
Big Beauty Bets on Standardised Eco-Scores. Will It Pay Off?
The brand is part of a cohort of first-mover beauty businesses rolling out new eco-score labels on select products in key European markets, starting with shampoos, conditioners, body washes and face care. The labels, which rate products from A to E, are the result of a years-long effort by some 70 global beauty brands and associations to develop a single system for measuring and communicating environmental impact.
The goal is to give consumers a clear, transparent and consistent way to compare products amid a confusing proliferation of 'clean,' green and natural marketing claims that have drawn increasing scrutiny from regulators and consumer watchdogs.
Many brands that once boldly promoted their products' climate credentials have quietly backed away from such claims as concern and skepticism around greenwashing has grown. A political backlash against so-called 'woke capitalism' led by the US has also made it more complicated for consumer goods companies to talk about environmental and social issues.
ADVERTISEMENT
But major players in the beauty industry are still betting that clear and credible green labels can keep them ahead of anti-greenwashing regulations and give them an edge with consumers.
Alongside Nivea, brands including L'Oréal Paris, Neutrogena and Eucerin will display the scores on the webpages for select skincare products in markets including the UK, France, Germany and Spain. More brands are expected to start using the labels in the coming months and more product categories will be added over time.
'We want to compare apples to apples so the consumer is in a position of really making a conscious choice,' said Katrin Selzer, senior communications lead for sustainability at Beiersdorf, Nivea's parent company. 'All these claims that are now listed on the packaging are overwhelming… at the moment it's very difficult to say what is better for the environment.'
'Clean,' Green and Out of Control
Over the last decade or so, consumers have been bombarded with a growing proliferation of sustainability-related marketing claims. 'Clean' and 'natural' beauty products promise an array of skin-kind benefits and hint at environmentally friendly attributes, while remaining vague.
Shoppers can pick from vegan products in recyclable or recycled packaging that may or may not also be biodegradable. They can seek out brands and retailers that have qualified for a variety of third-party sustainability certifications, or simply created their own.
Consumers, confused by the array of sustainability claims displayed on shop shelves, are increasingly skeptical and disengaged. Regulators, especially in Europe, have pressed for brands to make it easier for consumers to compare products' environmental performance and ensure any green claims are robust and substantiated.
Three years ago, a consortium of some 70 beauty brands and industry associations got together to try and figure out a solution, forming the non-profit EcoBeautyScore Association. Its mission: to develop an industry-wide environmental scoring system that would allow brands to provide clear, credible and comparable information about their products' impact. Now the first products bearing those labels are hitting shelves.
The effort is not without jeopardy. When the fashion industry tried to launch a similar programme back in 2021, it sparked a string of greenwashing allegations and ballooned into controversy. Regulators in Norway concluded the chosen ratings system was not robust enough to back up big brands' eco-marketing claims. The labels were withdrawn, and the credibility of fashion's climate commitments took a hefty and enduring hit.
ADVERTISEMENT
The EcoBeautyScore Association says it has taken steps to avoid repeating such mistakes. It also has the benefit of several years of broader alignment around how environmental impact should be measured. The organisation's methodology is based on a framework developed and approved by the European Commission (though this system, too, is not without its critics, who argue it is not comprehensive enough and often relies on underlying data of dubious quality). Throughout development, the EcoBeautyScore Association engaged closely with policymakers in Brussels to ensure alignment, consulted with independent external experts and turned to established third-party databases to underpin its calculations. Where data for key beauty ingredients didn't exist, it developed new datasets.
'There was strong awareness that we would be scrutinised by various types of stakeholders,' said EcoBeautyScore's managing director, Jean-Baptiste Massignon. 'They had to really invest and develop a methodology that would be fair, transparent and auditable… It took longer than planned, but it really started from a blank sheet of paper.'
Who Cares?
Developing a scoring system regulators, consumers and advocacy groups will treat with some level of trust is just step one. The real test is whether shoppers will care enough about a products' environmental rating for it to influence their purchasing decisions.
The jury's out. There are certainly plenty of studies and surveys that suggest shoppers do want to buy products they can trust were made in an environmentally and socially responsible way, but actual consumption habits suggest this is rarely the first consideration when buying an item. Other types of labelling intended to influence consumption habits in a more virtuous direction have had mixed results.
For instance, introducing calorie counts on food menus and product labels only has a modest influence on what people eat, according to a review of multiple studies on the topic published at the start of the year. It quantified the resulting calorie reduction as the equivalent of two almonds.
Policymakers' dedication to the topic is also less clear than even a few months ago. A rightward shift in Europe's parliament, which has led the push to impose tougher environmental standards on businesses, means many of those moves could now get rolled back. Last month, the future of a landmark piece of anti-greenwashing legislation was thrown into doubt after the European Commission put out a confusing series of statements flip-flopping about whether it was still on the agenda.
'The north star of EcoBeautyScore is providing the information to the consumer,' said Massignon. 'The regulatory landscape at present is in kind of a grey zone.'
The bet is that consistent and widespread labelling will help consumers make better choices, even if attributes like performance and price remain their primary concerns when selecting a product. That means a lot of work ahead to scale up the label's use and explain the scoring system to consumers.
ADVERTISEMENT
EcoBeautyScore is working on 30 categories in total. It's planning on releasing scores across two more by the first half of 2026 and adding at least another couple by the end of next year. Other members of the organisation, which includes companies from Walgreens Boots Alliance and Colgate-Palmolive to Coty, Chanel and Shiseido, are expected to start labelling covered products in the coming months. The hope is non-members will start to use the platform to score their products too.
'In cosmetics, having L'Oréal and Beiersdorf with brands already going live, this is something that is relevant,' said Selzer. 'You need to have big brands show conviction that this is the right thing to do… This would move the needle.'
Sign up to The Business of Beauty newsletter, your complimentary, must-read source for the day's most important beauty and wellness news and analysis.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices down as Trump's deadline for Russia eases supply fears
Oil prices fell during early European trading after US president Donald Trump set a 50-day deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine, potentially averting further sanctions. The announcement alleviated immediate concerns surrounding global supply disruptions. Brent crude (BZ=F) lost 0.7% to trade at $68.72 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate retreated 0.9% to $66.41. Initially, oil prices had surged on speculation about upcoming sanctions. However, the market reversed course as the deadline imposed by Trump raised hopes that punitive measures could be avoided. Investors began to question whether the US would actually go ahead with imposing high tariffs on nations continuing to trade with Russia. Read more: FTSE 100 LIVE: London heads near all-time highs as EU readies for US tariffs 'China, India, and Turkey are the largest buyers of Russian crude oil. They will have to weigh the benefits of buying cheap Russian oil against the costs of exporting to the US,' ING analysts wrote in a note. On Monday, Trump announced additional military aid for Ukraine, and over the weekend, he reiterated plans to impose a 30% tariff on most imports from the EU and Mexico, effective on 1 August. This move is part of broader threats aimed at other countries. Such tariff risks pose a potential slowdown to global economic growth, which could weaken fuel demand and, in turn, push oil prices lower. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs (GS) raised its oil price forecast for the second half of 2025. The investment bank cited factors such as potential supply disruptions, declining oil inventories in OECD countries, and production constraints in Russia. Gold prices were steady on Tuesday morning as investors weighed mixed signals from the US regarding the state of trade negotiations. Gold (GC=F) futures were 0.3% higher at $3,368.80 an ounce, while spot gold was muted at $3.363.49 per troy ounce after touching a three-week high of 3,385.90 in the last session. Trump expressed openness to further discussions with major economies, including the EU. However, his comments seemed to contradict his insistence that letters to governments outlining tariff rates essentially represent "the deals" for trade partners. Read more: Bank of England could cut interest rates faster if jobs market slows, Bailey says 'If trade talks deteriorate before August, we could easily see bullion retest or even breach its former highs,' said Fawad Razaqzada, a market analyst at City Index. 'For now, the market seems firmly in wait-and-see mode, keeping the gold forecast leaning cautiously bullish.' The precious metal has surged more than 25% this year, with gold reaching a record high above $3,500 an ounce in April. 'Gold remains the asset of choice when tariff tensions flare up. Its move towards $3,350 shows this again,' Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade, said. The pound was trading cautiously, edging up 0.1% to $1.3443, hovering just above a three-week low of $1.3430 against the dollar (GBPUSD=X). Market participants were hesitant to make significant moves ahead of the US inflation data set to be released later in the day. Investors are keenly awaiting the US consumer price index (CPI) data, as it will provide insights into the impact of the tariffs imposed by Trump on inflation. US Federal Reserve officials have signalled a preference for holding interest rates steady until there is more clarity on how much Trump's tariff policies are influencing price levels. The upcoming CPI release could offer crucial information on this front. The US dollar index ( which tracks the greenback's value against six major currencies, was down by around 0.2% to 97.94 at the time of writing on Tuesday morning. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio Estimates for the CPI data suggest that US headline inflation rose to 2.7% year-on-year in June, up from 2.4% in May. Meanwhile, core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is expected to have increased by 3%, up from 2.8% in the previous reading. On a month-to-month basis, both the headline and core CPI are forecast to have risen by 0.3%. Sterling's gains were also capped as investors awaited the release of key UK economic data. The UK CPI for June is set for release on Wednesday, followed by labor market data for the three months ending in May, which will be unveiled on Thursday. In other currency moves, the pound was flat against the euro, trading at €1.1505 at the time of writing. In equities, the FTSE 100 (^FTSE) hit 9,000 points for the first time ever. For more details follow our live coverage here.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oracle Drops $3 Billion Bombshell in Europe's AI Cloud War
Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) is stepping deeper into Europe's AI arms race. The company just announced a $3 billion investment over the next five years to expand its cloud and AI infrastructure in Germany and the Netherlands. $2 billion will be poured into the Frankfurt region, beefing up Oracle's cloud backbone and AI capabilities. Another $1 billion is headed to the Netherlands to boost infrastructure in Amsterdam. Oracle says this could help it serve more public and private sector clients that are shifting workloads to the cloudand looking to AI to cut repetitive work. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. This move adds Oracle to the fast-growing club of U.S. giants deploying serious capital across Europe. Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) plans to spend about $4.75 billion in Italy on cloud and AI. Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) has mapped out a 17.8 billion ($20.77 billion) commitment to Germany through 2040and another 15.7 billion earmarked for Spain's cloud ecosystem. Meanwhile, Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE:BAM) is backing a nearly $10 billion AI data center project in Sweden. Everyone's placing their chipsand Europe's digital infrastructure is the table. Why now? It's a mix of regulation, rising demand, and regional pressure to localize AI infrastructure. Oracle's bet suggests the company sees AI and cloud migration in Europe not as a trend, but a long runway. With hyperscalers racing to build out next-gen capacity, this wave of investment could reshape not just Oracle's European footprintbut who controls the pipes powering the next decade of enterprise AI. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Iran faces stiff sanctions if no deal by end of August, U.S. and allies agree
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the U.K. agreed in a phone call on Monday to set the end of August as the de facto deadline for reaching a nuclear deal with Iran, according to three sources with knowledge of the call. Why it matters: If no deal is reached by that deadline, the three European powers plan to trigger the "snapback" mechanism that automatically reimposes all UN Security Council sanctions that were lifted under the 2015 Iran deal. Zoom in: The snapback provision — included in the deal to allow the signatories to respond to Iranian violations — will expire in October. The process of activating "snapback" takes 30 days, and the Europeans want to conclude the process before Russia assumes the UN Security Council presidency in October. U.S. and European officials view snapback as both a negotiating tool to pressure Tehran and a fallback if diplomacy fails. But the Iranians argue there is no legal basis to reimpose the sanctions, and have threatened to withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in response. Driving the news: The call between Rubio and his European counterparts was aimed at coordinating positions on "snapback" and the path forward on nuclear diplomacy with Iran, the sources said. The intrigue: According to two of the sources, the Europeans now plan to engage with Iran in the coming days and weeks with the message that Iran can avoid the snapback sanctions if it takes steps to reassure the world about its nuclear program. Such steps could include resuming International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) monitoring, which Iran suspended after the U.S. and Israeli strikes on its nuclear facilities. One source said another such step could be the removal from Iran of the roughly 400kg of uranium enriched to 60% purity that's contained in those sites. Behind the scenes: Since the end of the war between Israel and Iran, the Trump administration has been trying to resume negotiations on a new nuclear deal. Some officials in France, Germany, the U.K. and Israel were concerned the Trump administration would press the European powers not to trigger the snapback sanctions so as not to harm potential negotiations. When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the White House last week he raised the issue with President Trump, Rubio and White House envoy Steve Witkoff, two Israeli officials said. Netanyahu asked Trump not to block snapback and told Witkoff that the U.S. should make it clear to the Iranians that they don't have much time if they want to get a deal and avoid the reimposing of UN sanctions. "We felt that Trump and his team agreed with us," an Israeli official said. What they are saying: A senior U.S. official said the Trump administration supports activating snapback and sees it as leverage in the talks with Iran.