RCMP Members Deserve Better: NPF Criticizes IIO Investigation Delays in British Columbia
'Once again, a case under investigation by the Independent Investigations Office (IIO) of B.C. has stretched over four years – a length of time that is simply unacceptable to our Members and to all British Columbians. For years we have maintained our support for thorough and transparent investigations into police conduct, but the length of time of these investigations is falling far short of what police officers and the public deserve. This is not an isolated occurrence but part of a broader pattern of delay that fails both our Members and the public.
Despite announcing their decision to refer this case to Crown Counsel, the IIO has also refused to release any meaningful details to the public, a convenient way to avoid public accountability while allowing speculation and misinformation to fill the void. This vilifies our Member who risks being presumed guilty in the court of public opinion long before any charge approval decision is made.
Now, we face yet another period of waiting, this time for the B.C. Prosecution Service to decide how to proceed. These extended and non-transparent processes erode public trust and take a real toll on our Members and their families, who are left to endure reputational harm and personal uncertainty for years with no timeline for resolution.
Our Members deserve better. The public deserves better. We are calling on the Province of B.C. to address these systemic failures, starting with timely investigations, fair public communication, and proper resourcing of oversight bodies.
RCMP Members across the province carry out difficult and dangerous work every day, responding to unpredictable and often high-risk situations to keep their communities safe. It is important to remember that use-of-force by police in Canada is exceedingly rare. Across nearly three million service calls each year, less than one-tenth of one percent, or 0.1 percent, result in any use-of-force at all. Our Members are trained professionals, equipped with extensive de-escalation skills, and overwhelmingly resolve situations without force.
We will continue to advocate for a balanced and timely process that respects the rights, well-being, and professional integrity of all involved.'
About the National Police Federation:
The National Police Federation (NPF) is the largest police union in Canada, representing ~20,000 Members of the RCMP. We are focused on improving public safety in Canada for our Members and all Canadians by advocating for investment in policing and other related supports and services. This includes calling for required resourcing, equipment, and supports to enhance community safety and livability in the communities we serve, large and small, across Canada.
For more information:
https://npf-fpn.com/
NPF:
,
,
, and
Media Contact
Sarah Kavanagh
Advisor, Media Relations
Media@npf-fpn.com
604-842-6864
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
RCMP Members Deserve Better: NPF Criticizes IIO Investigation Delays in British Columbia
SURREY, British Columbia, Aug. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Following is a statement from Brian Sauvé, President and CEO of the National Police Federation, responding to the Independent Investigations Office (IIO) of B.C.'s recent announcement recommending charges to the B.C. Prosecution Service regarding a 2021 incident in Prince George. 'Once again, a case under investigation by the Independent Investigations Office (IIO) of B.C. has stretched over four years – a length of time that is simply unacceptable to our Members and to all British Columbians. For years we have maintained our support for thorough and transparent investigations into police conduct, but the length of time of these investigations is falling far short of what police officers and the public deserve. This is not an isolated occurrence but part of a broader pattern of delay that fails both our Members and the public. Despite announcing their decision to refer this case to Crown Counsel, the IIO has also refused to release any meaningful details to the public, a convenient way to avoid public accountability while allowing speculation and misinformation to fill the void. This vilifies our Member who risks being presumed guilty in the court of public opinion long before any charge approval decision is made. Now, we face yet another period of waiting, this time for the B.C. Prosecution Service to decide how to proceed. These extended and non-transparent processes erode public trust and take a real toll on our Members and their families, who are left to endure reputational harm and personal uncertainty for years with no timeline for resolution. Our Members deserve better. The public deserves better. We are calling on the Province of B.C. to address these systemic failures, starting with timely investigations, fair public communication, and proper resourcing of oversight bodies. RCMP Members across the province carry out difficult and dangerous work every day, responding to unpredictable and often high-risk situations to keep their communities safe. It is important to remember that use-of-force by police in Canada is exceedingly rare. Across nearly three million service calls each year, less than one-tenth of one percent, or 0.1 percent, result in any use-of-force at all. Our Members are trained professionals, equipped with extensive de-escalation skills, and overwhelmingly resolve situations without force. We will continue to advocate for a balanced and timely process that respects the rights, well-being, and professional integrity of all involved.' About the National Police Federation: The National Police Federation (NPF) is the largest police union in Canada, representing ~20,000 Members of the RCMP. We are focused on improving public safety in Canada for our Members and all Canadians by advocating for investment in policing and other related supports and services. This includes calling for required resourcing, equipment, and supports to enhance community safety and livability in the communities we serve, large and small, across Canada. For more information: NPF: LinkedIn , Facebook , Twitter , and Instagram Media Contact Sarah Kavanagh Advisor, Media Relations Media@ 604-842-6864
Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Service Ontario warns of speed camera ticket scam — Why you shouldn't reply 'Y' to the text
If you receive a text message about a speed camera ticket violation in Ontario threatening 'a court date' and other penalties, delete it and don't attempt to reply — it's one of many smishing text campaigns targeting drivers. A widespread smishing campaign (SMS phishing) has been targeting Ontario residents and exploiting heated conversations about the provincially approved automated speed camera program in some municipalities. Residents in online chat forums are reporting multiple versions of a text message that scammers have been sending for the past few weeks. Texts claim that the person was caught on camera speeding, but without details about the vehicle, license number or location. Since the start of the campaign , multiple iterations of the smishing message have been circulating with a laundry list of supposed penalties if the person doesn't comply within the listed deadline. A University of Guelph cybersecurity expert says Canadians should expect smishing scams to All the text messages include a malicious link to a phishing website designed to harvest people's sensitive information, such as banking details. Some people who clicked the link were led to a page mimicking a legitimate Service Ontario page, but with a few red flags. Residents have shared screen captures of the spoof page on social media, including one version with an unreasonable deadline to finish the transaction: a six-to-eight-minute 'Estimated time to complete' notification. In an email sent to Metroland Media, a representative from Service Ontario said 'individuals should not open or click on any links as this message is not authorized' by the agency. They also remind Ontario residents that Service Ontario will never: 'In Ontario, automated speed enforcement tickets may be processed through the Provincial Offences Act (POA) Court Process or the Administrative Penalties (AP) Process,' the Service Ontario representative said. In both circumstances, residents are reminded that 'details about the offence are sent by regular mail to the registered owner of the plate,' Service Ontario shared. Examples of the fake website link show obvious signs of typosquatting, a tactic used by cybercriminals to trick users into trusting a spoofed site. It involves using a URL with minor variations of the legitimate address that may be missed. It may exploit people's tendency to make typos when inputting the URL of a website, such as typing instead of or instead of . Other times, cybercriminals will use similar looking characters in the URL like a capital letter 'i' to replace the small letter l in . Typosquatting seen in some phishing pages spoofing Service Ontario. Some phishing URLs may include extra characters that targets may fail to notice or drop one letter that people may not easily notice such as 'Canda' in this URL. Some versions of the spoofed Service Ontario site shows a with an 'a' instead of an 'o' at the end of Ontario. Others were taken to a page with 'Ontarioc' in the URL, which some may fail to notice. Some versions of the speeding text scam message include a prompt at the bottom telling the target to 'Reply 'Y' and reopen this message to click on the link, or copy it to your browser.' This exploits users' familiarity with legitimate companies that have habituated people to replying with responses 'Y' or 'N' to stop receiving messages or to confirm an appointment. Have you received a text from an unknown number asking you to text STOP? Here's why you should Prompting targets to reply with a simple 'Y' is a trick meant to make people turn off their phone's built-in anti-phishing protections. In many mobile devices, links sent by unknown numbers are disabled and cannot be clicked to protect them from accidentally or deliberately clicking phishing links. Replying Y or N to the message tells the phone this is not an unknown number, thus turning off its phishing protection and activating the link. N. Asokan, executive director of the University of Waterloo's Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute, said in a previous interview with Metroland Media that replying to hacker texts also exposes targets to future attacks. Even if the recipient doesn't click the link and avoids becoming a victim this time, by replying to text message with a Y or STOP, they are signalling that the number is active and the user may respond, which encourages scammers to target the user again in the future, he explained. 'It is very useful for the scammers to know ahead of time which recipients are more likely to respond so that they can hope to improve their conversion rates.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
3 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
I'm going on vacation to the Caribbean: Should I give someone power of attorney?
A trip abroad sounds fantastic in the summer months, but recent events might have travellers worried. In March, David Bennett found himself stranded in the Dominican Republic as he was wrongfully detained on charges of drug smuggling. That ordeal lasted two months after round-the-clock work from his wife and legal team to bring Bennett back to Canada. According to Canada's travel website, Canadians should exercise a high degree of caution when visiting the Dominican Republic, citing crime, fraud and unethical lawyers as safety concerns. Bennett's lawyer, Gary Bouchard, thinks it's important to ask as many questions as possible to make an informed decision about travelling. 'Everyone has to form their own opinion about this kind of stuff, and I think that opinion has to be formed based on whatever jurisdiction people are travelling to,' said Bouchard. 'That diligent effort includes using publicly accessible databases or information sources, and adding to that however you can.' Bouchard mentions, if you're booking through a travel agent that you should consult their expertise as well. While travelling, Canadians are subject to whichever country's laws and investigative process they're visiting, that also means being subjected to their time frames. Just because a situation is urgent for a traveller who's been detained, that doesn't always put them at the top of the list for authorities. 'With a couple of the matters that have recently been reported on, the expectation that people have — when they firmly believe that they had nothing to do with the matter — it will not necessarily align with how long it takes for the authorities down there to get confident that (they) got the wrong person,' said Bouchard. 'So that can be anywhere from a matter of days to weeks to months.' To help safeguard from getting in situations where a traveller can be detained, Bouchard suggests travelling as light as possible. If you can, only travel with a carry-on, it may seem counter to what seems natural, but Bouchard assures it's worth it. 'If you're going to take luggage with you, it's always prudent when you get the luggage tag, to take a photograph of the tag when it's applied to your bag at your departure point. When you pick your bag up off the carousel, check the tag and make sure it conforms to the photo that you took when you departed.' If you're leaving for a vacation, it's diligent to let people know where you're going, but Bouchard says it can be taken a step further. In the case of Zach Crawford and Cassandra DiPietro being falsely accused of drug smuggling earlier this year, both were jailed. Crawford posted bond the next day, but DiPietro was stuck for months. In case of being locked away for an extended period of time, he says travellers should consider giving someone trusted a limited power of attorney. 'If you've got bills to be paid and you're out of the jurisdiction for not two weeks like you planned, but four or five months, who's paying your bills while you're away?' said Bouchard. 'If the authorities pick you up in a foreign jurisdiction, even if they haven't got the right person, they really don't care that you can't pay your rent while you're away. That's not their issue.' Here are some of the incidents where local people have found themselves detained while travelling in the Caribbean. David Bennett was arrested for drug smuggling after officials at the Punta Cana International Airport seized a bright yellow bag that was misidentified as his. Bennett and his wife claim to have never see the bag before but Bennett was still detained for months. In early April 2022, the Canadian airline crew were detained after reporting suspected drugs on board their aircraft. The crew were held for months until prosecutors announced that they had insufficient evidence to charge the group with any criminal act. Earlier this year Zach Crawford and Cassandra DiPietro were detained after being falsely accused of drug smuggling. Crawford was released the day after arrest on a $10,000 cash bond while his wife remained in jail for months before being released. In 2013, Ben Costantini and his cousin, Nick Miele, were arrested and charged when a fight broke out at their resort that injured a tourist from Montreal. The two were detained for three weeks in prison as they slept on Styrofoam pads and their prison shirts were either stolen or thrown in toilets. Sahab Jamshidi was kite surfing with his friends in St. Lucia when he spotted a four-year-old child's body in the waters and tried to help. Originally maintaining his innocence, Jamshidi changed his plea to guilty, was made to pay a fine of $36,444 for his role in the death and was released. Démar Grant is a reporter at The Hamilton Spectator. Reach him at dgrant@ . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
