Nvidia wins as Trump retreats on China AI chip ban
The company secured Trump administration approval to resume selling advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips — specifically the H20 — to Chinese firms, reversing previous export bans, restrictions and geopolitical grandstanding on the crucial technology.
The decision is not a policy footnote; it's a geopolitical shift and recalibration of how the United States wields power in the AI age. It also confirms beyond doubt that AI has become the center of gravity for global economic strategy.
Now that Nvidia is back in the Chinese market, the implications for investors are vast — starting with the Nasdaq, where the tech rally just got fresh fuel.
The H20 chip is not Nvidia's crown jewel, but it's more than powerful enough to drive the large-scale AI infrastructure being built across China. The chip was designed precisely to fit within the guardrails of US export rules, but until this week, it was still blocked.
Now, that blockade is lifted. Not tentatively, not quietly, but after a personal meeting between Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and President Donald Trump. Huang has confirmed the approval publicly, both in a company blog post and in remarks broadcast on Chinese state television.
The announcement signals two things. First, Nvidia's influence now reaches the highest levels of the US government. Second, the US is apparently no longer trying to strangle China's AI ambitions through isolation and obstruction. Instead, it's opting to lead by dominating the supply chain.
This matters because AI is no longer a niche innovation sector but rather is the backbone of economic competition. Chips are today's oil, and Nvidia, with a market cap above US$4 trillion, is the most valuable and strategically critical company on the planet.
The decision to reopen China's access to Nvidia's AI chips is an unmistakable signal: the US wants to win by selling, not by severing. It is asserting its dominance through market depth, not by cutting ties.
That's why this moment is arguably bigger than Nvidia's stock price, although investors will no doubt take notice of what this means for earnings. This is about restoring the flow of capital and technological capability between the world's two largest economies.
For China, this is a return to the core. AI development inside China has continued despite sanctions, but performance gaps remain. Domestic chip alternatives still lag in key areas.
The H20 approval now allows Chinese firms — from startups to state players — to re-enter the global race on more equal terms. The signal to Chinese tech leaders is clear: the door to US tech is no longer shut.
That's going to have a cascading effect on innovation, investment and public-private partnerships across China's AI ecosystem. It means the tools they need to compete are once again within reach. That will accelerate project timelines, boost funding flows and restore momentum.
For the US, it's a different kind of win. Nvidia's success is America's success. Every chip sold strengthens US capital markets. Every dollar earned boosts American shareholder value, tax receipts and global standing. Keeping those chips locked away hurt no one more than the US itself.
The political message is also powerful. The White House is demonstrating it understands the difference between competition and economic self-harm. It's one thing to protect national security. It's another to cripple your own national champions in the name of isolationism.
Investors understand this intuitively. And they will act accordingly. The Nasdaq — already driven by Nvidia's weight — is set to react strongly to this decision. It reopens an enormous source of revenue. It validates global demand. And it removes one of the last serious geopolitical overhangs on the AI trade.
Expect semiconductor stocks to surge. Expect AI infrastructure firms to rally. Expect capital to flow back into Chinese tech names now reconnected to Nvidia.
But most of all, expect a broader repricing of risk. The export ban narrative has broken in a crucial way. The decoupling thesis has also been dealt a blow in the name of managed, yet competitive, interdependence.
That's the most investable message of all because while chip wars make headlines, global trade in innovation is what drives real value. Investors aren't looking for binary outcomes — they're looking for clarity. This week, they got it.
This decision reaffirms that the AI revolution will not be siloed into national boxes. It will be global, it will be competitive and it will be shaped by companies — like Nvidia — whose relevance has forced the US government to reconsider even its hardest tech war lines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
39 minutes ago
- HKFP
China jails Japanese national for 3.5 years for espionage, embassy says
A court in China sentenced a Japanese businessman to three-and-a-half years in prison on Wednesday for spying, Tokyo's ambassador in Beijing said. The man, an employee of the Japanese pharmaceutical company Astellas, was detained in March 2023 and placed under formal arrest in October. He was 'sentenced to three years and six months in prison for espionage activities', Kenji Kanasugi, Japanese ambassador to China, told Japanese media after the trial in Beijing. 'It is extremely regrettable that such a guilty verdict was issued,' he said. A foreign ministry spokesman in Beijing said China's judicial organs 'handle cases in strict accordance with the law'. 'As long as foreign personnel in China and coming to China abide by the law… there is nothing to be worried or anxious about,' spokesman Lin Jian told a regular news conference when asked about the Japanese businessman's case. Five Japanese nationals, including the Astellas official, are in custody or serving prison terms in China, according to Japanese public broadcaster NHK. Tokyo has repeatedly called on Beijing to release them and Wednesday's sentence deals a blow to ties, long frayed over territorial disputes, Japan's colonial history and other flashpoints. 'In light of the sentence, we have once again strongly urged the Chinese side for the early release of the Japanese national concerned in this case as well as others detained,' Tokyo's embassy in Beijing said in a statement. It also urged China 'to ensure their legitimate rights and humane treatment during detention, and to improve the transparency of the judicial process'. Beijing's foreign ministry said it would provide Japan the ability to 'perform consular duties'. The detained man had reportedly worked in China for two decades and was previously a senior executive at a major Japanese business lobby in the country. He was planning to return home before his sudden detention, according to Japan's Kyodo News Agency.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How easing of AI chip controls could reshape US-China trade talks
The United States' decision to ease export restrictions on certain advanced chips – part of a broader package of trade agreements with China – is seen by experts as an early sign that high-level negotiations have steered bilateral relations in the right direction. Washington's move to resume license application reviews for Nvidia's H20 AI and Advanced Micro Devices's MI308 AI chips comes ahead of talks between senior officials from both nations in the coming weeks, despite a protracted strategic stand-off over tech and export controls. Zhuang Bo, global macro strategist at Loomis Sayles Investment Asia, said the development was a clear win for China – effectively resetting the clock to March, before rare earths became a geopolitical chokepoint. 'It signals that Beijing is inching closer to the G2-style negotiations it has long sought, framed in official rhetoric as a call for 'mutual respect and equality.'' While the reality on the ground has not changed much, the situation has not deteriorated, he added. 'Whether there will be a Xi-Trump summit later this year will be crucial. If that happens, a partial agreement is still possible.' On Tuesday, AMD said the US Department of Commerce was reviewing its licence applications to export MI308 chips to China, and that sales would resume once approved.
AllAfrica
4 hours ago
- AllAfrica
US-Indonesia trade compromise will test Prabowo's mettle
JAKARTA – On July 15, Indonesia and the United States reached a compromise: the threatened 32% tariff on Indonesian exports will now be capped at 19% in exchange for Indonesia's commitment to purchase US energy, agricultural goods, and 50 Boeing aircraft. The deal also reportedly includes reciprocal tariff relief for American exports to Indonesia. The announcement, however, came unilaterally via a post on President Trump's Truth Social platform. While Jakarta's stock market reacted positively, no official statement has been issued from President Prabowo Subianto's office at the time of writing. Key aspects of the agreement—particularly its implementation timeline and enforcement mechanisms—remain uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the energy, agriculture and Boeing components of the deal had been proactively offered by Indonesia in prior negotiations, as reported by CNBC Indonesia and The Jakarta Post, further underscoring Jakarta's strategic signaling even before Trump announced it on social media. This asymmetrical rollout underscores the transactional nature of Trump-era trade tactics and places Indonesia in a diplomatically delicate position – forced to respond without the benefit of reciprocal clarity. The 19% tariff rate, though less severe than Trump's original 32% threat, offers limited relief. It reflects a partial de-escalation in a high-pressure game where leverage and optics trump deliberative fairness. Indonesia's inclusion—alongside China, Japan, Brazil, the EU and dozens of other countries—had little to do with specific trade violations. Rather, it reflects Washington's myopic vision of its global economic relationships: maximizing short-term partisan gain at the expense of systemic stability. This episode is more than bilateral maneuvering; it constitutes a strategic test for Indonesia. The real question is whether the Prabowo government can craft a resilient, adaptive response under asymmetric pressure, one that reinforces—not compromises—Indonesia's long-term strategic and economic sovereignty. Some observers have argued the deal is a clear-cut diplomatic failure. A recent Australian Outlook article by CELIOS, published before the July 15 announcement, called for a cabinet reshuffle, pointing to disjointed communication and technocratic underperformance. But while the critique identifies real symptoms—such as confusion over negotiating mandates and a long-vacant ambassadorial post—it mistakes short-term optics for attempts to forge a long-term strategic structure. Indeed, President Prabowo moved early on this front. Since taking office last October, he has pursued a multi-vector foreign policy aimed at expanding Indonesia's geopolitical and economic options. He has met with counterparts from China, Europe, Japan, Russia, India, Australia, Brazil and the Middle East. Indonesia joined its first BRICS summit, revived trade talks with the EU, initiated outreach to Latin America, and reinforced bilateral ties with key Muslim brother Saudi Arabia. Symbolically, Prabowo's recent appearances alongside leaders like French President Emmanuel Macron at Bastille Day and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara—where 11 billion euros worth of deals and 13 cooperation agreements, respectively, were signed—illustrate Indonesia's active hedging against global economic fragmentation and potential strategic shifts. These bilateral engagements also included defense cooperation, reflecting Indonesia's intent to link economic strategy with broader security considerations. But diplomacy alone cannot buffer the economy. Prabowo has also directed key domestic institutions to coordinate policy delivery. His administration has activated task forces focused on US trade response, deregulation, and labor market adjustment. Bank Indonesia, recognizing the urgency while maintaining its independence, has adjusted its monetary stance to preserve rupiah stability amid market volatility. Meanwhile, the Danantara fund—Indonesia's new sovereign wealth and development vehicle—has been structured to enhance national capacity to finance green energy, critical infrastructure and food system resilience. Critiques like CELIOS' overstate the effectiveness of short-term governance fixes, like cabinet reshuffles, and understate the structural reality of negotiating with a major power that shifts its trade doctrine by tweet. A personnel shake-up will not change the terms of asymmetry. What Indonesia requires is institutional stamina and adaptive coordination. Indeed, Prabowo's recent nomination of Indroyono Soesilo as ambassador to Washington reflects a course correction grounded in practical diplomacy, not theatrical reset. As an ABC analysis noted, the Trump tariff doctrine has ripple effects that are felt most acutely in emerging markets. While the immediate cost will fall on US consumers in many sectors, the structural burden of supply chain adjustment, risk repricing and investor perception falls heavily on countries like Indonesia. Jakarta's ability to weather these headwinds will depend less on any single deal, and more on whether its broader strategy builds economic depth. In that light, the July 15 announcement—while a tactical step forward in terms of avoiding a harsher tariff—is no guarantee of future reprieve. It reflects a pause, not a pivot. It buys Indonesia time, but not immunity. The weeks ahead must now focus on consolidation: fast-tracking alternative trade routes, deepening ties with ASEAN and the Global South, and insulating Indonesia's critical industries from further external shocks. At the same time, the government must show clarity in its communication, especially toward investors and producers navigating this new landscape. Toward its domestic constituents, the government will also need to manage rising expectations and potential discontent, particularly among export-oriented industries, small producers, workers and consumers who may feel squeezed by the reverberation from this global trade disruption. Prabowo will have to maintain a careful balance—communicating that while this deal secures temporary relief, it does not resolve the structural challenges ahead. Managing perceptions, sustaining investor confidence and ensuring that trade-offs do not disproportionately burden lower-income Indonesians will be critical to his government's future political stability. For all its constraints, Indonesia retains agency. It boasts a large domestic market, growing regional influence and leadership that is attempting to navigate an increasingly fluid global order. The strategic direction appears promising, but whether it will yield a net positive outcome remains to be seen. At least, for the time being, Indonesia can avert Sauron's gaze. Adi Abidin is a public policy specialist at the Kiroyan Partners and a research fellow at Populi Center, both of which are Jakarta-based offices. The views expressed here are his own.
