logo
Tesla vandals are terrorists, according to President Trump

Tesla vandals are terrorists, according to President Trump

Yahoo20-03-2025
A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.
President Donald Trump's administration is trying to expand the definition of domestic terrorism as it aims to crack down on a wave of attacks in which Teslas have been shot and set on fire, apparently to protest CEO Elon Musk's powerful but murky role in cutting the US government.
Critics of Musk and Trump will see irony in use of the term 'domestic terrorism' to describe people attacking electric vehicles after Trump issued mass pardons for more than 1,000 January 6 rioters who stormed the Capitol and tried to disrupt confirmation of the 2020 election results.
Under President Joe Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland, the Department of Justice announced a new national strategy to combat domestic terrorism after January 6 as well as a wave of deadly mass shootings by White nationalists and right-wing extremists.
The term will apparently take a new meaning under Trump as the FBI and law enforcement agencies will now focus on anti-corporate vandals targeting vehicles.
Usually, the word 'terrorism' is not used to describe vandalism, Daniel Byman, director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told me.
'There is a lot of property destruction, at times for political reasons, and this is almost never labeled as terrorism. These attacks seemed designed not to harm people,' Byman said.
Attorney General Pam Bondi described Tesla desecration as 'nothing short of domestic terrorism' in a statement released Tuesday. She promised to 'impose severe consequences on those involved in these attacks, including those operating behind the scenes to coordinate and fund these crimes.'
Bondi did not elaborate on who might be behind the scenes coordinating the vandalism, so it's appropriate to wonder if there's any evidence of any such coordination.
There have been documented incidents of Tesla vandalism in the Pacific Northwest, the Northeast and around the country, not to mention countless posts on social media.
Federal prosecutors charged a woman in Colorado with using incendiary devices — Molotov cocktails — to target Tesla vehicles, and federal agents in South Carolina made an arrest in connection with a fire set at a Tesla charging station, according to the Associated Press, which reported that an affidavit mentioned the man's opposition to Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
Bondi released her statement after an incident in Las Vegas where Teslas at a repair center were shot and set on fire in what Assistant Sheriff Dori Koren of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department described as a 'targeted attack on a Tesla facility.' He said officers have increased their presence at Tesla locations.
CNN's Josh Campbell reported that the FBI's joint terrorism task force is investigating the Las Vegas attack.
Domestic terrorism is not a specific crime with which a person can be charged, but it is defined in US law as acts that are dangerous to human life, violate US or state law, and are intended
to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion;
to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping
Trump agreed that the vandalism is terrorism during an interview on Fox News Tuesday and tried, without evidence, to seed a conspiracy theory that the attacks are part of a coordinated and funded campaign.
'I think that you will find out that they're paid by people who are very highly political on the left,' Trump said, without naming who might be behind such a campaign or what evidence has led him to that conclusion.
Musk also sees coordination in the violence, although he also did not offer specific allegations.
'I think there are larger forces at work as well,' Musk said in his own Fox News interview on Tuesday. 'I mean, I don't know who's funding it and who's coordinating it because this is this is crazy.'
There's currently no indication of any kind of coordinated campaign, but the attacks, which range from the slashing of tires to the slinging of Molotov cocktails, are clearly illegal, and probably counterproductive if their aim is to protest what Musk is undertaking with his Blitzkrieg effort to downsize the federal government.
John Miller, CNN's chief law enforcement and intelligence analyst, told me that prosecutors should be looking at allegations of domestic terrorism clinically rather than through a political lens.
'If firing bullets into the windows of Tesla dealerships or throwing Molotov cocktails inside cars in the lot is being done for political reasons, that would seem to fall into the category of domestic terrorism,' he told me by email.
Suspects would be charged, as they were for January 6 rioters, under standard federal or local statutes.
Some people involved with January 6, like those belonging to the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups were charged, tried and convicted by juries with more serious crimes, including seditious conspiracy, before Trump commuted their sentences.
Despite the verdict of the justice system, Trump viewed January 6 rioters as 'hostages.' Now back in the White House, he wants to put anyone coordinating an attack on a Tesla dealership in prison.
'Once politics enters the picture of what is or is not domestic terrorism, this is where we start to see imbalance,' Miller said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla (TSLA) Ordered to Pay $242.5M after Fatal Autopilot Accident
Tesla (TSLA) Ordered to Pay $242.5M after Fatal Autopilot Accident

Business Insider

time17 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Tesla (TSLA) Ordered to Pay $242.5M after Fatal Autopilot Accident

A Miami jury has ruled that EV maker Tesla (TSLA) is partly responsible for a 2019 crash that involved its Autopilot system, and ordered the company to pay $242.5 million in damages to the family of the victim and an injured survivor. The award includes $42.5 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages, which was below the $345 million sought by the plaintiffs. The case was heard in the Southern District of Florida and began on July 14. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The lawsuit focused on a fatal accident in Key Largo, Florida, where Tesla owner George McGee was driving his Model S with Enhanced Autopilot engaged. McGee dropped his phone and reached down to retrieve it, believing the system would automatically brake for obstacles. Instead, the vehicle accelerated through an intersection at more than 60 mph, crashing into a parked car and striking its owners, 22-year-old Naibel Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. Benavides died at the scene, while Angulo suffered multiple broken bones, a traumatic brain injury, and lasting psychological harm. Plaintiffs' attorney Brett Schreiber argued that Tesla marketed Autopilot as safer than human drivers and failed to limit its use to highways, which effectively turned public roads into test tracks. Interestingly, the verdict comes as Tesla CEO Elon Musk works to convince investors that the company's autonomous driving technology is safe and has the potential for robotaxi fleets. Despite the news, Tesla shares fell only slightly on Friday and are down 25% year-to-date. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on TSLA stock based on 14 Buys, 15 Holds, and eight Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average TSLA price target of $310.84 per share implies 2.8% upside potential.

Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for role in ending country's conflict with Thailand
Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for role in ending country's conflict with Thailand

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for role in ending country's conflict with Thailand

Cambodia will nominate President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize after he helped the country reach a ceasefire agreement to end its border conflict with Thailand. Sun Chanthol, Cambodia's deputy prime minister, thanked Trump for bringing peace to the region while speaking to reporters earlier Friday in the country's capital of Phnom Penh. Chanthol said the American president deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, the highest-profile international award given to a person or organization for doing the most to "advance fellowship between nations." "We acknowledge his great efforts for peace," Chanthol said. THAILAND, CAMBODIA REACH CEASEFIRE DEAL TO END CONFLICT THAT DISPLACED 260k, TRUMP SAYS Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last month he had nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize and Pakistani officials said in June they would recommend him for the award for his role in helping to end its conflict with India. Read On The Fox News App Trump urged a ceasefire last week when he spoke to the leaders of Cambodia and Thailand and threatened that the U.S. would not get back to the "trading table" with the Southeast Asian countries until the fighting stops. A ceasefire was negotiated in Malaysia on Monday, ending the heaviest conflict between the two countries in over a decade. "Numerous people were killed and I was dealing with two countries that we get along with very well, very different countries from certain standpoints. They've been fighting for 500 years intermittently. And, we solved that war ... we solved it through trade," Trump told reporters during his recent trip to Scotland. Trump Calls For Immediate Ceasefire Between Cambodia And Thailand Amid Escalating Violence Following news of the ceasefire, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X that Trump's direct involvement led to the truce. "President Trump made this happen. Give him the Nobel Peace Prize!," she said. The fighting began last week after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Each side blamed the other for starting the clashes, which lasted five days. At least 43 people were killed and more than 300,000 people were displaced on both sides of the border. "I said, 'I don't want to trade with anybody that's killing each other,'" Trump continued while in Scotland. "So we just got that one solved. And I'm going to call the two prime ministers who I got along with very, very well and speak to them right after this meeting and congratulate them. But it was an honor to be involved in that. That was going to be a very nasty war. Those wars have been very, very nasty." Chanthol, who also serves as Cambodia's top trade negotiator, said his country was also grateful to Trump for a reduced tariff rate of 19%. The Trump administration had initially threatened a tariff of 49% before later reducing it to 36%, a level that would have decimated Cambodia's vital garment and footwear sector, Chanthol told Reuters. Reuters contributed to this article source: Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for role in ending country's conflict with Thailand Solve the daily Crossword

After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo

time44 minutes ago

After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo

NEW YORK -- It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.' A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of 'legacy content recently' and the exhibit eventually 'will include all impeachments.' There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: 'We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness.' But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions like removing the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and getting rid of the leadership at the Kennedy Center. 'Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools,' said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. 'Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history.' It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. 'If they don't control the historical narrative,' he said, 'then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics.' In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, 'The Death of a President.' Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. 'We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world,' said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. 'So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth.' Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was 'concerned and disappointed' about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors 'should have red lines' and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. 'You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this ... why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?' Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: 'The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store