logo
'Draw Was The Goal': Steyn Slams Jadeja And Sundar For Hunting 'Free Milestones'

'Draw Was The Goal': Steyn Slams Jadeja And Sundar For Hunting 'Free Milestones'

News185 days ago
Dale Steyn feels that once Indian batters had accomplished their goal of saving the 4th Test against England, the gentlemanly thing was to accept the draw.
India's refusal to accept England's offer to end the 4th Test in Manchester prematurely with the contest seemingly heading towards a draw has polarised the cricket world. India have been backed for playing within the rule while England have been called out for 'whining' and forcing other teams to act according to their wishes. Fast bowling legend Dale Steyn though seems to be siding with England claiming that since Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar were batting for a draw, the 'gentlemanly' thing to do was to accept Ben Stokes offer for a handshake to end the contest after the duo had ensured that only one result was possible.
Stokes approached Jadeja with a handshake as the play entered the final hour on the fifth day in Manchester, but it was turned down leaving England players bemused. Both completed their well-deserved hundreds before the Test concluded.
South Africa spinner Tabraiz Shamsi bared his support for the Indian team after they exercised their right to not accept England's offer for a draw.
'Why is there such a big deal being made about the Indians choosing not to accept the offer to end the game in a draw immediately? The offer was made..the offer was rejected n they were fully entitled to make their choice. They got their 100s which they worked hard for. Game over," Shamsi posted on X.
'Shamo (Shamsi) this onion has many layers to it, and each one will make someone cry. The only issue I see here is the one thing people aren't realizing, the batters weren't playing for 100s, they were batting for a DRAW. That was the goal," Steyn wrote.
'Draw the game. Once that was accomplished, and a result was out of the question a handshake was offered, that's the gentlemanly thing to do right? It's not then the time to realize they safe and now say no we'd prefer some free milestones… although within the rules, just seems a little, well, odd. That said, they did bat well, and maybe with the last hour approaching they should have been more aggressive in reaching those milestones, at least then, we could all agree, no team tried to out do the other in this weird situation," he added.
view comments
First Published:
July 29, 2025, 08:07 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sporting heroes, shared memories: The power of nostalgia in sport
Sporting heroes, shared memories: The power of nostalgia in sport

The Hindu

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Sporting heroes, shared memories: The power of nostalgia in sport

When the public celebration of RCB's victory began, and before disaster struck, I remembered an occasion when I was among those who had lined up to cheer an Indian champion. This was when Prakash Padukone returned with the All-England badminton trophy A couple of us students stood outside a newspaper office on Bengaluru's M. G. Road, hoping that a photographer's camera might accidentally get our faces into next day's papers. We would have gone anyway, we worshipped Prakash. Sport, like music, is memory's favourite accomplice. But it has a built-in obsolescence. Players retire. Stadiums change names. The game you grew up with gets new rules, new formats, new millionaires. And yet, something endures. Nostalgia. My earliest memory of cricket is listening to radio commentary with my parents. I remember the commentator, V. M. Chakrapani, whom I met years later as a journalist. We didn't watch the matches, we listened to them. There is something deeply democratic about nostalgia in sport. The 1983 World Cup belongs as much to a retired bank clerk in India as it does to Kapil Dev. Just as a young boy hitting 'sixes' over the neighbour's wall can still vibrate with the imagined possibility that he could have been India's answer to Clive Lloyd. Nostalgia makes champions of us all. The goal scored in a school match was as vital, in the mind, as Maradona's in 1986. And yet nostalgia can deceive. It makes us believe the past was pure, untouched by greed or error. That every contest was noble, every rivalry gentlemanly. It allows us to forgive our heroes, and forget their flaws. We speak of P. T. Usha's near-miss in 1984 as if she were a mythological figure whose tragedy ennobled a nation. Which, in a sense, she was — and did. There is a shared rhythm. Nostalgia calls for a recaller and a listener (or reader) — you have to interact with someone. The danger, of course, is that it can freeze you. You say things like 'No one came close to _ ' (fill in the blank with any name from Hazare, Gavaskar, Tendulkar, Dravid, or as future nostalgists might say, 'Gill, Pant…..' Every generation believes its glories are unmatched. Even unmatchable. Often more fights break out over the skill of past champions than current ones. But nostalgia need not be a wall against the present. It is a bridge. It reminds us why we fell in love with sport in the first place. Not for the spreadsheets and strike-rates, but for the sense that anything was possible. That a boy from a small town could become Kapil Dev. That a girl running barefoot on a dusty field could become Mary Kom. Nostalgia connects us to younger versions of ourselves. The boy who believed that form was temporary and class permanent. That defeat was never the end of a story. That tomorrow is another day. As the years rolled by, Prakash became a friend, and the newspaper office I stood outside offered me my first job.

66 no less than a century: When batter Akash Deep thrilled Shubman Gill, teammates
66 no less than a century: When batter Akash Deep thrilled Shubman Gill, teammates

India Today

time11 minutes ago

  • India Today

66 no less than a century: When batter Akash Deep thrilled Shubman Gill, teammates

Shubman Gill and the Indian team were left in awe of Akash Deep's performance with the bat on Day 3 of the Oval Test. Having come in as a nightwatchman on Day 2, Akash showed incredible poise during his innings of 66 from 94 balls and hitting 12 boundaries in the process. His 107-run stand with Yashasvi Jaiswal, who scored a hundred, helped India put up a target of 374 runs for England to chase to win the match. While Akash has played entertaining cameos during his career so far, this was an innings of substance that had his captain and teammates singing his praises. In a video released by the BCCI, Gill said that the knock was nothing short of hundred for the team. advertisement"I think these 66 runs of Akash — it's no less than a century," said Gill. The Indian captain revealed that there has been constant banter between the batters and bowlers in the team. He said that the batters constantly keep telling the tailenders to contribute with some runs and the Indian captain felt that Akash settled all the scores with his knock. "For a long time, there's always been this banter going on between us. The batters keep saying, 'You lower-order bowlers, contribute a bit, man.' What to say — I think in this match, they settled all scores with us," said Gill. Akash certainly got a lot of tips along the way with batting coach Sitanshu Kothak and KL Rahul revealing what they told the pacer ahead of Day 3. Kothak said that he told Akash to go for a big shot if the ball was in his arc, rather than defending. "Yesterday when he was in the lift after we reached the hotel, I told him — 'Akash, if you get it in the slot tomorrow, just hit it. Don't defend compulsorily, because in the last two innings you got out defending,'" said Kothak. Rahul said that he advised Akash to think like a batter and not to throw his wicket away. "Yeah, this morning, just had a brief chat and told him to think like a batter and, you know, not throw his wicket away," said KL Rahul. Jaiswal and Prasidh Krishna also praised Akash for his knock in the video. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Team India (@indiancricketteam)'I'm not going to get out'Akash revealed his mindset during the knock and said that he told himself that he was not going to get out and throw away his wicket. "Last night when I went to sleep, my mindset was that I'm not going to get out. If the ball gets me out, that's a different thing — but I won't throw my wicket. Even if the ball hits the body or hits anywhere, I have to play. Where there was a need to play the ball, I did. With Jaiswal, we had a partnership of over 100 runs — so that's very special for me," said Akash. Akash said, while the fifty was dear to him, the knock was made special by the fact that he spent more than two hours in the middle for the team. "That fifty is special for me, but more special than that is that I played two hours in the morning for the team — that is very special for me," said Akash. The knock from Akash even brought out a smile from India coach Gautam Gambhir as it gave India the advantage on the day. - EndsTune InMust Watch

Divya Deshmukh says Chess WC triumph was stressful, needed stamina
Divya Deshmukh says Chess WC triumph was stressful, needed stamina

Business Standard

time11 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Divya Deshmukh says Chess WC triumph was stressful, needed stamina

Grandmaster Divya Deshmukh has revealed that achieving the goal of winning the FIDE Women's World Cup title was "quite stressful" but she was determined to go all the way after the tough matches in the lead-up to the title clash against Koneru Humpy in Batumi, Georgia recently. Divya, 19, overcame Humpy in the tie-breaker after two nerve-wracking classical games ended in draws to become the first Indian woman to win the prestigious title and become a Grandmaster. "It was quite stressful. Quite difficult at least because also it's such a long event. You have to keep up your stamina. You have to be resistant and you have to show up on the board every single day to give your best. Thankfully, I was never in a situation where I had to be in a must-win (situation). So, I don't know how I would have coped with that," said Divya in an interaction posted by FIDE on social media. The Nagpur player added that though she was nervous going into the final, she wanted to give it her best shot after coming this far. "I think from an emotional perspective, maybe, but the finals was incredibly difficult. The pressure, the nerves the toll that the entire tournament was taking and the feeling like you've come so far and now you cannot go back down so I would say it was quite difficult. "I think there was always some part of me that would never give up. So I always wanted to fight, but after I lost the second match I was quite disappointed or mainly because I got a good position at the opening.. Beating an opponent like GM Dronavalli Harika in a tough quarterfinals was a key motivations which helped Divya to go all the way to the final. The match went to a tiebreak after two classical games ended in draws. Divya won both tiebreak games to advance to the semifinals. "Harika was definitely quite strong, but I think because I had gone through (some tough games) already... by the time I got to Harika, I was already quite sure. Divya said she was taking it one game at a time and only started entertaining thoughts of winning the title after she had reached the final. "At least, I never had the thoughts of winning the tournament until I was in the finals. I knew that of course there's some part of you that always, you know, wants (to be) the best, but I was just trying to survive. Divya then beat Tan Zhongyi of China in the semifinals, one of the strongest players in the world. "She was a very strong player. Very strong. That was a close match. (As for Humpy), I think she's definitely quite strong, but honestly in this tournament the know you have to be calm throughout the entire tournament." On whether achieving the GM title was bigger than winning the tournament, she said, "I think Grandmaster title is something that would have eventually come definitely come. I don't know when but it would have. So can't choose. I think the fact that both of them happen at the same time makes it all the more special. "I think maybe maybe it was destiny that I got my title in one shot and the fact that I did not even have even one (GM) norm before it and now I'm a Grandmaster. That's why I think that maybe it was meant to be.". On what her mother told her following the emotional hug after winning the title, Divya said, "She told me to have confidence in myself and to manage my time. I think motivation is not a constant factor. I think sometimes there is, sometimes there isn't, but you just have to push through it. "At least that's what I've been doing. And, what I believe in is that all I can do is give my best and I don't control the results. So, that's what I've been focusing on.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store