A premium audio player with streaming support
The device runs a customized version of Android 13, allowing installation of major music streaming services like Spotify, TIDAL, and Qobuz for seamless online listening.
Internal storage includes 32GB of ROM (with 22GB usable), and it supports microSD cards up to 2TB which is ideal for large, high-resolution music libraries.
It's powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 processor built on a 6nm process, which ensures smooth multitasking and responsive app performance.
The 4.7-inch HD display with a resolution of 750x1334 pixels is bright and functional, allowing for clear navigation and playback control.
A major strength of the JM21 is its dual Cirrus Logic CS43198 DACs, which provide exceptionally detailed and natural sound reproduction. These DACs support high-resolution audio formats up to 384kHz/32bit and DSD256 (natively), delivering excellent fidelity.
FiiO's Digital Audio Purification System (DAPS) bypasses Android's global sample rate conversion, ensuring bit-perfect audio playback and maintaining the original quality of your music.
The battery lasts up to 12.5 hours of continuous usage and recharges in less than two hours with a 5V/2A charger.
Bad points?
With only 22GB of usable internal storage, you'll likely need a microSD card right away, especially if you use offline streaming or store a large local library.
Best for ...
Audiophiles seeking uncompromised audio quality with support for both offline files and streaming apps and a powerful output for a variety of professional headphones.
Avoid if ...
You want a simpler player that doesn't rely on a full Android interface that needs regular updates.
Score: 9/10
FiiO JM21, £179.99 (amazon.co.uk)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Khruangbin, again? I quit Spotify for a month to escape samey algorithms – this is what I learned
If you use music to set or fix your mood, Spotify is a tantalising tool. Feeling sad? Cry to your personalised 'Depress Sesh Mix'. In a romantic crisis? Stew in your own 'Situationship Mix'. As I write this, I'm listening to Spotify's Daylist, a mix that refreshes every few hours based on my own listening habits. Today's vibe is 'funky beats roller skating tuesday early morning mix'. At 120bpm, the algorithm knows I need some energetic house to roll from my bed to my desk. The problem with this listening experience isn't just the creepy AI-driven intimacy of it all, more that the same songs are recycled in a predictable loop. Spotify's algorithm has anaesthetised artists I once enjoyed. Every time I hear the slippery psychedelic bass of Khruangbin slinking into one of my playlists, or flow in seamlessly from another artist's radio, I violently hit skip. A decade ago, Spotify favoured human-curated playlists made by artists, celebrities and music aficionados. But in 2021, the streaming company pivoted towards machine learning, feeding 'nearly half a trillion events' into computer models every day. Now, user data – chiefly our listening history, interactions with Spotify's user interface and the time of day – is packaged into a mixtape for every micro-occasion. Advocates argue this is a chance to democratise music promotion, neatly matching artists with their audiences. Critics suggest this ultra-subjective experience limits musical discovery to the already familiar – and the less it's challenged, the more my music taste narrows. So as a test, I quit Spotify for a month, to bring some soul back into the way I find music. First, I consulted people who had never used streaming services, like my dad, who grew up in 1970s London in the heyday of punk and glam rock. Hunched in a booth in his local record shop, he would listen to a sample and take a punt on what vinyl to buy – A-side or B-side. Some albums apparently missed the mark, and others, like Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, transported him to a different universe. He insisted I start with my favourite artists, and listen to every album front to back, as if reading a story. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning Inspired, I bought a $30 record player in an op-shop and hunted for vinyls. Late to the record renaissance, it was slim pickings – Australian pub classics, Christian country or Christmas hits. But when a friend pointed out my new turntable was missing a needle, it became a dusty but decorative addition to my living room. My 20-year-old neighbour had another suggestion: a diamante-encrusted iPod, which she produced in a ziplock bag like a hallowed artefact. Found for $200 on Facebook Marketplace, plugging in wired earplugs and hitting shuffle was a nostalgic throwback. But this romance was short-lived: the iPod was incompatible with my Bluetooth speaker and demanded hours of admin to upload music. The biggest challenge came when driving my old silver Subaru, as I was stranded with only a single CD, a flimsy aux cord and my thoughts. Stuck with silence, I wondered what the new grinding noise was – until I discovered my local community broadcaster, Vox FM 106.9. More than 5 million Australians listen to community radio every week, for 17 hours on average – and now, I can see why. The station prides itself on 'real music' and even has the tagline 'You never know what you like until you try it'. Just what I needed! And it's true, I had forgotten how good it feels to wind down the windows and blast Push the Button by the Sugababes, and then to roll them up again when a classical German song, a mystery even to Shazam, comes on. Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion I contacted Justin Moon, who runs a popular underground radio station and record shop in Newcastle. He sources music from record fairs, friends, and Bandcamp – distributing interesting sounds as a conduit, or Hermes figure, to lay (or lazy) people like me. Moon is noticing that his customers are searching for a more 'active' listening experience. 'It's not this kind of passive wash-over-you rubbish that you make your two-minute noodles to and forget all about 10 seconds later,' he says. Music – like film, TV, and food – is now served to us effortlessly, instantly. But this has caused the way we consume music to be more siloed. Spending a month hunting for new music myself, rather than relying on an algorithm, made me feel more connected to my parents, friends, radio presenters and even complete strangers. Their recommendations – whether to my taste or not – came with a part of themselves, a memory, or a shared interest. After my month's Spotify hiatus, my algorithm hasn't been cleansed. Over the course of writing this piece, my daylist has evolved into 'french indietronica swimming pool tuesday afternoon', whatever that means. There are two Khruangbin songs on there. It's safe to say I would rather play roulette with the radio.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 launch sees £200 discount frenzy a day before release
Samsung has just launched its new Galaxy Club scheme that offers the chance to spread the cost of a new Galaxy phone The latest and greatest Samsung foldable is nearly here with a release date of 25th July, close for many Android enthusiasts - and there's plenty to be thrilled about. That's because the Z Fold7 could well be one of the finest foldable phones to hit the market in years - and Samsung has truly risen to the occasion. But what if we told you there was a way to save £200 on the Z Fold7 and Z Flip7? Well, Samsung has unveiled its own Galaxy Club - a loyalty and payment programme - that lets customers spread the cost of a new Galaxy phone over 24 months with a mere 10 per cent deposit. It's a scheme designed to make owning a new phone more affordable and rewarding. However, like plans at Sky and Vodafone (or any mobile contract), it is subject to the usual credit agreements. It enables customers to retain their SIM-only phone without having to commit to a carrier, and offers a £100 discount upon signing up. Samsung will also throw in a free storage upgrade worth £100, in addition to the Samsung Club discount, reports the Mirror. Furthermore, Samsung will refund 50 per cent of the phone's value after 12 months of ownership, allowing customers the freedom to upgrade whenever they wish. For shoppers looking for some other phone alternatives, the newest Galaxy Z Fold7 is out, and it's perfect for those who want to splash out. is offering some enticing pre-order deals for the gadget, and with the upgrades it boasts, it might just be worth the investment. Prices kick off at £44.99 a month, with double the storage included. Alternatively, if you're devoted to Apple, Giffgaff offers the iPhone 16 Pro for a reasonable £24 monthly plan, though there's a slightly higher initial cost of £25 upfront. The Daily Express recently put the Galaxy Z Fold7 through its paces. Tech editor Dave Snelling commented: "I've tried all of Samsung's previous Z Fold gadgets, and despite being blown away by the incredible technology, they have never replaced my normal phone. "However, that has all just changed. For the very first time, I'm actually truly smitten with a Samsung foldable. The tech giant has just released its new Z Fold7, and it really has to be seen to be believed. "Thanks to a new design and updated Armour FlexHinge, things have been seriously slimmed down this year, which makes the device feel much easier to handle." However, he did express some concerns, particularly about the cost. He noted: "Of course, all this tech does come at a very high price. The entry-level Z Fold7 with 256GB of storage starts from £1,799, with things rising to over £2,100 if you opt for the 1TB model."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Intel beats shareholder lawsuit over $32 billion stock plunge
July 24 (Reuters) - A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value. While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business. Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs, opens new tab and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab, while still making chips and wafers for internal use. In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading. Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value. While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business. Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs, opens new tab and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab, while still making chips and wafers for internal use. In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading. Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab of defrauding shareholders by concealing problems in a business where it manufactured chips for outside customers, leading to a $32 billion one-day plunge in its market value. While saying she "understands plaintiffs' frustrations," U.S. District Judge Trina Thompson in San Francisco ruled on Wednesday that Intel did not wait too long to reveal a $7 billion fiscal 2023 operating loss in its foundry business. Intel's stock price sank 26% last August 2, one day after the chipmaker announced more than 15,000 layoffs, opens new tab and suspended its dividend, hoping to save $10 billion in 2025. The Santa Clara, California-based company created the foundry business in 2021 to serve customers including (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab, while still making chips and wafers for internal use. In a 21-page decision, Thompson said Intel made clear that foundry results would be "obscured" until 2024, meaning its earlier financial reporting was not false and misleading. Thompson also cited an "overarching policy consideration" that because Intel's public statements suggested a "trial-and-error" approach to the foundry business, the company could have faced risks from reporting preliminary, unaudited data. The judge dismissed an earlier version of the lawsuit in March. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the shareholders cannot sue again. Intel had been accused of inflating its stock price from January 25 to August 1, 2024. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence. The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986. The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab. and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence. The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986. The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683. Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Intel and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests. Intel has struggled to compete with rival chipmakers such as Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.O), opens new tab, Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab, and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence. The company lost $18.8 billion in 2024, its first annual loss since 1986. The case is In re Intel Corp Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-02683.
