Moderate Democrats can't save their party if they don't fight for it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Speaker Johnson: Epstein drama ‘not a hoax,' Congress wants ‘full transparency'
House Speaker Mike Johnson has insisted that the drama surrounding the case of late child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein 'is not a hoax' and that lawmakers want to see justice for the victims as he grapples with a growing firestorm over the issue. 'We want full transparency,' Johnson (R-La.) told CBS News' 'The Takeout with Major Garrett' Wednesday. 'We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils — let's call it what it was — to be brought to justice as quickly as possible.' 'We want the full weight of the law on their heads.' Advertisement A weeks-long controversy has roiled Trump's MAGA movement after the Justice Department and FBI concluded in a July 6 memo that Epstein most likely killed himself in his Manhattan jail cell and didn't have an 'incriminating client list' of rich and powerful people who took part in sex with girls as young as 14. The conclusion has caused headaches for Johnson after House Democrats won over several Republicans in a push to publicly release the full case file. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hasn't seen the Jeffrey Epstein evidence in question. REUTERS Advertisement 3 Interest in Jeffrey Epstein was revived after a DOJ and FBI memo this week kicked up a firestorm and demands within MAGA world for more transparency. AP On Monday, the House Rules Committee — the lower chamber's gatekeeper for most legislation that gets a floor vote — was forced to adjourn by Republicans who wanted to short-circuit a Democratic effort to force the disclosure of the Epstein files. Johnson then opted to send lawmakers home to their districts Wednesday for the August recess — one day ahead of schedule — due to the House floor effectively being frozen over the Epstein revolt. President Trump has seethed at the controversy, calling out 'past' supporters as 'weaklings' for buying into the 'hoax.' Advertisement 'It's not a hoax. Of course not,' Johnson told Garrett. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson has been careful not to break with President Trump on the Jeffrey Epstein ordeal. Getty Images 'I've never seen the Epstein evidence; it wasn't in my lane, but I had the same concerning questions that a lot of people do,' he later added. Rank-and-file lawmakers are pushing Johnson to hold a vote to compel the release of outstanding documents once the House returns from its recess Sept. 2. Advertisement Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) are pursuing a discharge petition — a legislative technique to force a vote on a bill without the speaker's blessing — to that effect. Meanwhile, Trump has announced his support for the release of grand jury testimony in the cases against Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell. On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her legal team in Tallahassee, Fla. to discuss the case. Additionally, the GOP-led House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Maxwell for testimony, with an interview tentatively set for Aug. 11.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Epstein controversy sets capitol dome spinning
I have previously observed in this space that there's something about Washington that just loves a juicy scandal. Is D.C. different from anywhere else in the U.S.? Probably only in degree. Scandals divert attention from the otherwise hum-drummery of political infighting and bureaucratic skirmishes that consume so much of our government's business. They provide an entertaining diversion from things that really matter. This scandal fixation doubled-down in the current brouhaha over whether the evidence held by the Justice Department on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein should be released. It now is a scandal about a scandal. The original scandal related to the sex-trafficking by Epstein of women, including minors. The new scandal is about just who the paying clients were, why they were not tried as accessories, and why their identities remain concealed. The current scandal has kicked into overdrive with the reversals of President Trump and his top Justice and FBI appointees over the wisdom of releasing all the relevant materials. Epstein's was one of the juicier conspiracy theories fueled for years by Trump and these same allies, who charged past Democratic presidents with covering-up the details. Now the shoe is on the other foot and it's pinching. Trump and his team are now claiming there's no there there. The problem is the hardcore base of the MAGA movement both nationally and in Congress fail to buy into this spin reversal. It is causing panic among some in the White House and on Capitol Hill, with midterm elections looming just over the horizon next year. All this fuss from both parties is setting the capitol dome spinning. Democrats are thumping the drums of a coverup and clamoring for full disclosure. Majority party Republicans are ducking for cover, but some are taking issue with the president's protestations that it's all a hoax, fake news and hyperventilating. The president is especially upset that a segment of his MAGA supporters is not closing ranks behind him, calling them a bunch of idiots and lunatics. This came to a head last week as the president's party leaders in Congress were trying to pass his $9 billion rescission package and the defense appropriations bill, with Democrats throwing brickbats and smoke bombs over Epstein. Last Tuesday, when House Republicans were trying to pass a special rule on the floor providing for consideration of the defense appropriations bill and three other measures, the wheels came flying off. The routine special rule for consideration of the bill, which is usually adopted on a party-line vote, was rejected, 196-223, with 13 Republicans voting against it. Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) voted 'nay' to preserve his right to call for a reconsideration of the vote, which he promptly moved. The chair postponed action on that critical vote until the next day when it passed, 217-212, with only three members not voting. But that was not the end of it. Democrats smelled blood and moved in for another attack the following day when the Rules Committee met to consider a final procedural rule for the recission bill (H.R. 4). The proposed rule provided for automatic adoption of the Senate-passed amendment to the bill, thus clearing the recissions for the president's signature. Rules Committee Ranking Member James McGovern (D-Mass.), offered an amendment to also make in order a bill introduced by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to mandate that the Justice Department release all the evidence in the Epstein files. McGovern's motion was ruled non-germane by the chair, and he lost an appeal of the ruling on a party-line vote. When the special rule was brought to the floor late Wednesday evening, McGovern made a run at trying to defeat the previous question to allow for consideration of the Khanna bill. This time, the majority was better armed. In the Rules Committee, it had also allowed for consideration on the floor of a non-binding, sense of the House concurrent resolution by Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), one of two Freedom Caucus members on the committee. The resolution also called for the full disclosure of the Epstein files. Although the Norman resolution rule was not brought up for consideration last Wednesday, the leadership's agreement to allow for its later consideration was sufficient to placate most of the previous Republican naysayers to support the rescission rule, and it was adopted, 216-213, with only two Republicans voting 'nay' and two not voting. It was still obvious that the Epstein files concealment scandal had legs and was not going away. A small chunk of hardcore MAGA voters nationwide were still squawking, keeping pressure on for full disclosure of the Epstein files. House Republican leaders were sufficiently drained from the previous week's perilous peregrinations that they adjourned the House Wednesday for an early August recess rather than risk any more Epstein votes. The lesson learned from this whole episode is that conspiracy theories have a way of circling back and biting their original perpetrators in their posteriors. Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran who served as chief of staff to the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of, ' Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial ' (2000); and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump team's Epstein files pivot coincided with Trump being told he was in the files
The news Wednesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi told President Donald Trump back in May that his name appeared in the Jeffrey Epstein files isn't that surprising, in context. We've known the two men had a relationship dating back decades, and we've seen Trump's name appear in various previously released Epstein-related materials. Being in the documents isn't proof of any wrongdoing. But the news is significant in another way: It adds to questions about precisely why the administration changed its tune on the Epstein files. That doesn't mean there's been a cover-up of any actual Epstein-related misconduct by Trump; there remains no real evidence of that. But the administration clearly started downplaying the Epstein information – in a rather abrupt shift – around the same time Trump was told his name appeared in the files. What's more, sources familiar with the review told CNN the files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims about Trump and others that the Justice Department found not to be credible. In other words, extensive disclosures could have at least created problems for Trump. And the administration appeared to abruptly move away from such disclosures. We'll get to the full timeline in a second. But a few key things stand out: While we don't know the precise date in May that Bondi briefed Trump, the efforts to downplay Epstein conspiracy theories and previous promises for disclosure really kicked off on May 18, when top FBI officials Kash Patel and Dan Bongino appeared together on Fox News and suddenly said Epstein had indeed died by suicide. News of that May briefing contradicts Trump's claim from July 15 that Bondi hadn't told him he was in the files. When asked, Trump told reporters: 'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing.' If this is a nothingburger, why hide that? Elon Musk's later-deleted claim that Trump wasn't releasing the Epstein files because he was in them was lodged June 5, after the May briefing. Trump's recently launched, baseless claims that powerful Democrats 'made up' the Epstein files would fit with his tendency to deflect and distract when there's something he doesn't want out there. Prior to May, the administration had repeatedly promised extensive disclosures. Bondi in early March said Americans would 'get the full Epstein files,' subject to some redactions, and that 'everything's going to come out to the public.' Trump said on April 22 that '100% of all of these documents are being delivered.' But by late May and early June, Patel and Bongino for the first time indicated there wasn't much to the information and walked back those promises. On May 29, Bongino suggested it amounted to 'nothing.' On June 4, he downplayed the case as a 'hot potato for folks.' On June 6, Patel went further than the administration had before in suggesting disclosures would be limited to avoid re-victimizing people, saying, 'Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.' The administration ultimately did not release substantial new documents, saying in its July 7 memo that it 'found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials' and citing how many of them were under court seal. The administration did hype the files in one big way in early May. Bondi said on May 7 that the information included 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' By June 6, Patel appeared to walk back Bondi's claim. The DOJ's memo a month later did not back it up. And now, the full timeline. Feb. 21: Attorney General Pam Bondi is asked by Fox News about an Epstein 'client list,' and she responds by saying that it's 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' (The administration has since claimed she was referring to other documents.) Feb. 26: Bondi on Fox hypes a release of documents set for the following day, calling it 'breaking news,' and saying it will include 'a lot of information.' Feb. 27: The White House invites right-wing social media influencers to the White House and gives them binders of Epstein-related documents. But the documents are mostly old news, and some influencers cry foul. March 1: Bondi tells Fox that Americans will 'get the full Epstein files,' subject to redactions to 'protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses.' March 3: Bondi tells Fox's Sean Hannity that DOJ has received a new 'truckload of evidence' from the FBI. She adds that 'everything's going to come out to the public.' March 14: Bondi repeats on Fox Business Network that she has received a new 'truckload of documents.' She adds that 'we will get out as much as we can, as fast as we can, to the American people, because they deserve to know.' March 23: Bondi tells Fox News that 'we are releasing all of these documents as soon as we can get them redacted to protect the victims …' April 22: President Donald Trump is asked in the Oval Office about when the Epstein files will be released and says, '100% of all of these documents are being delivered.' May 7: Bondi claims there are 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' Her public claim comes shortly before the release of a secretly recorded video in which she made a similar claim. Sometime in May: Bondi briefs Trump about the Epstein files and tells him his name appears in them, among several other high-profile figures, CNN has confirmed. The files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims, including about Trump, that the DOJ found to be not credible, sources said. (The precise date of this briefing isn't clear, but White House officials noted Wednesday that Trump's name was already in the binders Bondi handed out earlier this year.) May 18: For the first time, the administration begins downplaying the Epstein conspiracy theories. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino appear together on Fox News and say Epstein indeed died by suicide. This despite both of them having promoted the conspiracy theories before joining the FBI. May 19: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says the administration is 'committed to releasing those files,' but defers to the Justice Department on timing. May 29: Bongino on Fox again downplays the significance of what will soon be released. 'There is nothing in the file at this point on the Epstein case,' he says. 'And there's going to be a disclosure on this coming shortly.' He says the administration will release video of the jail on the day of Epstein's death that backs up that assertion. June 4: Bongino is pressed on Hannity's show about the lack of Epstein disclosures. He downplays the case as a 'hot potato for folks' and then alludes to his own evolution on the subject: 'I'm not paid for my opinions anymore. I work for the taxpayer now. I'm paid on evidence. That's it.' June 5: Elon Musk claims while lashing out at Trump that the 'real reason' the president is not releasing the Epstein files is because '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files.' He provides no evidence for his claims and later deletes the post, while expressing regret for some of the things he said about Trump. June 6: Patel appears on Joe Rogan's podcast and downplays the looming disclosures again. 'We're gonna give you everything we can,' Patel says, before adding that 'we're not gonna re-victimize women. We're not going to put that sh*t back out there. It's not happening, because then he wins. Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.' Patel also appears to contradict Bondi's claim about 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,' telling Rogan the videos from Epstein's island are 'not of what you want.' July 6: Axios breaks the news that the DOJ has officially concluded that Epstein died by suicide and there was no 'client list,' despite Bondi's comments in February. July 7: The DOJ releases an unsigned memo laying out these conclusions. DOJ says it won't release any further documents because much of it is under court-ordered seal. 'Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography,' the memo says. The memo also undercuts Bondi's claims of 'tens of thousands of videos' of Epstein 'with children or child porn.' July 8: Trump for the first time lashes out at people still asking questions about Epstein, calling those questions a 'desecration.' He tells reporters: 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years.' He cites recent deadly floods in Texas and adds: 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this.' The president will go on to make similar comments over the next two weeks, including baselessly suggesting various powerful Democrats are behind the Epstein files. July 15: Trump is asked about whether Bondi told him his name was in the files and denies it. 'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing and – in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen,' he says. July 23: We learn Trump is indeed in the files.
