Deported after Pahalgam attack, Pakistani woman to get visitor's visa: MHA tells J&K HC
The court, however, stated that the MHA order should not constitute a precedent in any manner.
Rashid (62), a Pakistani citizen who married Sheikh Zahoor Ahmed 35 years ago in Jammu, was deported as part of the decision taken by the Indian government to deport Pakistani nationals staying in India in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the home ministry, informed the court that after considerable deliberation and in light of the peculiar circumstances of this case, an in-principle decision had been made to grant a visitor visa to Rashid.
The division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Palli and Justice Rajnesh Oswal acknowledged this in its order.
The bench further noted that Rashid can pursue the two applications moved by her regarding acquiring Indian citizenship as well as a long-term visa.
The court recorded the submission of the solicitor general and noted that "once an in-principle decision is taken by the competent authority, there is hardly any doubt that, post compliance of the requisite procedures and formalities, the authority would process and accord a visitor's visa to the respondent at the earliest".
The court dismissed Rashid's writ petition seeking relief from the deportation, saying that as a natural consequence, the impugned interim order loses its relevance and thus ceases to exist and operate.
On July 22, Mehta requested the court to defer the proceedings to enable him to explore whether the respondent could be helped in any manner or if it was still feasible to address her concerns.
In response, Rashid's counsel, Ankur Sharma and Himani Khajuria, submitted that she was agreeable to the course suggested by the solicitor general.
On June 6, a single-judge bench of Justice Rahul Bharti ordered the Central government to "retrieve" Rashid.
While passing the order, Justice Bharti observed, 'This court is bearing in mind the background reference that the petitioner was having long-term visa (LTV) status at the relevant point of time, which per se may not have warranted her deportation, but without examining her case in a better perspective and coming up with a proper order with respect to her deportation from the authorities concerned, she came to be forced out.'
Rashid was served with a Leave India Notice on April 28 under Sections 3(1), 7(1), and 2(c) of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 1946, issued by the Criminal Investigation Department, directing her to leave the country by or before April 29.
She approached the high court and sought interim relief to stay the operation of the order.
However, she was issued an exit permit and escorted to the Attari-Wagah border in Amritsar by the authorities, from where she crossed over to Pakistan.
Rashid, a resident of Jammu's Talab Khatikan area, has four children who continue to reside in Jammu and Kashmir.
Rashid, daughter of Mohammad Rashid from Namuddin Road in Islamabad, entered India on February 10, 1990, via Attari on a 14-day visitor visa to visit Jammu.
She continued to stay under an LTV granted by the authorities on an annual basis. During her stay, she revealed that she married an Indian national.
"It wasn't disputed either that her LTV was valid up to January 13, 2025, and she had applied for an extension on January 4, 2025. But no such extension was ever accorded," the order noted.
Her husband expressed happiness over the decision and thanked the court.
'We are relieved... The entire family was under tension. We were suffering due to the decision (to deport her),' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why US President Donald Trump's ‘dead economy' jibe at India fails to stand up to scrutiny
US President Donald Trump may have referred to India as a 'dead' economy, but the numbers tell a different story. While the Indian economy is expected to slow down in the current fiscal amid the global uncertainties and tariff wars, most recent projections by economists and international agencies paint a fairly bright picture since they see India as the fastest growing large economy in the world with a 6 per cent plus growth rate. Trump's aggressive stance against India in his social media posts has also exposed an inconsistency in America's stance and policy actions considering India and America have engaged together on several crucial initiatives, ranging from critical minerals, trade, defence and space after he took charge as the President in January. The most recent collaboration between India and the US was seen last week as the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) placed the NISAR satellite, a first-of-its-kind collaborative project between India and the US, into its intended orbit. NISAR, which stands for NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar, is the most powerful Earth observation satellite to be put in space, the result of over one decade of research and development by the space agencies of India and the US. The collaboration is set to expand as ISRO is planning to launch the Block 2 BlueBird communications satellite, developed by the US-based AST SpaceMobile, over the course of next few months. When Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the US in February, the two countries on several initiatives including the Transforming Relationship Utilizing Strategic Technology (TRUST) initiative — a bilateral initiative for cooperation in the recovery and processing of critical minerals such as lithium and rare earth elements. It was seen as a step towards reducing barriers to technology transfer, addressing export controls, and enhancing high-tech commerce. The TRUST initiative followed India's induction into the US-led Minerals Security Finance Network in September last year. India had joined the Minerals Security Partnership in 2023. A move towards stronger trade ties was also discussed in detail during Modi's US visit, with the countries agreeing to double their bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. India's trade relationship with the US has already been strengthening. In 2024, the total goods trade between the two nations stood at $129.2 billion, with the US' exports to India rising 3.4 per cent to $41.8 billion, while its imports were up 4.5 per cent at $87.4 billion, resulting in a deficit of $45.7 billion for the US. India's rising exports of electronic goods, especially smartphones, to the US have been in focus. India's share in US' smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, driven mainly by Apple's iPhones, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period. Roughly 20 per cent of Apple's global iPhone production capacity is now based in India. Trump's often-cited charge against India has been of it being a 'Tariff King', and India in response has made a conscious effort to broadcast the message that it is not. In the Union Budget for 2025-26, presented in February, duties on the top 30 US goods imported by India, including crude oil, LNG, coal, diamonds, aeroplanes, and motor vehicles, were reduced. In the automobile sector, India lowered tariffs on motorcycles based on engine capacity. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has also highlighted the same, pointing out last month that India has reduced the tariff rates to eight, including the zero per cent rate. Modi and Trump had also agreed to renew the 10-year defence framework, with the American President having mentioned increasing military supplies to India and ultimately providing the F-35 stealth fighter. The two leaders had announced plans to pursue new procurements and co-production arrangements for Javelin anti-tank guided missiles and Stryker infantry combat vehicles and six additional P-8I maritime patrol aircraft. Earlier this month, an official statement said India and the US will sign a new 10-year defence partnership framework when Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, meet later this year. While there are some downside risks to the Indian growth story from Trump's threat of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and a 'penalty' for its energy and arms imports from Russia, even a 20-40 bps decline in the growth rate to 6 per cent or so will not stop the economy from being the fastest growing large economy in the world. This is evident in the growth projections made by prominent global rating and multilateral agencies. Last week, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) raised India's GDP growth forecast to 6.4 per cent for both 2025-26 and 2026-27 after it had cut the projection for the current fiscal by 30 bps to 6.2 per cent in April. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also has predicted growth for FY26 to be stable at 6.5 per cent – the same as in the last fiscal. Meanwhile, the Finance Ministry estimates growth to be in the range of 6.3-6.8 per cent, saying in its latest monthly economic review report that the economy presents a picture of 'cautious optimism' in the face of global headwinds marked by trade tensions, geopolitical volatility, and external uncertainties. To be sure, the Finance Ministry has flagged slow credit growth and the private sector's investment appetite as issues. But these hardly make an economy 'dead' — especially one which the IMF estimates as the fifth-largest in the world with a GDP of $3.9 trillion in 2024. And it's only going to get better — by 2028, the IMF expects India to overtake Germany and Japan and rise to the third spot, only behind the US and China. While Trump called both India and Russia as 'dead economies', the latter is a different animal altogether. Unlike India's, the Russian economy has suffered from its war against Ukraine, with GDP growth averaging 2.2 per cent from 2022 to 2024, per IMF. This is even lower than the US' average growth rate of 2.7 per cent over the same period. The figure for India, meanwhile, is 7.8 per cent. Trump's comments, the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on India, and an as-yet unspecified penalty — even as officials from the two countries are negotiating a bilateral trade deal — is being viewed as Washington putting pressure on New Delhi to quickly come to an agreement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has admitted as much, saying on Thursday that Trump and the American trade team were frustrated by the pace of talks with India. 'India came to the table early. They have been slow-rolling things, so I think that the President, the whole trade team is frustrated with them,' Bessent told CNBC. However, just like the US, India has a duty to its people and must get the best possible deal. As Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, the government will take 'all necessary steps to secure our national interest'. Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there. ... Read More Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More
The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India's climate challenge
As this year opened, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the Doomsday clock at 89 seconds to midnight. This is the closest ever to human extinction. This year's report cited climate change as one of the defining reasons for the clock ticking fast towards the end of our time as we know it. The 2025 clock time signals that the world is on a course of unprecedented risk, and that continuing on the current path is a form of madness. Indian view Currently, India stands at the precipice of a climatic crisis, and its response — or the lack thereof — will shape the nation's future in more ways than we can yet imagine. India's history is replete with climate-related upheavals that have tested its resilience — socially, economically, and ecologically. As per a report by the UN office for Disaster Risk Reduction, India suffered an economic loss of a whopping $79.5 billion due to climate-related disasters in the past 20 years from 1998 to 2017. As per scientists, the Indian monsoon, once predictable, has been destabilised by global warming. Increasing temperature causes increased evaporation, which results in heavier and more erratic rainfall. The shifting monsoon trough has become a scourge especially for the northeastern states of Assam, Manipur, and Arunachal Pradesh, where, in recent weeks, more than 46 people died and almost half a million were affected. These climate disasters should not be seen as seasonal misfortunes, but as climate warnings. With no cohesive policy in place and minimal integration of climate considerations into its national security strategy, India is underprepared for a crisis that affects its economy, its people, and its very future. The threat ahead India's coastline, stretching over 7,500 km, is a hub of economic activity, cultural vibrancy and biodiversity. Yet, this vast peninsular stretch and its inhabitants now face a severe threat: rising sea levels, driven by climate change. Compounding the long-term threat of sea level rise are short-term climate phenomena such as El Nino and La Nina, which have a significant impact on weather patterns across South Asia. El Nino reduced monsoon rainfall, leading to droughts, while paradoxically, La Nina events may increase rainfall and the frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods, many of which wreak havoc along India's coastal belt. Together, these factors create a dangerous cocktail of rising seas and erratic climatic behaviour, threatening livelihoods, infrastructure, and long-term sustainability in the region. According to a report by the Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP), a Bengaluru-based think tank, there are multiple Indian States at the threat of getting submerged. Those such as Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, and Kerala are already prone to flooding, have an uncertain future lying ahead. The study further highlights that more than 10% of the land in Mumbai, Yanam, and Thoothukudi; 5%-10% in Panaji and Chennai; and 1%-5% in Kochi, Mangaluru, Visakhapatnam, Haldia, Udupi, Paradip, and Puri would be submerged due to rise in sea levels by 2040. Damage to livelihood The impact of severe weather goes beyond the metropolitan infrastructure and has a devastating impact on the rural and coastal communities. In a country where 47% of the population is dependent on agriculture, it poses a severe threat. Soil salinisation, caused by seawater intrusion, renders once-fertile land unfit for cultivation. This decline in agricultural output can fuel price inflation and deepen reliance on non-local food sources, thereby undermining national food security. The Indian coastal ecosystems are equally vulnerable — the mangrove forests, coral reefs, estuaries and wetlands which serve both as rich habitats for marine biodiversity and as natural buffers against cyclones and tidal surges. A survey warns that the Sunderbans, the world's largest contiguous mangrove forest could lose up to 80% of its area by 2100. The destruction of these habitats by warming waters and rising sea level could trigger species extinction and disrupt food chains, with consequences that ripple far beyond borders. National security concern With a ranking of sixth on the Climate Risk Index, India must acknowledge the danger of surging seas. Experts warn that India is most vulnerable to compounding impacts of sea level rise. The Indian Ocean is the fastest-warming ocean in terms of surface temperature, and cyclones are intensifying due to excess heat and moisture. Therefore, it is imperative that the government begin to treat environmental degradation concerns as an issue of national security, because nature itself can just be as dangerous, if not worse, than any armed adversary. Across the world, climate change is already being framed as a security threat. In the U.S., the Pentagon labels it a 'threat multiplier' — one that exacerbates tensions and compromises national defence readiness. The U.K., too, has integrated climate resilience into its foreign policy. While the Indian government has taken commendable steps — participating in the Paris Agreement and committing to a net-zero emissions target by 2070 — its internal budgeting tells a different story. As per the Union Budget 2025-26, the Ministry of Defence was allocated ₹6,81,210 crore, or 13.45% of the total Union Budget, highest among all the Ministries. While the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change received just ₹3,412.82 crore, a meagre 0.067%. It is high time India stopped operating as if in a cowboy economy, a reckless, fossil-fuel-hungry model that assumes infinite resources and minimal consequences. Incidents suh as the northeastern floods, the Wayanad landslides, and the slow but steady sea level rise are all climate alarms. They call for a shift towards the values of ecologism, sustainability, and resilience. As the World Economic Forum notes, ignorance in the face of environmental collapse is now a threat to over one billion people worldwide. In this era of de-territorialisation, no nation can insulate itself from the effects of climate related catastrophe. The environment has become the archetypal example of a global issue, affecting all nations alike. Therefore, the key takeaway from the incident climatic crisis is simple yet urgent: we must treat environmental risk as central to national and human security, and adhere to sustainable development. rohanststephens1@
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
India indicates it will keep buying Russian oil despite Trumps threats
NEW DELHI (AP) — India has indicated that it would continue buying oil from Russia despite threats by U.S. President Donald Trump. The Indian foreign ministry said its relationship with Russia was 'steady and time-tested,' and should not be seen through the prism of a third country. Addressing a weekly presser on Friday, spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said India's broader stance on securing its energy needs was guided by the availability of oil in the markets and prevailing global circumstances. The comments follow an announcement by President Donald Trump that he intends to impose a 25% tariff on goods from India plus an additional import tax because of New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. The threat came as the U.S. president has increasingly soured on Russia for failing to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. India bought 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, but by June of same year oil imports rose to 1.12 million barrels per day. The daily imports peaked at 2.15 million in May 2023 and have varied since. Supplies rose as high as nearly 40% of India's imports at one point, making Moscow the largest supplier of crude to New Delhi, the Press Trust of India reported, citing data from Kpler, a data analytics company. India's daily oil consumption is pegged around 5.5 million barrels, of which nearly 88% is met through imports. The country has historically bought most of its crude from the Middle East, but this has changed since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. India, the world's third-largest crude importer after China and the U.S., began buying Russian oil available at discounted rates after the West shunned it to punish Moscow.
