Mice talk differently after scientists insert a human language gene
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
By introducing the
NOVA1 gene
, a critical player in human brain development, scientists observed that the mice began producing different kinds of squeaks. These changes were not minor; the modified mice exhibited higher-pitched sounds and a new mixture of vocal patterns. This experiment offers a glimpse into how small genetic shifts might have played a monumental role in shaping human language. Could a single gene be one of the secrets behind humanity's unique ability to communicate?
What happens when a human gene is inserted into mice
The NOVA1 gene, although present in many animals, exists in a slightly different form in humans.
When scientists introduced this human version into mice, the effects were surprising. Baby mice carrying the modified gene produced distinctly different vocalisations compared to normal mice, altering how they called out to their mothers.
How did mice's communication change
Under normal conditions, baby mice squeak in ultrasonic sounds, typically categorised into four types: S, D, U, and M. However, after the human NOVA1 gene was inserted, some of these basic "sound letters" changed.
As the mice grew up, male mice also showed greater variety and complexity in their calls when courting females.
Importance of NOVA1 for vocalisation
NOVA1 is known to regulate the activity of many genes, particularly those involved in brain development and movement control. The study revealed that genes associated with vocal communication were among its main targets. This suggests that NOVA1 may have a direct influence on how complex communication systems evolve.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
What does this tell us about human evolution
Remarkably, the human-specific version of NOVA1 — containing a tiny I197V amino acid change — is absent in Neanderthals and Denisovans. Scientists believe this slight difference might have given early Homo sapiens a major evolutionary advantage, allowing them to communicate more effectively and survive better than their ancient cousins.
"We thought, wow. We did not expect that. It was one of those really surprising moments in science," said Professor Robert Darnell, who led the study.
This groundbreaking research provides a new lens through which we can view the origins of human language and the small but mighty genetic changes that may have made us who we are today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Not just Homo Sapiens: There were 20+ human species that walked the Earth with the modern man; Where are they now?
Once, Earth was home to diverse human species, not just Homo sapiens. Fossil evidence reveals at least 21 early human species, including Neanderthals and Denisovans, coexisted and even interbred with our ancestors. While the reasons for their extinction remain a mystery, factors like climate change, competition, and interbreeding likely played roles. Modern humans are often seen as the pinnacle of evolution and the only ones to have grown and developed over centuries. But in evolutionary terms, not long ago, we shared the planet with a number of other human species. These ancient relatives were not just distant ancestors but our contemporaries, walking the Earth at the same time with our ancestors, even in the same places. They lived, adapted, created tools, even interacted and had children with us. The picture of human evolution is not a straight line from primitive to modern but rather a tangled tree with many branches, where some of these branches ended in extinction and others merged. But who are the other types of human species that walked along the ancestors of the Homo Sapiens, and why couldn't they survive till today? A crowded family tree For most of human history, Homo sapiens weren't alone. Fossil evidence shows that at least 21 species of early humans once roamed the Earth. These included well-known relatives like Neanderthals, as well as Homo Naledi and Homo Luzonensis, as suggested by recent fossil discoveries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo Among these, some species lasted millions of years, while others were short-lived experiments in survival. The modern Homo Sapiens didn't just follow other human species; they overlapped with them. Homo sapiens lived alongside Neanderthals and Denisovans, sometimes for thousands of years. In some regions, they shared regional tools and even genes. Interbreeding between Homo sapiens and these relatives left traces in the DNA, especially in populations today outside Africa. These weren't short-lived events; they were complex interactions between intelligent, adaptable beings trying to survive a shifting world. In fact, any of these species wasn't alone; they were part of a larger and connected human world. The mystery of the missing species Despite advances in archaeology and genetics, many early human species remain a mystery. Some are known only from a few bones or teeth, like the Denisovans, for example, whose full skeleton has not been found till date. Instead, their story is put together from fragments and DNA. Scientists continue to debate how many species truly existed, since definitions of "species" can vary. Did they look different enough? Could they have kids together? These uncertainties mean the real number of human species might be far higher than 21. Why could only one species make it to today? The reasons aren't fully clear. It could be that they were more adaptable, better at cooperating, or just luckier. Climate change, competition for resources, and even disease may have wiped out other human species. Some were already disappearing when we arrived. Others may have blended into our gene pool through interbreeding. But there is one certainty that survival wasn't guaranteed; Homo Sapiens' today came at the cost of other lost human lineages.
The Print
5 days ago
- The Print
A UK health study has collected a whopping 100,000 full-body scans, and Neanderthals had ‘family recipes'
It is transforming healthcare, because UK National Health Service clinics now use Biobank-developed tools for faster, sharper diagnosis. The project is still ongoing and is expected to end by 2029. Since 2015, researchers have used this vast dataset, which includes MRI scans of the brain, heart and abdomen, bone and fat measurements, and more, to develop earlier and more accurate diagnostics for conditions like dementia, heart disease and cancer. The project is impactful not just because of the deep imaging, but also because of 10 years' worth of lifestyle, genetic and health data from the same volunteers. New Delhi: The UK Biobank has collected the scans of 100,000 volunteers in the world's largest whole body imaging project, to understand how bodies change with age, and how disease begins. The milestone was announced Tuesday in a release by UK Biobank, a biomedical database and research resource. Scientists have also used the data to train AI models that can predict diseases years before symptoms appear, and altogether around 1,300 peer-reviewed scientific studies have been published worldwide using this data. The Biobank will soon make available a billion anonymised images of MRI scans of the 100,000 volunteers, providing increasing access for global biomedical research. 'Family recipes' of Neanderthals Just like modern humans, the Neanderthals too had their own 'family recipes', according to a new peer-reviewed study published Thursday. The paper in Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology by researchers from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem talks about the different meat curing methods of two Neanderthal groups, with researchers studying animal bones from two nearby caves in northern Israel, named Amud and Kebara, which were occupied by Neanderthals around 500,000 years ago. Both groups seemed to have hunted the same animals and used similar tools, yet their butchery marks were surprisingly different. At Amud, the cut-marks on the meat were more densely packed and irregular, while at Kebara, they were more spaced and orderly. These differences weren't due to skill or resources; instead, the researchers wrote that they reflect cultural food practices passed down through generations, like drying or ageing meat before cutting it. It is one of the strongest pieces of evidence yet that Neanderthals had distinct traditions, possibly shared through social learning. It's a glimpse into their cultural complexity and shows that meat prep may have carried deeper meaning in their communities, much like the food rituals we have today. Scientists catch a planet dying It is rare that a cosmic tragedy unfolds in real time, but astronomers from Australia's Macquarie University have caught a distant planet in the act of dying. In their study on orbital decay, the astronomers have found TOI-2109b, a giant exoplanet nearly five times the mass of Jupiter and twice the size, spiralling dangerously close to its host star, completing one blistering-hot orbit every 16 hours. This is even shorter than Mercury's orbit around the Sun. It is the shortest orbit ever seen for a planet this big. Using data that was collected over 14 years from NASA's TESS, ESA's CHEOPS and ground-based telescopes, the researchers confirmed that the planet's orbit is shrinking by about 10 seconds over the next few years. What happens next? According to the study, TOI-2109b might plunge into its star, be shredded by gravity, or have its gas layers stripped away, leaving just a rocky core behind. This rare glimpse into a planet's 'death spiral' is giving scientists new insights into how planetary systems change over time. The peer-reviewed study was published in The Astrophysical Journal Tuesday. A refuge for wildlife After a massive wildfire swept through Brazil's Pantanal wetlands in 2020, researchers noticed something surprising: more jaguars showed up. A protected 36,700-acre site that already had the world's highest jaguar density saw an increase in both jaguar activity and new cubs. A new peer-reviewed paper in Global Change Biology, published Tuesday, describes the findings. Led by Oregon State University, US, the study used camera traps and analysis of animal droppings to study jaguar populations before, during, and after the fire. The researchers found that resident jaguars stayed put, while others migrated in, and that the cats continued to feed mostly on aquatic prey like fish and caiman, rather than switching to land animals. The authors said the area may be acting as a climate refuge, a safe haven for wildlife during extreme climate events like wildfires and drought. They highlighted the value of protected wetlands in an era of increasing climate extremes. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: That morning brew could be doing more than just jumpstarting your day—helping your cells age gracefully
Time of India
16-07-2025
- Time of India
Scientists just found a 140,000-year-old child's skull in Israel, and what they found could change human history
A child's skull, almost 140,000 years old, was found in Israel. Researchers believe it shows interbreeding between modern humans and Neanderthals. The skull has both Homo sapiens and Neanderthal traits. CT scans helped in the analysis. Some scientists disagree and want DNA evidence. The discovery could change views on human evolution. It suggests interbreeding occurred earlier than thought. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Skull shows both modern and Neanderthal features New reconstruction raises old questions Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Debate continues among scientists Implications for human evolution A nearly 140,000-year-old child's skull found in Skhul Cave, Israel, may show evidence of interbreeding between modern humans and Neanderthals, researchers said in a new study. The partially reconstructed skull, first discovered almost a century ago, belonged to a child believed to be around 3 to 5 years old and was recently examined using modern scanning research, published in the July-August issue of L'Anthropologie, was led by Anne Dambricourt Malasse at the Institute of Human Paleontology in France. Her team used CT scans to re-analyse the skull, which was previously restored with plaster, limiting scientific study for braincase of the child displays features common to Homo sapiens, but the mandible — or jawbone — appeared more similar to Neanderthal anatomy. It lacked a chin and showed traits typical of Neanderthals, suggesting a possible mixed lineage."This study is maybe the first that has put the Skhul child's remains on a scientific basis," said John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who was not involved in the research. "The old reconstruction and associated work, literally set in plaster, did not really enable anyone to compare this child with a broader array of recent children to understand its biology."The skull had several missing parts, including much of the facial area and the base. The rest of the bones were in fragments. Using modern technology, the team developed a clearer reconstruction, bringing new attention to the child's all experts agree with the hybrid theory. Some researchers caution that DNA evidence is needed to confirm the claim. Others believe the observed traits may reflect natural variation within early modern humans."Even if not 1st-generation hybrids, it's certainly possible that the Skhul fossils reflect some gene flow between the 2 populations," said Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London, who also did not take part in the study. "Overall though, looking at all the material, including the skeletons, the material still primarily aligns with Homo sapiens, in my view."If proven to be a hybrid, the skull would support the idea that modern humans and Neanderthals interbred more often and earlier than previously thought. This could change long-held views about human migration and studies suggest that genetic exchange between the two species may have occurred about 100,000 years ago. The Skhul child may provide a physical example of this interaction."I have long thought that hybridisations were not viable and I continue to think that they were mostly abortive," said Malasse. "This skeleton reveals that they were nevertheless possible, even though this little girl lived only 5 years."
