Small-cap stocks: A closer look at seasonal trends
Catch more Stocks in Translation here, with new episodes every Tuesday and Thursday.
To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here.
Every market has a hidden calendar, and small cap stocks have a rhythm all of their own. But how much does the presidential cycle actually matter? And is 2025 already breaking all of the rules? Today we revisit seasonality. I'm Jared Blickre, host of Stocks and Translation, and first the definition. Seasonality is the predictable and recurring changes in data that tend to happen at the same time every year. And we've talked about this, well, I've talked about this at the beginning of the year. But guess what? Seasonality did not predict anything in regards to the tariff tantrum that we saw, and that kind of bucks seasonality in a big way, but it seems to be back. So let's take a look at this chart. The Russell 2000 started in the late 70s, so this goes all the way back to 1979. Every month, these green bars are the median returns, not the average because that can skew things to the upside or the downside too much. But we take the median returns, and then in white, I also have the percent positive. And I like to see something above 70% to get me really bullish because that is the historical average or median, uh, for any given day in most stock indices. So we're going to notice here, June is kind of ho hum. That's about 1.3%. And what you might notice is that May is a lot better. And in fact, we're just coming off the best May since last November. And guess what here? November is the best month of the year, historically speaking, with a positive rate of about 70%. And December is right there with it, 74% of the time. It is up, uh, over 2%. So you put it all together, we are still in the midst of a nice little seasonality, perhaps back run in the Russell 2000 with small caps, and we did see them lead this week in particular. Now, let's take a little different look here, and you can slice seasonality in a lot of different ways, but one of the ways is to match the presidential cycle. So since 1979, we've had 11 or so first year presidential terms, all the way from Ronald Reagan, he had two, and then you had HW Bush, and then you had two of Clinton, all the way through Biden. And so that's what we're looking at here. And with only 11, uh, with only 11 sample sizes here, we're seeing a lot more volatility. So the green bars are going to vary a bit more. But what you might notice is the standout month is May. And again, we just had the best May since last November. And historically, with this presidential cycle, we've seen returns of about 4%, 91% of the time, 3% plus. Also, June again, ho hum, it's a little bit less than 1% there, but it does have a percent positive of about 73%. And then July looks a little bit better. What you might notice here is that August and September are really not the greatest months in this cycle. So that's something to look out for potentially, especially August, which has a median negative return and also only a 45% positive rate, which is pretty low here. And I'm going to show a final chart. Hopefully, I'm not going to confuse things anymore, but I did want to show you what has happened this year, and that is in blue here. So this is a 2025 chart. Here we have, I'm going to trace out what the Russell 2000 has done this year. And there's that big plunge, uh, into the early April that we saw. And then I have two maps, the white and the green lines. Now the white line is going to closely match what has happened that first bar chart that I showed you since 1979 every year and those median returns. And you can see it's pretty much from the lower left to the upper right here. We do kind of flatten out in the fall a little bit, but then there's a rise into year end. But what I'm really interested in is that green line. And this is a special way I've been, uh, I've been conducting these seasonality studies. For everything that's included in here, you have to have the exact same day of the week as it appears in this particular month. So for instance, this month started on June 2nd, and that was a Monday, and we're only going to include those years back to 1979 where June 2nd was a Monday. And that happens to be 1980, 1986, 1997, 2003, 2008, which was a global financial crisis, and also 2014. And what we see here is a bit of negative seasonality into early April. And that kind of matches, not to the extreme that we saw, but it matches what we saw this year. And so what I'm interested in in particular is what's happening in June. We do see a nice upslope here, and when we get to October, November, December, that's when we reach the rocky period. So the bottom line, if you put all of this together, and you put some stock in seasonality, uh, we probably have some smooth sailing perhaps until August, September, October, November, and then with the resumption of the uptrend, maybe in November and December, and that's if everything goes according to plan. And with all the geopolitics, who knows? We could get another bump up in volatility. But all considered, we do have a map for the year. So tune into Stocks and Translation for more jargon busting deep dives. New episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays on Yahoo Finance's website or wherever you find your podcast.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysts Say $127.3 Trillion Liquidity Surge Could Be Rocket Fuel for Bitcoin
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Digital asset investment firm CoinShares predicts a potential surge in Bitcoin's (CRYPTO: BTC) value, suggesting a 65% increase if the cryptocurrency captures a small portion of the global liquidity and gold's market cap. What Happened: CoinShares' report posits that Bitcoin could experience a significant rally if it manages to seize just 2% of the global liquidity (global M2) and 5% of gold's market cap. The predictions are based on the total addressable market (TAM) model, a tool used to estimate the maximum market opportunity available to a product or service. In this case, the model is applied to Bitcoin, assuming it can capture the entire market. Trending: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— The report states, 'If you believe bitcoin is unlikely to compete with the cash positions of Corporate Treasuries or FX Reserves (assigning them 0%) but more likely to take a share of Global M2 (let's assume 2%) and Gold (5%), the sum of those contributions would estimate a value of $189,000/BTC.' Currently, the global liquidity (global M2) is valued at $127.3 trillion, while the total market cap of all the mined gold is $23.9 trillion. CoinShares suggests that Bitcoin is 'increasingly likely to obtain a higher share of monetary markets' as it evolves into a 'more useful form of money.' "Bitcoin does not need to replace the global monetary system to be profoundly valuable. Capturing a small share of these enormous markets would be more than enough," the report prediction comes at a time when Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are gaining traction as alternative investment options. The potential for Bitcoin to capture a portion of the global liquidity and gold's market cap could significantly impact its value, making it an attractive option for investors. The report's findings underscore the growing recognition of Bitcoin's potential in the financial market. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading at $113,352.03. Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Image: Shutterstock This article Analysts Say $127.3 Trillion Liquidity Surge Could Be Rocket Fuel for Bitcoin originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should You Invest in Fractional Real Estate or Just Buy a REIT?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. If you're looking to invest in real estate without the hassle of managing a property yourself, you're probably deciding between two major options: buying into a REIT (real estate investment trust) or using a platform like Arrived, which lets you invest directly in individual rental homes with as little as $100. On the surface, both offer a way to earn passive income and diversify outside of the stock market. But once you dig into the details, these two options are actually very different—and which one is right for you depends on what kind of investor you are. REITs are often pitched as the "set it and forget it" way to invest in real estate. You buy shares like a stock, and the REIT takes care of owning and managing properties. But you don't get to choose what those properties are, and you typically don't get the same tax benefits or direct ownership perks that come with owning physical real estate. That's where Arrived stands out. It gives you the chance to pick the homes you want to invest in, earn quarterly rental income, and get a share of the appreciation if the home goes up in value—all without ever becoming a landlord. So which one's better? Let's break it down. What Is a REIT, and Why Do People Invest in Them? REITs are publicly traded companies that own and operate income-producing real estate—think office buildings, apartment complexes, shopping centers, and warehouses. When you buy a REIT, you're essentially buying stock in a company that makes its money from collecting rent and managing properties. You don't own any specific property yourself, but you do get paid a portion of the income as dividends, typically on a monthly or quarterly basis. The upside? Liquidity. You can buy and sell REIT shares just like you would any stock. That makes them easy to trade, easy to diversify, and easy to access through regular brokerage accounts or retirement plans. For many investors, that simplicity is the main draw. You don't need to do much homework or track individual properties—you're trusting the REIT's management team to handle everything behind the scenes. But here's the tradeoff: when you invest in a REIT, you're buying into a giant pool of assets, and you don't have any say in what those assets are. You're also not treated like a direct owner, which means you miss out on some of the tax benefits—like depreciation and expense write-offs—that come with actual real estate ownership. Don't Miss: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. What Arrived Does Differently Arrived takes a very different approach. Instead of pooling your money into a fund, it lets you invest in individual homes—mostly single-family rentals across the U.S. Each property is owned by an LLC, and you buy shares in that LLC. The minimum investment? Just $100. From there, Arrived takes care of everything: they vet and acquire the home, hire a local property manager, find tenants, collect rent, and handle maintenance. You just collect your portion of the rent as passive income every quarter—and when the property is sold after a 5–7 year hold period, you also get your share of any profits from appreciation. This structure means you have more control. You pick which homes to invest in. You see full financial projections, including rent estimates, expense breakdowns, and expected returns. You can diversify across cities, types of homes, and even different property strategies (like vacation rentals). And because you're a direct equity holder, you get access to tax benefits that traditional REIT shareholders don't. The best part? No landlord duties. You don't answer phone calls. You don't fix leaks. You don't even have to think about it. You're earning real estate income from real homes—without the job of owning them. How They CompareFeature REITs Arrived Minimum Investment As low as 1 share ($10–$100) $100 minimum per property Liquidity Highly liquid (traded on stock exchanges) Illiquid (5–7 year hold period) Asset Selection You don't choose the properties You hand-pick each property Ownership Indirect (stockholder in a company) Direct (equity in property-specific LLC) Tax Benefits Limited (no pass-through depreciation) Yes (depreciation, expense allocation) Payouts Dividends (monthly or quarterly) Rent-based dividends (quarterly) Property Type Commercial-focused Single-family and short-term rentals Risk Profile Market-linked volatility Property-based cash flow + appreciation So which one's better? If you want liquidity and don't care about property-level control, a REIT might make more sense. But if you want to build a real estate portfolio one home at a time, earn rental income with more transparency, and enjoy tax advantages, Arrived gives you far more ownership and far less noise. The Tax Angle Most Investors Miss One of the most overlooked differences between REITs and Arrived is how they're treated at tax time. REIT dividends are taxed as ordinary income, and you don't benefit from the property-level deductions or depreciation that traditional landlords enjoy. But with Arrived, because you're technically a member of an LLC that owns a specific property, you can receive a share of the tax benefits. That includes things like depreciation (which lowers your taxable income on paper), maintenance deductions, and write-offs for capital expenses. Over time, this can add up to meaningful savings—especially if you continue reinvesting your income to grow your portfolio. It's the kind of benefit you wouldn't think about at first glance, but it's a real reason why Arrived feels more like property ownership than simply holding a stock. So, Should You Choose Arrived or a REIT? There's no universal answer—it depends on what you're optimizing for. If you want real estate exposure with zero commitment, fast liquidity, and the ability to buy and sell with a few clicks, REITs are the easy answer. But if you want deeper ownership, long-term rental income, and more direct control over what you're investing in, Arrived offers something REITs can't: a true stake in actual homes, with real tenants, managed on your behalf for as little as $100. And while REITs fluctuate with the market just like any stock, Arrived's performance is tied to local rental markets, occupancy rates, and property appreciation—not the S&P 500. That makes it a compelling way to diversify your portfolio and build passive income over time, especially in markets where real estate is holding strong even when stocks don't. See Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. It's no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $250 million in art — this beloved alternative asset has outpaced the S&P 500 since 1995, delivering an average annual return of 11.4%. This article Should You Invest in Fractional Real Estate or Just Buy a REIT? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Selloff? What Selloff? Monday Market Rebound
Monday, August 4, 2025Markets reversed Friday's selloff with relative ease today, hitting the tape in the green this morning and staying higher throughout the session. It's a clear bounce-back to start a new week of trading. The Dow gained +585 points, +1.34%, while the S&P 500 grew +91, +1.47%. The Nasdaq was up an impressive +403 points, +1.95% on the day, and the small-cap Russell 2000 beat the field: +44 points, +2.05%.Bond yields had already come down and they were steady today, as well: +4.20% on the 10-year and +3.69% on the 2-year. These are clear indicators that interest rates will need to come down — they are currently between +4.25-4.50%, as they have been all year so far. There is no August Fed meeting, however; unless an emergency arises, the Fed's next chance to lower rates will come September Orders for June came in at negative levels, as expected, but 10 basis points (bps) better than expected at -4.8%. This follows the best single-month in factory orders for at least 10 years, an upwardly revised +8.3%. This clearly was a result of tariff and tariff deadline adjustments post-'Liberation Day' at the start of calendar Q2. A tariff reprieve gave companies (and individuals) the opportunity to load up ahead of any future unforeseen moves. Q2 Earnings After the Close Denver-based intelligence software firm Palantir Technologies PLTR posted robust numbers in its Q2 report after the closing bell sounded today, beating on its bottom line by only 2 cents to 16 cents per share, but revenues of $1.0 billion surging past the $938.3 million expected — a record high quarter on the top line. The U.S. grew +68%, commercial was up +93% and the government +53%.Palantir's revenue guidance for next quarter is well beyond prior estimates, for both next quarter and the full year. The low-end of revenue guidance of $1.083 billion for the quarter and $4.14 billion for the year were already well beyond the $989.4 million and $3.92 billion, respectively. Shares are up +4% currently, and the company expects 10x revenue growth over the next decade. We expect the company will be able to shake off its Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) & Hers Health HIMS, on the other hand, came up short on both top and bottom lines this afternoon, with earnings of 17 cents per share missing the Zacks consensus by a penny, with revenues of $545 million below the $553.2 million expected. The company reaffirmed full-year guidance, but at +162% year to date, shares are trading off -12% in the Pharmaceuticals VRTX is off by an even more significant margin, -13.5%, even as the biopharma firm beat estimates on both top and bottom lines after today's close. One of its pain drugs in Phase 2 testing failed to meet its objectives and will be discontinued. CSO David Altshuler will also be stepping down from his post. What to Expect from the Stock Market Tomorrow Q2 earnings season hits full throttle Tuesday, with Caterpillar CAT, McDonald's MCD, big pharma Pfizer PFE and biotech Amgen AMGN all reporting ahead of the open, and chipmaker AMD AMD and EV upstart Rivian RIVN coming out with numbers after the U.S. Trade Deficit will hit the tape Tuesday morning, expected to improve to -$61.0 billion from -$75.5 billion reported last time around. We'll also see S&P and ISM Services PMI once the market opens, expected to remain north of the 50-level, which depicts growth versus loss. Trade deals have gone quiet of late, but there's always a chance something new will be agreed upon, or or comments about this article and/or author? Click here>> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) : Free Stock Analysis Report Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Pfizer Inc. (PFE) : Free Stock Analysis Report Amgen Inc. (AMGN) : Free Stock Analysis Report McDonald's Corporation (MCD) : Free Stock Analysis Report Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) : Free Stock Analysis Report Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) : Free Stock Analysis Report Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio