logo
‘Absurd' dropped charge for protester Hannah Thomas raises police bias questions

‘Absurd' dropped charge for protester Hannah Thomas raises police bias questions

SBS Australiaa day ago
Civil liberties groups have criticised NSW Police's attempt to invoke rarely used anti-riot laws for the first time in over a decade against former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, questioning whether police are biased against pro-Palestinian protesters. Thomas was seriously injured after being arrested at a pro-Palestinian protest in June and says she may never regain sight in her right eye. NSW Police confirmed it would seek to drop the charge relating to emergency police powers under section 6A of the Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act (LEPRA) laid on 27 June, and have added an alternate charge of refusing to comply with a direction to move on. "On Monday 30 June 2025, I put in place a process to review the charges laid in this matter to ensure the relevant and most appropriate charges are applied," NSW Police assistant commissioner Brett McFadden said in a statement. "The review is part of normal critical incident protocols."
On Monday, the Sydney Morning Herald revealed Thomas had been charged under the laws introduced in late 2005 to give police more powers to stop "large-scale demonstrations" in the wake of the Cronulla riots in December that year.
Advocates say the treatment of pro-Palestinian protesters by NSW Police is highly concerning. Source: AAP / Flavio Brancaleone But some lawyers say they are shocked the charge was ever laid, as the emergency police powers outlined in LEPRA cannot be invoked without high-level approval from the commissioner of police or premier, and cannot apply retroactively if that approval was never given.
"Even the police say that this would be an inappropriate misuse of police powers — in the NSW police submission when these laws were reviewed they said a peaceful assembly could never be categorised as a riot or other civil disturbance," Human Rights Centre senior lawyer David Mejia-Canales told SBS News.
Hannah Thomas in hospital being treated for her eye injury, in a still taken from a video on her Instagram page. Source: Instagram / Hannah Thomas Meija-Canales said the laws give police "unbelievable powers" that aren't often used "for good reason". "The fact that these laws have been used and the charges have been removed under a review where the police haven't actually explained why they were laid in the first place, that raises incredible concerns," he said.
"We're also really concerned about the fact that police do seem to be targeting protests for Palestine and also protests for climate action, maybe disproportionately and with incredible force, compared to other types of peaceful assemblies."
Police confirmed four others were arrested on 27 June but were not charged with the same anti-riot offence as Thomas, as about 60 people protested outside a Sydney firm they say is manufacturing material used in Israeli fighter jets.
A still from an undated video showing police and protesters clashing outside a Sydney factory. The protesters said the factory was supplying material used in Israeli fighter jets. Source: AAP / Amanda King and Fabio Cavadini/PR IMAGE What are NSW's anti-riot laws? In 2005, following the Cronulla riots, then-NSW Premier Morris Iemma recalled parliament to vote on legislation which would give police more powers to force people to move along amid large-scale demonstrations where there was a risk of public disorder, and seize and detain objects and search people without a warrant.
Iemma stated the powers "are not intended to be used in respect of peaceful protests, union demonstrations and the like".
They haven't been invoked for protests since 2011. Since their introduction, police have not clarified how many people would constitute a "large-scale" demonstration. In October 2023, NSW deputy police commissioner David Hudson told reporters he was seeking to enable the anti-riot powers before a pro-Palestinian rally in Sydney's Hyde Park, a decision backed by Premier Chris Minns. A legal case was brought against the proposal and police ultimately backed down, choosing not to invoke the emergency powers.
Senior lawyer at Redfern Legal Centre Sam Lee said section 6A of LEPRA gives police extensive powers to move people on only if there is a risk of public disturbance.
She said it was "absurd" to have levelled them against Thomas and "there are allegations police used powers unlawfully" against the former Greens candidate for Grayndler. "They're very extensive powers and certainly I think it would've been just not required in this situation," Lee told SBS News.
"I would be surprised if anyone in the police department actually approved these charges of such calibre and therefore why an officer charged someone under 6A ... it just doesn't make sense".
Allegations of bias Australian Democracy Network (ADN) protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said it's "extra worrying" police were "attempting to charge somebody for not complying with powers that they weren't aware existed at the time" at the protest Thomas attended. Radievska also pointed out it's not clear on what legal basis police issued a move-on order to the demonstrators.
"That's kind of the big unanswered question: under what legal authority were these quite extreme uses of force undertaken and the charges brought."
She said in NSW "there's been an escalating pattern of police violence at protests where there's large representation of Muslim communities and similarly protests where there's basically communities that are already vulnerable to policing when they demonstrate in large numbers".
A recent ADN report stated police have imposed particularly heavy-handed directions, surveillance and restrictions on protests carried out by SWANA (South West Asian and North African) and First Nations communities since 2019, based on reports from independent legal observers.
Pro-Palestinian protesters in Sydney's Hyde Park in November last year. There has been regular pro-Palesitian protests in Sydney since the start of the Hamas-Israel war. Source: AAP / Flavio Brancaleone "In 2023-24, police in NSW were observed by independent legal observers to target cars with Palestinian flags driving near Hyde Park during a rally for stop and searches, with drivers being fined for minor infringements such as tucking P plates under a number plate instead of on a bracket," the report states. "Police were also observed to be writing down the number plates of vehicles with Palestinian flags. None of the other many cars passing by the area were stopped and searched or had their vehicles recorded by police."
SBS News contacted NSW Police for comment on claims the force appeared to be targeting protesters disproportionately. A spokesperson referred to McFadden's earlier statement on Thomas' charges and said further comment would not be provided as the matter is before the court.
Mejia-Canales said since October 2023 there has been a "weaponisation of the law to target protests for Palestine". "The most recent objections that police have had — where they lodged Supreme Court challenges to prevent protests from going ahead — were protests for Palestine, particularly one that was going to occur one year after the Hamas attacks in Israel." He said this was despite peaceful protests happening in support of Palestinians "every week for a year". "The overwhelming number of those protests have been peaceful, but police still sought to block a protest from going ahead, a protest for peace in Palestine based on some ridiculous assessment, including that the planter boxes that are outside town hall in Sydney are going to be dangerous somehow to protesters. "I mean, it really does seem that the police is really just clutching at straws to kind of weaponise more laws to prevent protests from happening, in particular protests regarding peace in Palestine."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Massive $90,000 fine for steelmakers after horror workplace injury
Massive $90,000 fine for steelmakers after horror workplace injury

News.com.au

time43 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Massive $90,000 fine for steelmakers after horror workplace injury

A company has been issued a massive fine after a worker's hand was pulled into a bending machine and sustained a 'partial degloving' WorkSafe Victoria said Retired AKZ Pty Ltd, which previously traded as AKZ Reinforcing Pty Ltd, pleaded guilty to two separate workplace safety charges in the Latrobe Valley Magistrates Court on Wednesday July 2. It was convicted and fined $90,000 after the incident that hospitalised the worker. The court heard the worker had been operating a machine designed to bend reinforced steel and was asked to do a type of bend he had not done before. One of the steel bars began to twist as he bent it, and he guided it back into the machine with his hand – as he had allegedly been taught. Unfortunately his glove was caught in the wired components of the bar and pulled his hand into the machine. The worker then sustained what WorkSafe Victoria termed a 'partial degloving' of his left index finger and was taken to hospital. An investigation by WorkSafe showed that a guard designed for the machine had not been fitted to its danger area, and the company's instructions to the worker 'directly contradicted' the machine's operating manual. The manual instructed workers to stay at least two metres away from the machine while it was operating. The court heard that the steelmaking company had a history of workplace health and safety offences including an incident in December 2024 for which it was fined $146,000 and three similar incidents with bending machines. The company has had five employees sustain serious finger injuries. WorkSafe Executive director of health and safety Sam Jenkin said AKZ's failure to learn from previous incidents should be a 'major red flag' to workers and the industry. 'WorkSafe keeps a watchful eye on businesses known for putting workers at risk and will continue taking enforcement action when appropriate,' Mr Jenkin said. 'Aside from the obvious – protecting workers from harm, avoiding tragedies and upholding legal duties – a company that prioritises health and safety generally has better reputation, stronger staff retention and less expenses in the long run.' The company had worked on major projects in Victoria including the Suburban Rail Loop and the West Gate Tunnel.

'No place for antisemitism in Australia': PM vows to take prompt action
'No place for antisemitism in Australia': PM vows to take prompt action

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

'No place for antisemitism in Australia': PM vows to take prompt action

'No place for antisemitism in Australia': PM vows to take prompt action Published 10 July 2025, 4:43 am The long awaited report from the special envoy to combat antisemitism in Australia is now with the government. Among its key recommendations: withholding public funding to universities that 'facilitate, enable or fail to act' on antisemitism. It also calls for: law enforcement agencies to cooperate, stronger regulation of online hate speech and monitoring of media organisations for accurate and fair reporting. The Prime Minister says there's no place for antisemitism in Australia, and has vowed to consider the recommendations.

ABC News apologises over on-air AFL blunder
ABC News apologises over on-air AFL blunder

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

ABC News apologises over on-air AFL blunder

An ABC News presenter has been forced to apologise to viewers after the program aired the wrong story. Presenter Ruby Cornish addressed viewers after a series of sports stories aired including an AFL report 'from a week ago' on Thursday night. Cornish initially read a headline in relation to a Collingwood member who was banned for five years over a 'highly inappropriate and threatening text message' aimed at the embattled Carlton coach Michael Voss. She revealed that an AFL investigation found a member of a rival club was behind the vile threat. However, the program then aired a video package from last week regarding Gold Coast Suns coach Damien Hardwick taking aim at the AFL in the wake of a league-wide change to umpire contact. The clip discussed the AFL's announcement that players hit with a fourth or subsequent careless umpire contact charge within the past two seasons will likely be sent straight to the tribunal. As the bulletin came to an end, Cornish swiftly addressed viewers at home who may have been left baffled by the mistake. 'Before we move on, just a quick apology,' began the reporter. 'A very short time ago, we played you an AFL story, which is actually from a week ago. 'That is not today's news,' she added. Earlier, Head of AFL integrity and security Tony Keane said no coach, player, official, staff member or fan should feel unsafe while at a game. 'The anti-social hotline at venues is designed to ensure everyone attending the match can do so in a safe and inclusive manner, and the majority of times this service is used appropriately,' he said. 'We understand there is passion in the game; however, the text message in question sent to the MCG hotline on Friday crossed the line. 'Regardless of the intent, no coach, player, official, staff member or fan deserves to be threatened in such a way, and now that patron has lost the privilege of attending the footy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store