logo
Apple targets spring 2026 for release of delayed upgrade of Siri AI

Apple targets spring 2026 for release of delayed upgrade of Siri AI

Apple Inc. has set an internal release target of spring 2026 for its delayed upgrade of Siri, marking a key step in its artificial intelligence turnaround effort.
The company's Siri team is aiming to bring the revamped voice assistant to market as part of an iOS 26.4 software update, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The long-promised changes will allow Siri to tap into consumers' personal data and on-screen activities in order to better fulfill queries.
Apple's '.4' updates — known as 'E' on the company's internal software development schedule — are typically released in March. That was the case with iOS 18.4 this year and iOS 17.4 in 2024. But an exact date hasn't been set internally for the software, beyond a spring time frame, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the work is private.
Apple, in response to a request for comment, said it hasn't announced exact timing for the new Siri features. It reiterated earlier statements that the upgrades are planned for the 'coming year.'
The timeline could still shift depending on whether new snags emerge. If the next several weeks of development work proves promising, the company could consider giving a preview of the features when it launches the next iPhones in the fall, one of the people said, though no final decisions have been made.
The upgrade has been a long time coming. Apple originally introduced the next-generation Siri features at its Worldwide Developers Conference in June of last year. The idea was to modernize the voice assistant — first introduced in 2011 — which hasn't kept pace with chatbots and other AI tools.
The technology in the works also includes a system called App Intents that allows Siri to more precisely control applications and in-app actions across Apple devices.
If the latest release timing sticks, Apple will have gone nearly two years between announcing the new Siri and delivering it to customers. It's been an especially high-profile delay because the capabilities were part of the iPhone 16 marketing last year — despite the new Siri not being close to ready.
Internally, Apple's AI and marketing teams have pointed fingers at each other. The engineering side has blamed marketing for overhyping features, while marketing maintains it operated on timelines provided to them by the company's AI teams, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
There also remains a debate over how much AI functionality Apple should be building itself and how much it should push off to partners like OpenAI. And the company has held internal discussions about buying smaller AI-related startups.
Within Apple, the original goal was to have the Siri features ready in the fall of 2024, alongside the new iPhone. The target then shifted to spring 2025. The company had privately expected a rollout as part of iOS 18.4, before moving the target again to May with iOS 18.5.
By March, the company postponed the features indefinitely, saying at the time they wouldn't arrive until sometime in the coming year. The delays stemmed from engineering snags that kept the technology from working properly a third of the time, Bloomberg News reported earlier this year.
A key technical challenge: Siri's brain was essentially split in half for iOS 18. Apple used an existing system for common tasks, such as setting timers and making calls, and a newer-generation platform for upgraded Siri features. Combining the two architectures led to bugs, necessitating Siri to be rebuilt entirely.
The issues set off a firestorm within Apple, leading to the company's senior vice president of AI, John Giannandrea, being stripped of all consumer-facing product oversight. That included his management of Siri and Apple's secretive robotics unit.
At the company's latest developer event this week, Giannandrea kept a low profile. It was a shift from the previous year, when he spoke in a number of press interviews about the Apple Intelligence platform and the company's AI work.
He's also become less influential internally, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Some executives believe he should be squarely focused on underlying AI research, which is seen as his strength. He continues to oversee development of large language models — the basis of generative AI — and testing of AI technology.
Engineering for the voice assistant was taken over by Vision Pro headset creator Mike Rockwell and software engineering chief Craig Federighi. Both executives played key roles in the company's latest software announcements at WWDC. Rockwell is now leading work on Siri LLM, the internal name for the new underlying system to power the service and enable the delayed features.
While Apple announced a sweeping design overhaul for all of its platforms this week, it didn't introduce major in-house AI features beyond opening its large language models to developers and adding live translation to calls and text messages. It also didn't introduce or demonstrate Siri features, though Federighi did address the delay.
'This work needed more time to reach our high quality bar, and we look forward to sharing more about it in the coming year,' he said at the beginning of the roughly 90-minute presentation.
Federighi and other executives also sought to downplay the company's struggles in AI, saying that the postponed Siri features were just a part of a broader push and that success in AI will be determined over the next several years.
The reality, though, is that the delays have already had repercussions. The technology was part of a planned smart home hub that has now been pushed back as well, keeping Apple from moving into a new product category, Bloomberg has reported.
The home hub is a screen-based device that can be affixed to walls or placed on a desk. The operating system for the product relies heavily on the new Siri features — and the software delays forced Apple to indefinitely postpone a hardware release that had been set for March.
The larger concern is how Apple's still-nascent push into AI will affect future hardware categories. The company wants to launch smart glasses next year featuring AI-enhanced cameras that can scan the surrounding environment. But as of now, it's still reliant on OpenAI and Alphabet Inc.'s Google for image analysis.
For further in the future, the company has been working on an even more ambitious Siri revamp. This would turn the assistant into an always-on device copilot that's more conversational. Apple also has teams exploring a chatbot-like app dubbed Knowledge that can tap into the open web.
The chatbot project is being led by Robby Walker. He previously ran the team developing Siri, until it was removed from his responsibilities during the shake-up earlier this year. That has spurred concerns within the company over whether his team is up to the latest challenge, Bloomberg has reported.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US judge allows govt antitrust lawsuit against Apple to move forward
US judge allows govt antitrust lawsuit against Apple to move forward

Business Standard

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

US judge allows govt antitrust lawsuit against Apple to move forward

The 33-page opinion from US District Judge Xavier Neals in New Jersey will enable an antitrust lawsuit that the US Justice Department filed against Apple 15 months ago to proceed AP New Jersey A federal judge on Monday rebuffed Apple's request to throw out a US government lawsuit alleging the technology trendsetter has built a maze of illegal barriers to protect the iPhone from competition and fatten its profit margins. The 33-page opinion from US District Judge Xavier Neals in New Jersey will enable an antitrust lawsuit that the US Justice Department filed against Apple 15 months ago to proceed. Neals has set a timetable that could see the case come to trial in 2027. Apple has sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the Justice Department had distorted the contours of the smartphone market and made a series of other misinterpretations that warranted the case be thrown out. But Neals decided there is enough evidence to support the Justice Department's market definitions and concluded the case's key allegations merited further examination at trial. The case seeks to pierce the digital fortress that Apple Inc, based in Cupertino, California, has built around the iPhone, iPad and other products to create a so-called walled garden allowing its hardware and software to mesh seamlessly for users. The Justice Department alleges that walled garden has mostly turned into a shield against competition, creating market conditions that enable it to charge higher prices and stifle innovation. The lawsuit sets forth several allegations of technological barricades that constitute anticompetitive conduct, Neals wrote in his opinion. The judge also concluded the Justice Department had pointed toward enough areas of troubling conduct that raised the dangerous possibility that Apple has turned the iPhone into an illegal monopoly. In a Monday statement, Apple reiterated its position that the Justice Department's case is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will continue to vigorously fight it in court". The antitrust lawsuit isn't the only legal headache threatening to undercut its profits, which totalled USD 94 billion on sales of USD 295 billion in its fiscal year ending last September. Another federal judge in April issued a civil contempt order banning Apple from collecting any fees from in-app transactions on the iPhone that are funnelled through other options besides its once-exclusive payment processing system that charged commissions ranging from 15 to 30 per cent. Apple also could lose a more than $20 billion annual payment that it gets for making Google the default search tool on the iPhone and other products as part of another antitrust case brought by the Justice Department. A federal judge in Washington is considering whether to ban the deals with Apple as part of a shake-up being proposed to address Google's illegal monopoly in search. Neals' decision to allow the Justice Department's antitrust case to proceed came on the same day that Apple was hit with a lawsuit by app maker Proton amplifying the accusations of wrongful conduct by the company. The lawsuit, which will seek to be certified as a class action presenting thousands of developers who have made iPhone apps, is asking for punitive damages against Apple, as well as a court order to dismantle its walled garden. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Five surprising facts about using AI chatbots better
Five surprising facts about using AI chatbots better

Hans India

time24 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Five surprising facts about using AI chatbots better

AI chatbots have already become embedded into some people's lives, but not many know how they work? Did you know, for example, ChatGPT needs to do an internet search to look up events later than June 2024? Some of the most surprising information about AI chatbots can help us understand how they work, what they can and can't do, and how to use them in a better way. With that in mind, here are five things you ought to know about these breakthrough machines. 1. They are trained by human feedback: AI chatbots are trained in multiple stages, beginning with something called pre-training, where models are trained to predict the next word in massive text datasets. This allows them to develop a general understanding of language, facts and reasoning. If asked: 'How do I make a homemade explosive?' in the pre-training phase, a model might have given a detailed instruction. To make them useful and safe for conversation, human 'annotators' help guide the models toward safer and more helpful responses, a process called alignment. Without alignment, AI chatbots would be unpredictable, potentially spreading misinformation or harmful content. This highlights the crucial role of human intervention in shaping AI behaviour. OpenAI, the company which developed ChatGPT, has not disclosed how many employees have trained ChatGPT for how many hours. But AI chatbots, like ChatGPT, need a moral compass so that it does not spread harmful information. Human annotators rank responses to ensure neutrality and ethical alignment. Similarly, if an AI chatbot was asked: 'What are the best and worst nationalities?' Human annotators would rank a response like this the highest: 'Every nationality has its own rich culture, history, and contributions to the world. There is no 'best' or 'worst' nationality – each one is valuable in its own way.' don't learn through words but with tokens: Humans naturally learn language through words, whereas AI chatbots rely on smaller units called tokens. These units can be words, sub-words or obscure series of characters. While tokenisation generally follows logical patterns, it can sometimes produce unexpected splits, revealing both the strengths and quirks of how AI chatbots interpret language. Modern AI chatbots' vocabularies typically consist of 50,000 to 100,000 tokens. 3. Their knowledge is outdated every passing day: AI chatbots do not continuously update themselves; hence, they may struggle with recent events, new terminology or broadly anything after their knowledge cutoff. A knowledge cut-off refers to the last point in time when an AI chatbot's training data was updated, meaning it lacks awareness of events, trends or discoveries beyond that date. If asked who is the current president of the United States, ChatGPT would need to perform a web search using the search engine Bing, 'read' the results, and return an answer. Bing results are filtered by relevance and reliability of the source. Likewise, other AI chatbots use web search to return up-to-date answers. Updating AI chatbots is a costly and fragile process. 4. They hallucinate quite easily: AI chatbots sometimes 'hallucinate', generating false or nonsensical claims with confidence because they predict text based on patterns rather than verifying facts. These errors stem from the way they work-they optimise for coherence over accuracy, rely on imperfect training data and lack real world understanding. While improvements such as fact-checking tools (for example, like ChatGPT's Bing search tool integration for real-time fact-checking) or prompts (for example, explicitly telling ChatGPT to 'cite peer-reviewed sources' or 'say I don't know if you are not sure') reduce hallucinations, they can't fully eliminate them. For example, when asked what the main findings are of a particular research paper, ChatGPT gives a long, detailed and good-looking answer. It also included screenshots and even a link, but from the wrong academic papers. So, users should treat AI-generated information as a starting point, not an unquestionable truth. 5. They use calculators to do maths: A recently popularised feature of AI chatbots is called reasoning. Reasoning refers to the process of using logically connected intermediate steps to solve complex problems. This is also known as 'chain of thought' reasoning. Instead of jumping directly to an answer, a chain of thoughts enables AI chatbots to think step by step. For example, when asked 'what is 56,345 minus 7,865 times 350,468', ChatGPT gives the right answer. It 'understands' that the multiplication needs to occur before the subtraction. To solve the intermediate steps, ChatGPT uses its built-in calculator that enables precise arithmetic. This hybrid approach of combining internal reasoning with the calculator helps improve reliability in complex tasks. (The writer is with the University of Tubingen)

Teams across the table, Delhi seeks zero tariff on export of electronics
Teams across the table, Delhi seeks zero tariff on export of electronics

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Teams across the table, Delhi seeks zero tariff on export of electronics

As part of its ongoing trade talks with the US, India has sought a zero-tariff structure on export of electronics items to the country, even as President Donald Trump has raised concerns around import of gadgets like the iPhone from India, and has threatened to slap additional tariffs on Apple if it sells foreign made phones in the country. 'We have sought zero duty on electronics exports to the US and our negotiators are currently discussing how to operationalise that,' a senior government official told The Indian Express requesting anonymity since the discussions are currently private. As part of his wide ranging tariff action in April, Trump had imposed a 26 per cent rate on imports from India. And while India was among the countries which saw a 90-day pause from the revised rates, the US President has since ratcheted up criticism of companies selling electronics products in the US, which are manufactured in China, India and elsewhere. As Indian trade negotiators landed in the US last Friday for the final round of in-person talks before the July 9 deadline for the reciprocal tariff pause runs out, Trump said the US and India 'may' sign a deal that will 'open up India'. Weeks after Apple said that a majority of iPhones to be sold in the US will be produced in India and its contract manufacturer Foxconn followed it up with a $1.49-billion investment plan in one of its India unit, Trump had said Apple would have to pay 25 per cent tariff if it sold in the US iPhones built in India or anyplace else. Earlier, he said that he told Apple CEO Tim Cook that he does not want the company to expand its manufacturing operations in India, unless it is to cater specifically to its domestic market. The Indian Express had reported that the US flagged a number of non-tariff barriers and high duties in India, but was yet to commit to several Indian demands, more so because the US currently lacks a valid Trade Promotion Authority (TPA). Without this, the current US administration is not legally permitted to reduce tariffs. Experts have pointed out that the tariff-related discussions in the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) negotiations may be limited only to executive-level tariffs levied by the current administration, raising questions about the long-term durability of any deal reached. Despite Trump's earlier warning to Apple that it should focus on production in the US and refrain from expanding in India, Foxconn informed the London Stock Exchange earlier this week that it was investing $1.49 billion in one of its India units, Yuzhan Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd. The plant is expected to come up in Tamil Nadu, where Foxconn also has a major iPhone production base. Currently, iPhones are primarily assembled in China, India and Vietnam, with Apple having plans to expand operations in India. Experts have said that moving production to the US would be impractical for Apple, given that the company has no manufacturing and supplier base in the country. Apple has identified India as a key market for iPhone production and a gradual base for its suppliers in a move away from China. The company currently produces nearly 15% of all iPhones in India, with plans to increase that to a quarter in the coming years. The company's assembly operation in India has been a key success story of the government's 'Make in India' push. Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store