
Trump sets 25% tariffs on Japan and South Korea, and new import taxes on 12 other nations
Trump provided notice by posting letters on Truth Social that were addressed to the leaders of the various countries. The letters warned them to not retaliate by increasing their own import taxes, or else the Trump administration would further increase tariffs.
'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' Trump wrote in the letters to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung.
The letters were not the final word from Trump on tariffs, so much as another episode in a global economic drama in which he has placed himself at the center. His moves have raised fears that economic growth would slow to a trickle, if not make the U.S. and other nations more vulnerable to a recession. But Trump is confident that tariffs are necessary to bring back domestic manufacturing and fund the tax cuts he signed into law last Friday.
He mixed his sense of aggression with a willingness to still negotiate, signaling the likelihood that the drama and uncertainty would continue and that few things are ever final with Trump.
'It's all done,' Trump told reporters Monday. 'I told you we'll make some deals, but for the most part we're going to send a letter.'
South Korea's Trade Ministry said early Tuesday that it will accelerate negotiations with the United States to achieve a mutually beneficial deal before the 25% tax on its exports goes into effect.
Imports from Myanmar and Laos would be taxed at 40%, Cambodia and Thailand at 36%, Serbia and Bangladesh at 35%, Indonesia at 32%, South Africa and Bosnia and Herzegovina at 30% and Kazakhstan, Malaysia and Tunisia at 25%.
Trump placed the word 'only' before revealing the rate in his letters to the foreign leaders, implying that he was being generous with his tariffs. But the letters generally followed a standard format, so much so that the one to Bosnia and Herzegovina initially addressed its woman leader, Željka Cvijanović, as 'Mr. President.' Trump later posted a corrected letter.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump, by setting the rates himself, was creating 'tailor-made trade plans for each and every country on this planet and that's what this administration continues to be focused on.'
Following a now well-worn pattern, Trump plans to continue sharing the letters sent to his counterparts on social media and then mailing them the documents, a stark departure from the more formal practices of all his predecessors when negotiating trade agreements.
The letters are not agreed-to settlements but Trump's own choice on rates, a sign that the closed-door talks with foreign delegations failed to produce satisfactory results for either side.
Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute who formerly worked in the office of the U.S. Trade Representative, said the tariff hikes on Japan and South Korea were 'unfortunate.'
'Both have been close partners on economic security matters and have a lot to offer the United States on priority matters like shipbuilding, semiconductors, critical minerals and energy cooperation,' Cutler said.
Trump still has outstanding differences on trade with the European Union and India, among other trading partners. Tougher talks with China are on a longer time horizon in which imports from that nation are being taxed at 55%.
The office of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said in a statement that the tariff rates announced by Trump mischaracterized the trade relationship with the U.S., but it would 'continue with its diplomatic efforts towards a more balanced and mutually beneficial trade relationship with the United States' after having proposed a trade framework on May 20.
The S&P 500 stock index was down 0.8% in Monday trading, while the interest charged on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes increased to nearly 4.39%, a figure that could translate into elevated rates for mortgages and auto loans.
Trump has declared an economic emergency to unilaterally impose the taxes, suggesting they are remedies for past trade deficits even though many U.S. consumers have come to value autos, electronics and other goods from Japan and South Korea. The constitution grants Congress the power to levy tariffs under normal circumstances, though tariffs can also result from executive branch investigations regarding national security risks.
Trump's ability to impose tariffs through an economic emergency is under legal challenge, with the administration appealing a May ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade that said the president exceeded his authority.
It's unclear what he gains strategically against China — another stated reason for the tariffs — by challenging two crucial partners in Asia, Japan and South Korea, that could counter China's economic heft.
'These tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your Country,' Trump wrote in both letters.
Because the new tariff rates go into effect in roughly three weeks, Trump is setting up a period of possibly tempestuous talks among the U.S. and its trade partners to reach new frameworks.
'I don't see a huge escalation or a walk back — it's just more of the same,' said Scott Lincicome, a vice president at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank
Trump initially roiled the financial markets by announcing tariff rates on dozens of countries, including 24% on Japan and 25% on South Korea. In order to calm the markets, Trump unveiled a 90-day negotiating period during which goods from most countries were taxed at a baseline 10%. So far, the rates in the letters sent by Trump either match his April 2 tariffs or are generally close to them.
The 90-day negotiating period technically ends Wednesday, even as multiple administration officials suggested the three-week period before implementation is akin to overtime for additional talks that could change the rates. Trump signed an executive order Monday to delay the official tariff increases until Aug. 1.
Congressionally approved trade agreements historically have sometimes taken years to negotiate because of the complexity.
Administration officials have said Trump is relying on tariff revenues to help offset the tax cuts he signed into law on July 4, a move that could shift a greater share of the federal tax burden onto the middle class and poor as importers would likely pass along much of the cost of the tariffs. Trump has warned major retailers such as Walmart to simply 'eat' the higher costs, instead of increasing prices in ways that could intensify inflation.
Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at The Atlantic Council, said a three-week delay in imposing the tariffs was unlikely sufficient for meaningful talks to take place.
'I take it as a signal that he is serious about most of these tariffs and it's not all a negotiating posture,' Lipsky said.
Trump's team promised 90 deals in 90 days, but his negotiations so far have produced only two trade frameworks.
His outline of a deal with Vietnam was clearly designed to box out China from routing its America-bound goods through that country, by doubling the 20% tariff charged on Vietnamese imports on anything traded transnationally.
The quotas in the signed United Kingdom framework would spare that nation from the higher tariff rates being charged on steel, aluminum and autos, though British goods would generally face a 10% tariff.
The United States ran a $69.4 billion trade imbalance in goods with Japan in 2024 and a $66 billion imbalance with South Korea, according to the Census Bureau. The trade deficits are the differences between what the U.S. exports to a country relative to what it imports.
According to Trump's letters, autos would be tariffed separately at the standard 25% worldwide, while steel and aluminum imports would be taxed on 50%.
This is not the first time Trump has tangled with Japan and South Korea on trade — and the new tariffs suggest his past deals made during his first term failed to deliver on his administration's own hype.
In 2018, during Trump's first term, his administration celebrated a revamped trade agreement with South Korea as a major win. And in 2019, Trump signed a limited agreement with Japan on agricultural products and digital trade that at the time he called a 'huge victory for America's farmers, ranchers and growers.'
Trump has also said on social media that countries aligned with the policy goals of BRICS, an organization composed of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, would face additional tariffs of 10%.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
The Rising Force of Japan's Ultra-Nationalist, Anti-Immigration Sanseito Party
What began as a fringe movement is now gaining traction, driven by voter dissatisfaction with mainstream political parties and a strong online following. 'Japan First' is the signature slogan of the controversial Sanseito party, which is becoming a serious choice for voters ahead of this month's upper house election. The party, which launched on YouTube in 2020 as a fringe political movement promoting a conservative stance on economic security and immigration, is gaining momentum among social media savvy men in the 30s to 50s age bracket. The self-described 'party for citizens' now polls ahead of many established opposition parties in the run-up to the upper house election on July 20. Its core policies call for the preservation of traditional culture, the revival of the 'true Japanese spirit,' anti-globalization and agricultural self-sufficiency. This includes opposition to vaccines, LGBT rights, immigration and nuclear power. Currently, it boasts five lawmakers in the National Diet, mostly through lawmakers and independents who have changed their affiliation and joined Sanseito after the 2022 upper house election. For the 2025 election, the party is fielding candidates nationwide, galvanizing support with anti-establishment slogans. The party presents itself as an alternative to the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)-Komeito coalition. Sanseito aims to secure six seats in the upcoming election. As campaigning intensifies, the party has sought to clarify its position on foreigners and immigration amid criticism it is normalizing xenophobia in Japan. Kamiya Sohei, who now leads the party, addressed foreign reporters at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan on Thursday, July 3. At the press conference, Kamiya reiterated the party's hardline stance on immigration but framed the issue as a matter of national protection rather than cultural exchange. He said Japan needs tougher policing and regulation if it continues to accept more foreigners, citing concerns that foreigners have a tendency to exploit legal loopholes and commit crimes. In particular, he voiced concern about migrants who leave their assigned workplaces due to poor conditions and then turn to pickpocketing, petty theft, or organized crime to survive. 'We are not in any way intending to exclude foreign workers who are here legally, who are working legally side by side with the Japanese, with jobs,' he clarified. On the issue of falling birthrates, Kamiya described demographic shifts as a manageable trend, rather than a national crisis. He shared Sanseito's vision of Japan as a trailblazer in human-centered technological innovation to offset its dependence on foreign labor. The party advocates for robotics, automation and AI in sectors like elder care, healthcare, and agriculture — areas hit hardest by workforce shortages. Kamiya stressed that the party opposes accepting migrants in order to substitute the projected fall in the Japanese workforce. He said the aim was to prevent cases where workers are recruited under false pretenses by brokers and end up in low-paid, exploitative jobs abroad. Sanseito has placed agriculture at the heart of its politics. It's framed not only as a food issue but as a matter of national resilience and cultural identity. The party has proposed a 10 trillion yen investment over the next decade to double Japan's food self-sufficiency rate. At 38 percent, Japan's food self-sufficiency rate ranks among the lowest in the OECD. Sanseito aims to establish year-long emergency food reserves in every municipality by 2030. It argues that true sovereignty requires the ability to feed the population without dependence on foreign imports. Sanseito also seeks to reclassify farmers as public-sector workers, expand organic farming, and integrate traditional cuisine into school lunch programs. The effort is part policy and part narrative, positioning farming not just as economic activity but as moral duty and the essence of what it means to be Japanese. The U.S. has made increased access to Japan's rice market a condition for any trade agreement. It's an ultimatum Tokyo continues to resist, insisting that rice remains off the negotiating table. Kamiya warned that importing American rice would devastate Japan's domestic rice farmers. 'We do not believe U.S. rice should be imported into Japan,' he said, citing fears of collapse in the country's rice-farming sector. He also criticized past trade concessions Japan had made, particularly in agriculture, to protect the auto industry, saying the time for these types of trade-offs had passed. 'Japanese agriculture is already at its limit,' Kamiya said. In response to U.S. tariff threats, he called for a recalibration of the bilateral trade relationship, pointing out that Japanese consumers spend trillions of yen annually on American digital and IT products. Instead of yielding to U.S. pressure, he argued, Japan should offset automotive export losses by relaxing decarbonization rules and cutting domestic auto taxes to bolster internal demand. Sanseito's rhetoric offers a glimpse into the tensions shaping the country's political future. The degree to which Sanseito's message translates from online support to votes on July 20 will determine whether it remains a digital phenomenon or becomes a durable force in Japanese politics.


The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
The Path to a US-India Trade Deal Lies Through Economic Security
A broader trade agreement, including cooperation on key supply chains, foreign investment, and advanced technologies makes a deal more likely and can help the U.S. and India more effectively counter China. Negotiations for a U.S.-India trade deal have been progressing at breakneck pace, as officials rush to reach an agreement before President Donald Trump's July 9 tariff deadline. India being near the front of the line is surprising, given that the two countries have consistently imposed high trade barriers and haven't signed a deal despite years of discussions. But Delhi is ready to negotiate because it sees an even bigger geoeconomic play: undercut China's status as a leading manufacturing hub and destination for investment by securing key supply chains and investing in advanced technologies. To seal the deal, Washington and Delhi should put economic security issues at the heart of the agreement. Getting to yes will require overcoming a long history of nos. In 2019, the U.S. removed India from the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, and India imposed retaliatory tariffs on 28 U.S. goods in response to earlier Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. While mutual tech and defense cooperation increased during the Biden administration, and India joined the non-trade pillars of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, there was little progress in improving market access apart from the removal of previous tariffs and resolution of WTO disputes. Despite Trump's recent optimism, ongoing negotiations for a first tranche deal are facing several hurdles, largely due to U.S. demands for lower trade barriers for steel and agricultural products. The task of lowering tariffs and non-tariff barriers for agriculture is especially politically costly for the Indian government, given that 46 percent of the workforce is involved in agriculture. While still willing to negotiate, Indian officials have signaled their preference for a good deal that puts national interest first rather than just a deal, which may defer discussions on tariffs for key industries and constituencies to a future round of negotiations. Washington and New Delhi's mutual economic dependence on China presents yet another opportunity for collaboration in national interest. The U.S. and India are reliant on China for a variety of goods, ranging from steel and rare earths to solar cells and pharmaceutical inputs, which are vital for commercial industry as well as national security needs. Recent episodes, including China's export ban on rare earths, have highlighted just how vulnerable their respective economies are to Chinese economic coercion. This dependence is holding back the U.S.-India economic partnership, and while reducing tariffs and other trade barriers is an important step, addressing the dragon in the room can cement this relationship as 'the defining partnership of the 21st century.' To this end, policymakers must consider deepening cooperation in three core pillars of economic security — securing supply chains, building resilience against foreign economic coercion, and building an allied ecosystem for advanced technologies — to enhance the value of a trade deal and address common security concerns. Collaboration on supply chains should include sectors critical to economic and national security, and where there is a clear dependence on China. Obvious candidates include pharmaceuticals and critical minerals, where China either manufactures a large proportion of inputs or possesses significant reserves and processing capacity. India is a key supplier of pharmaceutical products to the U.S. but is reliant on China for key starting materials. While India has already introduced incentives to onshore the production of inputs, there is space to coordinate industrial policy with the U.S. to fund the co-production of key starting materials and active pharmaceutical ingredients, or establish a strategic pharmaceutical ingredient reserve. Similarly, India's vast critical mineral reserves (rare earths, cobalt, and graphite) and push for domestic production could provide an opportunity for the U.S. to fund and transfer technology for refining projects in exchange for security of supply agreements. Building resilience against Chinese economic coercion also includes anticipating and mitigating the risk of Chinese capital in domestic markets while simultaneously filling the gap through bilateral investment. While both countries have robust investment screening frameworks, India has pursued a significantly more restrictive policy toward Chinese FDI since a border clash in 2020. Attitudes in Delhi may be softening, however, as India needs foreign investment to build out domestic manufacturing. To court investments from the U.S., Indian officials must consider expanding the automatic route for FDI approvals to more sectors, including raising the 74 percent cap for the burgeoning defense industry, and reducing tax rates for U.S. firms investing in target sectors and regions. Although FDI from India pales in comparison to that from China ($4.6 billion vs $28 billion in 2023), Washington should include Indian investment into a proposed CFIUS fast track to ensure it capitalizes on the growth of the world's fourth-largest economy. To win the global technology race, the U.S. must also look to India, among other allies, to manufacture and adopt advanced technologies. Capturing the market of the world's most populous country, after all, is perhaps the only way to achieve global adoption of tech platforms like AI and quantum based on U.S. IP. The above-mentioned reforms are key to increasing investment and developing secure supply chains, but the core problem of technology and knowledge transfer remains. The scrapping of the 'AI Diffusion Rule' is a step forward in increasing access to advanced chips among partners like India and Singapore, and the Trump administration should prioritize such countries in negotiations relaxing export controls for advanced tech. Given that Washington will be rightfully concerned about the flow of these chips to Russia and Iran, New Delhi should consider increasing resources to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade and customs authorities to better enforce the SCOMET (special chemicals, organisms, materials, equipment, and technologies) list and implementing contractual solutions that impose liabilities on exporters shipping to Russia or Iran. While the U.S. and India often clash on tariffs and market access, a broader trade agreement including concrete provisions for cooperation on key supply chains, foreign investment, and advanced technologies may help them move past enduring pain points and more effectively counter China's coercive practices.

3 hours ago
Yen Tumbles to 2-Week Low over Trump Tariff Letter
Tokyo, July 8 (Jiji Press)--The yen tumbled to a two-week low around 146.50 per dollar on Tuesday after U.S. President Donald Trump said in a letter to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba that his country will impose a 25 pct reciprocal tariff on goods from Japan, higher than the 24 pct he announced in April. At 5 p.m., the dollar stood at 146.03-04 yen, up from 145.19-20 yen at the same time Monday. The euro was at 1.1759-1760 dollars, up from 1.1744-1745 dollars, and at 171.73-75 yen, up from 170.52-53 yen. Trump's tariff letter prompted yen selling, as speculation grew that Japan's trade deficit could expand, and that an economic slowdown could make it difficult for the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates, market sources said. The Japanese currency was also dampened against the dollar by a rise in U.S. Treasury yields amid concerns that Trump's tariffs could rekindle inflation in the United States, they said. On the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the benchmark Nikkei 225 average closed at 39,688.81, up 101.13 points from Monday's closing, with export-oriented stocks supported by the weaker yen. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]