Sadiq Khan backs Nuked Blood police investigation into crimes against veterans
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has written to nuclear veteran campaigners backing their fight for a police investigation of alleged crimes by the British state.
He has supported them in their battle for answers about a hidden programme of blood and urine testing on troops ordered to take part in nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War.
Families made a criminal complaint of misconduct in public office to the Met Police in May, backed with a 500-page dossier of proof that the biological monitoring was hidden behind national security at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, and that judges and Parliament were repeatedly misled about its existence.
But the Met refused to even look at the evidence, instead deciding that as the AWE is in Berkshire the matter is the jurisdiction of Thames Valley Police.
Campaigners accused the Met of "refusing to investigate its neighbours", as many of the allegations centred on the Ministry of Defence in Whitehall.
Families and MPs had asked the Labour mayor to "lean in" to ensure the complaint was properly assessed amid concerns that the complaint will become "a game of official ping-pong", with both police forces fearing political repercussions of a criminal inquiry.
In its three-year investigation the Mirror has found that thousands of troops were subject to orders for the monitoring, but the results have subsequently been removed from their medical records. Evidence shows chest x-rays were conducted without clinical reason, and troops gave no consent to be part of the weapons experiments.
Mayor Khan previously signed an open letter with seven other metro mayors saying nuke veterans "served on the most dangerous of operations thousands of miles from home, where they were exposed to life-threatening levels of radiation".
The 2021 letter called for "truth and justice" and said "time is running out for us to do the right thing". It added: "The government has denied them the opportunities they deserve and refused to give any compensation for the medical conditions that have dominated their lives."
Now he has written again to campaigners personally to express his "gratitude" to nuclear veterans "and to all those who have served in our nation's armed forces for their work to keep our communities safe".
He said that, while he had no authority to direct police investigations, as the mayor is in effect the Police and Crime Commissioner for London, he had ordered staff to contact the Met on his behalf "on this important matter". They have "been advised that this investigation has been passed to and accepted by Thames Valley Police", he said.
He expressed his hope that the investigation would proceed and urged campaigners to contact the new force to keep up the pressure.
A spokesman for the mayor said he had "the utmost respect" for veterans and Thames Valley "will take this investigation forward".
Thames Valley Police has confirmed that its investigations team "is in the very early stages" of reviewing the evidence dossier, and it is expected to take "a considerable time due to the amount of information".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Why thousands of Afghans were secretly relocated to the UK
This week an email was sent to people in Afghanistan. It told the recipients, who had all worked for British forces in Afghanistan, that some of their personal data 'may have been compromised'. All had applied for asylum in the UK, fearful because their work for Britain made them a target for the Taliban. Now they were told their asylum applications had been leaked into the public domain. They were advised not to take phone calls or respond to messages or emails from unknown contacts, to limit access to their social media, to consider closing their accounts, and to only go online via a private connection. Understandably, they were terrified. Dan Sabbagh, the Guardian's defence and security editor, tells Helen Pidd how 24 hours later, John Healey, the defence secretary, apologised for probably the biggest – and most expensive — data leak in British government history. And the former Afghan judge Marzia Babakarkhail tells Helen about how Afghans fear the data list could could endanger their lives.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Fifth of motorists have drunk alcohol after 10pm ahead of morning drive
The survey of 1,072 UK motorists also indicated that 38% of people who have consumed several alcoholic drinks ahead of driving before 9am stopped drinking after 9pm. Charity Drinkaware states that alcohol is removed from the body at a rate of one unit per hour, although this varies depending on a person's weight, liver health and metabolism speed. Around three large glasses of wine or three pints of high-strength beer or cider is the equivalent of nine units. Someone consuming those drinks up to 10pm could still have alcohol in their body at 7am or later, IAM RoadSmart warned. Nicholas Lyes, the charity's director of policy and standards, said: 'Drink-driving is a killer, and drivers may be unwittingly getting into their vehicle in the morning unaware that they could be doing so illegally if they have been drinking alcohol the night before, posing a serious threat to the safety of others. 'Even if they are just inside the legal limit, the level of alcohol in their system will impair their reaction times. 'Moreover, consuming alcohol impacts on sleep quality.' Chief Constable Jo Shiner, the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for roads policing, said: 'There is simply no excuse for getting behind the wheel when you are impaired through drink or drugs, and this includes the morning after. 'If you choose to do so you are putting your life and the lives of others at risk.' The survey also suggested nearly a third (31%) of drivers in the previous 12 months had been with a friend or relative who drank alcohol before getting into a vehicle. Some 72% of this group warned them they should not drive, while 23% said they took no action. Four out of five (81%) people polled said rehabilitation courses should become mandatory for anyone convicted of a drink-drive offence. Currently the courses are sometimes offered in return for a shorter driving ban. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency statistics previously obtained by the PA news agency revealed 27,837 British motorists were convicted of drink-driving multiple times in the 11 years to July 20 2024. Some 372 were caught at least four times, including four who were prosecuted on seven occasions. Only time sobers you up — nothing else works. It takes about an hour to process one unit of alcohol, meaning you could still be over the limit the next morning. If you're driving early, it's safest to skip the drinks. Learn more: — IAM RoadSmart (@IAMRoadSmart) July 16, 2025 Latest Department for Transport (DfT) figures show an estimated 300 people were killed in crashes on Britain's roads involving at least one driver over the legal alcohol limit in 2022. That was up from 260 the previous year and was the highest total since 2009 when 380 deaths were recorded. Separate figures show there are more drink drive-related casualties in July than any other month of the year. The drink-drive limit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is 80mg of alcohol in 100ml of blood. Nowhere else in Europe has a limit above 50mg/100ml. The Scottish Government reduced its limit to that level in 2014. A DfT spokesperson said: 'We take road safety extremely seriously, and there are already strict penalties in place for those who are caught drink-driving, with rehabilitation courses offered to those convicted and banned from driving for over a year. 'While we don't have plans to mandate these courses, we are committed to improving road safety, and our Think! campaign will next week launch its summer drink-drive activity, timed to coincide with the National Police Chiefs' Council's Operation Spotlight.' – IAM RoadSmart commissioned research company Online95 to conduct the survey of 1,072 UK motorists last month.
Western Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Fifth of motorists have drunk alcohol after 10pm ahead of morning drive
Road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, which commissioned the poll, warned that drinking alcohol the night before getting behind the wheel can pose a 'serious threat' because a 'groggy head' means slower reaction times. The survey of 1,072 UK motorists also indicated that 38% of people who have consumed several alcoholic drinks ahead of driving before 9am stopped drinking after 9pm. Consuming alcohol impacts on sleep quality Nicholas Lyes, IAM RoadSmart Charity Drinkaware states that alcohol is removed from the body at a rate of one unit per hour, although this varies depending on a person's weight, liver health and metabolism speed. Around three large glasses of wine or three pints of high-strength beer or cider is the equivalent of nine units. Someone consuming those drinks up to 10pm could still have alcohol in their body at 7am or later, IAM RoadSmart warned. Nicholas Lyes, the charity's director of policy and standards, said: 'Drink-driving is a killer, and drivers may be unwittingly getting into their vehicle in the morning unaware that they could be doing so illegally if they have been drinking alcohol the night before, posing a serious threat to the safety of others. 'Even if they are just inside the legal limit, the level of alcohol in their system will impair their reaction times. 'Moreover, consuming alcohol impacts on sleep quality.' There is simply no excuse for getting behind the wheel when you are impaired through drink or drugs, and this includes the morning after Chief Constable Jo Shiner, National Police Chiefs' Council Chief Constable Jo Shiner, the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for roads policing, said: 'There is simply no excuse for getting behind the wheel when you are impaired through drink or drugs, and this includes the morning after. 'If you choose to do so you are putting your life and the lives of others at risk.' The survey also suggested nearly a third (31%) of drivers in the previous 12 months had been with a friend or relative who drank alcohol before getting into a vehicle. Some 72% of this group warned them they should not drive, while 23% said they took no action. Four out of five (81%) people polled said rehabilitation courses should become mandatory for anyone convicted of a drink-drive offence. Currently the courses are sometimes offered in return for a shorter driving ban. Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency statistics previously obtained by the PA news agency revealed 27,837 British motorists were convicted of drink-driving multiple times in the 11 years to July 20 2024. Some 372 were caught at least four times, including four who were prosecuted on seven occasions. Only time sobers you up — nothing else works. It takes about an hour to process one unit of alcohol, meaning you could still be over the limit the next morning. If you're driving early, it's safest to skip the drinks. Learn more: — IAM RoadSmart (@IAMRoadSmart) July 16, 2025 Latest Department for Transport (DfT) figures show an estimated 300 people were killed in crashes on Britain's roads involving at least one driver over the legal alcohol limit in 2022. That was up from 260 the previous year and was the highest total since 2009 when 380 deaths were recorded. Separate figures show there are more drink drive-related casualties in July than any other month of the year. The drink-drive limit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is 80mg of alcohol in 100ml of blood. Nowhere else in Europe has a limit above 50mg/100ml. The Scottish Government reduced its limit to that level in 2014. A DfT spokesperson said: 'We take road safety extremely seriously, and there are already strict penalties in place for those who are caught drink-driving, with rehabilitation courses offered to those convicted and banned from driving for over a year. 'While we don't have plans to mandate these courses, we are committed to improving road safety, and our Think! campaign will next week launch its summer drink-drive activity, timed to coincide with the National Police Chiefs' Council's Operation Spotlight.' – IAM RoadSmart commissioned research company Online95 to conduct the survey of 1,072 UK motorists last month.
