Villages pulled from planning areas are governed by RP: HC
In a major setback to the TCP department's plans for allowing construction activities along the North Goa coastal belt, the high court last week held that the two ODPs of Calangute-Candolim and Arpora-Nagoa-Parra could not operate for these villages, and would not govern them.
It directed the state to follow Regional Plan 2021 for the approval of plans and the grant of permissions in these villages.
'Since the villages now fall in non-planning areas and the North Goa planning and development authority (NGPDA) has no jurisdiction, but the town and country planning department has assumed jurisdiction, it is open for it to process the permissions for development not as per the outlined development plan, which already lapsed, but as per the Regional Plan 2021,' stated the division bench comprising justices Bharati Dangre and Nivedita Mehta.
These villages, once withdrawn from planning areas, still continue to be governed by the Regional Plan as the planning area falls within the state of Goa and the TCP Act extends to the whole of Goa, the high court observed.
The high court order on the ODPs came after a series of legal back and forths, with the matter even reaching the Supreme Court, as the TCP department desperately tried to defend its implementation.
The high court stated that state govt was not justified in invoking executive powers in issuing an executive order (enabling continuance of impugned ODPs) on the premise that there was a vacuum in the absence of a statutory regime governing the withdrawn planning areas, and that to fill the gap, the executive must step in and make an 'order' governing areas which are withdrawn as planning areas.
As long as the Goa TCP Act continues to govern land development in the state through the regional plan, and since the Regional Plan 2021 is already in operation, there was no justification for the state in using the executive order, the court observed.
From issuing circulars to even an ordinance, state govt has been trying hard to keep alive the ODPs despite initially suspending them due to large-scale illegalities. But in between all the legal wrangles, the TCP department went ahead with zone changes on its own.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Doctor's Day 2025
,
messages
and quotes!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
23 minutes ago
- United News of India
To curb drug smuggling Maha govt will bring amendment to MCOCA: CM Fadnavis
West Mumbai, July 2 (UNI) Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis today announced that his government will bring in an amendment to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) during the ongoing monsoon session of the assembly to curb drug smuggling. While replying to a question in the House, the chief minister said in the existing law Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 which deals with drug peddlers, the accused persons get bail in most of the cases and resume their criminal acts. So a strict law is required to curb such activities . The Chief Minister also said that a separate NDPS unit has been set up in every police station in the state and officers and other personnel have been appointed in it. Coordination committees have also been set up at the district level. He added that the police have taken action in a large number of cases over the last two and a half years. UNI AAA SSP Tags: #To curb drug smuggling Maha govt will bring amendment to MCOCA: CM Fadnavis
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Bihar: NIA charge sheets another accused in the PFI case, funds traced to Dubai
Patna: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has charge sheeted Md Sajjad Alam of East Champaran, Bihar, in connection with the anti-national activities of the banned Popular Front of India (PFI), making him the 18th accused to be arrested and charge sheeted in the case. The NIA filed its supplementary charge sheet before the NIA Special Court, Patna, charging Sajjad under various sections of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UA(P)A). Sajjad, an active PFI cadre, was arrested at Delhi's IGI Airport in January this year upon his arrival from Dubai. According to NIA investigations, Sajjad was channelling illegal funds from Dubai to PFI operatives in Bihar through a syndicate operating in Karnataka and Kerala. These funds were allegedly used to further the criminal and unlawful activities of PFI even after the organisation was banned by the Union government. The NIA stated that the broader PFI conspiracy aimed to 'establish' Islamic rule in India by 2047 and involved activities designed to terrorise people and disrupt peace by spreading communal enmity. The case was originally registered on 12 July 2022 at Phulwarisharif Police Station, Patna, against 26 individuals under IPC sections. The NIA took over the probe, invoking the UA(P)A and previously charge sheeting 17 accused. The PFI module was initially busted by the Patna Police and the ATS in 2022 while conducting physical training camps for Muslim youths at Phulwarisharif under the PFI banner. The camps, held at the house of Mohammad Jalaluddin, a retired Jharkhand police sub-inspector, along with Athar Parvez, allegedly aimed at brainwashing youths against India. Athar Parvez's brother, Manzar Alam, was involved in the 2013 Patna Gandhi Maidan serial blast during Narendra Modi's 'Hunkar Rally'. The then Patna SSP, Manavjeet Singh Dhillon, had recommended handing over the case to the NIA, following which the agency began its probe. The NIA has indicated that further investigations in the case are ongoing to uncover deeper financial and operational networks of the banned PFI in Bihar and other states.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Kerala University V-C suspends Registrar, sparks political row and legal showdown
In a move that has intensified the ongoing tensions within the top echelons of Kerala University, Vice-Chancellor in-charge Mohanan Kunnummal on Wednesday suspended Registrar K.S. Anil Kumar in connection with a recent fracas during a programme attended by Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar. The suspension, which has triggered both political backlash and the prospect of legal confrontation, relates to the event at here Senate Hall where a function was 'disrupted' over the display of the controversial Bharat Mata portrait. The Vice-Chancellor invoked special powers under Section 10(13) of the Kerala University Act, 1974, citing 'urgency,' and suspended Dr. Kumar with immediate effect for 'wilful disobedience, insubordination and dereliction of duty.' Dr. Kumar has announced his intention to legally challenge the disciplinary action, setting the stage for a prolonged dispute and potential administrative gridlock. In the interim, Joint Registrar (Administration) P. Harikumar has been appointed to officiate as Registrar. In a curious turn of events, Raj Bhavan later issued an order appointing Digital University Kerala Vice-Chancellor in-charge Ciza Thomas to officiate as Vice-Chancellor of Kerala University until July 8. This was necessitated by Prof. Kunnummal's travel to Russia, sources said. Dr. Kumar's suspension comes just days after the Vice-Chancellor recommended an inquiry to Raj Bhavan, accusing Dr. Kumar of misconduct for allegedly issuing an order to cancel the event while the Governor was on stage and the National Anthem was being played. Dr. Kumar, however, refuted the charge, asserting that the cancellation order was issued before the Governor arrived on the campus. Sources indicated that the Vice-Chancellor had advised Dr. Kumar not to interfere with the programme, describing it as a 'private event.' The Registrar was also accused of addressing the media from a stage 'sanitised for anti-terror activities.' The Vice-Chancellor's report claimed that Dr. Kumar's actions were prejudicial to the university's interests and warranted disciplinary action. The suspension has drawn a sharp rebuke from the State government. Higher Education Minister R. Bindu condemned the move as a blatant violation of rules and an overreach of authority. 'There is no provision in the university Act, statutes or regulations that allows the Vice-Chancellor to unilaterally suspend the Registrar. The authority to take disciplinary action against the Registrar lies solely with the Syndicate, which is the appointing authority. At best, the Vice-Chancellor can refer the matter to the Syndicate,' she said. Dr. Bindu also alleged that the Vice-Chancellor's action appeared ideologically motivated rather than administrative. 'He has shown open affiliations with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh-backed efforts,' she added. Left-backed Syndicate members also accused the Vice-Chancellor of bypassing established procedures by misusing his authority. They also warned that any disciplinary action not ratified by the Syndicate could be overturned.
