the aesthetic renewal of his example.
For streaming tickets to 'Beckett Briefs,' click here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Boys Go to Jupiter' Fulfills the Radical Creative Promise of the Internet
‘Boys Go to Jupiter' Fulfills the Radical Creative Promise of the Internet

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Boys Go to Jupiter' Fulfills the Radical Creative Promise of the Internet

'Flow' winning an Oscar for Best Animated Film has been celebrated — specifically by us here at IndieWire — for its use of the free-to-download software Blender, which enabled the film's Latvian animation team to craft a lush, human-free world of staggering beauty and rising water. Practically at the other end of the spectrum of what's possible, director Julian Glander has created a lo-fi, distanced, painfully, poignantly pastel vision of Florida in 'Boys Go to Jupiter.' The film was also made in Blender, but this vaporwave coming-of-age story couldn't look or feel more different. More from IndieWire No AI Was Used on the Last Shot of 'Together' Sharon Stone Wants to Portray Phyllis Diller in Biopic: 'I'm Desperate to Play Her' The story follows intrepid (and intensely sleep-deprived) teenaged deliverista Billy 5000 (Jack Corbett) as he tries to hustle for the $5,000 he hopes will give him the independence he craves, even as absurd and miraculous things keep happening around him, his friends, and an orange juice factory run by Janeane Garofalo and Julio Torres. In the exclusive clip above, you can watch Billy's long walk home, over a musical interlude and the equally transporting landscape of the Florida highways, after his phone and his trusty swagway die. IndieWire spoke to Glander about creating the feature on a regular MacBook and how the look of the film was influenced both by the timeless alienation of being a teenager and this specific moment of Internet enshittification, why Florida is the Petri dish of America, and how independent films can find surprising, rewarding ways to make financial or logistical constraints work for the stories they want to tell. The following interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and length. IndieWire: As someone from Louisiana, I really appreciate the oppressively hot winter vibes going on in the film. There's this humid weirdness you're able to capture through the animation style. Julian Glander: ​​ I'm glad to hear you say that. It's definitely the same region and has some of the same weirdness. I actually don't know Louisiana very well, but for the purpose of your enjoyment of the film, let's say it's the same thing. Oh, I mean, it doesn't have to be. The aliens are in Florida. That makes sense to me. Yeah, it does make a lot of sense. I feel as if we all understand Florida as America's hell. It's like the Petri dish where America kind of happens. I kind of think of it as all coming out of Disney World — the invention and the construction of Disney World 75 years ago, the conquering of the swamps, and then the sort of decay of that whole magical fantasy is the world where this movie takes place. It looks like it was made in Blender. Is that how you created this world? This was made in Blender. Hell, yeah. We love anything anyone can download for free to make art. Well, this is the radical promise of the Internet. We love Blender — the software of the year, the hot software of the moment. I think about 20 years ago, when I was on AOL Kids, [there was] this idea that all these tools would come to us and all this amazing creative expression would happen, and I certainly started my career during what I think of as a golden age of that on Tumblr. We've almost seen a constriction of it and a re-platforming and a reorganizing of the Internet that's very unsatisfying. I think you'd be very hard-pressed to find someone in 2025 who's like, 'I enjoy going online. I like the Internet.' And that wasn't the case 10 years ago. Being someone who went on the computer all day was, for a moment, almost something to be proud of. That's also something the movie is talking about: The way we've all been kind of hoodwinked by the gamification and by the pastel fantasies the tech industry sold us, and the way that they restructured our entire lives — in some ways without our permission, and in some ways with our completely willing buy-in. I wrestle with this all the time, where it's like, 'Am I just getting older? If I were a teenager now, would I still be experiencing exciting connections online?' Probably. But that's also something I want to talk about in the movie. Part of being a teenager is finding a way to have a beautiful life or see the beauty in the world when you basically have no good options. Can you talk a little bit about character design for your teens and others? I'm curious if you experimented with the scale of the world or the level of expressiveness on the characters, and how you finessed all your weird little guys. I've been doing 3D illustration for about a decade now, and a lot of the visual language has developed from the constraints of Blender — specifically the constraints of using Blender, which is infinitely powerful, on my tiny little computer. I just have a MacBook. But I would say part of the look of the movie comes from Florida. I grew up there. I haven't been back in a long time, so this is how I remember it: This very dreamy, sun-drenched, acid pastel place with a little bit of gunk on it. The other part of it is this idea of the gamified world, where we see these characters a lot through the isometric point of view and from some distance. That is a very economically efficient way to make scenes and make a movie. It avoids some of the most expensive stuff in 3D animation, which is camera movement and character movement — specifically moving around within scenes. But I also think, creatively, the sell there is that we're looking at characters who have been isolated from each other and dehumanized in a way because of this new way of working that has been foisted upon us over the last decade. It's this really lovely blend of the logistical and economic realities and creating characters that fit those constraints and a story that really thrives off of them, actually. That's the story of independent filmmaking. To me, it feels like we're at the same moment live-action films had 15 years ago, when all of a sudden everyone had iPhones and everyone started being born with some camera literacy. I think the same thing is happening in animation now. The tools are definitely there — and beyond the tools, the educational resources are there and the communities are there. We had to find every shortcut there was, and then we also had to find a way to make that work creatively. Like, almost nobody walks in the movie, because walk cycles in animation are very time-intensive and when they look wrong, you can really tell. It just shatters everything. So we have characters standing behind gates, characters on wheels a lot or behind doors. Billy, our main character, is on a swagway for most of the movie because it's the easiest thing to animate, but also, I think, sells his character as an aimless young man who's floating through life in a very ghostly way, trying to be unobserved and unnoticed. The swagway is so key to him. Can you talk about the scene where he actually has to walk home in the dark after his phone and his swagway die? That also has a great song, in that moment, too. I really like that scene because it takes place at night, and so we get to see everything we just saw in a different light, and it's new again. The thinking there was, 'OK, Billy has to move through town, and this is the moment where we can show how small he is by putting him up against his actual surroundings.' This is something people talk about a lot in urban development — when you live in car-centric America, the scale of everything is off. It's not done at human scale. I think Billy's point of view in that scene is like he's in a world that's too big for him; and the billboards that he walks past — I think one of this is for the lottery, one of them is saying you're gonna die and go to hell, and that just sort of hangs over the movie. That's a scene that kind of bridges Day 1 of the movie into the next day, where his life really starts changing. Like in a traditional musical, I guess that would be the end of the first act song. This is the stasis. This is how things are. But let's see what's going to happen next. 'Boys Go to Jupiter' will be released on Friday, August 8 by Cartuna and Irony Point. Best of IndieWire The 16 Best Slasher Movies Ever Made, from 'Candyman' to 'Psycho' Martin Scorsese's Favorite Movies Include 'Eddington': 87 Films the Director Wants You to See The Best Thrillers Streaming on Netflix in July, from 'Vertigo' and 'Rear Window' to 'Emily the Criminal'

Sharon Stone on why she didn't cut ‘Basic Instinct' crotch shot despite having ‘legal right' to
Sharon Stone on why she didn't cut ‘Basic Instinct' crotch shot despite having ‘legal right' to

New York Post

time6 hours ago

  • New York Post

Sharon Stone on why she didn't cut ‘Basic Instinct' crotch shot despite having ‘legal right' to

Sharon Stone is tackling her infamous leg-crossing scene and explaining why she didn't pull it from 'Basic Instinct.' The Oscar-nominated actress, 67, discussed the controversial moment from the 1992 erotic thriller in a candid interview with Business Insider published on Monday. In the film, Stone played Catherine Tramell, the seductive crime author-turned-serial-killer, who was investigated by Michael Douglas' character, Det. Nick Curran. 13 Sharon Stone's memorable scene from 'Basic Instinct.' ©TriStar Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 13 The 1992 movie featured Sharon Stone and Michael Douglas. Corbis via Getty Images The most famous scene included Stone crossing her legs to reveal she wasn't wearing underwear while being questioned. That shot caused the star to face scrutiny over the years, with Stone even claiming she lost custody of her son over the scene. Now, she's revealing why she didn't make director Paul Verhoeven remove it from the movie, despite alleging she legally could have forced his hand. 13 Sharon Stone played Catherine Tramell, a seductive crime author-turned-serial-killer. ©TriStar Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection 13 Michael Douglas starred as Det. Nick Curran, who was investigating her for murder. Corbis via Getty Images 13 Sharon Stone revealed why she didn't force the director to remove the controversial scene. sharonstone/Instagram 'I very much believe that none of us knew at the time what we were getting in regard to that shot, and when Paul got it, he didn't want to lose it, and he was scared to show me. And I get that,' Stone explained. 'Once I had time to calm down, I didn't make him take it out of the movie when I had the legal right to,' she continued. Stone said time helped her process that the scene enhanced the flick. 13 Stone also claimed that she got into a shouting match with Michael Douglas before landing the role. Corbis via Getty Images 13 Michael Douglas seemingly denied her allegations. Corbis via Getty Images She acknowledged that she 'did have the chance to do it differently,' but said, 'I didn't because once had the chance to step back, I understood, as the director, not the girl in the film, that that made the movie better.' Stone also revealed whether she regretted taking on the role. 'It made me an icon, but it didn't bring me respect. But would I do it again? We don't get to make these choices in life. I don't participate in the fantasy world in this way,' she stated. 13 Sharon Stone has previously been vocal about her claims that she was made to believe the crotch shot scene was far less revealing than it was. Instagram 'What I did with what happened is exactly the way I wanted to do it. Verhoeven and I have a wonderful relationship. I would work with him again in a second. We both understand. Even though we have different public ways of discussing it, we understand very well what happened regarding the crotch scene,' Stone explained. The actress was vocal about her claims that she was made to believe the crotch shot scene was far less revealing than it was in her memoir, 'The Beauty of Living Twice.' In it, Stone claimed that she saw the shot for the 'first time' with a room full of agents and lawyers. 13 She alleged she didn't see the actual footage until she was in a room full of lawyers and agents. WireImage 13 Her 'Basic Instinct' director claimed Stone was 'lying' about now knowing what would be shown. Instagram/@sharonstone 'That was how I saw my vagina-shot for the first time, long after I'd been told, 'We can't see anything — I just need you to remove your panties, as the white is reflecting the light, so we know you have panties on,' she explained. Verhoeven previously claimed she was 'lying' about not knowing what would be shown in the scene. 'Any actress knows what she's going to see if you ask her to take off her underwear and point there with the camera,' he told ICON in 2017. 13 Stone said as the 'one with the vagina,' her opinion is the only one that matters and 'the other points of view are bulls–t.' Getty Images However, Stone held firm by stating that as the 'one with the vagina,' her opinion is the only one that matters and 'the other points of view are bulls–t.' The starlet also revealed her alleged explosive first encounter with her co-star Douglas, claiming he 'wouldn't even test with me' after the pair got into a verbal altercation at the Cannes Film Festival before she landed the role in the flick. 'A bunch of us were all sitting, and he was talking about someone and their kids. I really, really knew this person he was talking about,' Stone said of Douglas. 'So I said something and he responded to me, saying, 'What the f–k do you know?' It was in regard to a father-child relationship.' 13 She also claimed that Michael Douglas didn't want to be her co-star following their alleged shouting match in Cannes. Corbis via Getty Images 'So he screams this at me across a whole group of people. And I'm not the person who goes, 'Oh, excuse me, superstar.' I pushed back my chair and said to him, 'Let's step outside.' That's how we first met,' she claimed. Once away from the group, Stone 'explained to him what the f–k I knew about this family he was speaking about, and that I was best friends with the children and the parent. And then we parted. I wouldn't say as best friends, but amicably.' She added, 'I don't think he wanted me to be his costar.' But Douglass shot down those claims, with his rep telling Business Insider he 'doesn't recall seeing or knowing Sharon' until seeing her 'Basic Instinct' screen test. 13 Michael Douglas' rep said the actor 'doesn't recall seeing or knowing Sharon' before seeing her screen test. FilmMagic 'The only time Michael remembers the two of them in Cannes together was when they were there to screen and promote the picture,' the rep stated. The Post reached out to Stone for comment.

Stella Rimington, first female chief of Britain's MI5, dies at 90
Stella Rimington, first female chief of Britain's MI5, dies at 90

UPI

time6 hours ago

  • UPI

Stella Rimington, first female chief of Britain's MI5, dies at 90

A file photograph shows Dame Stella Rimington, the first female director of the British Security Service, commonly known as MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5), during the presentation of her novel 'The invisible' in Madrid in January 2009. Rimington died Sunday night at the age of 90. File Photo by Angel Diaz/EPA Aug. 4 (UPI) -- Stella Rimington, the first female chief of the British Security Service MI5 and the first woman to "head any intelligence agency in the world," has died at the age of 90. Rimington, who joined MI5 as a typist in the mid-1960s in India and was the inspiration behind Judi Dench's M in the James Bond series, died Sunday night. She was "surrounded by her beloved family and dogs and determinedly held on to the life she loved until her last breath," her family said in a statement. Rimington joined MI5 full-time in 1969 and was promoted to director general in 1992. Born in 1935 in south London, Rimington's career with MI5 was dominated by the Cold War and threats from the Soviet Union. Not only was she the first female chief, she was also the first director general to be publicly identified when appointed. Her roles with the agency included "counter-subversion, counter-espionage and counter-terrorism," MI5 said Monday in a statement on its website. "She oversaw MI5 taking lead responsibility for countering Irish republican terrorism in Great Britain, the move of MI5's headquarters to Thames House and instituted a policy of greater public openness to demystify the work of MI5, including beginning a program of releasing MI5 files to The National Archives." Rimington retired from MI5 in 1996 and was made Dame Commander of the Order of the Bath that same year. "I'm proud that I was the first woman DG and that, during the time I was there, MI5 changed from being an old-fashioned closet organization," Rimington told the Guardian in 2011. "I still thought the essence of the Cold War and spies and stuff was fun. You know, going around listening to people's telephones and opening their mail and stuff," she said in a separate interview after leaving the agency in 2001. Rimington wrote her autobiography, "Open Secret," that same year, followed by a series of eight novels with a fictitious MI5 officer, named Liz Carlyle. She also wrote two more novels with the character Manon Tyler as a CIA agent. Current MI5 director general Ken McCallum paid tribute to Rimington on Monday, calling her "the first publicly avowed Director General of MI5" and the "first avowed female head of any intelligence agency in the world." "Her leadership ushered in a new era of openness and transparency about the work MI5 does to keep this country safe," he said, "a legacy that continues to this day." Notable deaths of 2025 Loni Anderson Actress Loni Anderson arrives on the orange carpet for the Race to Erase MS Gala in Beverly Hills, Calif., on May 10, 2019. Anderson, best known for her Actress Loni Anderson arrives on the orange carpet for the Race to Erase MS Gala in Beverly Hills, Calif., on May 10, 2019. Anderson, best known for her scene-stealing role as receptionist Jennifer in the sitcom "WKRP in Cincinnati" and for her real-life marriage to late actor Burt Reynolds, died at the age of 79 on August 3. Photo by Chris Chew/UPI | License Photo

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store