
Meme Stocks Are Back And Retail Is About To Get Burned Again
They're back. It's not the businesses making a comeback; it's the same reckless behavior wrapped in new tickers. Meme stocks are ripping on no news, no turnaround, just vibes, and short interest déjà vu from 2021. Kohl's surged nearly 40%, not because of earnings, not because of strategy, but because some folks online decided it should. That's all it takes now. Retail's lit again. But scroll the forums, and it's all heat, no floor, no fundamentals. If this feels familiar, it should. GameStop. AMC. Bed Bath & Beyond. We've seen how this plays out.
The move looks smart, until it isn't. And the fall is usually as sharp as the rise.
But this isn't about Kohl's. It's not even about stocks. It's about memory. Or lack of it. The meme resurgence tells us less about opportunity and more about the refusal to learn. Investors aren't just repeating a trade; they're repeating a mistake. This isn't a rerun of a trade. It's a rerun of a train wreck and if you know where to look, the signs are everywhere.
What Meme Stocks Did To Retail Last Time
We don't need to guess how this plays out. We've already lived it. Back in August 2023, I laid it bare in Why You're Almost Guaranteed to Lose Money Trading GameStop, AMC & Other Meme Stocks. The pattern was clear: online hype caught fire, retail flooded in late, and institutional money used the wave to cash out. Social chatter turned into FOMO flows. Stocks surged. Then came the rug pull.
Most retail traders weren't early; they were ammunition. They bought the highs and sold the pain. Meanwhile, professionals, armed with liquidity and exit plans, let the frenzy work for them.
GameStop soared above $480 at its peak. Today, it trades under $30. AMC touched $72. It now limps below $5. That's not 'hold the line' loyalty. That's capital destruction. And yet, with the same names trending again, the crowd looks ready to walk into the fire a second time.
The Real Lessons From The Meme Stock Bubble
The meme stock bubble wasn't just a wild moment—it was a classroom. And in my January 2024 piece, What We Learned From The Stock Market Meme Bubble, the takeaways were clear. First: narrative is not strategy. A good story might move price in the short term, but it doesn't anchor value. Second: short interest, while flashy, is not a catalyst. It's a setup, not a reason to buy.
Third, and maybe most crucial: community isn't capital. Online unity might create a movement, but it doesn't replace liquidity or discipline. And finally, behavioral traps ruled the day, confirmation bias, herd mentality, and the illusion of control all played leading roles.
As I wrote then: 'Retail got a taste of power—and then a dose of reality.'
The lessons were there in plain sight. Anyone willing to step back from the noise could see the cracks forming. But in every mania, reason is the first casualty. And now, as the same trades cycle back into fashion, we're finding out just how few people were paying attention.
AMC
What's Happening Now
We're seeing the signs again. This time it's Kohl's. The stock jumped nearly 40% in a single session on absolutely nothing. No earnings release. No new strategic plan. No operational inflection. Just movement. And in 2024, that's all it takes to light up Reddit threads and X timelines with déjà vu-level energy: 'Squeeze coming.' 'Institutions are scared.' 'This is the next GameStop.'
According to Barron's, it's meme traders driving the action, again using short interest as a battle cry, not a risk signal. And that's the issue. The crowd sees a high short float and mistakes it for an opportunity, not a warning. The irony? The very setup they're piling into is the one institution are often waiting to sell into.
What's changed since 2021? Not much, except now there's no stimulus check liquidity, no novelty in zero commissions, and far less of a surprise factor. What's left? Noise with no fuel. Urgency built on fumes.
As I warned in my May 2024 piece, The Risk Of Losing Big On GameStop And Other Meme Stocks: 'Retail investors often confuse movement with meaning. Just because a stock moves doesn't mean it's moving for you.'
This time may look familiar, but the backdrop is very different. And when the music stops, it won't be the short sellers left standing without a chair.
The Psychology Driving Meme Stock FOMO
This latest meme stock wave isn't driven by analysis; it's driven by psychology. Recency bias leads traders to believe that because a squeeze happened once, it will happen again. Survivorship bias keeps them focused on the few who struck it rich last time, not the thousands who got burned. Add in community bias where being part of the crowd feels like validation and you've got a cocktail for poor decision-making.
What's really fueling this is social reinforcement. TikTok clips showing fake P&L gains. X posts hyping charts with no context. The illusion of credibility from anonymous accounts shouting conviction. It's all theater. And with every like, share, and comment, that group think spreads.
What's missing? Due diligence. Valuation. Anything resembling a thesis beyond 'shorts will cover.' This isn't investing. It's a TikTok trend with margin calls. The danger isn't just that these trades unravel. It's that the behavior behind them keeps getting rewarded by attention, not outcome. And when the feedback loop breaks, the fallout is real.
The Structural Problem
Even when meme stocks spike, most traders don't win. The reason isn't just timing; it's structure. Liquidity vanishes at the top. Platforms freeze. Bid-ask spreads widen. Right when you should sell, conviction freezes. Hesitation takes over. Emotion takes over. No plan, no discipline, just the hope it'll go higher. Nail the entry? Great. Now try getting out before the bid vanishes.
These trades sell the illusion of repeatability. But the structure doesn't support the outcome. Most retail investors are playing a game where the rules shift mid-trade. The system isn't built for fast exits or disciplined decision-making at scale.
And that's the catch: meme stocks promise outsized gains but offer little in terms of practical execution. By the time you hear the alarm, the exits are already jammed. That's the meme stock playbook. It's hard to win when the game isn't designed for you to leave with chips.
What's Next For Meme Stocks: A Familiar Trap
We've seen this script before and it doesn't end well.
Here's what's likely next. One or two meme names pop, and Kohl's is already on that path. Maybe Bed Bath & Beyond will return from the dead via some illiquid microcaps. Social media does the rest. Reddit threads light up. TikTok gets flooded with charts and rocket emojis. 'The squeeze is on.' Retail starts piling in. FOMO kicks in hard. Flows accelerate.
Then the air starts thinning. Liquidity evaporates. The same volatility that attracted traders begins to repel them. Without fundamentals or fresh capital, prices collapse under their own weight. Retail holds the bag, again.
The difference this time? The players who won last time weren't even on the field. Institutions aren't surprised. Market makers are prepared. There's no novelty here, just a rerun.
But it's a rerun with worse odds. No stimulus tailwind. No surprise factor. No second wave of liquidity. This isn't momentum. It's old muscle twitching in a dead trade. And those hoping for a different ending are ignoring the script.
The Meme Stock Sequel Will End the Same Way
Meme stocks aren't back because the fundamentals changed. They're back because memory faded and the crowd got bored. That's not opportunity; it's risk in disguise. In any greater fool game, the last one is the one who loses most. So, take this as a warning, not a headline to chase. Just because stocks are moving doesn't mean they're moving toward profit. Ask anyone who is still holding AMC. You've seen this movie before, and the ending didn't change. And like every sequel, this one's got the same ending, just fewer people left to cheer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Delta Air Lines tries to calm fury over ticket prices, telling lawmakers it won't use AI
Delta Air Lines said Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from lawmakers. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would 'likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'' Delta has said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. Delta has said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025. AFP via Getty Images 'There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data,' Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. 'Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data.' The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of 'the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares.' Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. 'This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking,' Isom said on an earnings call, adding 'talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do.' Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition but not a specific consumer's personal information. 'There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data,' Delta told the senators in a letter. AFP via Getty Images 'Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics,' Delta's letter said. It added that AI can 'assist our analysts with pricing by reducing manual processes, accelerating analysis and improving time to market for pricing adjustments.'


Tom's Guide
10 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Verizon just confirmed it's raising fees again — here's what you'll pay now
Verizon, one of the best phone carriers, may have introduced a three-year price lock in April, but prices can still go up on your phone bill. The company confirmed to Tom's Guide that it's "making some adjustments" that will raise various fees starting in September. In a statement, a Verizon spokesperson said that the "vast majority" of customers would see an increase of "less than 30 cents" to their monthly bill. "To continue delivering the best customer experience on America's best 5G network and industry-leading services and tools that save our customers' time and money, we're making some adjustments," the statement reads. A recent Reddit thread (spotted by PhoneArena) revealed a number of fees that would see increases; Verizon spokesperson's confirmed those increases. The affected fees include the Administrative and Telco Recovery Charge which is used by Verizon to pay for "direct and indirect" costs like property taxes, and was already raised by the carrier last December. According to the Reddit post, the recovery charge will increase by 28 cents to $3.78 per voice line. Data-only plans are taking a massive leap from $1.60 to $3.97 per line. The Verizon Regulatory Charge is also rising 3 cents from $0.19 to $0.21 per line. This charge is an assessment that the carrier uses to to cover "various government charges." "These adjustments are in line with market rates and allow us to continue to provide top-tier products and services," the spokesperson said. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. While Verizon's three-year price lock keeps your main plan at a friendlier price for longer, it doesn't specifically lock fees and taxes. The guaranteed price lock is only available to customers on a newer myPlan subscription. Lastly, the post indicates that Verizon is also raising the price of its device activation fee from $35 to $40, which can already be seen on the Verizon website. Tablet plans are also rising by an additional $5 a month. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mystery $10M Birkin buyer says purchase was his ‘most expensive' ever: ‘Made me sick to my stomach'
Who spends $10.1 million on an old handbag? Japanese resale mogul Shinsuke Sakimoto, that's who. The now-revealed mystery buyer placed his winning bid from halfway around the world on the original Hermès Birkin last month — making the coveted fashion artifact the priciest purse in history. And yes, he's still recovering from the experience. Advertisement 4 Who blew $10.1M on a used handbag? Meet Shinsuke Sakimoto — a Japanese resale tycoon who snagged the record-breaking Birkin from halfway across the globe. Valuence 4 The jaw-dropping sale of the original Hermès Birkin rocked the auction world — and now the Tokyo tycoon behind the splurge is speaking out. Getty Images 'It was the most expensive purchase I've ever made for a single item,' the Valuence Holdings CEO admitted, as reported by CNN. 'It was very exciting, but it really made me sick to my stomach.' Sakimoto snapped up the 1984 prototype bag, designed for British 'it girl' Jane Birkin — actress, singer, model and icon of effortless Parisian style. Advertisement The top-quality tote was sold last month at Sotheby's Paris in a nine-way bidding war that sent prices sky-high. The final gavel dropped at 7 million euros. Add in fees, and Sakimoto shelled out over $10 million for the black leather beauty. Advertisement Sakimoto, 43, watched the drama unfold via phone from his Tokyo office, channeling his past life as a pro soccer player into auction aggression. 'We were almost at the upper limit, but in those few minutes we were strategizing how to inflict psychological damage on our opponents and force them to give up,' he said. 'Hit back in three or five seconds. I had to be aggressive.' In true sports fashion, he'd even dreamt of the win — twice — the night before. Of course, the luxury-loving gods weren't footing the bill. Sakimoto says the purchase — made under his company, not personally — was a strategic investment, not a sentimental splurge. Advertisement 4 The Birkin's bragging rights just hit a whole new level — a wild nine-way bidding war at Sotheby's Paris sent prices soaring. AP 'It was certain that the winning bid would break the record, which meant it would be reported all over the world,' he explained. Valuence expects the media blitz to generate 'several billion yen' in advertising value — possibly enough to justify the stomachache. But don't expect this Birkin to land in someone's closet. Sakimoto insists it's not for resale. In fact, it's likely to cost even more thanks to shipping and import duties, which are expected to add another $2 million to the final tab. Instead, he plans to share the prized purse with the world, keeping it on public display — not tucked in a vault. 'The purpose of winning this artwork is not to make it the personal property of the wealthy, but to create a new ownership model — for companies like ours and society to share, together,' Sakimoto said. 'We want to preserve it in the future and share it with everyone.' Advertisement He added that learning about Jane Birkin's philanthrophic legacy helped him feel connected to her mission. 4 The original Hermès Birkin is the 1984 prototype made for the late British 'it girl' Jane Birkin — actress, singer, model and Parisian style legend. Mike Daines / Shutterstock 'I felt that I have a very strong connection with these people [like Jane Birkin], and their role as ambassadors or evangelists, that really match our company's business philosophy.' Hey, for $10 million, it better match. Advertisement As previously reported by The Post, before this record-breaking OG Birkin snagged the spotlight, the priciest purse ever sold at auction was a Himalaya Crocodile Birkin — which fetched a jaw-dropping $450,000, back in 2022. Jane Birkin, who passed away in 2023, was widely revered for her chic ensembles, and she was known to carry her belongings in a woven basket — whether on the red carpet or while running errands. The first Birkin was born after the 'Je t'aime… moi non plus' crooner met Hermès CEO Jean-Louis Dumas on a flight. Advertisement Spotting her straw basket, he suggested she needed a 'better bag' — then sketched the now-iconic design on an airplane barf bag. Months later, the prototype was ready — launching a luxury legend.