Panasonic's battery unit profit grows 47% y/y in Q1 on AI boom
on Wednesday said operating profit at its battery-making energy unit grew strongly in the first quarter due to the
AI investment boom
, offsetting negative impacts from US tariffs and the termination of
electric vehicle tax credits
.
Profit for the key unit, which makes batteries for Tesla and other EV makers, rose 47 per cent year-on-year to 31.9 billion yen ($215.6 million).
"Concerns remain over a further slowdown in EV demand due to US tariff policies and termination of IRA 30D tax credit", Panasonic said in a presentation slide, but noted demand for data centre-bound
energy storage systems
is "growing more than anticipated".
For the full-year that ends in March 2026, the company kept its operating profit forecast for the energy unit at 167 billion yen.
Panasonic Holdings said in May it would cut 10,000 staff and expected to book restructuring costs of 130 billion yen as part of a push to improve group profitability.
The electronics manufacturer said at the time it did not expect to book any restructuring costs in its energy business.
Last week, Panasonic Energy's major customer Tesla warned of fallout from the US government's legislation to cut a $7,500 tax credit for EV buyers.
Panasonic Energy operates a plant in the US state of Nevada that provides batteries to Tesla and earlier this month started production at its second US plant, in Kansas.
It also makes energy storage systems for data centres in its consumer business, which in the April-June quarter saw a rapid rise in demand owing to massive AI-related investments, the company said.
But both auto batteries and consumer energy storage systems would see certain impact from US President Donald Trump's tariffs, it added, without providing the impact forecast in numerical terms.
Panasonic Energy is investing in new battery technologies as it competes with Chinese and South Korean rivals such as CATL and LG Energy Solution (LGES) in the global EV supply chain.
Last week, LGES warned of slowing demand by early next year due to US tariffs and policy uncertainties after it reported a profit jump for the April-June period.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Trump fires ‘Biden-appointee' top labour statistics official Erika McEntarfer after weak jobs report: 'Must be fair…'
President Donald Trump has dismissed the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics just hours after a disappointing jobs report was released, sparking concern among economists and policymakers over the future credibility of the agency's data. In a statement posted on social media on Friday, Trump announced he had instructed his team to sack Erika McEntarfer — a Biden appointee — 'IMMEDIATELY.' He added, 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Not long after Trump posted about firing the BLS chief on Truth Social, Chavez-DeRemer chimed in on X, naming deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski as acting head of the agency. 'I agree wholeheartedly with @POTUS that our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' she wrote, echoing Trump's unfounded claims. Vice President JD Vance and Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer sought to put a positive spin on weak jobs numbers hours before their boss, President Donald Trump, fired the person who oversees the data, claiming without evidence that the dour report was politically motivated. Vance reposted a graphic on X that showed the number of native-born workers increased while employment of foreign-born workers declined, suggesting that was a result of Trump administration immigration policy. Friday's report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed payrolls increased 73,000 in July and that the prior two months were revised down by nearly 260,000. In the past three months, employment growth has averaged 35,000 — the worst since the Covid-19 pandemic.
Hindustan Times
a minute ago
- Hindustan Times
Tesla to pay $243 million over fatal autopilot crash
Tesla Inc. was told to pay $243 million in a lawsuit over a 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida that killed a young woman and seriously injured her boyfriend, the first significant court loss for the automaker in litigation related to its driver-assistance technology. Elon Musk's Tesla to pay $243 million in an autopilot crash lawsuit(REUTERS) A jury in Miami federal court found Friday that Tesla was 33% to blame for the collision. A Tesla Model S ran a stop sign at a T intersection in the Florida Keys and rammed into the couple's parked Chevrolet Tahoe while they were standing next to it. Jurors issued their verdict after less than a day of deliberations following a three-week trial. The jury determined that the Tesla S driver was primarily responsible for the crash and that Tesla should pay $42.5 million to compensate the victims for their losses. The panel also ordered Tesla to pay $200 million in punitive damages, but the company said it expects that figure to be reduced by the court. Tesla had argued the driver was entirely at fault because he was distracted when he dropped his mobile phone on the floorboard. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.' The Miami suit is one of a handful of crash cases that have gone to trial and the verdict tarnishes Tesla's near-perfect record in court. The electric-vehicle maker prevailed in two previous trials in California over Autopilot-related crashes and has struck confidential accords to resolve several cases that blamed defective technology for deadly accidents. The verdict comes as Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk faces enormous investor pressure after the company's stock has been battered, first by his close affiliation with President Donald Trump, and then by his dramatic falling out with the president. Musk has staked Tesla's future in part on autonomous driving as the company is launching a robotaxi business. But when Tesla recently announced disappointing second-quarter earnings, Musk warned that the company is in for a few 'rough quarters' as incentives like the EV tax credit go away in the US. At trial, the jury heard testimony from the driver of the Model S, family members of the woman who died, company engineers and various outside experts who discussed whether Autopilot played a role in the collision. George McGee, the driver of the Model S, had engaged his vehicle's driver-assistance system while traveling home from work. In the moments before the collision, data obtained from the vehicle showed that he had pressed the accelerator to 17 miles (27.4 kilometers) per hour over the posted speed limit, leading him to override the vehicle's adaptive cruise control before he went off the road. McGee testified that he had been on hold on with American Airlines trying to modify an upcoming flight. He said his phone fell and he was looking for it just before the crash. As his car left the road, McGee said he felt the texture of the road change under his tires and he remembered 'jamming on the brakes.' During questioning, he told jurors that he knew he was completely responsible for operating the car, but that he expected Autopilot to assist him in the event he made a mistake. 'In that case, I do feel like it failed me,' he said, according to a transcript of his testimony. The family of Naibel Benavides Leon, the woman who was killed, reached a confidential settlement with McGee in 2021 in a separate lawsuit. Lawyers for the estate of Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, argued Tesla's Autopilot encourages complacency and that the company and Musk have overstated the system's capabilities, leading drivers to be overconfident in its abilities. They also alleged that Tesla failed to add safeguards to ensure the software was only available on roadways where it was designed to be used and features to monitor the attentiveness of drivers. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives,' Brett Schreiber, lead attorney for the crash victims, said in a statement. Tesla, as it has in other cases, blamed driver error for the collision. Lawyers for the company argued repeatedly that McGee was an aggressive driver with a history of speeding, and that he took his eyes off the road and his hands off the wheel despite warnings in the owners' manual that drivers must stay engaged. The company has maintained there were no defects in its software and that Autopilot operated exactly as designed. Throughout the trial, Tesla defense attorney Joel Smith said no driver-assistance technology on the market in 2019 would have been able to prevent the crash. The automotive industry categorizes automation systems in vehicles from Level 0 to 5, based on what features are available. Level 0 features simply pass on information to the driver, like sounding a warning when you're driving out of a traffic lane. Tesla's Autopilot is classified as Level 2 because it requires constant driver input and supervision. The case is Benavides v. Tesla, 1:21-cv-21940, US District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami). (An earlier version of the story corrected the damages amount. Updates with additional details about damages in third paragraph.) More stories like this are available on ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Time of India
a minute ago
- Time of India
Trump slaps 25% tariff on all Indian goods; exports worth $85 billion at risk
The United States has levied high tariffs on India, potentially affecting a significant portion of Indian exports. This move places India among the most heavily penalized nations under the new tariff regime. Ongoing trade negotiations between India and the US aim to address these concerns. The Indian government downplays the impact, emphasizing its commitment to protecting national interests. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The US has imposed an across-the-board 25% tariff on all Indian-origin goods, effective August 7, along with penal duties on scores of other countries. The duties range from 10% to 41%. India 's competitors, including Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh and Turkey, were levied lower tariffs of 15-20%. The steep duty could hurt nearly half of India's exports of more than $85 billion to the US. This measure, part of a new executive order issued by US President Donald Trump on July 31, places India among the most harshly treated countries in the new tariff regime, of fering no product-level exemptions even for sectors deemed critical, such as pharmaceuticals, energy and the order mentions that tariffs may be reduced once countries do a deal with the US. India and the US are currently in negotiations over a trade accord. Indian government officials played down the measure's impact and added that New Delhiwill not be pressured into giving any duty exemptions on agricultural, dairy and genetically modified (GM) products in trade pacts.'The impact (of the tariff) will not be very big. More than half of India's exports to the US are expected to remain unimpacted. Due to the Section 232 exemption of the US, exports worth about $40 billion would be impacted with these tariffs,' said an has been intensifying his rhetoric against India in the past few days. New Delhi, though, has said it will take all necessary steps to safeguard its national interest, besides pointing out that the country's economy—the fastest-growing major one —was a bright spot amid global Indian goods , such as pharma and electronic goods, are already in the exemption category of the US and would not attract any duty, he said the tariffs will not have any adverse effect on the economy and India will not come under pressure. 'The GDP loss likely to be less than 0.2% in the worst case scenario. Exports may fall slightly, but most of the goods exported to the US will not be subject to tariffs,' said the official.'India is giving top priority to its interests, There will be no compromise on agriculture, dairy, GM crops… (considering) religious sentiments. There will be no compromise on non-veg milk and beef,' said another official. 'No adverse effect will be allowed on the interests of Indian farmers.' Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal will meet exporters from textiles, engineering, pharmaceuticals, steel, IT and chemicals, from August 2-3 in Mumbai to discuss the implications of the 25% tariff. Similar stakeholder consultations would be held in New Delhi the next have been seeking immediate rollout of Interest Equalisation Scheme for pre- and postshipment export credit, and market support for goods meant for the US. The government should absorb some of the cost disabilities due to the tariffs, said the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO).'We expect $45-47 billion of exports to get impacted by this move,' said Ajay Sahai, director general of FIEO. The US was India's largest export destination in FY25, with shipments valued at $87 billion, accounting for about a fifth of the $437 billion and the US have been negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) since March and aim to conclude the first tranche of talks by October. The US has been pressuring India to allow farm, dairy and GM imports as part of the pact. So far, five rounds of talks have been completed. The sixth round of talks will be held from August official cited earlier insisted that animal feed is used in the dairy sector in the US, and that New Delhi has never given any duty concessions in any of its earlier trade pacts on its imports. 'There are religious sentiments… so it is not acceptable,' the person said. 'There will be no compromise on these segments in any of India's trade pacts.'Another official said that certain segments, such as gems and jewellery, will not be impacted much as these are region-specific. 'If American consumers buy jewellery which is made in Rajasthan, then that demand would not get impacted much,' the official said that the new order puts India at a disadvantage relative to some of its rivals that face lower tariffs. Trump has also threatened an unspecified penalty levy to be imposed on India for doing business with Russia. 'The implications of the recent development are being examined. The ministry of commerce and industry is engaged with all stakeholders, including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation,' commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal said in his statement in Parliament on per the order, countries have been subject to tariffs ranging from 10% to over 41% with differential rates based on geopolitical risk, economic alignment, and trade volume. 'Many trading partners have been constructive, bold, and visionary in their commitment to this fundamental change initiated by the President,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on the executive order. 'This new trading system will lower the US trade deficit and lead to better outcomes for American workers, their families, and their communities. In the coming weeks, this new system will begin to take shape, as the Trump administration works with trading partners on a common path to shared prosperity.'The EU has been granted a special concession. If the existing US most favoured nation tariff on an EU product is below 15%, total tariff will rise to 15%. However, if the MFN tariff is already 15% or higher, no additional duty will be charged. Those that have been hit by the highest Trump tariffs are Iraq and Serbia (35%), Switzerland (39%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), and Syria (41%).
