State educators say they are on hold waiting to see how federal DEI demands will impact NM students
New Mexico educators say federal demands to ban diversity, equity and inclusion programs or lose funding are 'frustrating' and it's unclear how they might ultimately impact students.
The U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to state education leaders last week ordering them to certify their compliance with federal requirements banning diversity, equity and inclusion practices in order to continue receiving federal assistance.
States were given 10 days to respond to the letter, but a spokesperson for the federal education department told Source NM that the deadline was extended to April 24.
Michael Chavez, superintendent of Hatch Valley Public Schools, told Source NM that he feels districts are in a 'wait and see' situation and that he hasn't received any specific directive from the New Mexico Public Education Department about how the state will respond.
'I guess the first question I have is: 'What does that mean for us?'' he said. 'I don't know what that means because we're all about providing equity…Are we talking equality or we talking equity, because that's two different things.'
Hatch Valley Public Schools consists of five schools from elementary to high school, and serves fewer than 2,000 students. A majority of children come from families living below the poverty line and many are English Language Learners, Chavez said.
Chavez told Source that about 15 to 20% of the Hatch Valley district's budget is made up of federal funds. He pointed out that Title I and Title II funds are particularly important to the Hatch Valley district as they provide federal financial assistance for at-risk students as well as professional development for teachers serving these students.
'We'll roll with the punches and do whatever we have to do, but we're not going to compromise on providing equitable services for kids,' Chavez said. He added that a majority of his district's budget comes from the state and described the federal money as 'extra' for expanding programs even further.
He noted that the spring budget conference for all public schools in the state is this week — during which districts develop their budgets for the next year — and said he hopes the state will 'share with us any information that they have.'
Janelle Taylor Garcia, a spokesperson for the state education department, said in a written statement to Source NM that the department 'is working closely with the New Mexico Department of Justice and the Governor's Office on addressing these directives. NMPED will continue to monitor communications from the U.S. Department of Education and remains focused on supporting districts and charters in serving all our student populations in the state.'
Stan Rounds, executive director of the New Mexico Coalition of Educational Leaders, told Source that he is working with Education Secretary Mariana Padilla as much as possible to develop a strategy for dealing with the Trump administration's demands. He said he is also working with the American Association of School Administrators, his organization's federal counterpart.
'Our hope is to be able to retain programs and funds that have been in play, so it's navigation as much as anything that we're having to do,' Rounds told Source.
Whitney Holland, president of the American Federation of Teachers New Mexico chapter, told Source that from the perspective of teachers in the state, 'our students are being used as political pawns.' She said she is concerned for the 'unique populations' of students who require additional assistance federal money pays for, as well as school social workers and occupational therapists.
'And that is super, super frustrating because we've hit this really good stride where every year we're chipping away at the narrative of 51st in education and school funding and all of that. And then to have this come, this blow come from the federal level, it feels like a huge step backwards,' Holland said.
She added that if the certification letter does not work to satisfy federal demands, she anticipates the Trump administration will 'continue to put the pressure on.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
8 hours ago
- Atlantic
Why the White House Backed Down From Its First Big Education Cuts
The email arrived at 10:55 p.m. on Friday, July 25, with an upbeat subject line: 'Big News: Key Federal Title Funds Set to Release Next Week.' It was sent by North Dakota's schools superintendent, Kirsten Baesler, who is awaiting confirmation to become an assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Education, the very agency that had been holding back the funds in question—more than $5 billion—from school districts for weeks. 'Thank you for your advocacy, patience, professionalism, and persistence as we've waited for these essential funds to flow,' Baesler wrote to local school leaders. Like their peers across the country, North Dakota educators had grown dismayed as the congressionally approved money, one of the largest federal-grant programs for K–12 students, had been held up. Some had spent the summer pondering layoffs and sweating over spreadsheets. 'Hopefully, this development will provide greater clarity as you move forward with budget planning for the upcoming year,' Baesler reassured them. She signed the message, 'With relief and gratitude.' That an incoming official of the Department of Education was touting the importance of federal dollars for a heavily Republican state underscores the conundrum that President Donald Trump faces in his attempt to dismantle the agency. On the campaign trail, Trump's promise to 'send education back to the states' was often greeted with applause, and the Supreme Court has allowed the president to go ahead with his plans to gut the Education Department. But the four-week funding freeze—and the backlash it sparked—showed that cutting popular programs for schoolkids can be as unwelcome in Trump country as it is in coastal cities. Quinta Jurecic: The Supreme Court won't explain itself 'After months of being told to 'wait it out,' districts are now supposed to pick up the pieces and act like everything's fine,' Steven Johnson, the superintendent of Fort Ransom School District, in southeastern North Dakota, told me. 'I've got to be honest—this doesn't sit well out here. You can't freeze money that was already allocated, leave schools hanging through hiring season and budget planning, and then expect us to just be grateful when it finally shows up. Rural folks don't like being jerked around.' While the funds were frozen, an informal alliance emerged between rural and big-city educators who pushed back against the president. Lawmakers from some of the reddest parts of the country opposed the funding pause too, an early warning signal to the White House as it weighs plans that might further disrupt the public-education system. If the Trump administration's decision to abruptly cut off the funding began as a trial balloon, it ended as a cautionary tale. In arguing for the dismantling of the Education Department, Trump has asserted that America's schoolchildren have fallen further behind their global peers since the department's creation, in 1979. This is correct, but his proposed solution of sending education 'back to the states' has always been a bit misleading. The federal government accounts for only about 10 percent of K–12 funding; states and localities cover the bulk of the cost. Still, the money that the administration withheld last month—which initially totaled about $6.8 billion—is significant. It represents more than 7.5 percent of the Education Department's current budget. The funds pay for after-school programs, teacher training, English-learner services, migrant-education grants, and STEM activities. Many schools rely on the money to pay educators and run summer programs. Educators across the country first learned on June 30 that the money was being frozen, just hours before it was supposed to be released. In a three-sentence email, the Department of Education told states that it was withholding the funds to conduct a review, 'given the change in Administrations.' The unsigned message came from [email protected] and offered no details on what the review entailed, how long it would take, or whether the money would ultimately be released. The closest thing to an explanation came from the Office of Management and Budget, which asserted in a statement that the funds had previously been used to 'subsidize a radical left-wing agenda,' support LGBTQ programming, and 'promote illegal immigrant advocacy.' Schools immediately began to feel the impact of the missing funds. In Cincinnati, administrators were forced to cancel orders for new curriculum materials and pause some services for students learning English. Some teachers in Fargo, North Dakota, learned that their annual $500 bonus was abruptly being cut. Officials in California, which had been expecting almost $1 billion from the federal funds, abruptly paused operations for a teacher-training program. Back-to-school planning was affected too. In the nation's second-largest school district, Los Angeles, officials braced for 'impossible choices' such as potentially having to shut down after-school tutoring or lay off school counselors, the district's superintendent, Alberto Carvalho, told me. 'For us to organize and budget and prepare for a school year impacting 540,000 students—in addition to 70,000 adult learners—we need to know what our recurring revenues are,' he said. Johnson, whose hometown of Fort Ransom, North Dakota, has a population of 2,200 and is 70 miles from the nearest Walmart, made the same case when he spoke with me from his cattle ranch. 'If we don't hire staff between such-and-such a date, we're not going to get them,' he told me. 'So the delay tactics already have hurt.' In a survey conducted last month by the School Superintendents Association, a group that advocates for more federal support for K–12 education, hundreds of school-district leaders from across the country similarly reported that they were planning to lay off teachers and cut classroom programs if the hold on funds persisted into August. David A. Graham: What does the Department of Education actually do? In Washington, lawmakers from both parties began to relay these concerns to the White House. In a July 16 letter to OMB Director Russell Vought, Senator Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia joined nine other Republican senators—including lawmakers from six of the 10 states Trump carried by the largest margins in November—to urge the administration to release the money immediately. The senators noted that Congress had already approved the funding as part of a spending law and called on the administration to 'faithfully implement' that legislation. 'Withholding these funds will harm students, families and local economies,' the senators wrote. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama did not sign the letter but told reporters on July 17 that he planned to talk with Trump about the funds during a dinner that was planned for the following day. (I asked Tuberville's office if the senator had gone through with the conversation but didn't get a response.) Meanwhile, local and state officials from across the demographic and political spectrum banded together to advocate for the funding's release. On July 21, a group that included school districts and teachers' unions filed a joint lawsuit challenging the halt in funding. Among the plaintiffs were the Kuspuk School District, in remote Alaska, which has about 300 students spread out over 12,000 square miles, as well as Cincinnati Public Schools, which has 35,000 students in about 80 square miles. 'They do not want to spend their time suing the federal government,' the lawsuit said of the schools. 'They want to do their jobs serving students and communities.' (The case is pending.) That same day, the Department of Education released part of the funding—$1.4 billion for '21st Century Community Learning Centers' grants, which high-poverty states such as West Virginia disproportionately rely on for after-school and summer-school programs. A few days later, on July 25, the department said it would release the more than $5 billion in remaining funds. Federal officials offered no public accounting of what their review had turned up, but they threatened further scrutiny of school districts that ran afoul of federal civil-rights laws and presidential directives. The Trump administration has used civil-rights legislation to go after schools for policies regarding transgender athletes and diversity, equity, and inclusion. The White House and the Education Department did not respond to requests for comment about the funds. Speaking at a National Governors Association meeting on the day the funds were released, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the federal government was 'well satisfied' after evaluating the grant programs under review and that she expected dollars to flow more seamlessly in the future. Although OMB officials had initially attempted to cast the review as part of Trump's effort to root out liberal ideology from schools, Jon Valant, who researches K–12 policy at the Brookings Institution, told me that the White House was never likely to find much evidence to back up those claims. 'When you have a country with millions of public-school teachers across about 100,000 public schools, if you look, sure, you're going to find someone somewhere who's doing something objectionable,' he said. 'But the vast majority of these funds are used in ways that hardly any American would object to.' Ed Hermes, a school-board member in Phoenix, echoed this. 'This is going to Girl Scouts. This is going to softball. I know because my kids are in these programs,' Hermes, a former schoolteacher himself, told me. 'This is going to fund kids getting help with their math homework after school.' The decision to hold back the congressionally mandated funding came as the Education Department has lost nearly half its workforce under Trump, who is proposing additional budget cuts for the agency. The White House has asked Congress to slash grants for migrant education, English-language acquisition, and other programs funded by the money that was recently frozen, as part of next year's budget. If she is confirmed by the Senate, Baesler, the North Dakota superintendent, could soon join that effort as the next assistant secretary for elementary and secondary education. Whether she will use her new perch to contribute to the Trump administration's goal of shutting down the department or advocate on behalf of schools that rely on federal funds is a question of great concern to educators in her home state. Wayne Trottier, who retired in June as superintendent of the school district in Sawyer, North Dakota (population 307), told me that he'd recently confronted Baesler about the funding freeze. Trottier said that he'd asked her whether she would fight from the inside against the Trump administration's cuts. 'This is why the Department of Education needs me on staff now and not later,' he recalled her saying. Baesler did not respond to my requests for comment. In an email to superintendents yesterday, she said she was 'pleased' to announce that the dollars were now available, and thanked McMahon, North Dakota lawmakers, and local educators 'who advocated for the release of these funds.' Kevin Carey: Scammers are coming for college students She could have a tough time in Washington making the case for Trump's proposed cuts. On Thursday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers on the Senate Appropriations Committee passed a spending bill that rejected Trump's plan to scale down the Education Department. The bill also included language essentially banning the Trump administration from pursuing another funding freeze for K–12 schools next year. It passed by a 26–3 margin and now heads to the full Senate for a vote. The Trump administration could also continue to face resistance from around the country. In my conversations with school officials from both urban and rural districts, I frequently heard them making the case for each other. Johnson, who serves on the board of the National Rural Education Association, which advocates for schools in remote areas, stressed the crucial role the department plays in defending the civil rights of minority students and immigrants—of which there are few in his town. 'Why are they picking on the Hispanics?' he said at one point. Luisa Santos, who serves on the school board in Florida's large and very diverse Miami-Dade County, told me that without the Education Department, smaller districts would struggle the most. 'The federal government is able to support extremely rural areas—areas that, frankly, I don't think could generate that funding on their own if they needed to,' she said. This urban-rural alliance could be tested, however, as Trump aims to move forward with his broader education agenda, which includes advancing school-choice vouchers, filing lawsuits against schools over transgender policies, and promoting what the White House has called 'patriotic education.' Some educators I spoke with feared that long-standing cultural divides over immigration, race, gender, sexuality, and how to teach American history could create fissures among school districts that have found common cause in advocating for broadly popular programs such as summer school. The administration's decision to end the funding freeze, these sources said, could ultimately be a tactical retreat ahead of a more aggressive push to demolish the Department of Education. 'It's a half-sigh of relief,' Santos said about the release of federal funds, adding that a 'roller coaster of unknowns' still awaits educators as the new school year begins. 'I don't think this is the end at all.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Knox County School Board will discuss what happens if federal K-12 money gets frozen again
The Trump administration is releasing the $6 billion in education funding it froze June 30, but uncertainty remains for the Knox County Board of Education moving forward. School Board member Katherine Bike is leading an effort to ask the state to make sure that, if federal money gets frozen again, the state can offset the loss for its public schools. What the freeze meant for Knox County Schools: KCS stood to lose $3.8 million for Title II, III and IV grants, Superintendent Jon Rysewyk told Knox News, before the Trump administration released the nearly $6 billion it had frozen nationwide. The county made its budget assuming it would get the money July 1 (the start of the fiscal year). Damage to KCS was still done: After KCS found out June 30 the money was being frozen, it terminated 27.5 positions: 13.5 regional content facilitator positions in academic areas including math, English language arts, science and social studies 11 student support staffers 3 Welcome Center family liaisons What Bike wants the school board to ask the state: The resolution from Bike "respectfully urges the Tennessee General Assembly to take immediate action to ensure that any future loss, reduction or freeze of federal funding - particularly under IDEA and Titles I, II, III and IV - is fully offset by state funding." State lawmakers are talking about federal education dollars: Earlier this year, lawmakers created the Tennessee Joint Federal Education Deregulation Cooperation Task Force to explore how much the state relies on federal dollars for education. For the 2025-26 school year, the state reported to task force members July 29 it expects $106,353,503 in federal funding to be available. "I think it's important that we look at what could happen in Tennessee because the Department of Education from the federal level is somewhat in a state of flux," state Sen. Bill Powers of Clarksville said. Unanswered questions about how the state could step in: When state Sen. Dawn White of Murfreesboro asked budget analyst Alan Hampton if the state could replace lost funds for programs currently funded by the federal government, he didn't know. "I would have to get back to you on that," Hampton said. Attend the meetings: The school board will discuss the resolution at its meeting at 5 p.m. Aug. 4 in the boardroom of Summer Place, 500 W. Summit Hill Drive. The board will have its voting meeting at 5 p.m. Aug. 7 in the boardroom of Summer Place, 500 W. Summit Hill Drive. Study up: You can check out the proposal from Bike at Click "Board agendas/minutes." Want an update on plans for Knoxville parks? What's the plan? Knoxville is working on a master plan to guide prorities for its parks, sports facilities, programs and senior activities over the next 10+ years. The process kicked off in January. What's happening this week: Representatives from the firm making the plan will give an update on their findings from community engagement over the course of 2025. They'll also detail what's next. The final product: The city expects the final verion of the master plan to be ready "later this fall." When's the meeting? Council members will hear about the master plan at 5 p.m. Aug. 5 in room 461 of the City-County Building, 400 Main St. Council members will have their regular meeting at 6 p.m. in the main assembly room of the City-County Building, 400 Main St. Learn more about the master plan: You can find more infomration about the parks and recreation master plan at Study up on the rest of the agenda: You can find the agenda for the city council's meeting by clicking the "agendas" link on the city council's webpage at Choose the "HTML" option for Aug. 5. Knoxville's violence reduction leadership committee The violence reduction leadership committee will meet at 1:30 p.m. Aug. 7 at the city's public works service center, 311 Morris Ave. The committee does not share agendas. Closing the loop I wrote about Knox County Commissioners considering an effort to raise the mineral service tax paid by companies that use the county's quarries from 15 cents per ton to 20 cents per ton. The effort passed July 28. The only commissioner to vote against it was Larsen Jay, who represents the whole county. "Minutes before (the vote), we had a report on housing and it outlined how materials costs in housing were continuing to rise and I didn't want to add to more expense to build a home," Jay said in the text. The county expects to make an extra $150,000-$160,000 a year for road work from the mineral service tax increase. 5 things you might have missed Here are some news highlights from last week: Hayden Dunbar highlighted how SNAP federal funding cuts could change free lunch at Knox County Schools I reported that Knox County Commission chair Gina Oster, a Republican, has a challenger from the right Joanna Hayes wrote about the Knoxville bar that was named one of USA TODAY's best of the year Keenan Thomas exclusively reported U.S. Rep. Fleischmann wants Tennessee to fill an empty TVA seat, and to lead in nuclear Devarrick Turner reported Great Smoky Mountains National Park is cracking down on speeding after fatal crashes Allie Feinberg is the politics reporter for Knox News. Email: Reddit: u/KnoxNewsAllie This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: Knox County Board of Education will discuss federal dollars Solve the daily Crossword
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
Student loan borrowers — how will the end of the SAVE plan impact you? Tell us
When the Biden administration rolled out SAVE, or the Saving on a Valuable Education plan, in 2023, it said borrowers would soon benefit from the lowest monthly bills ever. Nearly 7.7 million people enrolled in SAVE, the U.S. Department of Education recently said. But borrowers never got those promised lower payments. Just as many of the SAVE plan's benefits were going into effect, Republican-led legal challenges blocked the program. Unlike the Biden administration, President Donald Trump's officials have not fought in the courts to preserve SAVE, and recently, Congress repealed the plan altogether. Now, millions of student loan borrowers are bracing for bigger payments. How has the end of the SAVE plan impacted you and your household finances? We want to hear from you. If you're willing to share your experience for an upcoming story on this topic, please write to me at
