Trump announces 25% tariffs on Japan and South Korea
The tariffs are set to go into effect on August 1.
Mr Trump provided notice by posting letters on Truth Social that were addressed to the leaders of the various countries.
The letters warned them to not retaliate by increasing their own import taxes, or else the Trump administration would further increase tariffs.
'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' Mr Trump wrote in the letters to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung.
The letters were not the final word from Mr Trump on tariffs, so much as another episode in a global economic drama in which he has placed himself at the centre.
His moves have raised fears that economic growth would slow to a trickle, if not make the US and other nations more vulnerable to a recession.
But Mr Trump is confident that tariffs are necessary to bring back domestic manufacturing and fund the tax cuts he signed into law last Friday.
He mixed his sense of aggression with a willingness to still negotiate, signalling the likelihood that the drama and uncertainty would continue and that few things are ever final with Mr Trump.
Imports from Myanmar and Laos would be taxed at 40%, South Africa at 30% and Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Tunisia at 25%.
Mr Trump placed the word 'only' before revealing the rate in his letters to the foreign leaders, implying that he was being generous with his tariffs.
Mr Trump still has outstanding differences on trade with the European Union and India, among other trading partners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ghislaine Maxwell was not Jeffrey Epstein's sole enabler. So why is she the only one in prison?
Great news, everyone! We can all stop thinking about Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged with the sex trafficking of minors in 2019 and found dead in his Manhattan jail cell shortly after, apparently of suicide. Great minds have looked into the case and discovered there is nothing more to uncover. So don't waste your time wondering which powerful people might have been part of Epstein's alleged trafficking operation. There's nothing to see here – nothing at all. Case officially closed. That, in essence, was the message from the Trump administration over the weekend. On Sunday, Axios reported on a memo from Trump's justice department and the FBI that concluded there is no evidence that Epstein was involved in blackmailing people, kept a 'client list' or was murdered. Most importantly, the memo said there is no 'evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties'. This is a big deal because Trump and his lackeys have spent a lot of time and energy dangling Epstein-related conspiracy bait in front of their base, constantly insinuating that they're on the verge of revealing the shocking truth about Epstein's network of elite predators. When asked about an Epstein client list (the one that the new memo says is nonexistent) during a February appearance on Fox News, the US attorney general Pam Bondi said: 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review.' Shortly after that interview there was a big to-do where Epstein-obsessed Maga influencers were invited to the White House and given binders titled the Epstein Files, full of information that Bondi promised 'will make you sick'. Shock horror, there was nothing new or notable in those binders and Maga had a meltdown. Now, a second Epstein-induced meltdown is in full swing. Elon Musk, who is back to publicly fighting with Trump, and has threatened to start a new political party, has been firing off jabs about the justice department's Epstein U-turn. On Monday, Musk, who previously accused Trump of being in the Epstein Files, retweeted a post by a woman called Sarah Fields that said: 'If the entire government is protecting paedophiles, it has officially become the government against the people.' Bit late figuring out the Trump administration doesn't work for 'the people' – but hey, welcome to the resistance, Elon! The conservative activist Robby Starbuck is also fuming. 'Pam Bondi said the Epstein client list was on her desk to review for release to the public just a few months ago,' Starbuck tweeted. 'Now the DOJ she leads claims that there's no Epstein client list. Sorry but this is unacceptable … We deserve answers.' It's always fun when the Maga crowd realise what the people they propelled into power are really like. But why are rightwing voices the loudest on this topic? Starbuck is right that the current situation is unacceptable: everyone should be demanding more answers about Epstein. Everyone should be outraged that there is only one person, Ghislaine Maxwell, who has actually faced justice in what was, by all accounts, a vast trafficking operation. Some people have paid in other ways – in 2023 Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75m (£60m) to settle a lawsuit brought by a group of women who accused it of helping facilitate Epstein's operations – but Maxwell is the only person to have got prison time. There are, it should be said, a lot of ridiculous Epstein-related conspiracy theories circulating. Those obviously should not be indulged. But I'll tell you what is not a conspiracy: the fact that there are a lot of high-status people who are very interested in covering up their association with the disgraced financier. It is not a conspiracy to say the US has a two-tier justice system where rich and powerful people can do terrible things and face no consequences. Earlier this year, Virginia Giuffre, one of the most prominent Epstein victims, died of suicide. She was the third Epstein accuser who is reported to have died of suicide or a drug overdose. Epstein destroyed countless lives. And he didn't do it alone: he was enabled by 'respectable' people who actively facilitated his crimes. And, more broadly, he was enabled by people who looked the other way, who helped whitewash his reputation, who hobnobbed with him in high society. Those people are still out there, living their best lives. And it is looking increasingly likely they will never be held accountable. Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US only has 25% of all Patriot missile interceptors needed for Pentagon's military plans
The United States only has about 25% of the Patriot missile interceptors it needs for all of the Pentagon's military plans after burning through stockpiles in the Middle East in recent months, an alarming depletion that led to the Trump administration freezing the latest transfer of munitions to Ukraine. The stockpile of the Patriot missiles has fallen so low that it raised concern inside the Pentagon that it could jeopardize potential US military operations, and deputy defense secretary, Stephen Feinberg, authorized the transfer to be halted while they reviewed where weapons were being sent. Donald Trump appeared to reverse at least part of that decision on Monday when he told reporters in advance of a dinner at the White House with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he would 'send some more weapons' to Ukraine, although he did not disclose whether that would include Patriot systems. Trump also told Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in a phone call that he was not responsible for the halt in weapons shipments and that he had directed a review of US weapons stockpiles but didn't order the freeze, according to people briefed on the conversation. But the determination last month to halt the transfer, as described by four people directly familiar with the matter, was based in large part on the Pentagon's global munitions tracker, which is used to generate the minimum level of munitions required to carry out the US military's operations plans. According to the tracker, which is managed by the joint chiefs of staff and the Pentagon's defense security cooperation agency, the stockpiles of a number of critical munitions have been below that floor for several years since the Biden administration started sending military aid to Ukraine. The Trump administration started a review of the depleted level of Patriot missiles and other munitions around February, the people said. Deliberations accelerated after the US deployed more of the interceptors in the Middle East to support the Houthi campaign and to Israel. The situation also became more acute following Trump's move to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities last month, the people said, when the US fired close to 30 Patriot missiles to intercept Iranian ballistic missiles fired in performative retaliation at the Al Udeid base in Qatar. The recent depletion of Patriot missiles and other munitions formed part of the basis of a 'recommendation memo' by Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defense for policy, that outlined several options to conserve weapons and sent to Feinberg's office. Earlier reports said Colby, who has drawn criticism from Democrats for prioritizing shifting resources from the Ukraine conflict in preparation for a potential war with China, had paused the transfer but two of the people said the undersecretary's office lacks the power to make such a unilateral move. The decision was rather made by Feinberg, the former chief executive or Cerberus Capital Management to whom Colby reports, the people said. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth then signed off on Feinberg's determination. But the abrupt pause has come at a critical time for Ukraine, as Russia last week launched its largest aerial offensive to date and Ukraine has limited options to acquire both precision-guided and more basic weapons to hold off increasingly intense Russian attacks. Ukraine is also largely unable to directly buy weapons from defense contractors for its purposes, since a new order is estimated to take years to fulfill, and it would only be completed after the Pentagon had its own orders completed since the defense department is a higher priority customer. Trump's decision to reverse course and allow some defensive munitions to be sent to Ukraine appears to have come amid growing frustration with Russian president Vladimir Putin, who he criticized on Monday for not helping end the war. Spokespeople for the White House and the Pentagon confirmed some transfers would resume at Trump's direction but did not specify whether the weapons being sent to Ukraine would involve munitions at critically low levels. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'As Operation Midnight Hammer proved, the American military is stronger than it's ever been. President Trump wants to stop the killing and has pledged to provide Ukraine with additional defensive munitions,' said White House spokesperson Anna Kelly. While Trump has publicly complained about Ukraine aid in financial terms, Feinberg was briefed that the larger problem has been with the ability for the US to manufacture the weapons to quickly backfill the depleted stockpiles, two of the people said. The US has been transferring weapons to Ukraine using two principal channels: through a drawdown of defense department stockpiles, and through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), where the defense department pays contractors to manufacture weapons to go to Ukraine. Both transfer mechanisms was set to have been affected by the freeze, the people said, since the Pentagon is prioritizing replenishing its stockpiles using the same defense contractors being relied upon to build weapons for Ukraine through the USAI program. For the latest weapons shipment to Ukraine, the US had earmarked dozens of Patriot missiles among other munitions including air-to-air Sparrow missiles, Hellfire missiles, GMLRS rocket artillery and anti-tank guns. The principal concern appears to revolve around the Patriot missiles, which the US produces 600 per year but Iran alone has more than 1,000 ballistic missiles remaining it could theoretically use against US bases in the region if the ceasefire with Israel were to break down. The US has also transferred around 2,000 Stinger missiles to Ukraine, which officials estimated to be equivalent to two-and-a-half years of production, and is increasingly used by the US military for its own defense purposes against hostile drones, the people said.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump Media files for 'Crypto Blue Chip ETF' with SEC
President Donald Trump continues to expand his crypto-related offerings, this time with a planned exchange-traded fund tied to the prices of five popular cryptocurrencies. Trump Media & Technology Group, a Florida company that operates the Truth Social media platform, announced Tuesday it had filed paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission for approval to launch the 'Crypto Blue Chip ETF' later this year. The proposed ETF would have 70% of its holdings in bitcoin, the world's most popular cryptocurrency, 15% in ethereum, the second-most popular, and 8% in solana, a cryptocurrency popular in the meme coin community. The fund would hold 5% in the cryptocurrency developed by the company Ripple and 2% in the crypto created by the exchange which will act as the ETF's digital custodian. Trump Media previously announced plans for a crypto ETF with just bitcoin and ethereum. It's unclear if the company plans to move forward with that ETF offering. Trump Media did not immediately return a request for comment. Cryptocurrency-based ETFs make it easier for investors to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies without having to buy them directly. These funds have exploded in popularity since bitcoin ETFs began trading in U.S. markets last year. The SEC released new guidelines last week for crypto ETF issuers as part of the Trump administration's push to create a more welcoming regulatory environment for crypto-related companies. The agency has also dropped or paused several enforcement actions against crypto companies since Trump took office. Trump was once a bitcoin skeptic who has since warmly embraced the cryptocurrency industry, which has showered him with campaign and other types of contributions. Ripple, for example, was one of the biggest donors to Trump's inaugural committee. While the Trump administration has pushed for crypto-friendly regulations and laws, the Trump family has aggressively sought to expand its crypto-related businesses. That dynamic has led to allegations of corruption from Democrats and concern among some crypto enthusiasts that the president may be undermining their efforts to establish credibility and stability for the industry. At a news conference last month, Trump dismissed any notion that his family's investments were improper and touted his administration's efforts to make the U.S. the world capital for crypto. 'If we didn't have it, China would,' Trump said.
