Removing CO2 from the ocean could have a negative impact, scientists warn
We're losing our fight to control climate change, which has led a lot of scientists to look for new ways to combat the consistently rising global temperatures. While we've come up with a few different solutions to try, many come with additional problems. Now researchers have discovered that one of the most widely discussed solutions, marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR), could actually make things much worse by lowering the ocean's oxygen levels.
The idea behind mCDR is to try to make our oceans more effective at storing carbon dioxide. Currently, our oceans are the planet's largest carbon sink, estimated to hold around a quarter of human-made CO2 emissions. As such, many believe the ocean could be key to turning the tide in our fight against human-driven climate change. But there's a major problem.
Today's Top Deals
Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales
Best Ring Video Doorbell deals
Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98
Our oceans are already suffering due to the ongoing changes in our planet's environment. For one, the oxygen levels in the ocean are dropping significantly. Additionally, a large percentage of the ocean is losing access to sunlight, driving lower oxygen levels throughout. As the oceans grow warmer, scientists warn that the deeper parts of our oceans will become much less efficient at circulating oxygen.
This will affect marine ecosystems across the world, driving lower oxygen levels and less marine diversity. While we have ideas to slow this warming, what if those plans would actually make things worse? That's the question behind new research published in Environmental Research Letters. The team of researchers behind the study looked at several different mCDR methods, and found that many of them could actually make things worse.
We've come up with a number of different ways to slow warming in the oceans. While this might stop sea levels from rising, most would involve some kind of biomass production, which would lead to sinking biomasses in the ocean. This, the researchers warn, would have unintended impacts on the ocean's oxygen levels.
One method is to essentially fertilize the ocean by adding nutrients like iron to help stimulate phytoplankton like the ones seen in the image above. These blooms can then soak up more carbon dioxide. While these plants would sink and carry the carbon to the bottom of the ocean, they'd eventually consume oxygen as they decayed. Using simulations, the researchers looked at how 100 years of continuous fertilization would affect the ocean's oxygen levels.
They found that over 100 years, the ocean would lose around three percent of its oxygen capacity across the globe. That's more than double the loss being caused by global warming alone. Further, they found that some areas beneath the fertilized zones could actually drop by over 50 micromoles, changes that would even exceed the deoxygenation of the ocean seen under high-emission climate scenarios.
This new research just shows that while we might have good ideas about how to help the climate, not all of those are going to help the ocean. Our goal, as humans trying to help our planet, should be to find the best way to do that without hurting it more. And so far, it looks like most methods of mCDR would hurt more than help in the long run. Time to go back to the drawing board, I guess.
More Top Deals
Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free
See the
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
44 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Wearable devices helped spot postsurgical complications in kids
Wearable devices like Fitbits can help health care providers spot postsurgical complications in kids, a new analysis in Science Advances finds. About 1 in 7 children will have postoperative complications, but diagnoses can be delayed because they can be difficult for caretakers outside the hospital to spot. To determine if data recorded by wearable devices can help predict recovery in children, researchers gave Fitbits to 103 children ages 3 to 18. All were recovering from an appendectomy, a common surgery in kids. The devices monitored heart rate and step-count data, sleep and other biometrics. They recorded 2,163 total monitoring days. The researchers used the data to find circadian patterns in the children's biometrics during each day after their surgery. Of 94 children whose data could be used, 58 had a normal recovery, 23 had abnormal symptoms such as diarrhea but no ultimate complication, and 13 had a postoperative complication. The researchers used a machine-learned model to predict complications using the Fibits and biorhythms. Daily patterns associated with activity, such as step count, ended up being the most important to predicting post-appendectomy recovery, followed by heart rhythms. Tracking biorhythms for as little as 120 minutes produced robust enough data for the model to analyze. Overall, the researchers were able to predict postoperative complications using the wearable data with 91 percent sensitivity and 74 percent specificity. 'In our data, 89% of patients who had complications after discharge were readmitted and were all correctly predicted by the biorhythm model,' they write. Other research suggests biorhythms may not be as effective at tracking adults' postoperative recovery. It might be easier to use biometrics to predict children's recoveries because their lives are more structured, making it easier to establish a typical baseline for analysis, the researchers add. Other studies should focus on other childhood procedures including tonsillectomies, the researchers suggest. But overall, the researchers write, the study shows that consumer wearables and monitoring could help 'address key challenges in postoperative monitoring of children.'
Washington Post
44 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Dolphins in the Potomac River? There are a lot more than you think.
REEDVILLE, Va. — Aboard a small motorboat, the trio of researchers navigated the waters of Chesapeake Bay. It was two hours into their trip, and there was no sign of what they'd come looking for. They watched and waited, at one point plucking a plastic bottle from the water. The researchers, based out of Georgetown University, were accustomed to long stretches with nothing but birds and fishing boats as far as the eye could see.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Bright Side: Underwater robot live stream mesmerizes Argentines
A robot is navigating the dark, cold depths of the South Atlantic seabed, streaming images of dazzling coral and previously unseen fish, while scientists provide live commentary on YouTube – and Argentines are captivated. It's the first time human eyes, albeit remotely, are witnessing this underwater oasis in real time, where the frigid, nutrient-rich Malvinas current meets the warm, salty waters of the Brazil Current. A robot explores the dark, cold, deep sea floor of the South Atlantic, transmitting images of vibrant coral and fish never seen before as scientists give live commentary via YouTube. And Argentines can't get enough of it. The Argentine-American scientific mission is for the first time exploring the Mar del Plata canyon, a submarine gorge which plunges nearly 4,000 meters (13,000 feet) deep, off the coast of the seaside resort of the same name. The awed conversations between scientists leading the expedition and the explanations they give to viewers allow the public a rare insight into the hidden wonders of marine biology. In one instance, the camera on the SuBastian underwater robot shows a weird-looking, little white animal. One of the scientists on the team can be heard asking her colleagues, "Do we want it?" "Yes, yes, we want it!" reply dozens of messages in the live stream chat before the image shows the suction device being activated to suck up the specimen for study. "Oh, I love these little creatures," says one user. "I'm obsessed!" comments another. "Don't take the little one away!" pleads a third. The live stream began a week ago and exceeded one million views per day since Thursday, when it also began to be broadcast on television. "There are cold-water corals with the same colors as those in the Caribbean. How can that be? At a depth of 3,000 meters!" Pablo Penchaszadeh, a marine biologist and painter who is on board the expedition as an artist, told AFP. Patrick Star The 20-day expedition "Underwater Oases of the Mar del Plata Canyon" involves 25 scientists -- most of them from the Argentine research agency CONICET. Part of the GEMPA deep sea study group, with support from the US Schmidt Ocean Institute, it will end on August 10. Aboard the Schmidt Ocean Institute's "Falkor (too)" ship, scientists remotely operate the robot, which can descend to a depth of 4,500 meters (14,700 feet). They collect biological samples with its robotic arms and other instruments, and send back high-definition images. "The fact that anyone can connect from home and see what we are seeing live is a unique opportunity," explains expedition leader Daniel Lauretta in a statement. "Science is no longer something distant or inaccessible, but becomes part of everyday life." This week, social media users were delighted when an orange starfish with two symmetrical bumps resembling buttocks appeared on the live stream. It quickly prompted comparisons with Patrick Star, from the popular animated series SpongeBob SquarePants. Memes circulated joking that "Patrick is Argentine," marine biology became a trending topic on social media, and the broadcast reached the screens of hundreds of thousands of captivated viewers. "I came to see the big-bottomed star, is it here?" asked one user upon entering the YouTube chat. Spectators also gave other sea creatures nicknames: a king crab was dubbed "Drag Queen," and sea cucumber was fondly called "Sweet Potato." 'Beacon of light' This is the first time that human eyes -- albeit remotely -- have seen this underwater oasis in real time, where the cold, nutrient-rich Malvinas current and warm, salty Brazil current converge. The confluence is "one of the most energetic regions in our global Ocean," according to the website of the Schmidt Institute, with the temperature difference creating an area teeming with marine wildlife and flora. "We are already seeing incredible things: animals that have never been recorded in this area, underwater landscapes that look like something from another planet, and behaviors that surprise even the most experienced scientists," said Lauretta. But funding for such expeditions is under threat in Argentina. CONICET, the government's scientific research arm, has been severely underfunded by libertarian President Javier Milei, who has implemented draconian cuts to public spending with his infamous "chainsaw." Its budget fell by 21 percent last year, salaries have plummeted by 35 percent since the Milei took office in December 2023, and the cuts have led to an exodus of scientists. As a result, in between "oohs" and "aahs" of wonder, messages of support are flooding the live stream's chat: "Long live Conicet!". "Seeing people being passionate about their job is attractive," said Tomas Atilio Luppi, a biologist at the CONICET-affiliated marine and coastal research institute in Mar del Plata, who is not directly involved in the campaign. "This is happening at a very difficult time," he told AFP of the popular broadcast. "Science is in a very complicated position, both financially and in terms of support and human resources." "The fact that this craze is happening is like a beacon of light." (FRANCE 24 with AFP)
