Micah Parsons trade: Why Cowboys, Jerry Jones should consider request

The Herald Scotland

a day ago

Thank you Dallas ???????? ????????! I pic.twitter.com/EUnEj9uRUt — Micah Parsons (@MicahhParsons11) August 1, 2025
Maybe Friday's bombshell ignites negotiations with Parsons' agent, whom has been cut out of them to date, according to the Dallas superstar. Yet maybe it necessitates a key turning point for the player and his (current) team.
Prescott and Lamb patiently waited while Jones dragged his feet before (inevitably) minting them in 2024 - yet again in the case of Prescott, who's played on a franchise tag and a pair of extensions during his nine seasons. But in a lengthy statement posted to X, Parsons wrote, among other things, "I no longer want to play for the Dallas Cowboys" as part of a rare public break with Jones, who seemed to openly question the wisdom of a long-term megadeal at the start of camp. And Parsons' ire wasn't limited to his bank account, as he also expressed, "I no longer want shots taken at me for getting injured while laying it on the line for the organization."
Divorce is rarely imminent in the NFL, but these feel like irreconcilable differences, albeit in what's also clearly a heated set of circumstances.
"This is an inflection point for the Dallas Cowboys, their business practices and how they've been doing things if this young man decides, 'I'm gonna be that one player that don't just go with the (flow) and accept the contract and go back and play with the Cowboys. I'm going to request a trade and stand on it,'" former Dallas defensive lineman Marcus Spears, now an ESPN analyst living in North Texas, said Friday afternoon.
But what if Parsons stands on it? Then this might also be a golden opportunity for Jones and a team that will be 30 years removed from its fifth and most recent title if it doesn't win Super Bowl 60 next February.
The benefits of extending Parsons, especially given his age and production (52 1/2 sacks in 63 career games) are obvious, especially since it has seemed recently that he was about to become the unquestioned leader of the defense following the offseason departure of DeMarcus Lawrence - who, incidentally, went scorched earth on the Cowboys on his way to Seattle, saying he'd never win a Super Bowl in Dallas.
But should Jones now actually lean into Parsons' trade request? Could he create something of another Herschel Walker moment by doing so?
Make no mistake, Parsons plays a premium position - perhaps the most important one in football aside from quarterback. But if Jones ties up a huge percentage of his salary cap in Prescott, Lamb and Parsons - they'd undoubtedly be playing concurrently on deals that collectively average more than $135 million annually - then that kneecaps the team's flexibility to address other areas of the roster in meaningful ways, and this team seems to have its share of holes. Maybe paying all three could work for a brief period - think the Los Angeles Rams with the expensive trio of Matthew Stafford, Aaron Donald and Cooper Kupp, who led the team to victory in Super Bowl 56. But it's just not sustainable, nor have the Cowboys shown any evidence that they're just a move or two away from a Lombardi Trophy as those Rams were.
As for potentially moving Parsons? If non-quarterbacks like Jalen Ramsey, Laremy Tunsil and even Jamal Adams can fetch two first-round picks in a deal - and all of them once did - that should be the minimum return Jones would expect. And with the regular season still five weeks away, there's ample time to incite an even more lucrative bidding war among 31 other teams who would love to have a young, explosive, versatile, smart QB hunter like Parsons, who's also healthy and fresh after doing little this offseason aside from good-faith efforts while being a regular presence for the offseason program and training camp as he awaited his payday.
Would Jones reap the numerous assets former Cowboys coach Jimmy Johnson did for Walker in 1989, helping lay the groundwork for the 1990s Dallas dynasty? Is he winding up with dynastic cornerstones like Emmitt Smith, Russell Maryland and Darren Woodson? Fanciful. No team is surrendering eight premium draft picks, including three first-rounders, for anyone not named Brady or Mahomes.
But could Jones get a pair of Round 1 picks and maybe a pair of Day 2 selections? Maybe? After all, Parsons is at the peak of his powers, and Walker no longer was - meaning a haul is there to be had in the context of 2025 trade architectures. And would it be beneficial getting an influx of cost-controlled talent around Prescott, Lamb and a young offensive line in the early stages of rookie head coach Brian Schottenheimer's tenure - particularly considering vice president of player personnel Will McClay's acumen as a talent evaluator? Maybe?
There's no sugarcoating what a mess Jones has made around arguably his best player, and perhaps some Myles Garrett-level rapprochement is in the offing if Jones, Parsons, and his agent can achieve a Kumbaya moment. Yet maybe current events signal to Jones' family that he needs to start delegating more responsibility after he smartly empowered Johnson all those years ago until he could no longer bear to.
What seems pretty clear, though, is that business as usual isn't working in Dallas and hasn't really for three decades despite all the talented players and coaches who have been affiliated with "America's Team." Maybe it's time for a unique approach, like the one Johnson utilized so long ago, to give this team - and maybe Parsons - the fresh start all parties seem to need right now.
All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY's 4th and Monday newsletter.